Road 96

Road 96

AVERAGE FPS
82
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 82 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 28 35 44 60
1440p QHD 53 67 83 114
1080p Full HD 82 105 131 178

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 60
3840x2160 Medium 44
3840x2160 High 35
3840x2160 Ultra 28
2560x1440 Low 114
2560x1440 Medium 83
2560x1440 High 67
2560x1440 Ultra 53
1920x1080 Low 178
1920x1080 Medium 131
1920x1080 High 105
1920x1080 Ultra 82

Road 96 with Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050, In-Depth Analysis

Road 96 is an adventure title that scales across a wide performance envelope, and the measured data for the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 shows a configuration that is well-suited for high-refresh 1080p gaming, but one that begins to strain at higher resolutions. The benchmark results indicate a predictable pattern: performance degrades as resolution increases, but the rate of that degradation is not uniform across all quality presets. This analysis walks through the data step by step, examining how the CPU and GPU each contribute to the final frame rates and where the combination lands among all tested configurations.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate drop from 1080p to 4K is significant and tells a clear story about the limiting component in this system. At 1080p with Low settings, the combination produces an average of 178 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low drops that to 114 FPS, a reduction of 64 FPS. At 4K Low, the average falls further to 60 FPS, which is a substantial 118 FPS below the 1080p result. This steep decline, particularly the drop from 1440p to 4K, indicates that the GPU is becoming the primary bottleneck as pixel count increases.

The scaling pattern is even more pronounced at higher quality settings. With High settings, the average frame rate goes from 105 FPS at 1080p to 67 FPS at 1440p, and then down to 35 FPS at 4K. The gap between 1440p and 4K High is 32 FPS, which is a larger relative drop than the 38 FPS difference between 1080p and 1440p. This suggests that the combination of increased resolution and higher quality settings places a heavy load on the graphics card, which has to work progressively harder to maintain playable frame rates.

For Medium settings, the data shows 131 FPS at 1080p, 83 FPS at 1440p, and 44 FPS at 4K. The Ultra preset, which is the most demanding, yields 82 FPS at 1080p, 53 FPS at 1440p, and only 28 FPS at 4K. The 4K Ultra result is the lowest of all measured rows, and it falls below the threshold for smooth gameplay. The data suggests that the RTX 5050's 8 GB of VRAM and 128-bit memory interface, which provides 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth, are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, but the sheer volume of pixels at 4K overwhelms the GPU.

The scaling behavior indicates that at 1080p, the CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU efficiently, but as resolution increases, the workload shifts entirely to the graphics card. The fact that the 1080p Low score of 178 FPS is more than double the 4K Low score of 60 FPS highlights how resolution-bound this configuration becomes. This is typical for a mid-range GPU like the RTX 5050, which is positioned to handle 1080p gaming as its primary target. The data does not show any anomalies where the CPU would be the limiting factor at higher resolutions; the consistent decline across all presets points squarely at the GPU.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 is a 14-core, 14-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process node. It has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with 24 MB of shared L3 cache. In the context of Road 96, an adventure game that is not typically known for heavy multi-threaded workloads, the CPU's role is to maintain a stable frame delivery without becoming a bottleneck. The benchmark results show that the CPU performs this role admirably at lower resolutions, where frame rates are high and the CPU must keep up with the GPU's output.

At 1080p with Low settings, the average of 178 FPS is a strong indicator that the CPU is not holding the system back. The processor's single-thread performance, as measured by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2085, is sufficient to handle the game's logic and draw calls. The multi-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14769, is also robust, but it is unlikely to be fully utilized by Road 96, which typically scales with single-thread performance more than multi-thread performance. The CPU's passmark single-thread score of 4516 and passmark multithread score of 37816 further confirm its capability.

When comparing the CPU to its nearest rivals, the data shows that it is a competitive part. The Core Ultra 5 235 has an average benchmark score of 46062, which places it within 0.1% of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and within 0.1% of the Intel Core i9-13900HX. It is 0.2% ahead of both the AMD EPYC 4364P and the AMD EPYC 7303. These deltaPct values are negligible in real-world gaming, meaning the CPU's performance is effectively on par with these alternatives. The CPU's percentile ranking of 89 out of all CPUs indicates that it sits in the top 11% of all processors, which is a strong position.

