Rust

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 combination delivers a highly capable Rust experience, with the data showing that the CPU is rarely the limiting factor. The processor’s 6 cores and 12 threads, based on the Zen 4 Raphael architecture, provide ample throughput for Rust’s simulation and entity-tracking workloads, while the RTX 4080’s raw graphics power drives frame rates that scale impressively with resolution and settings. Benchmark results indicate that the combo ranks 278th out of 3723 tested combinations, placing it in the top 7.5% of all systems, and the measured FPS data confirms that this pairing is built for high-refresh-rate 1440p and smooth 4K play, provided settings are tuned appropriately.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on TSMC’s 5 nm process, operating at a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. For Rust, which is known to be sensitive to single-thread performance for core game logic and physics, the high boost clock is a critical asset. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072 and multi-core score of 21765 indicate strong per-thread performance that helps maintain consistent frame pacing, especially in complex scenes with many players and structures.

The processor’s 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 83.2 GB/s of dual-channel DDR5 memory bandwidth are also relevant to Rust’s performance profile. The game frequently loads and unloads world data as players move, and the substantial cache helps mitigate latency spikes. In the measured results, the CPU’s contribution is most evident at lower resolutions and settings where the GPU is not saturated; at 1080p Low, the average FPS reaches 216, which is roughly 82% higher than the 1080p Ultra figure of 124 FPS, demonstrating that the CPU can feed the GPU with frames when graphical load is low. The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 3689 places it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, and its average benchmark score of 32750 is within 0.2% of rivals like the Intel Core i5-14600T and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, indicating balanced performance for this game’s mixed workload.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

The measured data strongly suggests that the Medium preset offers the best balance of visual fidelity and performance across all tested resolutions. At 2560x1440, the Medium setting delivers an average of 133 FPS with minimums of 113 FPS and maximums of 153 FPS, which is a 49% improvement over the High preset’s 112 FPS average and a 56% improvement over Ultra’s 85 FPS average. The jump from Medium to High costs 21 FPS on average at 1440p, while the jump from High to Ultra costs an additional 27 FPS, making Ultra a poor trade-off for the modest visual gains.

At 1920x1080, the Medium preset’s 185 FPS average (with minimums of 157 FPS and maximums of 213 FPS) is the sweet spot for high-refresh-rate monitors, as it is 22 FPS higher than High’s 163 FPS and 61 FPS higher than Ultra’s 124 FPS. The Low preset at 1080p does hit 216 FPS, but that extra 31 FPS over Medium comes at a significant graphical cost that is likely not worth it for most players. For 3840x2160, the Medium preset at 79 FPS (minimums of 67 FPS, maximums of 90 FPS) is the only viable option for a smooth experience, as High drops to 66 FPS and Ultra falls to 50 FPS. The data indicates that Medium is the recommended preset for this combo, as it consistently provides the best playable frame rates without the steep diminishing returns seen at Ultra.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo can achieve in Rust?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 216, achieved at 1920x1080 with the Low preset. This represents the ceiling for this combination, where the CPU and GPU are both operating with minimal graphical overhead.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K Ultra settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS drops to 50, which is below the 60 FPS threshold typically considered smooth for most players. The data shows that Ultra at 4K is not a recommended configuration for this hardware pairing.

Q: Is there a significant difference between Medium and High settings at 1440p?

A: Yes, the difference is substantial. The Medium preset at 2560x1440 produces an average of 133 FPS, while High produces 112 FPS, a decrease of 21 FPS (about 16%). Minimum frame rates are not provided for High, but the Medium preset’s 113 FPS minimum suggests better frame pacing.

Q: What is the combo’s overall ranking among tested systems?

A: The combination ranks 278th out of 3723 tested combos, placing it in the top 7.5% of all systems in the database. This high percentile reflects the strong synergy between the 7400F and RTX 4080 for Rust.

Q: Does the CPU hold back the GPU at any point?

A: At 1080p Low, the average FPS of 216 is likely near the CPU’s limit, but at 1080p Medium the average is 185 FPS and at 1440p Medium it is 133 FPS, suggesting the CPU remains capable of feeding the GPU at these settings. The 4K Ultra result of 50 FPS is clearly GPU-bound.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to its closest rival in terms of overall benchmark scores?

A: The RTX 4080’s average benchmark score is 54247, which is 0.1% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER’s score of 54209. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 1.1% higher, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 2.6% lower.

