Road 96
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 98 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 33 | 43 | 53 | 72 |
| 1440p QHD | 63 | 81 | 100 | 136 |
| 1080p Full HD | 99 | 127 | 157 | 214 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Road 96 with Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, In-Depth Analysis
Road 96 is an adventure title from 2021, and the benchmark data for the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 reveals a configuration that is heavily skewed toward high-refresh-rate 1080p and 1440p gameplay, while struggling to maintain smooth performance at 4K. The combination ranks 1249th out of 2903 tested combos, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all recorded systems. The measured frame rates show a clear pattern: this pairing excels when the resolution is kept in check, but the GPU becomes the limiting factor as pixel count rises, particularly under the most demanding graphics presets.
FAQ
Q: What is the highest average frame rate recorded for this combo in Road 96?
A: The highest average frame rate is 214 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low settings preset.
Q: How does the combo perform at 4K resolution with Ultra settings?
A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the combo produces an average of 33 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth, playable performance in a fast-paced action-adventure context.
Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, the average frame rate drops from 136 FPS on Low settings to 63 FPS on Ultra settings, representing a reduction of more than half the frame rate.
Q: Does the CPU or GPU appear to be the primary bottleneck at 1080p?
A: At 1080p, the GPU is likely the primary bottleneck, as the frame rates scale significantly with graphics settings (from 214 FPS on Low to 99 FPS on Ultra), indicating that the rendering load is the limiting factor rather than the CPU's processing power.
Q: What is the rank of this specific hardware combination among all tested systems?
A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combo is ranked 1249th out of 2903 total combinations tested for this game.
Q: What is the frame time consistency like at 1080p Medium settings?
A: At 1920x1080 with Medium settings, the average FPS is 157, with a minimum of 133 FPS and a maximum of 180 FPS, showing a relatively stable frame delivery with a 47 FPS spread between the low and high points.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is the engine driving visual output in this configuration, and its 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth is a defining characteristic for Road 96's performance. The GPU's memory size and bandwidth are sufficient for the game's demands at 1080p and 1440p, but the data suggests they become stressed at 4K. The RTX 5060 operates with a base clock of 2280 MHz and a boost clock of 2497 MHz, and these clock speeds directly influence the raw compute throughput, which is rated at 19.18 TFLOPS for FP32 operations.
The benchmark results show that the GPU's performance is highly variable depending on the workload. In synthetic tests, the GPU scores 20891 in Passmark G3D and 112787 in Geekbench OpenCL, indicating a solid mid-range capability. However, its percentile ranking of 72 against all GPUs places it behind more powerful cards, which is reflected in the 4K Ultra result of 33 FPS. The GPU's 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores are part of its Blackwell 2.0 architecture, but for Road 96, a title that is not heavily reliant on ray tracing, these features have less impact on the measured frame rates than the raw rasterization performance and memory bandwidth.
The relationship between the GPU's clock speeds and the measured results is evident in the scaling from Low to Ultra settings. At 1080p, the GPU can push 214 FPS on Low, where the boost clock is likely sustained, but as settings increase, the additional shader and texture work causes frame rates to drop. The 48 ROPs and 120 TMUs handle pixel and texture processing, and the data shows that at 4K Ultra, these units are overwhelmed, leading to the 33 FPS average. The GPU's 145 W TDP and 300 W suggested PSU are modest, but the performance ceiling is clearly defined by its 8 GB VRAM capacity and 128-bit memory interface when dealing with higher resolutions.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data for Road 96 reveals a consistent and predictable scaling pattern as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At Low settings, the average frame rate drops from 214 FPS at 1080p to 136 FPS at 1440p, and then further to 72 FPS at 4K. This represents a 66% reduction in performance from 1080p to 4K, indicating that the GPU is struggling to fill the increased pixel count. The scaling is even more dramatic on High settings, where the average FPS goes from 127 at 1080p to 81 at 1440p and finally to 43 at 4K, a 66% decrease from the lowest to highest resolution.
These results strongly suggest that the limiting component at higher resolutions is the GPU. The RTX 5060's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus are likely saturated at 4K, especially with higher quality textures and effects. The frame rate drops are not linear with the pixel count increase (which would be a 4x difference from 1080p to 4K), but rather show a more moderate decline, implying that the game's engine and the GPU's compute capabilities are interacting in a way where memory bandwidth becomes a critical constraint. At 1080p, the CPU has more headroom to feed the GPU, but at 4K, the GPU's rendering pipeline is the clear bottleneck.
The difference between Medium and High settings also highlights the GPU's limitations at higher resolutions. At 1440p, Medium settings yield 100 FPS, while High settings drop to 81 FPS. At 4K, this gap widens, with Medium producing 53 FPS and High dropping to 43 FPS. This pattern indicates that the GPU's shading units and texture units are being pushed harder as both resolution and settings increase, and the 19.18 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is insufficient to maintain high frame rates when the pixel workload quadruples. The data points to a system that is well-balanced for 1080p and 1440p gaming but falls short of the demands of 4K.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo in Road 96 depend heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers an average of 99 FPS, which is smooth for most displays, while the Medium preset offers a higher 157 FPS average with a minimum of 133 FPS. For gamers with high-refresh-rate monitors (144Hz or higher), the Medium preset at 1080p is the best choice, as it provides a significant frame rate boost over Ultra while maintaining a stable minimum frame rate. The Low preset at 214 FPS is excessive for most displays, but it shows the system's headroom.
