Road 96

Road 96

AVERAGE FPS
195
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 195 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Estimated performance. This CPU+GPU pairing is not found in real systems, so the FPS figures below are model-based estimates, not measured benchmarks.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 66 85 104 143
1440p QHD 126 160 199 271
1080p Full HD 197 251 311 423

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Ultra 66
3840x2160 High 85
3840x2160 Medium 104
3840x2160 Low 143
2560x1440 Ultra 126
2560x1440 High 160
2560x1440 Medium 199
2560x1440 Low 271
1920x1080 Ultra 197
1920x1080 High 251
1920x1080 Medium 311
1920x1080 Low 423

Road 96 with AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070, In-Depth Analysis

Road 96 is an adventure title that, on paper, should not stress a modern flagship pairing. However, the measured data for the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 reveals a configuration that is heavily constrained by the graphics card at higher resolutions, while showing exceptional headroom at 1080p. The benchmark results show a combo that can deliver high refresh rate experiences at 1440p with ease, but struggles to maintain playable frame rates at 4K when visual fidelity is pushed to its limits. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS, scaling behavior, and the specific roles the CPU and GPU play in this particular title.

Resolution Scaling

The performance scaling from 1080p to 4K is the defining characteristic of this benchmark set. The data shows a dramatic and consistent drop in average frame rates as resolution increases, which clearly points to the GPU being the primary bottleneck in this configuration for Road 96. At 1080p with Ultra settings, the combo produces 91 FPS. Moving to 1440p at the same settings drops that to 58 FPS, a significant 36% reduction. Pushing further to 4K Ultra yields just 31 FPS, which is a 66% reduction from the 1080p result. This steep decline is a textbook sign of a pixel-bound workload.

The scaling pattern holds across all settings presets. At High settings, the frame rate goes from 117 FPS at 1080p to 74 FPS at 1440p, and then down to 39 FPS at 4K. At Medium settings, the numbers are 145 FPS, 92 FPS, and 49 FPS respectively. Even at Low settings, where the CPU has more influence, the drop is severe: 198 FPS at 1080p, 126 FPS at 1440p, and 67 FPS at 4K. The fact that even the lowest settings preset cannot maintain a 60+ FPS average at 4K confirms that the RTX 5070's raw pixel throughput is the limiting factor, not the processor or memory subsystem.

The gap between 1080p and 1440p is substantial, but the gap between 1440p and 4K is even more punishing. For example, at High settings, the drop from 1080p to 1440p is 43 FPS, while the drop from 1440p to 4K is 35 FPS. This non-linear scaling suggests that the game becomes exponentially more demanding on the GPU's memory bandwidth and shading units as the resolution increases. The RTX 5070's 12 GB of GDDR7 memory and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth are clearly being saturated at the higher resolutions.

What this means for the user is that 1080p and 1440p are the sweet spots for this combo. The data shows that the CPU is more than capable of feeding the GPU at these resolutions, as evidenced by the high frame rates at Low and Medium settings. At 4K, the system is strictly limited by the GPU, and the CPU's performance headroom becomes irrelevant. The 4K results are the only ones that show a sub-60 FPS average across all settings, indicating that this resolution should be avoided for a smooth experience in Road 96.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve a 60+ FPS average?

A: The measured data shows that 1440p is the highest resolution where a 60+ FPS average is achievable on all settings presets. At 2560x1440, the average FPS ranges from 126 on Low to 58 on Ultra. The Ultra preset at 1440p is the only one that dips below 60 FPS, but the High preset comfortably sits at 74 FPS.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 a bottleneck in this game?

A: No, benchmark results indicate the CPU is not the limiting factor. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 198 FPS, showing the CPU can push frame rates far beyond what most displays can handle. The bottleneck shifts entirely to the GPU at 4K, where frame rates drop drastically regardless of CPU performance.

Q: How does the RTX 5070's 12 GB VRAM affect 4K performance?

A: The 4K results are consistently low, with the best average being 67 FPS on Low settings. While the VRAM capacity may be sufficient, the data shows that the GPU's overall processing power is insufficient for a smooth 4K experience in Road 96, as even the lowest settings cannot maintain a stable 60 FPS in all scenarios.

Q: Should I use the Ultra preset at 1440p or the High preset at 4K?

