Road 96
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 66 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 23 | 29 | 36 | 49 |
| 1440p QHD | 43 | 54 | 67 | 92 |
| 1080p Full HD | 67 | 85 | 106 | 145 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Road 96 with AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + Intel Arc B570, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and Intel Arc B570 pairing in Road 96 produces a performance profile that is heavily dictated by resolution and graphics settings, with the B570's 10 GB VRAM and 160-bit memory bus becoming a clear limiting factor at higher resolutions. The data shows a combo ranking of 2324 out of 2903 tested configurations, placing it in the lower third of all tested hardware pairings for this title.
FAQ
Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p with Medium settings?
A: The measured average frame rate is 106 FPS, with a minimum of 90 FPS and a maximum of 122 FPS, indicating a smooth experience at this configuration.
Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 4K at Ultra settings?
A: The average FPS drops from 67 at 1920x1080 Ultra to 23 at 3840x2160 Ultra, representing a 65.7% reduction in frame rate.
Q: Does the Intel Arc B570 perform better than the Intel Arc A750 in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556, while the Arc A750 scores 20582, meaning the B570 is actually 0.1% slower on average in synthetic tests.
Q: What is the best playable setting at 1440p based on the measured data?
A: At 2560x1440, the Medium preset delivers 67 FPS average, which is the highest frame rate above the 60 FPS threshold among the four tested settings at this resolution.
Q: How does the Ryzen 9 9900X3D compare to the Intel Core i7-14700F in average benchmark scores?
A: The Ryzen 9 9900X3D has an average score of 54762, while the Core i7-14700F scores 53620, giving the AMD chip a 2.1% advantage.
Q: Is the 4K High preset playable with this combo?
A: At 3840x2160 with High settings, the average FPS is 29, which falls below the generally accepted 30 FPS minimum for playable frame rates in most titles.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B570's specifications directly explain the observed performance ceiling in Road 96. The GPU features 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. With 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, the card is positioned as a mid-range Battlemage part. The pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s provide a theoretical foundation, but the measured FPS data suggests these capabilities are not fully realized at higher resolutions.
The B570's 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20556, places it in a competitive but not elite tier. Its nearest rival, the Intel Arc A750, scores 20582, a 0.1% difference that underscores how closely matched these two Intel cards are in raw synthetic performance. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile also sits nearly identical at 20534, meaning the B570 is effectively trading blows with last-generation laptop GPUs in compute workloads.
In Road 96, the GPU's 10 GB VRAM capacity is likely sufficient for the game's art style, but the bandwidth constraints become apparent when moving from 1080p to 1440p. The 380.0 GB/s figure is modest by modern standards, and the data reflects this: at 1080p High, the card manages 85 FPS, but at 1440p High, that number falls to 54 FPS. The 36.5% drop is more severe than what would be expected if the GPU were purely compute-bound, suggesting memory bandwidth is a contributing factor.
The B570's boost clock of 2500 MHz is modest, and the card's FP32 throughput of 11.52 TFLOPS is decent for its class. However, the 160-bit bus width is the standout limitation. When combined with the 10 GB frame buffer, this configuration is clearly optimized for 1080p gaming rather than high-resolution rendering. The card's DirectX 12 Ultimate support and Vulkan 1.4 compatibility show modern API readiness, but the hardware fundamentals dictate its performance envelope.
Resolution Scaling
The measured data reveals a predictable but steep performance degradation as resolution increases. Starting at 1920x1080 Low with 145 FPS average, the frame rate drops to 92 FPS at 2560x1440 Low, then to 49 FPS at 3840x2160 Low. This represents a 36.6% drop from 1080p to 1440p, and a 46.7% drop from 1440p to 4K. The scaling pattern is consistent across all settings, but the severity varies.
At High settings, the scaling is more dramatic. The 1080p average of 85 FPS falls to 54 FPS at 1440p (36.5% drop) and then to 29 FPS at 4K (46.3% drop). This suggests that as resolution increases, the GPU becomes increasingly the bottleneck. The CPU, with its 12 cores and 24 threads, is likely not the limiting factor here, as Road 96 is not a particularly CPU-intensive title.
The Medium settings row provides the only complete min/max data across all resolutions. At 1080p, the range is 90-122 FPS with a 106 FPS average. At 1440p, this narrows to 57-78 FPS with a 67 FPS average. At 4K, the range compresses further to 30-41 FPS with a 36 FPS average. The tightening of the min-max spread at higher resolutions indicates that the GPU is hitting consistent performance limits rather than experiencing occasional spikes, reinforcing the theory that memory bandwidth and ROP throughput are saturated.
The Ultra preset shows the most dramatic scaling collapse. From 67 FPS at 1080p to 43 FPS at 1440p (35.8% drop) to 23 FPS at 4K (46.5% drop). This 4K Ultra result is the lowest measured in the entire dataset, and it falls well below playable thresholds. The data clearly shows that this combo is a 1080p performer first and foremost, with 1440p being a stretch for medium-to-high settings and 4K being reserved for Low settings only.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the lowest resolution tested, the combo performs admirably. The Low preset delivers 145 FPS average, which is exceptionally smooth. Medium settings still provide a highly playable 106 FPS average with a tight 90-122 FPS range. High settings drop to 85 FPS average, still comfortably above 60 FPS. Ultra settings bring the frame rate down to 67 FPS average, which remains playable but shows the first signs of strain.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance picture changes markedly. Low settings produce 92 FPS average, which is still strong but represents a 36.6% reduction from 1080p. Medium settings yield 67 FPS average with a 57-78 FPS range, making this the most viable 1440p option for smooth gameplay. High settings fall to 54 FPS average, which is borderline for many players. Ultra settings struggle at 43 FPS average, clearly not ideal for competitive or fast-paced play.
