Road 96
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 92 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 34 | 38 | 52 | 71 |
| 1440p QHD | 57 | 79 | 94 | 127 |
| 1080p Full HD | 90 | 120 | 145 | 203 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Road 96 with Intel Core i7-12700K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, In-Depth Analysis
Road 96 with the Intel Core i7-12700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 delivers a highly playable experience at most resolutions, but the data reveals that the GPU is the definitive limiting factor at higher settings. The combination ranks in the 56th percentile (953rd out of 1684 tested combos) for this game, indicating a solidly above-average pairing. The benchmark results show a clear hierarchy: the system easily handles 1080p gaming with room to spare, offers smooth 1440p performance at mid-range presets, but falls below the 60 FPS threshold at 4K with higher visual fidelity, confirming that the RTX 4060's 8 GB frame buffer and 128-bit bus are the primary constraints in this title.
Resolution Scaling
The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and directly proportional to the workload increase, which is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 120.4 FPS at 1920x1080 to 78.7 FPS at 2560x1440, a 34.6% reduction, and then further down to 38.4 FPS at 3840x2160, representing a 68.1% decline from the 1080p baseline. This progressive collapse indicates that the RTX 4060's rendering capabilities are being saturated as pixel count increases, with the 4K resolution nearly tripling the load on the graphics processor.
The scaling pattern is even more telling at Ultra settings, where the frame rate drops from 90.3 FPS at 1080p to 56.7 FPS at 1440p, and then plummets to a barely playable 34.2 FPS at 4K. This suggests that the combination of Ultra details and 4K resolution demands more than the GPU's 15.11 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 272.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth can deliver. Interestingly, the CPU does not appear to bottleneck the system even at 1080p Low, where the frame rate reaches 202.9 FPS, indicating that the Intel Core i7-12700K's 12 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for this adventure title.
The resolution scaling data also reveals that the game's engine is not particularly well-optimized for high resolutions at maximum settings. The gap between Low and Ultra settings widens dramatically as resolution increases: at 1080p, the difference is 112.6 FPS, but at 4K, the same settings gap yields only a 36.3 FPS difference. This narrowing margin at higher resolutions underscores that the GPU's raw pixel throughput becomes the dominant constraint, rather than the game's graphical complexity.
FAQ
Q: What is the highest average FPS achievable with this combination at 1080p?
A: The highest recorded average is 202.9 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. Even at High settings, the system maintains 120.4 FPS, making it well-suited for high-refresh-rate monitors.
Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Road 96?
A: Yes, but with significant compromises. At 4K Low, the average FPS is 70.5, which is playable, but at Medium it drops to 51.8 FPS, and at High it falls to 38.4 FPS. Ultra settings at 4K yield only 34.2 FPS, which is below the generally accepted 60 FPS standard.
Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The RTX 4060 has an average benchmark score of 23181, placing it 0.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6600M and 0.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti. It is 0.7% ahead of the Intel Arc B580 and 0.8% ahead of the AMD Radeon 760M.
Q: What is the recommended resolution for the best balance of quality and performance?
A: The data suggests 2560x1440 with Medium settings provides an excellent experience, averaging 93.5 FPS. This offers a substantial improvement in visual fidelity over 1080p while maintaining frame rates well above 60 FPS.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to limit performance in this game?
A: The GPU is clearly the limiting component. Evidence shows that even at 1080p Low settings, the frame rate reaches 202.9 FPS without any apparent CPU bottleneck, given the i7-12700K's strong single-thread performance of 4128 in Cinebench R23.
Q: How does the i7-12700K's benchmark score compare to its rivals?
A: The i7-12700K has an average benchmark score of 35684, which is 0.3% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 and 0.7% lower than the Intel Core i5-14500HX. It is 0.6% higher than the Intel Core i7-13700T and 0.8% higher than the Intel Core i7-13800H.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060's specifications directly explain the observed performance ceiling in Road 96. With 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, the GPU has a bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s, which is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming but becomes strained at 4K with high-detail textures. The card's 3072 shading units and 48 ROPs, running at a boost clock of 2460 MHz, deliver a pixel rate of 118.1 GPixel/s, which is insufficient to maintain high frame rates at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, where the average dips to 34.2 FPS.
The GPU's performance profile in this game aligns with its synthetic benchmark results. Its Passmark G3D score of 19545 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2302 indicate mid-range capabilities, which is consistent with its 66th percentile ranking among all GPUs. The RTX 4060's 15.11 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is well-suited for the game's rendering demands at lower resolutions, but the data shows that the memory subsystem becomes the bottleneck at higher resolutions. The 17 Gbps effective memory speed is not enough to feed the GPU's cores efficiently when rendering at 4K, leading to the observed frame rate collapse from 70.5 FPS at Low to 34.2 FPS at Ultra.
The GPU's architecture, built on TSMC's 5 nm process with 18,900 million transistors, provides efficient power delivery with a 115 W TDP, but this power envelope limits the boost clock sustainability under heavy loads. The benchmark results indicate that the GPU's performance is consistent with its nearest rivals, sitting just 0.6% below the AMD Radeon RX 6600M and 0.7% below the GTX 780 Ti in average score, yet it manages to deliver better performance in this specific game than those comparisons might suggest, as evidenced by the playable 1080p and 1440p results.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS data provides clear guidance on which settings preset offers the most rewarding experience for this hardware combination. At 1920x1080, High settings deliver 120.4 FPS, which is a 17.1% improvement over Ultra's 90.3 FPS while likely providing nearly identical visual quality in an adventure game of this style. The jump from Medium to High at 1080p costs only 24.8 FPS (from 145.2 to 120.4), making High the recommended preset for players with 144 Hz monitors, as it remains well above the refresh rate threshold.