The CPU's 14 cores and 14 threads are more than enough for the demands of Road 96. The game is not a multi-threaded stress test, and the processor's ability to boost up to 5.00 GHz on a single core is more relevant. The data suggests that the CPU is not the limiting factor in any of the measured configurations, as the frame rates consistently scale downward with resolution and settings, which is a function of GPU load. The CPU's memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s and dual-channel DDR5 support are adequate for feeding the GPU with data. Overall, the CPU provides a solid foundation for the RTX 5050, allowing it to reach its full potential at 1080p without introducing any notable frame pacing issues.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is the clear driver of the performance differences observed in the measured data. This GPU, based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, has 2560 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. It operates at a base clock of 2317 MHz and a boost clock of 2572 MHz, with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus providing 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU's FP32 performance is rated at 13.17 TFLOPS, which places it in a position to handle 1080p gaming with ease but struggle with 4K.

The measured frame rates directly reflect the GPU's capabilities. At 1080p, the RTX 5050 delivers an average of 178 FPS on Low, 131 FPS on Medium, 105 FPS on High, and 82 FPS on Ultra. These numbers show that the GPU has ample headroom at this resolution, and even the most demanding preset achieves a high frame rate. The GPU's 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 1080p, as Road 96's textures and effects do not appear to exceed this capacity at these settings. The memory bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s is also adequate for the data throughput required at 1080p.

At 1440p, the GPU's performance is still respectable but begins to show strain. The average frame rates are 114 FPS on Low, 83 FPS on Medium, 67 FPS on High, and 53 FPS on Ultra. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is significant, but the GPU still manages to provide playable frame rates across all presets. The 53 FPS on Ultra is on the edge of what is considered smooth, but it is still usable. The GPU's 8 GB of VRAM might be a limiting factor at 1440p Ultra, but the data does not show any catastrophic frame drops, as the min FPS for Medium at 1440p is 71 FPS.

At 4K, the GPU is clearly overburdened. The average frame rates are 60 FPS on Low, 44 FPS on Medium, 35 FPS on High, and 28 FPS on Ultra. The 4K Ultra result of 28 FPS is well below the threshold for a smooth experience, and even the 60 FPS on Low is marginal for a fast-paced action game, though Road 96 is an adventure title where this might be acceptable. The GPU's pixel rate of 82.30 GPixel/s and texture rate of 205.8 GTexel/s are not sufficient to handle the 4K pixel count combined with higher quality settings. The GPU's percentile ranking of 66 out of all GPUs indicates it is a mid-range performer, and its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL, which is only 0.6% behind in average score. This shows that the RTX 5050 is not a high-end part, and its performance at 4K is expected to be limited.

How This Combo Ranks

In the grand scheme of all tested combinations, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 pair ranks at position 1760 out of 2903 total combos. This places it in the 60th percentile of all configurations, which is a solidly mid-range result. The rank of 1760 indicates that there are many faster combinations, but also a significant number that are slower. For a game like Road 96, which is not a demanding AAA title, this rank suggests that the combo is more than capable of delivering a good experience at most settings.

The combo's rank is influenced by the GPU's performance, as the CPU is a strong component with an 89th percentile ranking. The GPU's 66th percentile ranking is the weaker link, and it drags the overall combo down. This is a classic pairing of a high-end CPU with a mid-range GPU, which is a common configuration for gamers who prioritize CPU-intensive tasks or plan to upgrade the GPU later. The data shows that the combo is not a top-tier performer, but it is also far from being a low-end setup. It sits comfortably in the middle of the pack, and for a game like Road 96, this is more than enough.

Compared to other combos, the Core Ultra 5 235 and RTX 5050 combination is likely to be outperformed by setups with higher-end GPUs, but it will also outperform many older or lower-end configurations. The combo's rank suggests that it is well-balanced for 1080p gaming, which aligns with the measured frame rates. At 1440p, it is still capable, but at 4K, it falls behind. The rank is a reflection of the overall performance across all tested games, not just Road 96, but the data for this specific game shows that the combo is a reliable choice for adventure titles.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the combo's performance across three resolutions and four quality settings. At 1920x1080, the results are strong across the board. The Low preset delivers an average of 178 FPS, which is exceptionally high and indicates that the game is not taxing the system at all. The Medium preset averages 131 FPS, with a min of 111 FPS and a max of 150 FPS, showing a stable frame delivery. The High preset averages 105 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 82 FPS. All of these results are well above 60 FPS, making 1080p the sweet spot for this combo.

