Road 96
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 71 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 25 | 31 | 38 | 55 |
| 1440p QHD | 43 | 59 | 71 | 97 |
| 1080p Full HD | 71 | 93 | 115 | 156 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Road 96 with Intel Core i5-12400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i5-12400 is a 6-core, 12-thread Alder Lake desktop processor with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. Its 18 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel memory support (DDR4 and DDR5) position it as a solid mid-range foundation for gaming. In synthetic benchmarks, the chip posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15935 and a single-core score of 2249, indicating robust throughput for both heavily threaded workloads and lighter, latency-sensitive tasks. For a game like Road 96, an adventure title where scene transitions and dialogue-driven moments can be CPU-intensive, the i5-12400’s 12 threads ensure that background simulation and physics don’t bottleneck the frame pipeline. The data shows a 3DMark single-thread score of 910 and a max-thread score of 5890, suggesting that while the CPU is capable of high peak performance, its real strength lies in consistent multi-threaded execution. Interestingly, its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-9700, has an average benchmark score of 19831, just 0.1% lower than the i5-12400’s 19850, meaning the two are virtually interchangeable in aggregate performance, despite the i7’s older architecture. The i5-12400’s 77th percentile ranking among all CPUs further confirms that it sits comfortably above the median, providing ample headroom for Road 96’s demands without becoming a limiting factor in most scenarios.
How This Combo Ranks
In the context of Road 96, the pairing of the Intel Core i5-12400 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 achieves a combo rank of 1382 out of 1684 tested combinations. This places the system in the lower-mid tier of all possible hardware pairings, which is a direct reflection of the GPU’s modest standing rather than the CPU’s capabilities. The RTX 2060 itself ranks in the 58th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 16074, while the CPU sits in the 77th percentile. This mismatch—a relatively strong CPU paired with a mid-range GPU—means that in Road 96, the frame rate is almost exclusively dictated by the graphics card’s rendering limits, especially at higher resolutions and settings. The combo’s rank of 1382 out of 1684 indicates that roughly 82% of tested systems outperform it, which is expected given the RTX 2060’s age and position in the market. However, the data reveals that the CPU is not the bottleneck: the i5-12400’s nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i7-8700 (avg score 19894, delta -0.2%) and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX (avg score 19928, delta -0.4%), show that the processor can hold its own even against far more expensive parts. The weak link is the GPU, which trails its own nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7600S, by just 0.5% in average score, but still lags behind faster cards by a wider margin. For Road 96, this means users should expect playable but not exceptional performance, with the system’s overall ranking reflecting a balance that favors CPU-heavy tasks over pixel-pushing.
FAQ
Q: Is the Intel Core i5-12400 strong enough to keep up with the RTX 2060 in Road 96?
A: Yes. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15935 and single-core score of 2249 show it has far more throughput than the GPU needs. The combo rank of 1382 out of 1684 proves the system is GPU-limited, as the CPU’s 77th percentile standing is much higher than the GPU’s 58th percentile.
Q: What is the best performance setting for this combo at 1920x1080?
A: The measured FPS data shows that Low settings deliver the highest average frame rate at 156.4 FPS, while Medium yields 114.8 FPS, High produces 92.6 FPS, and Ultra drops to 70.7 FPS. For a smooth experience, Low or Medium are optimal, but Ultra remains playable above 60 FPS.
Q: How does the RTX 2060 compare to its closest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7600S?
A: The RTX 2060 has an average benchmark score of 16074, while the RX 7600S scores 15996, a difference of 0.5% in favor of the RTX 2060. This means the two GPUs are effectively tied in raw performance, so the choice between them would come down to other factors like driver support or features.
Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Road 96?
A: At 3840x2160, the data shows an average of 30.5 FPS on High settings and 54.6 FPS on Low. While Low is playable, High dips below the 60 FPS threshold, so 4K requires dropping settings significantly to maintain smoothness.
Q: What is the launch MSRP of the RTX 2060?
A: The launch MSRP is 349 USD. This figure is provided for reference only and does not reflect current market pricing.