For 1440p users, the data strongly supports Medium settings as the optimal choice. At 2560x1440, Medium produces 93.5 FPS, which is 14.8 FPS higher than High's 78.7 FPS and a massive 36.8 FPS higher than Ultra's 56.7 FPS. The difference between Medium and High at this resolution is likely subtle in terms of visual fidelity, but the performance gain is substantial, ensuring smooth gameplay. For those who prioritize visual quality over frame rate, High at 1440p is still viable, but Ultra should be avoided due to its sub-60 FPS average.
At 4K, the recommendations become more restrictive. Low settings at 3840x2160 yield 70.5 FPS, which is the only preset that maintains a comfortable margin above 60 FPS. Medium at 4K drops to 51.8 FPS, which may be acceptable for a slow-paced adventure game, but High and Ultra are not recommended as they fall below 40 FPS. The 4K Low setting offers a playable experience, but players with 4K displays might prefer to run the game at 1440p High for a superior overall experience, given the relatively modest visual differences in this stylized title.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Intel Core i7-12700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 ranks 953rd out of 1684 tested combinations in Road 96, placing it in the upper 43% of all systems evaluated. This ranking is respectable, given that the GPU's 66th percentile standing among all GPUs and the CPU's 89th percentile among all CPUs would suggest a potentially higher placement. The gap between the expected performance from the individual components and the actual combo ranking indicates that Road 96's performance is more heavily weighted toward GPU capability, which is consistent with the resolution scaling data showing the GPU as the primary bottleneck.
The system's ranking becomes more meaningful when compared to the individual component benchmarks. The i7-12700K's average benchmark score of 35684 places it within 0.8% of its nearest rivals, while the RTX 4060's score of 23181 places it within 0.8% of its closest competitors. This tightly clustered performance means that the combo's ranking is not significantly influenced by any single component's exceptional or deficient performance, but rather by the balanced mid-range nature of both parts. The 953rd ranking out of 1684 suggests that there are many combinations with faster GPUs that naturally perform better in this GPU-bound title.
The fact that this combo ranks in the middle of the pack is not a criticism, but rather a reflection of the hardware's positioning. With the CPU ranking in the 89th percentile and the GPU in the 66th percentile, the system is heavily weighted toward processor performance, which is underutilized in Road 96. The data shows that a system with a weaker CPU but a stronger GPU would likely rank higher in this specific game, as the CPU's headroom is not needed to achieve the frame rates measured here.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates its strongest performance across all settings. Low settings produce an average of 202.9 FPS, Medium produces 145.2 FPS, High produces 120.4 FPS, and Ultra produces 90.3 FPS. These figures show a smooth progression with diminishing returns as settings increase, with the largest single-step drop occurring between Low and Medium at 57.7 FPS.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales predictably. Low settings average 126.7 FPS, which is still excellent for high-refresh-rate displays. Medium settings deliver 93.5 FPS, maintaining smooth gameplay. High settings average 78.7 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra settings drop to 56.7 FPS, falling below the 60 FPS standard but remaining playable for this genre.
At 3840x2160, the GPU's limitations become apparent. Low settings average 70.5 FPS, the only 4K preset above 60 FPS. Medium settings drop to 51.8 FPS, while High falls to 38.4 FPS. Ultra settings bottom out at 34.2 FPS. The decline from Low to Ultra at 4K represents a 51.5% reduction in performance, highlighting the significant cost of maximum settings at this resolution. The data shows that 4K gaming with this combo is possible, but only with significant compromises to visual quality.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i7-12700K's specifications suggest it is overqualified for Road 96, which is reflected in the benchmark results. With 12 cores and 20 threads operating at a base clock of 3.60 GHz and boost clock of 5.00 GHz, the CPU provides substantial headroom for this adventure game. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29241 and single-core score of 4128 indicate strong performance across both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads, but the game's frame rates are not limited by the processor.
The evidence for the CPU not being a bottleneck is compelling. At 1080p Low settings, the system achieves 202.9 FPS, which is near the theoretical limit for many game engines. If the CPU were the limiting factor, we would expect to see similar frame rates across different resolutions at the same settings, but instead we see a significant decline from 202.9 FPS at 1080p to 126.7 FPS at 1440p and 70.5 FPS at 4K with Low settings. This pattern definitively shows that the GPU is the constraint, not the CPU.
The CPU's 25 MB of shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB per-core L2 cache provide ample bandwidth for the game's data requirements, and its memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 allows for flexible system configurations. The processor's 89th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35684, places it among the strongest desktop processors available. However, in Road 96, the CPU's capabilities are largely untapped, as the game's performance is dictated by the GPU's rendering throughput and memory bandwidth. The i7-12700K's 3DMark multi-threaded score of 9979 and Passmark multi-thread score of 34404 confirm its ability to handle any background tasks or streaming requirements without impacting game performance.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i7-12700K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i7-12700K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 in Road 96
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 70.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 51.8 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 38.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 34.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 126.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 93.5 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 78.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 56.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 202.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 145.2 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 120.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 90.3 |
Road 96 with ii7-12700K + Other GPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Road 96 with RTX 4060 + Other CPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii7-12700K + RTX 4060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.