Road 96
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 106 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 39 | 45 | 58 | 76 |
| 1440p QHD | 70 | 88 | 109 | 145 |
| 1080p Full HD | 107 | 137 | 167 | 231 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Road 96 with Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 delivers a performance profile in Road 96 that is heavily dictated by resolution and graphics settings. At 1080p, the combination is capable of very high frame rates, but the scaling curve reveals that the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor as resolution increases. The data indicates that this combo ranks 755th out of 1684 tested combinations, placing it in the upper-middle tier of systems for this title.
Resolution Scaling
The measured frame rates show a clear and predictable decline as resolution increases, with the most dramatic drop occurring between 1440p and 4K. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the system produces an average of 137.1 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same settings reduces the average to 87.5 FPS, a decrease of 49.6 FPS or roughly 36%. The jump to 3840x2160 High yields only 44.8 FPS, which represents a further drop of 42.7 FPS from the 1440p result and a total reduction of 67% from the 1080p figure.
This scaling pattern strongly suggests that the RTX 3070 is the bottleneck at higher resolutions. The 4K High result of 44.8 FPS is noticeably below the 60 FPS threshold that many users consider the minimum for smooth gameplay, while the 1440p High result of 87.5 FPS remains comfortably playable. The Ultra preset at 4K drops to 38.7 FPS, indicating that the most demanding settings are only viable at lower resolutions or with reduced quality expectations.
Examining the Low preset reveals the extent of GPU limitation. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 230.7 FPS, which is a substantial 93.6 FPS higher than the High preset at the same resolution. This large gap between Low and High settings at 1080p suggests that the CPU is not the limiting factor at lower resolutions; if it were, the frame rate would plateau regardless of settings. At 4K Low, the average is 76.2 FPS, which is still higher than the 4K Medium result of 58.3 FPS, confirming that graphics settings have a far greater impact on performance than resolution alone in this configuration.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is based on the GA104 chip using the Ampere architecture, built on an 8 nm process at Samsung. It features 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation pipelines. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1500 MHz with a boost clock of 1725 MHz, paired with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.
In Road 96, the GPU's role becomes increasingly dominant as resolution scales. The 4K Ultra result of 38.7 FPS versus the 1080p Ultra result of 106.6 FPS illustrates that the 8 GB frame buffer and memory bandwidth are under significant strain at higher pixel counts. The gap between Medium and High at 4K is 13.5 FPS (58.3 vs 44.8), while the gap between High and Ultra is only 6.1 FPS (44.8 vs 38.7), suggesting that the most demanding settings provide diminishing returns relative to the performance cost.
The GPU's benchmark scores place it in the 72nd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 28238. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, scores 27985, which is 0.9% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti scores 27956, putting it 1% behind. These comparisons show that the RTX 3070 sits in a competitive position, though the Road 96 results indicate that its 8 GB memory capacity may be a limiting factor at 4K Ultra settings, where the average drops below 40 FPS.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is a 20-core, 20-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, based on the Arrow Lake architecture built on a 3 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a 30 MB shared L3 cache and 3 MB L2 cache per core. The processor supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus providing 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth.
In Road 96, the CPU's role is secondary to the GPU at higher resolutions, but the data reveals its importance at lower settings. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 230.7 FPS, which is significantly higher than the 4K Low result of 76.2 FPS. This indicates that the CPU can feed the GPU with enough frames at 1080p Low, but the GPU cannot maintain that throughput at higher resolutions. The processor's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 7060, contributes to maintaining high frame rates when the GPU is not the bottleneck.
The CPU ranks in the 97th percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 79102. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF, scores 79240, which is 0.2% higher. The Intel Core i9-14900KF scores 79245, also 0.2% higher, while the Intel Core i9-14900K scores 79824, 0.9% higher. These margins are minimal, showing that the 265K offers comparable CPU performance to its immediate competitors. In the context of Road 96, the CPU's capabilities are more than sufficient, as evidenced by the fact that the frame rate drops consistently with resolution increases, a pattern that points to GPU rather than CPU limitation.
FAQ
Q: What is the average frame rate at 1080p with High settings?
A: The system achieves an average of 137.1 FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.
Q: How does the 4K Ultra performance compare to 1080p Ultra?
A: At 4K Ultra, the average frame rate is 38.7 FPS, while at 1080p Ultra it is 106.6 FPS. This represents a reduction of 67.9 FPS, or roughly 64%, when moving from 1080p to 4K at the same settings.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this game?
A: The data indicates that the GPU is the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 230.7 FPS, but this drops to 76.2 FPS at 4K Low, showing that the GPU cannot maintain throughput as pixel count increases.
Q: How does the RTX 3070 compare to its nearest rival, the RX 6600 XT?
A: The RTX 3070 has an average benchmark score of 28238, while the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT scores 27985, which is 0.9% lower. The RTX 3070 is slightly ahead in overall GPU benchmarks.
Q: What is the best resolution for maintaining a high frame rate?
A: At 1440p High, the system delivers 87.5 FPS, which is a good balance between visual quality and performance. At 1080p High, it reaches 137.1 FPS, but 4K High drops to 44.8 FPS, making it less suitable for high-refresh-rate displays.
Q: How does the Core Ultra 7 265K perform in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The CPU scores 50009 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 7060 in single-core. It ranks in the 97th percentile among all CPUs, with its nearest rival, the 265KF, scoring 0.2% higher on average.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 ranks 755th out of 1684 tested combinations in Road 96, placing it in the 55th percentile of all tested systems. This position reflects a balanced pairing where the CPU is significantly stronger than the GPU in relative terms. The CPU's 97th percentile ranking contrasts with the GPU's 72nd percentile ranking, indicating that the GPU is the weaker component in this matchup.
Within the context of Road 96, this rank suggests that many other combinations achieve higher frame rates, likely due to more powerful GPUs. The RTX 3070's 8 GB memory capacity and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 4K results show that it struggles with the most demanding settings. The system's 4K Ultra average of 38.7 FPS is below the 60 FPS target, and even 4K High at 44.8 FPS falls short.
The ranking also reflects the game's specific performance characteristics. Road 96 is an adventure game, and the data shows that it does not place extreme demands on either component. The CPU's high single-thread performance ensures that it does not bottleneck the GPU at lower resolutions, while the GPU's capabilities are sufficient for smooth gameplay at 1080p and 1440p. The 755th rank indicates that while this combo is not at the top tier of systems, it is above the median and provides a playable experience at most settings, with the caveat that 4K Ultra is not viable for maintaining high frame rates.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 in Road 96
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 76.2 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 58.3 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 44.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 38.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 144.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 109.2 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 87.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 70.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 230.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 166.7 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 137.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 106.6 |
Road 96 with iUltra 7 265K + Other GPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Road 96 with RTX 3070 + Other CPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 7 265K + RTX 3070
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.