Roblox

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT pairing delivers a serious amount of framerate in Roblox, a sandbox title with user-generated experiences. The CPU, a 6-core / 12-thread Zen 4 chip with a 5.00 GHz boost, and the GPU, a 12 GB RDNA 2 part with a 384.0 GB/s memory bus, combine to score a combo rank of 1940 out of 3711 tested in this game. The pulse of the data is clear: this system can push Roblox past 360 FPS at 1080p, hold 200+ at 1440p, and still comfortably exceed 90 FPS at 4K with maxed-out settings. The following analysis breaks down the measured results by resolution, setting, and component behaviour, leading to concrete recommendations for what the hardware can actually deliver in this specific title.

Resolution Scaling

The most dramatic scaling occurs between 1080p and 4K. At the low preset, the average FPS falls from 368 at 1920x1080 to 139 at 3840x2160, a drop of 229 frames. The high preset drops from 296 to 112 across the same split (184 frames lost), while ultra moves from 240 down to 91. This indicates a clear CPU-to-GPU handoff: at 1080p the CPU can generate numer of frames rapidly – 368 FPS on low – but the GPU cannot finish each frame at that speed, so it becomes the principal limitation at the pixel-dense 2160p. The medium preset also shows this run: 335 FPS at 1080p, 224 FPS at 1440p, and 127 FPS at 4K. Since medium is the only preset with minimum and maximum data, we can see that 285–386 at 1080p shifts to 108–146 at 4K, a huge raw numbers shift that stresses the entire pipeline.

The scaling factor is not uniform across presets. The step from 1440p to 2160p nearly halves the framerate for every setting: low goes 246→139, high 198→112, ultra 91 (from 160), but the gap between 1080p and 1440p is smaller, about 66–100 FPS. This indicates the GPU becomes increasingly loaded as pixel count rises, and the CPU loses its ability to “overdrive” the output. The measured framerates at 4K Medium showing a min–max of 108–146 quantifies the RX 6700 XT's actual workload at those 4k pixel counts. The chip has 12 GB of GDDR6 and a 2560-shader count, which is enough to push more than 100 FPS in this sandbox title, but the consistent low-140s at High and low-prone at Low suggest the pixel fill isn't the problem; it's the modern cost of newer scene complexity.

What this data says about the limiting component is that the Ryzen 5 7500F provides ample headroom for very high FPS at low resolutions. At 1080p even the Ultra setting hits 240 FPS, which is far beyond most high-refresh displays' capability. The CPU's 3.70 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost, along with its 32 MB L3 cache, clearly feed the card's 2,560 shading units efficiently when not burdened by pixel count. As the resolution climbs to 4K, the GPU's bounding becomes the dominant factor, and the gap between Low and High narrows. The average FPS at 4K Low vs High is 42 FPS apart, versus 72 FPS at 1080p, which is a consistent empirical sign that GPU is the binding constraint at 3840×2160.

How This Combo Ranks

Out of the 3,711 measured CPU–GPU combinations in this database, this pairing of the Ryzen 5 7500F and Radeon RX 6700 XT lands at rank 1940, placing it roughly in the middle of the field. The CPU individually sits in the 77th percentile of all tested CPUs, with an average synthetic score of 24,964 across all benchmarks. The GPU sits at the 72nd percentile with an average score of 27,425. Both components are positive performers, but the mid-pack ranking is largely because the two are both mid-tier parts, not a mix of extremes. the data shows that the ceiling of the CPU, for example, is within 0.4% of the Intel Core i7-11850H, and of the GPU is within 0.5% of a GeForce RTX 3090.

Within the nearest rivals list, the 7500F is represented by the Intel Core i7-11850H (0.1% away), the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (0.2% apart), the Intel Core i7-13620H (0.2% away), and the Intel Core 5 210H (0.4% away). That is a tight band, indicating that the CPU is what is expected: a solid mid-range chip. The 6700 XT similarly sits close to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile (0.0% gap), within 0.5% of the RTX 3090, and 1.1% off the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell. This is evidence that the average performance level, as computed by each device's average benchmark score, is correspondingly near those parts but the ultimate game ranking depends on how well they work together.

The overall rank of 1940, meaning it places ahead of 1771 other tested combos and behind 1940 of them, suggests this is not a low-end setup but also not a top-tier option for this sandbox title. The data shows a capable gaming CPU and a strong 1440p-tier GPU that together produce high but not record-breaking frame rates. The mid-pack placement is expected, with higher ranking combos generally using beefier GPUs or more heavily multi-threaded CPUs.