At 3840x2160, the limitations become severe. Low settings manage 49 FPS average, which is the only 4K preset that approaches playability. Medium settings drop to 36 FPS average with a 30-41 FPS range, which is technically playable but not smooth. High settings fall to 29 FPS average, below the 30 FPS threshold commonly cited as minimum for playable frame rates. Ultra settings bottom out at 23 FPS average, making this configuration unsuitable for 4K gaming at any settings above Low.
The pattern across all resolutions shows a consistent hierarchy: Low > Medium > High > Ultra in terms of average FPS. The differences between presets are substantial, with Low settings typically delivering 50-70% more performance than Ultra settings at the same resolution. This indicates that the game's graphics settings have a significant impact on GPU load, and players seeking higher resolutions must be willing to sacrifice visual quality.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D is a formidable processor with 12 cores and 24 threads, based on the Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm process. Its base clock of 4.40 GHz and boost clock of 5.50 GHz provide strong single-threaded performance, evidenced by a 3dmark single thread score of 1269 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6739. The 128 MB of L3 cache is particularly noteworthy for gaming, as it reduces memory latency for frequently accessed data.
In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU achieves an average score of 54762, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF, scores 55093, only 0.6% higher. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K is 1.3% slower, and the Intel Xeon 6505P is 2% slower. This positioning shows the 9900X3D is competitive with but not dominant over the latest Intel desktop offerings.
For Road 96, a game with a release date of 2021-08-15, the CPU is likely overkill. The game's genre, Adventure, typically does not require high core counts. The 3dmark 16-thread score of 12490 and max-thread score of 13795 indicate robust multi-threaded capability, but the game likely uses only a fraction of these resources. The CPU's 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, while not exceptional, is sufficient for the game's needs.
The data suggests the CPU is not the bottleneck at any resolution. The consistent frame rate drops as resolution increases point squarely at the GPU as the limiting component. Even at 1080p Low with 145 FPS, the CPU could likely push higher if the GPU allowed, but the B570's 160-bit memory bus and 10 GB VRAM cap performance. The CPU's high single-thread performance, with a PassMark single-thread score of 4646, ensures minimal frame pacing issues, but the GPU simply cannot keep pace at higher resolutions.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured data, the optimal experience for this combo depends heavily on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance, delivering 106 FPS average with a narrow 90-122 FPS range. This provides headroom for dips without dropping below 90 FPS, ensuring a consistently smooth experience. High settings at 85 FPS average are also viable, but Medium offers a more comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold.
At 2560x1440, the Medium preset is the clear recommendation. The 67 FPS average is just above the 60 FPS target, and the 57-78 FPS range suggests occasional dips below 60 FPS but no catastrophic drops. High settings at 54 FPS average are playable but risky for players sensitive to frame rate fluctuations. Low settings at 92 FPS average sacrifice too much visual quality for a resolution that should be able to handle Medium.
For 3840x2160, the only viable option is Low settings, which delivers 49 FPS average. Medium at 36 FPS average is technically playable but will feel sluggish, and High at 29 FPS falls below acceptable thresholds. Ultra at 23 FPS is simply not recommended for any gameplay scenario. Players with 4K displays should strongly consider running the game at 1440p with Medium settings and relying on upscaling, as the visual fidelity loss from lowering resolution is likely less noticeable than the frame rate penalty at 4K.
The Ultra preset is only recommended at 1080p, where it achieves 67 FPS average. This is playable but offers no meaningful advantage over High settings, which provides 85 FPS average. The 18 FPS difference between High and Ultra at 1080p suggests diminishing returns from the highest preset, making High the better choice for most players.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo of AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and Intel Arc B570 ranks 2324 out of 2903 tested combinations in Road 96, placing it in the 20th percentile of all tested systems. This low ranking is surprising given the CPU's strength, but it directly reflects the GPU's limitations at higher resolutions. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs is undermined by the GPU's 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs.
The ranking suggests that while the CPU is capable of driving high frame rates, the B570's memory bandwidth and VRAM constraints prevent the combo from achieving competitive performance in this title. The data indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck, as evidenced by the steep FPS drops from 1080p to 4K across all settings. A stronger GPU would likely push this combo much higher in the rankings, given the CPU's headroom.
The disparity between the CPU's synthetic performance (54762 average, 91st percentile) and the combo's in-game ranking (2324 of 2903) highlights a common issue with pairing high-end CPUs with mid-range GPUs. The CPU is never the limiting factor in Road 96, but the GPU's 10 GB VRAM and 160-bit bus create a hard ceiling on performance. This ranking should be interpreted as a GPU-limited result rather than a reflection of the CPU's capabilities.
For players considering this combo, the data suggests it is best suited for 1080p gaming, where the B570 can deliver smooth frame rates across most settings. At 1440p, Medium settings provide a playable experience, but the combo cannot compete with systems featuring more powerful GPUs. The 2903 total tested combos include many with weaker CPUs but stronger GPUs, which naturally outperform this pairing in GPU-bound scenarios like Road 96.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Intel Arc B570
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + Intel Arc B570 in Road 96
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 49.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 36.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 29.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 23.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 92.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 67.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 54.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 43.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 145.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 106.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 85.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 67.0 |
Road 96 with Ryzen 9 9900X3D + Other GPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Road 96 with Arc B570 + Other CPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 9 9900X3D + Arc B570
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.