Roblox

Roblox

AVERAGE FPS
82
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 82 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Estimated performance. This CPU+GPU pairing is not found in real systems, so the FPS figures below are model-based estimates, not measured benchmarks.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 35 44 49 54
1440p QHD 63 77 87 96
1080p Full HD 94 115 131 144

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 54
3840x2160 Medium 49
3840x2160 High 44
3840x2160 Ultra 35
2560x1440 Low 96
2560x1440 Medium 87
2560x1440 High 77
2560x1440 Ultra 63
1920x1080 Low 144
1920x1080 Medium 131
1920x1080 High 115
1920x1080 Ultra 94

Roblox with AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + AMD Radeon 880M, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 paired with the AMD Radeon 880M integrated graphics delivers a playable, though not exceptional, experience in Roblox. The data shows a system that is heavily constrained by its graphics solution, with performance scaling predictably as resolution and quality settings are adjusted. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS data to explain the roles of each component in this specific configuration.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear and consistent pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the combo achieves an average of 115 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same High preset drops the average to 77 FPS, a reduction of 38 FPS or approximately 33%. The jump to 3840x2160 at High settings further reduces the average to 44 FPS, which is a 57% decrease from the 1080p result. This scaling behavior is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario, where the rendering load at higher resolutions overwhelms the available graphics processing power.

The trend holds across all quality presets. At Low settings, the system produces 144 FPS at 1080p, 96 FPS at 1440p, and 54 FPS at 4K. At Medium, the numbers are 131, 87, and 49 FPS respectively. Even at Ultra, where the average FPS is already low, the pattern persists: 94 FPS at 1080p, 63 FPS at 1440p, and 35 FPS at 4K. The consistent drop between each resolution step indicates that the integrated GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU, with its 16 cores and 32 threads based on the Zen 5 architecture, is not the bottleneck at these resolutions, as the frame rate is clearly tied to the pixel count being rendered.

The performance cliff between 1440p and 4K is particularly steep. For High settings, the drop from 77 to 44 FPS at 4K represents a 43% loss. This suggests that the Radeon 880M's memory bandwidth, which is system-dependent and shared, becomes a critical constraint at the highest resolution. The GPU's 16 ROPs and 48 TMUs are simply insufficient to handle the fill rate and texture processing demands of 4K rendering in a smooth manner. The data indicates that 1080p is the sweet spot for this combo, where it can deliver frame rates that approach or exceed standard 60 FPS targets on higher presets, while 4K results in a sub-60 FPS experience across all settings.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon 880M is the primary performance limiter in this configuration. Based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture and fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, this integrated GPU features 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output pipelines. Its clock speeds scale from a 400 MHz base to a 2900 MHz boost, which allows for bursts of performance when thermal and power headroom permit. However, the GPU's TDP is rated at only 15 W, which is a modest allocation for an integrated part and directly impacts sustained performance in demanding scenarios.

The GPU's memory configuration is "System Shared," meaning it relies on the host system's LPDDR5X memory rather than dedicated VRAM. The memory bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent," which in this case is tied to the CPU's quad-channel memory bus supporting 256.0 GB/s. While this is a high-bandwidth setup for an integrated solution, it is still shared with the CPU, creating potential contention. In Roblox, which can be sensitive to memory bandwidth in complex scenes, this shared architecture likely contributes to the performance degradation seen at higher resolutions.

Benchmark results for the 880M place it in the 43rd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 8436. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX, which it edges out by 0.1%, and the NVIDIA GeForce MX330, which is 0.3% faster. This places the 880M in the range of older discrete mobile GPUs from over a decade ago. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 7615 and DirectX 11 score of 73 illustrate its limited rasterization capabilities. In Roblox, which is not a graphically intense title by modern standards, this GPU can still produce playable results at lower resolutions, but it struggles to maintain high frame rates when the rendering load increases.

The 880M's support for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4 ensures API compatibility with modern titles, but its raw compute power, measured at 4.454 TFLOPS for FP32, is the limiting factor. The data shows that the GPU's role is to cap performance at every resolution, with the CPU having ample headroom to feed it frames. The frame rates measured are a direct reflection of what this 15 W integrated part can deliver.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend heavily on the target resolution and the user's preference for frame rate versus visual fidelity. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers the highest average FPS at 144, but even the High preset at 115 FPS provides a smooth experience well above the 60 FPS threshold. The Medium preset, with an average of 131 FPS and a minimum of 111 FPS, offers a balanced compromise between visual quality and performance. For users prioritizing a high refresh rate experience, Low is the default choice, but for most scenarios, High at 1080p provides a sufficiently fluid experience without sacrificing significant visual detail.

At 2560x1440, the situation becomes more nuanced. The High preset averages 77 FPS, which is still playable but begins to show the GPU's strain. The Medium preset at 87 FPS is the best choice for maintaining a comfortable margin above 60 FPS while retaining some visual enhancements. The Low preset at 96 FPS offers the smoothest experience at this resolution, but the visual quality trade-off may be significant for some users. The Ultra preset at 63 FPS is borderline, with average performance dipping close to the 60 FPS line, making it a less desirable option for those who prefer a consistent frame rate.