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F?

A: The CPU has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: How much video memory does the Radeon RX 6700 XT have?

A: The GPU contains 12 GB of GDDR6 memory, on a 192-bit memory bus with a bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s. The die itself is built on 7 nm process.

Q: What resolution and preset gives the highest measured average FPS?

A: The highest average FPS on a single measured point is 368 FPS, which occurs at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low setting.

Q: What are the 4K Medium results?

A: At 3840×2160 with Medium settings, the average FPS is 127, with a minimum of 108 and a maximum of 149 FPS.

Q: What is the CPU's L3 cache total?

A: The 7500F has 32 MB of shared L3 cache, along with 1 MB L2 per core and 64 KB L1 per core.

Q: Does the CPU support fast memory?

A: Yes, it supports DDR5, dual-channel memory, and has an maximum memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. ECC memory is supported.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data suggests a clear tier of GPU headroom across the three target resolutions. At 1920×1080, every preset delivers an average FPS at or above 240. Low gives 368, Medium gives 335 (minimum 285, maximum 386), High 296, and Ultra still 240. For a 144Hz or 165Hz monitor, all presets are playable, and the user can choose Ultra to maximize visual detail while retaining a frame rate that exceeds typical 240Hz panels. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 128 FPS, but both remain on the top.

At 2560×1440, the pair still flushes that. Low outputs 246, Medium 224, High 198, and Ultra 160. Even Ultra settings maintain a maximum required frame rate that's above 144 FPS, while High and Medium allow variable refresh rates to take quality. The minimum measured value for Medium is 190 FPS, which is still excellent. If aiming for 144Hz, Low or Medium is more than enough, while Ultra stays above 60 FPS with noticeable visual scaling.

The 4K becomes more nuanced. At 3840×2160, Low passes 139 FPS, Medium averages 127, High 112, and Ultra 91. We also have the min/max for Medium: 108–146. Given the 4K pixel load, the optimal preset depends on the display. If the user is running a 144Hz 4K panel, do not get the highest preset possible, because even 139 FPS on Low is below 144 but still on the border. For a standard 120Hz setup, Medium should be my choice: 127 average FPS with a 108 FPS floor to handle drops. For 60Hz connected, even Ultra, which yields 91 average, is far above the 60-count. That said, in the strictest sense of measured performance, Medium is the best-balanced settings for 4K, because it retains 149 FPS as the maximum and 108 as the minimum, leaving some thermal/spike safety without a heavy frame-rate penalty. For players who desire maximum fidelity in Roblox, Ultra at 4K still delivers 91 FPS, which is smooth, but the data indicates a potential 36 FPS gain by stepping down to Medium.

Ultimately, the fine balance point for modern gameplay is the Medium preset at 2560×1440: 224 average FPS, min 230, max 257, offering both high image quality per resolution and die gap. There is no reason to drop below Medium at 1440p because the measured low is 246 and high 296, effectively all presets are viable.

Measured breakdown FPS data

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|-----------|----------|---------|---------|---------|

| 1920x1080 | Low | 368 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 335 | 285 | 386 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 296 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 240 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 246 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 224 | 190 | 257 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 198 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 160 | — | — |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 139 | — | — |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 127 | 108 | 146 |

| 3840x2160 | High | 112 | — | — |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 91 | — | — |

CPU Role

The Ryzen 5 7500F is built on 4th-gen Zen 4 architecture (Raphael) on AMD's 5 nm process and is a 6-core, 12-thread CPU with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost up to 5.00 GHz. Its 32 MB shared L3 across all cores, and it carries a 65 W TDP with the AM5 socket. The CPU's own benchmark score is strong: Cinebench R23 hits 22799 points multi-core and 3218 in single-core, while Geekbench scores 12362 multi and 2374 single. In the database, the CPU has a percentile rank of 77 among all CPUs, meaning it is well above average.

In Roblox, the data points suggest the CPU maintains enough overhead that at low resolutions, the CPU emphasizes the absolute limit of this pairing, not the GPU. The FPS at 1080p. Notice that Low increases to 368 at 1080p, then drops to 246 at 1440p, 139 at 1440p, and 139 at 4K, indicating the GPU becomes a load. The 5GHz boost,