Q: Why does the combo rank lower than the CPU’s percentile might suggest?
A: The combo rank of 1382 out of 1684 (roughly the 18th percentile) contrasts with the CPU’s 77th percentile ranking because the RTX 2060’s 58th percentile drags the system down. In Road 96, the GPU is the dominant factor, so the CPU’s strength cannot overcome the graphics card’s limitations.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the RTX 2060 delivers a wide range of frame rates depending on settings. Low settings produce an average of 156.4 FPS, which is more than enough for high-refresh-rate monitors. Medium settings drop to 114.8 FPS, still comfortably above 100, while High settings average 92.6 FPS. Ultra settings pull the frame rate down to 70.7 FPS, which remains playable but shows the GPU’s limits when pushed to maximum detail. The gap between Low and Ultra is 85.7 FPS, a 121% increase in performance when dropping settings, indicating that the game is highly scalable on this hardware.
Stepping up to 2560x1440, the numbers show a more pronounced impact from resolution. Low settings still manage a strong 97.3 FPS average, but Medium falls to 70.6 FPS, and High drops further to 59.1 FPS—just under the 60 FPS mark. Ultra settings at 1440p yield an average of 43.3 FPS, which is noticeably less smooth and suggests that users should stick to Medium or lower for a fluid experience. The transition from 1080p to 1440p at High settings represents a 37% performance hit, from 92.6 FPS to 59.1 FPS, highlighting the RTX 2060’s memory bandwidth constraints at higher resolutions.
At 3840x2160, the RTX 2060 struggles to maintain playable frame rates on higher settings. Low settings average 54.6 FPS, which is borderline acceptable, but Medium drops to 37.8 FPS and High to 30.5 FPS. Ultra settings bottom out at 25.2 FPS, making 4K gaming impractical except at the lowest detail levels. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 4K represents a 54% reduction in performance, from 54.6 FPS to 25.2 FPS, showing that the 6 GB of VRAM and 192-bit memory bus are insufficient for high-fidelity 4K rendering in this title. Across all resolutions, the pattern is clear: the RTX 2060 can handle 1080p with ease, 1440p with some compromises, and 4K only at minimal settings.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is built on the Turing architecture with a TU106 chip manufactured on a 12 nm process at TSMC. It features 1920 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 48 render output units, along with 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores for ray tracing and AI workloads. The GPU’s base clock is 1365 MHz with a boost clock of 1680 MHz, and it pairs 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s. This configuration yields a pixel rate of 80.64 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 201.6 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance rated at 6.451 TFLOPS. The 160 W TDP and dual-slot design make it a relatively power-hungry card, requiring a 450 W suggested PSU and a single 8-pin power connector.
In Road 96, the RTX 2060’s role is the primary determinant of performance, as evidenced by the measured FPS data. The GPU’s 58th percentile ranking among all GPUs and its average benchmark score of 16074 place it just above the midpoint of the performance spectrum. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro 5700, scores 16351, a 1.7% advantage for the AMD card, while the Radeon Pro W5500 trails by 1.8% with a score of 15786. This tight clustering shows that the RTX 2060 is competitive with its direct peers, but it cannot compete with higher-tier cards that would push the combo rank higher. The GPU’s 6 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming in Road 96, but the 4K results—where High settings only achieve 30.5 FPS—indicate that memory bandwidth and capacity become limiting factors at that resolution. The RTX 2060’s DirectX 12 Ultimate support and Vulkan 1.4 compatibility ensure it can handle modern rendering techniques, but the hardware’s age is apparent in the scaling curves, which show a steep drop-off as resolution and settings increase. The GPU’s end-of-life production status and 2019 release date further contextualize its position as a mid-range card that remains viable for 1080p gaming but struggles with more demanding scenarios.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-12400
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-12400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 in Road 96
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 54.6 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 37.8 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 30.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 25.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 97.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 70.6 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 59.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 43.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 156.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 114.8 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 92.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 70.7 |
Road 96 with ii5-12400 + Other GPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Road 96 with RTX 2060 + Other CPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-12400 + RTX 2060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.