How This Combo Ranks

The Ryzen 5 7400F and RTX 4080 combination holds the 278th rank out of 3723 tested combos in the database, a position that places it in the upper echelon of systems. This ranking is driven by the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (83rd percentile of all CPUs) and the GPU’s high overall score (86th percentile of all GPUs). The combo’s rank indicates that it outperforms the vast majority of systems tested, including many with more expensive CPUs, because Rust’s performance is heavily influenced by the balance between CPU and GPU capabilities.

In terms of raw CPU benchmark scores, the 7400F’s average of 32750 is nearly identical to the Intel Core i5-14600T (32707, 0.1% lower) and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32662, 0.3% lower), while being slightly behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32812, 0.2% higher). This tight grouping means that the 7400F is not a bottleneck in most scenarios, and the RTX 4080’s performance is the primary driver of the combo’s high ranking. The data suggests that for Rust specifically, this combo is well-positioned to deliver high frame rates at mainstream resolutions, with the ranking reflecting a system that can handle both competitive play at 1080p and immersive play at 1440p without compromise.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is a high-end graphics card built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, featuring 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus with a bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 1400 MHz (22.4 Gbps effective), and the GPU has a base clock of 2205 MHz with a boost clock of 2505 MHz. For Rust, which can be demanding on memory bandwidth due to large world textures and draw distances, the 16 GB VRAM capacity ensures that even at 4K Ultra settings, the card does not run out of memory, although the 50 FPS result at that setting shows that raw compute power is the limiting factor.

The RTX 4080’s shading units (9728), texture mapping units (304), and render output units (112) provide substantial throughput, as evidenced by its FP32 performance of 48.74 TFLOPS. This compute capability translates directly into the measured FPS results: at 1440p Medium, the card delivers 133 FPS, and at 1080p Medium it reaches 185 FPS, both of which are well above the 60 FPS target. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 34457 places it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs, and its average benchmark score of 54247 is within 0.1% of the RTX 4080 SUPER, indicating that the card is performing near its expected level.

The data shows that the RTX 4080 is the dominant component in this combo for most settings. The transition from Low to Medium at 1440p reduces the average FPS from 190 to 133 (a 30% drop), while the transition from Medium to High reduces it to 112 (a 16% drop), and High to Ultra reduces it to 85 (a 24% drop). This pattern indicates that the GPU’s workload scales significantly with settings, and the card’s 16 GB VRAM is sufficient to handle all presets without texture thrashing, as evidenced by the consistent minimum FPS figures at Medium settings across resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

3840x2160 (4K)

• Low: The average FPS is 117, providing a smooth 4K experience with reduced graphical fidelity. No minimum or maximum values are recorded.
• Medium: The average FPS is 79, with minimums of 67 FPS and maximums of 90 FPS. This is the recommended 4K preset, as it maintains playable frame rates with better visuals.
• High: The average FPS drops to 66, which is below the 70 FPS threshold for a consistently smooth experience. No minimum or maximum values are recorded.
• Ultra: The average FPS falls to 50, making this preset unsuitable for 4K gaming on this combo. No minimum or maximum values are recorded.

2560x1440 (1440p)

• Low: The average FPS is 190, offering a very high frame rate that is ideal for competitive play. No minimum or maximum values are recorded.
• Medium: The average FPS is 133, with minimums of 113 FPS and maximums of 153 FPS. This preset provides an excellent balance of performance and quality, suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors.
• High: The average FPS is 112, which is still smooth but represents a 16% drop from Medium. No minimum or maximum values are recorded.
• Ultra: The average FPS is 85, which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced action. No minimum or maximum values are recorded.

1920x1080 (1080p)

• Low: The average FPS is 216, the highest measured value for this combo, indicating a CPU-bound scenario at this setting. No minimum or maximum values are recorded.
• Medium: The average FPS is 185, with minimums of 157 FPS and maximums of 213 FPS. This preset delivers a highly responsive experience, well-suited for 144Hz or 165Hz displays.
• High: The average FPS is 163, which is 22 FPS lower than Medium but still above 144 FPS. No minimum or maximum values are recorded.
• Ultra: The average FPS is 124, which is a significant drop from High, suggesting that Ultra settings impose a heavy load on the GPU even at 1080p. No minimum or maximum values are recorded.

Across all resolutions, the Medium preset consistently offers the best combination of average FPS and frame time stability, as evidenced by the recorded minimum and maximum values at that setting. The data confirms that this combo is best utilized at 1440p Medium or High for the optimal experience, with 4K reserved for less demanding presets.