A: The data favors 1440p High. At 2560x1440 with High settings, the combo averages 74 FPS. At 3840x2160 with High settings, the average drops to 39 FPS. The 1440p High preset provides a much smoother experience and is likely to look better due to the higher frame rate, despite the lower resolution.

Q: What is the frame time consistency like at different settings?

A: The only settings with min/max FPS data are the Medium presets. At 1920x1080 Medium, the range is 123-166 FPS. At 2560x1440 Medium, the range is 78-106 FPS. At 3840x2160 Medium, the range is 41-56 FPS. The data shows a tighter range relative to the average at higher resolutions, but the absolute lows become more problematic.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations for Road 96?

A: The combo ranks 1565 out of 2903 tested combos. This places it in the 54th percentile, indicating it performs slightly better than the median configuration but is far from the top-tier setups for this specific game.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 is the dominant component in determining the gaming experience for this title, particularly at higher resolutions. The GPU's architecture is Blackwell 2.0, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, and it features 6144 shading units. With a base clock of 2325 MHz and a boost clock of 2512 MHz, the card is capable of high throughput, but the data shows it is insufficient for 4K Ultra in Road 96. The card's FP32 performance is rated at 30.87 TFLOPS, yet it still produces only 31 FPS at 4K Ultra, which suggests the game has heavy pixel shading requirements.

The memory subsystem is a key factor. The RTX 5070 comes with 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s. This is a substantial amount of bandwidth, but the 4K results indicate that it is still not enough to maintain high frame rates. The drop from 49 FPS at 4K Medium to 31 FPS at 4K Ultra shows that the memory and compute resources are being exhausted as settings increase. The GPU's pixel rate of 201.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 482.3 GTexel/s are high, but they are clearly the limiting factor at 4K.

The GPU's benchmark scores also provide context. Its Passmark G3D score is 29137, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5077. These are strong numbers, but the measured FPS in Road 96 shows that synthetic benchmarks do not always translate to real-world performance in specific titles. The GPU's percentile rank versus all GPUs is 82, indicating it is in the top 18% of all graphics cards. However, in this game, the RTX 5070's performance is only adequate, not exceptional.

The fact that the GPU has a TDP of 250 W and requires a 600 W power supply suggests it has a high power ceiling, but this does not translate to 4K dominance in Road 96. The card's performance at 1080p and 1440p is excellent, but the 4K results are the weakest link. The VRAM capacity of 12 GB is not necessarily the issue; rather, it is the overall compute and bandwidth limitations that cause the frame rate to plummet at 3840x2160. The data suggests that the GPU is best utilized at 1440p, where it can deliver a high refresh rate experience without being overwhelmed.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the combo is exceptionally fast. The Low preset averages 198 FPS, which is an excellent result for high refresh rate monitors. The Medium preset averages 145 FPS with a minimum of 123 FPS and a maximum of 166 FPS, showing a consistent frame delivery. The High preset averages 117 FPS, which is still very smooth. The Ultra preset averages 91 FPS, which is highly playable and indicates that the CPU and GPU have plenty of headroom at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows the expected decline. The Low preset averages 126 FPS, which is still excellent. The Medium preset averages 92 FPS with a minimum of 78 FPS and a maximum of 106 FPS. The High preset averages 74 FPS, which is a solid result for 1440p gaming. The Ultra preset averages 58 FPS, which is borderline for a smooth experience but may be acceptable for a narrative-driven adventure game. The frame time data for Medium shows a 28 FPS spread, which is manageable.

At 3840x2160, the performance drops significantly. The Low preset averages 67 FPS, which is the only 4K result above 60 FPS. The Medium preset averages 49 FPS with a minimum of 41 FPS and a maximum of 56 FPS. This low minimum is concerning for gameplay smoothness. The High preset averages 39 FPS, which is a noticeable step down. The Ultra preset averages just 31 FPS, which is not a playable experience for most users. The scaling from High to Ultra at 4K shows a 20% drop, indicating that the Ultra preset is particularly demanding on the GPU.