At 2560x1440, the High preset produces an average of 81 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for competitive play. The Medium preset, with an average of 100 FPS and a minimum of 85 FPS, offers the best balance of visual fidelity and smoothness at this resolution. The Ultra preset at 63 FPS is borderline, and for a game like Road 96 with its narrative-driven gameplay, the Medium preset's higher frame rate and lower frame time variance (85-115 FPS) would provide a more consistent experience. The Low preset at 136 FPS is an option for players prioritizing pure speed, but it sacrifices visual quality.
For 3840x2160, the data shows that no preset provides a consistently smooth experience. The Low preset at 72 FPS is the only option that approaches playability, while Medium drops to 53 FPS, High to 43 FPS, and Ultra to a stuttery 33 FPS. Given these results, the recommendation is to avoid 4K with this GPU if a stable 60 FPS is required. If 4K is a must, the Low preset is the only viable choice, but it undermines the visual fidelity that 4K offers. The best overall experience is at 1440p with Medium settings, which provides a 100 FPS average and a reasonable 85 FPS minimum, ensuring smooth gameplay without compromising too much on visual details.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combination holds a rank of 1249 out of 2903 tested combos in Road 96, placing it in the 43rd percentile of all systems. This rank reflects a mid-range performance tier, which is consistent with the GPU's 72nd percentile ranking among all GPUs and the CPU's 96th percentile ranking among all CPUs. The CPU is a high-end part, but the GPU's mid-range positioning drags the overall combo ranking down, indicating that the system is CPU-heavy in this pairing.
The CPU's benchmark scores are impressive, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44253 and a single-core score of 2439, placing it in the top 4% of all CPUs. However, in gaming, the GPU is the primary determinant of frame rates, and the RTX 5060's nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks show a tight cluster of performance. The GPU's average benchmark score of 26331 is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon 860M (26401, -0.3% delta), the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26421, -0.3% delta), and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (26553, -0.8% delta). This suggests that in raw compute, the RTX 5060 is not significantly ahead of these older or lower-tier cards, which explains its mid-pack ranking in the game.
The combo ranking of 1249 suggests that there are 1654 other tested configurations that perform better in Road 96, likely featuring more powerful GPUs. The system's strong CPU does not compensate for the GPU's limitations at higher resolutions, as evidenced by the 4K Ultra result of 33 FPS. The data indicates that this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where its ranking would likely be higher relative to other systems, but at 4K, it falls behind many others. The rank is a global average across all resolutions and settings, and the system's performance profile is heavily skewed toward lower resolutions.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at the system's performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the average frame rates are 214 FPS on Low, 157 FPS on Medium (with a min of 133 and max of 180), 127 FPS on High, and 99 FPS on Ultra. These numbers show a clear progression, with the Low preset offering more than double the frame rate of the Ultra preset. The 1080p results are all above 60 FPS, making this resolution the sweet spot for this combo.
At 2560x1440, the average frame rates drop to 136 FPS on Low, 100 FPS on Medium (with a min of 85 and max of 115), 81 FPS on High, and 63 FPS on Ultra. The 1440p results show a similar scaling pattern, but the Ultra preset at 63 FPS is just above the 60 FPS threshold, and the High preset at 81 FPS is comfortable. The Medium preset offers a good balance, with a 15 FPS margin above the High preset's average.
At 3840x2160, the average frame rates are 72 FPS on Low, 53 FPS on Medium (with a min of 45 and max of 61), 43 FPS on High, and 33 FPS on Ultra. The 4K results highlight the GPU's struggles, as only the Low preset manages to stay above 60 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 45 FPS indicates noticeable frame drops, and the Ultra preset's 33 FPS average is not suitable for a smooth experience. The data shows a consistent 25-30% frame rate reduction when moving from 1440p to 4K at each settings level, underscoring the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute limitations at higher pixel counts.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is a 24-core, 24-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. This CPU is a powerhouse in synthetic benchmarks, scoring 44253 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 2439 in single-core, with a Passmark single-thread score of 5068. Its 36 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support (with 115.2 GB/s bandwidth) provide ample memory bandwidth for feeding the GPU in gaming workloads.
In Road 96, the CPU's role is primarily to handle game logic and physics, while the GPU renders the frames. The measured FPS data shows that at 1080p Low settings, the system achieves 214 FPS, which is likely near the CPU's limit for frame generation in this game. The CPU's high single-core performance (5068 in Passmark single-thread) ensures that it is not a bottleneck at lower resolutions, but as resolution increases, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and the CPU's utilization likely decreases.
The CPU's 24 cores and 24 threads are more than sufficient for a game like Road 96, which is not heavily multi-threaded. The high boost clock of 5.50 GHz is beneficial for the game's primary thread, and the CPU's 96th percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates it is in the top tier for processing power. However, the benchmark results show that this raw CPU power does not translate to proportionally high frame rates in Road 96, as the GPU's mid-range performance caps the system's overall output. The data suggests that pairing this high-end CPU with a more powerful GPU would yield significantly better results in this title, particularly at 1440p and 4K, but with the RTX 5060, the CPU is rarely the limiting component.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 in Road 96
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 72.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 53.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 43.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 33.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 136.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 100.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 81.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 63.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 214.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 157.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 127.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 99.0 |
Road 96 with iUltra 7 270K Plus + Other GPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Road 96 with RTX 5060 + Other CPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 7 270K Plus + RTX 5060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.