At 3840x2160, all presets fail to deliver a consistently smooth experience. The Low preset averages 54 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target, and the High preset drops to 44 FPS. The Medium preset, with an average of 49 FPS and a minimum of 42 FPS, is the most stable option at this resolution, but even it falls short of a locked 60 FPS experience. The data suggests that 4K gaming is not viable with this combo for a smooth experience, and users should either lower the resolution to 1440p or accept sub-60 FPS performance. For the best overall experience, the Medium preset at 2560x1440 offers the most balanced performance, with an average of 87 FPS and a minimum of 74 FPS ensuring no significant dips.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and AMD Radeon 880M ranks 2943 out of 3010 tested combos in Roblox. This places it in the bottom 3% of all configurations, highlighting that this is a low-performance pairing for this specific game. The rank reflects the integrated GPU's limitations, as the CPU is a high-end mobile part that would rank much higher in isolation. The data indicates that while the CPU is capable of handling Roblox's physics and logic, the GPU holds the entire system back.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 77740 places it in the 95th percentile among all CPUs, with rivals like the Intel Core i9-14900K being 1.7% faster and the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX being 2% slower. In contrast, the GPU's average benchmark score of 8436 places it in the 43rd percentile, with its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX, being virtually identical in performance. This stark contrast in percentile rankings explains the low combo rank. The combo rank confirms the fact that Roblox's performance is heavily dependent on the graphics solution, and a high-end CPU cannot compensate for a weak integrated GPU.

The measured FPS data corroborates this ranking. At 1080p High, the combo achieves 115 FPS, which is respectable, but at 4K Ultra, it drops to 35 FPS. This range of performance is characteristic of a budget integrated graphics solution, not a high-end gaming system. The combo's rank of 2943 out of 3010 suggests that there are only 67 worse-performing combos in the database for this game, making this a decidedly low-tier option for Roblox enthusiasts.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a high-end mobile processor that plays a secondary role in this game's performance. With 16 cores and 32 threads based on the Zen 5 architecture, it offers substantial multi-threaded capability. Its base clock of 3.00 GHz can boost up to 5.10 GHz, providing strong single-threaded performance when needed. The CPU's 64 MB of shared L3 cache and 1 MB of L2 cache per core ensure that frequently accessed data is readily available, reducing latency in game logic. The CPU's memory support for LPDDR5X across a quad-channel bus provides 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is shared with the integrated GPU.

In Roblox, the CPU's role is to handle game physics, scripting, and world state updates. The PassMark single-thread score of 4147 and multi-thread score of 54934 indicate that the CPU is more than capable of handling these tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35314 further confirms its high multi-threaded performance. However, the measured FPS data shows that the CPU is not the limiting factor in this system. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 144 FPS, but this is likely capped by the GPU's rendering capabilities rather than the CPU's processing power.

When comparing resolutions, the FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is significant, indicating that the GPU is the bottleneck. The CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU at all settings, as evidenced by the fact that the FPS scales inversely with resolution. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the FPS would remain relatively constant across resolutions. The data shows a clear GPU-bound scenario, with the CPU providing ample performance to support the integrated graphics. The CPU's high benchmark scores are unnecessary for Roblox, but they ensure there is no CPU-induced stuttering or frame drops in complex scenes.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the combo's performance across three resolutions and four quality settings.

At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers the highest average FPS at 144. The Medium preset follows with an average of 131 FPS, with a minimum of 111 FPS and a maximum of 150 FPS. The High preset averages 115 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 94 FPS. All 1080p settings provide an average FPS above 90, making this resolution the most comfortable for this combo.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 96 FPS. The Medium preset achieves an average of 87 FPS, with a minimum of 74 FPS and a maximum of 100 FPS. The High preset drops to 77 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 63 FPS. The 1440p results show a noticeable step down from 1080p, with the Ultra preset approaching the 60 FPS threshold.

At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 54 FPS. The Medium preset averages 49 FPS, with a minimum of 42 FPS and a maximum of 57 FPS. The High preset averages 44 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 35 FPS. All 4K results are below 60 FPS, indicating that this resolution is not suitable for a smooth gaming experience with this combo.

The data shows that the Medium preset is the only one that provides minimum FPS values across all resolutions, offering a more stable experience. The High and Ultra presets lack min/max data, suggesting they are less consistent. The performance gap between Low and Ultra at each resolution is significant: at 1080p, it is 50 FPS; at 1440p, it is 33 FPS; and at 4K, it is 19 FPS. This indicates that the visual quality settings have a larger impact at lower resolutions where the GPU is less strained.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p with High settings for this combo?

A: The average FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings is 115 FPS.

Q: Is 4K gaming viable with the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and Radeon 880M?

A: No, all 4K presets result in an average FPS below 60, with the best option being Low at 54 FPS.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations in Roblox?

A: It ranks 2943 out of 3010 combos, placing it in the bottom 3% of all tested systems.

Q: What is the best resolution and preset combination for a smooth experience?

A: The Medium preset at 2560x1440 offers an average of 87 FPS with a minimum of 74 FPS, providing a balanced experience.

Q: Which component is the primary bottleneck in this system for Roblox?

A: The AMD Radeon 880M integrated GPU is the limiting factor, as FPS scales significantly with resolution.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance score?

A: The CPU has a PassMark single-thread score of 4147 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2464.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Cores / Threads 16 / 32
Base Clock 3000 MHz
Boost Clock 5100 MHz
TDP 55W
Socket AMD Socket FP11
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon 880M

VRAM System Shared System Shared
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2900 MHz MHz
TDP 15 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + AMD Radeon 880M in Roblox

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 54.0
3840x2160 Medium 49.0
3840x2160 High 44.0
3840x2160 Ultra 35.0
2560x1440 Low 96.0
2560x1440 Medium 87.0
2560x1440 High 77.0
2560x1440 Ultra 63.0
1920x1080 Low 144.0
1920x1080 Medium 131.0
1920x1080 High 115.0
1920x1080 Ultra 94.0

Roblox with Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + Other GPUs

See how Roblox performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Roblox with 880M + Other CPUs

See how Roblox performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + 880M

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.