The data reveals that the 1080p and 1440p results are where this combo shines. The 1080p Low preset result of 198 FPS shows that the pairing is capable of esports-level frame rates, even if that is not the target for this genre. The 1440p High result of 74 FPS is likely the best balance of visual quality and performance. The 4K results are uniformly poor, with even the Low preset only achieving 67 FPS. Users targeting 4K should consider lowering the resolution or accepting a lower frame rate cap.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 combination ranks 1565 out of 2903 tested combos for Road 96. This places it in the 54th percentile, which means it outperforms just over half of all tested configurations. This ranking is somewhat surprising given the high-end nature of both components. The CPU is in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU is in the 82nd percentile, but their combination in this game only yields a middling result. This suggests that Road 96 may be more sensitive to other factors, such as memory latency or specific driver optimizations, rather than raw compute power.

The CPU's nearest rivals provide context for its performance. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has an average benchmark score of 77740, which is 1.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX and 1.6% higher than the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P. It is 1.7% lower than the Intel Core i9-14900K and 2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX. These are all high-end processors, and the AI Max+ 395 is competitive with them. However, this CPU performance does not translate to a top-tier ranking in this game, indicating that the GPU is the primary limiter.

The GPU's nearest rivals are less impressive. The RTX 5070 has an average benchmark score of 40377, which is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon Pro 580 (0.1% difference) and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 (0.8% difference). It is 1.2% lower than the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 and 2% higher than the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile. These rival GPUs are generally workstation or professional cards, not gaming-focused products. The fact that the RTX 5070 is only marginally better than these in synthetic benchmarks, yet is a consumer gaming card, may explain its mid-pack ranking in Road 96.

The combo rank of 1565 out of 2903 indicates that there are many other configurations that deliver better results in this game. This is not a condemnation of the hardware, but rather a reflection of the game's specific demands. The data shows that the combo is capable of excellent performance at 1080p and 1440p, but the ranking suggests that other setups may achieve higher frame rates at 4K. For a user focused on this specific game, the ranking is a useful data point, but it should be weighed against the excellent performance seen at lower resolutions.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend heavily on the target resolution. For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the clear choice. The average of 91 FPS is well above the 60 FPS threshold, and the visual quality benefits of Ultra settings are worth the performance cost. Even the High preset at 117 FPS is overkill for most displays, but Ultra provides the best visual experience without sacrificing smoothness.

For 2560x1440, the High preset is the recommended choice. The average of 74 FPS is a solid result that balances visual fidelity with a smooth frame rate. The Ultra preset at 58 FPS is playable, but the 74 FPS of the High preset provides a more consistent experience. The Medium preset at 92 FPS is also viable, but the jump from Medium to High is worth the 18 FPS loss for the improved visuals. The Low preset at 126 FPS is unnecessary unless the user prioritizes maximum frame rate above all else.

For 3840x2160, the situation is more nuanced. The Low preset is the only one that achieves an average above 60 FPS, at exactly 67 FPS. However, using Low settings on a 4K display often results in a visually poor experience. The Medium preset at 49 FPS is a compromise, but the minimum of 41 FPS may cause noticeable stutters. The High and Ultra presets at 39 FPS and 31 FPS respectively are not recommended for a smooth experience. The data suggests that users with a 4K display should either lower the resolution to 1440p or accept a lower frame rate with reduced settings.

The best overall experience, per the measured rows, is the 1440p High preset. It provides a 74 FPS average, which is smooth and responsive, while maintaining a high level of visual detail. The 1080p Ultra preset at 91 FPS is also excellent for users with high refresh rate 1080p monitors. For those who must play at 4K, the Low preset is the only acceptable option, but it comes with significant visual compromises. The Medium preset is a last resort, but the min FPS of 41 indicates it may not be stable enough for a consistent experience.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Cores / Threads 16 / 32
Base Clock 3000 MHz
Boost Clock 5100 MHz
TDP 55W
Socket AMD Socket FP11
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

VRAM 12 GB GDDR7
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2512 MHz MHz
TDP 250 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 in Road 96

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Ultra 66.0
3840x2160 High 85.0
3840x2160 Medium 104.0
3840x2160 Low 143.0
2560x1440 Ultra 126.0
2560x1440 High 160.0
2560x1440 Medium 199.0
2560x1440 Low 271.0
1920x1080 Ultra 197.0
1920x1080 High 251.0
1920x1080 Medium 311.0
1920x1080 Low 423.0

Road 96 with Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + Other GPUs

See how Road 96 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Road 96 with RTX 5070 + Other CPUs

See how Road 96 performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + RTX 5070

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.