Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

AVERAGE FPS
147
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 147 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 51 69 93 112
1440p QHD 95 122 161 196
1080p Full HD 143 186 242 297

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 112
3840x2160 Medium 93
3840x2160 High 69
3840x2160 Ultra 51
2560x1440 Low 196
2560x1440 Medium 161
2560x1440 High 122
2560x1440 Ultra 95
1920x1080 Low 297
1920x1080 Medium 242
1920x1080 High 186
1920x1080 Ultra 143

Counter-Strike 2 with Intel Core i5-12400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060, In-Depth Analysis

Counter-Strike 2 is a competitive FPS that demands high and consistent frame rates, and the data for the Intel Core i5-12400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 combo shows a system capable of delivering them, though the balance shifts depending on resolution and settings. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Alder Lake-S part with a 2.50 GHz base clock and a 4.40 GHz boost clock, paired with an RTX 2060 based on the Turing architecture. The benchmark results reveal a system that is heavily CPU-bound at lower resolutions, where frame rates soar past 290 FPS, but becomes increasingly GPU-limited as the resolution and graphical load increase. The Core i5-12400's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by its 3dmark_single_thread score of 910 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2249, is critical for CS2's engine, which relies on a few fast cores. This CPU strength is what allows the system to hit 297.2 FPS at 1080p Low, a figure that drops significantly at higher resolutions, indicating the RTX 2060's 6 GB GDDR6 memory and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth become the limiting factor.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core i5-12400 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on Intel's 10 nm process, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. It shares an 18 MB L3 cache across all cores, and its dual-channel memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives it flexibility. In Counter-Strike 2, the CPU's role is most apparent at 1080p, where the measured frame rates are exceptionally high. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 297.2 FPS, and at 1080p Medium it still hits 241.6 FPS. These numbers, which far exceed the refresh rates of most monitors, suggest that the i5-12400 is not the bottleneck at this resolution. The CPU's single-thread capabilities, highlighted by its Passmark single-thread score of 3456 and 3dmark_2_threads score of 1692, are well-suited to CS2's typically low-thread-count engine demands.

However, the CPU's influence wanes as resolution climbs. The data shows that moving from 1080p to 1440p High drops the average FPS from 185.6 to 121.6, a 34% reduction. This is not a CPU limitation; rather, it signals that the RTX 2060 is starting to struggle with the increased pixel workload. The i5-12400's performance relative to its peers is also revealing. In the database, it sits at the 77th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19850. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-9700, which scores 19831 (a 0.1% delta), and the Intel Core i7-8700 at 19894 (-0.2% delta). This places the i5-12400 in a performance tier just above older i7 parts, confirming that its 6-core/12-thread configuration and high clocks provide ample headroom for CS2. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15935 further shows that even under heavier all-core loads, it has enough throughput to avoid dragging down frame rates in a game that is not heavily multi-threaded.

FAQ

Q: What is the maximum average frame rate achievable with this CPU and GPU combo in Counter-Strike 2?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 297.2, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This indicates the CPU can push extremely high frame rates when the GPU load is minimal.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-12400 compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core i7-9700?

A: The i5-12400 has an average benchmark score of 19850, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i7-9700's score of 19831. This makes them statistically equal in overall CPU performance, though the i5-12400 is a newer architecture.

Q: Is the RTX 2060 a bottleneck at 4K resolution in this game?

A: Yes, the data suggests the GPU is the limiting factor at 3840x2160. The average FPS at 4K High is 68.5, and at 4K Ultra it falls to 51.3. These figures are significantly lower than the 1080p results, indicating the RTX 2060's compute and memory bandwidth are strained.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the average FPS drops from 196.4 on Low to 94.6 on Ultra. This is a 52% reduction in frame rate, showing the substantial cost of high graphical fidelity at this resolution.

Q: How does the combo's CPU rank against all other CPUs in the database?

A: The Intel Core i5-12400 is in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it outperforms 77% of processors in the benchmark database. This is a strong position for a mainstream desktop part.

Q: Does the RTX 2060's benchmark performance place it above or below the median GPU?

A: The RTX 2060 is in the 58th percentile of all GPUs, meaning it performs better than 58% of graphics cards in the database. Its average benchmark score is 16074.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides a clear hierarchy of settings for this combo. For competitive play at 1080p, the Low preset delivers the highest average frame rate at 297.2 FPS, which is ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. However, the Medium preset at 241.6 FPS still offers excellent responsiveness while likely improving visual clarity. The data suggests that at 1080p, the CPU is so strong that the user can sacrifice some frames for better visuals without dropping below the 144 Hz threshold. The High preset at 185.6 FPS is also viable for 144 Hz displays, but the Ultra preset at 143.3 FPS dips below 144 FPS, making it less ideal for the most competitive scenarios.