At 2560x1440, the performance drops but remains playable. The Low preset averages 114 FPS, which is still very smooth. The Medium preset averages 83 FPS, with a min of 71 FPS and a max of 96 FPS, indicating a slight dip in consistency. The High preset averages 67 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset averages 53 FPS, which is below 60 FPS but still playable for a slower-paced adventure game. The data shows that 1440p is a viable option, but users may need to dial back settings to maintain higher frame rates.

At 3840x2160, the performance is the weakest. The Low preset averages 60 FPS, which is exactly at the 60 FPS target but leaves no headroom for demanding scenes. The Medium preset averages 44 FPS, with a min of 37 FPS and a max of 51 FPS, which is a noticeable drop. The High preset averages 35 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 28 FPS. These results are below the ideal 60 FPS target and would be considered borderline for a smooth experience. The 4K data clearly shows that the RTX 5050 is not designed for this resolution in Road 96, and users should stick to 1080p or 1440p for the best experience.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Road 96?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 provides the highest frame rates, with all presets averaging above 80 FPS. This is the optimal resolution for this configuration.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Road 96?

A: The measured data indicates that 4K is not ideal. The highest average at 4K is 60 FPS on Low settings, while Ultra drops to 28 FPS. It is technically playable, but the frame rates are not smooth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 has an average benchmark score of 46062, which is within 0.1% of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Intel Core i9-13900HX, and 0.2% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4364P and AMD EPYC 7303.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 has an average benchmark score of 21035, which is 0.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL and 1% behind the AMD Radeon HD 8970M, but 1.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 178 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 82 FPS. This is a difference of 96 FPS.

Q: Is the RTX 5050's 8 GB of VRAM sufficient for Road 96?

A: The data suggests it is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, as there are no catastrophic frame drops. At 4K, the lower frame rates are more likely due to the GPU's compute limitations rather than VRAM capacity.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the user's target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1080p, the Ultra preset is the best choice, as it provides an average of 82 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold. This gives users the best visual quality without sacrificing smoothness. If a user has a high-refresh monitor and prefers maximum frame rates, the High preset at 105 FPS is an excellent alternative, offering a significant boost over Ultra with only a modest reduction in visual fidelity.

For 1440p, the High preset is the recommended starting point, as it averages 67 FPS, which is just above 60 FPS. This provides a good balance between visual quality and performance. If the user experiences any stuttering or prefers a higher frame rate, the Medium preset at 83 FPS is a solid fallback. The Ultra preset at 53 FPS is playable but may not feel as smooth, so it is better to use High or Medium for a more consistent experience.

For 4K, the data suggests that this combo is not well-suited for the task. The Low preset at 60 FPS is the only option that hits the 60 FPS target, but it sacrifices visual quality. The Medium preset at 44 FPS is a compromise, but it is below the ideal threshold. For the best experience at 4K, users should consider lowering the resolution to 1440p or accepting the visual compromises of the Low preset. The overall recommendation is to play Road 96 at 1080p with Ultra settings for the best balance of quality and performance, as this is where the combo excels.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 5 235

Cores / Threads 14 / 14
Base Clock 3400 MHz
Boost Clock 5000 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1851
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2572 MHz MHz
TDP 130 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 in Road 96

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 60.0
3840x2160 Medium 44.0
3840x2160 High 35.0
3840x2160 Ultra 28.0
2560x1440 Low 114.0
2560x1440 Medium 83.0
2560x1440 High 67.0
2560x1440 Ultra 53.0
1920x1080 Low 178.0
1920x1080 Medium 131.0
1920x1080 High 105.0
1920x1080 Ultra 82.0

Road 96 with iUltra 5 235 + Other GPUs

See how Road 96 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Road 96 with RTX 5050 + Other CPUs

See how Road 96 performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with iUltra 5 235 + RTX 5050

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.