At 1440p, the recommendation shifts. The Low preset at 196.4 FPS remains the top choice for maximum frame rates, but the Medium preset at 161.1 FPS is a strong balance, still comfortably above 144 Hz. The High preset at 121.6 FPS is playable but may not fully utilize a 144 Hz monitor, and the Ultra preset at 94.6 FPS is best reserved for less competitive, more visually demanding play. For 4K, the data indicates that the RTX 2060 is the primary constraint. The Low preset at 112 FPS is the only setting that provides a smooth experience above 100 FPS, while High at 68.5 FPS and Ultra at 51.3 FPS are not suitable for fast-paced competitive play. The best experience across all resolutions is achieved by prioritizing the Low or Medium presets, with the 1080p Medium setting offering an optimal compromise between frame rate and image quality for most users.

How This Combo Ranks

In the context of all tested hardware combinations for Counter-Strike 2, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i5-12400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 ranks 1289 out of 1632 combos. This places it in the lower-middle tier of all systems tested, which might seem counterintuitive given the high frame rates measured. However, this rank is relative to the entire database, which includes far more powerful and expensive combinations. The rank of 1289 out of 1632 means that 343 other combos perform better in this game. This is primarily due to the RTX 2060, which, while competent, is not a high-end GPU. The CPU is a strong performer, ranking in the 77th percentile, but the GPU's 58th percentile standing drags the overall combo down. This is a classic case of a system where the CPU has more headroom than the GPU, particularly at higher resolutions.

The data shows that this combo is capable of excellent 1080p performance, where the CPU can stretch its legs, but it falls behind more balanced or GPU-heavy systems at 1440p and 4K. The delta between this combo and others is not shown directly, but the CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-9700, has a nearly identical average score, suggesting that pairing that CPU with a stronger GPU would yield a better overall rank. The RTX 2060's nearest rivals, such as the AMD Radeon RX 7600S (0.5% delta) and AMD Radeon Pro 5600M (-1.7% delta), are also mid-range parts, confirming that this combo's rank is a reflection of its balanced but not top-tier component selection. For a user with a 1080p monitor, this rank is misleading, as the experience is excellent. For 4K gaming, the rank is more representative of the system's limitations.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K provides a clear picture of where the bottleneck lies. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 185.6 at 1920x1080 to 121.6 at 2560x1440, a 34.5% decrease. Moving further to 3840x2160, the average FPS falls to 68.5, which is a 63.1% reduction from the 1080p baseline. This pattern is consistent with a GPU that is becoming increasingly saturated as pixel count grows. The RTX 2060 has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 192-bit memory bus, which provides 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. At 4K, the sheer number of pixels and the memory pressure from textures and effects are too much for this GPU to maintain high frame rates in CS2.

The scaling is even more dramatic on the Low preset. At 1080p Low, the system hits 297.2 FPS, but at 1440p Low it drops to 196.4 FPS (a 33.9% decrease), and at 4K Low it falls to 112 FPS (a 62.3% decrease from 1080p). This shows that even at the lowest graphical settings, the GPU's raw throughput and memory bandwidth are the limiting factors at higher resolutions. The CPU's performance is essentially constant across these resolutions, as its workload is tied to game logic and draw calls, not pixel count. Therefore, the data strongly indicates that the RTX 2060 is the component that determines the system's ceiling at 1440p and 4K, while the Intel Core i5-12400 provides ample headroom. The 1080p results, where the CPU can push frame rates beyond 290 FPS, demonstrate that the CPU is not a constraint in this game; the GPU's 12 nm Turing chip simply cannot keep pace as the resolution scales up.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i5-12400

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 2500 MHz
Boost Clock 4400 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

VRAM 6 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1680 MHz MHz
TDP 160 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i5-12400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 in Counter-Strike 2

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 112.0
3840x2160 Medium 92.9
3840x2160 High 68.5
3840x2160 Ultra 51.3
2560x1440 Low 196.4
2560x1440 Medium 161.1
2560x1440 High 121.6
2560x1440 Ultra 94.6
1920x1080 Low 297.2
1920x1080 Medium 241.6
1920x1080 High 185.6
1920x1080 Ultra 143.3

Counter-Strike 2 with ii5-12400 + Other GPUs

See how Counter-Strike 2 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Counter-Strike 2 with RTX 2060 + Other CPUs

See how Counter-Strike 2 performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii5-12400 + RTX 2060

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.