Road 96

Road 96

AVERAGE FPS
123
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 123 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 44 54 65 92
1440p QHD 80 98 126 170
1080p Full HD 126 156 195 266

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 92
3840x2160 Medium 65
3840x2160 High 54
3840x2160 Ultra 44
2560x1440 Low 170
2560x1440 Medium 126
2560x1440 High 98
2560x1440 Ultra 80
1920x1080 Low 266
1920x1080 Medium 195
1920x1080 High 156
1920x1080 Ultra 126

Road 96 with AMD Ryzen 5 9600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 combination places 512th out of 1,684 tested combos in Road 96, positioning it in the 70th percentile of all systems. This is a solid mid-to-upper tier standing, but the data reveals that this pairing is not optimized for this specific adventure title. The ranking suggests that while the hardware is capable, it does not dominate the game's performance landscape, with many other CPU-GPU pairings achieving higher frame rates. The combo's position is more reflective of balanced, high-end performance than of an absolute top-tier specialist, indicating that the game's engine may not fully exploit the strengths of either component.

How This Combo Ranks

The 512th rank out of 1,684 combos places this system firmly in the upper-middle tier of tested configurations. This is a notable position, as it means the pair outperforms roughly 70% of all other hardware combinations tested for this game. However, it also implies that a significant number of other systems, likely with more recent or more powerful components, deliver higher average frame rates. The ranking data suggests that this is not a pairing that will set records, but it is far from a weak performer. The score indicates a system that can handle the game with high frame rates at most settings, but the presence of 511 better-performing combos highlights that there is room for improvement, particularly in scenarios where the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is the dominant component in this pairing for Road 96, evidenced by the clear scaling of frame rates with resolution. Its memory configuration of 10 GB of GDDR6X on a 320-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s, which is ample for the game's textures and geometry at 1440p and 4K. The GPU's boost clock of 1710 MHz, built on the Ampere architecture with 8,704 shading units, is the primary driver of the measured FPS. The data shows that the GPU's performance is the main factor in the frame rate differences between settings. For instance, at 4K, the gap between Low and Ultra settings is a substantial 47.9 FPS, from 91.9 down to 44. This wide variance is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario where the load on the graphics card scales significantly with visual fidelity. The RTX 3080's 80th percentile ranking among all GPUs reinforces its capability, but the game's performance is clearly tethered to its ability to process the increasing pixel count and graphical effects.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a predictable and steep decline as resolution increases, confirming that the RTX 3080 is the limiting component at higher resolutions. At 1080p with High settings, the system produces 156.3 FPS, which drops to 98.2 FPS at 1440p and further to 54.1 FPS at 4K. This represents a 37% decrease from 1080p to 1440p and a 65% decrease from 1080p to 4K. This scaling is typical for a game that is heavily dependent on the GPU, as the number of pixels being rendered quadruples from 1080p to 4K. The CPU, with its 6 cores and 12 threads based on Zen 5 architecture, is evidently sufficient to feed the GPU at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 266 FPS, a frame rate so high that it is likely near the CPU's limit, but the data indicates that the GPU is still the primary bottleneck. The frame rate scaling suggests that for a smoother experience at 4K, reducing settings is more effective than expecting a CPU-side improvement.

Settings Recommendations

The optimal settings for this combo depend heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. At 4K, the data shows that High settings provide an average of 54.1 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced action. Dropping to Medium settings yields a more comfortable 64.7 FPS, a 19.6% improvement, while Low settings push the frame rate to 91.9 FPS, a 70% increase over High. For a 60 FPS target at 4K, Medium settings are the sweet spot, offering a significant frame rate boost over High without the visual degradation of Low. At 1440p, High settings deliver 98.2 FPS, which is already excellent for most displays. Pushing to Ultra drops this to 79.6 FPS, still smooth, but Medium at 126 FPS is the best choice for high refresh rate monitors. At 1080p, all settings are playable, with Ultra still producing 125.9 FPS, but the data suggests that High at 156.3 FPS is the best balance, as the visual difference between High and Ultra is often less impactful than the 24% frame rate drop.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across all combinations of resolution and settings.

At 1920x1080, the system is exceptionally fast. Low settings produce an average of 266 FPS, while Medium and High settings deliver 194.9 FPS and 156.3 FPS, respectively. Even Ultra settings maintain a high 125.9 FPS. This resolution is clearly not a challenge for the RTX 3080, and the frame rates are likely limited by the CPU's single-thread performance in some instances.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong. Low settings yield 170.2 FPS, Medium settings 126 FPS, and High settings 98.2 FPS. Ultra settings drop to 79.6 FPS. The step from High to Ultra is a 19% performance hit, which is a noticeable trade-off for incremental visual gains.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is fully exercised. Low settings average 91.9 FPS, Medium settings 64.7 FPS, High settings 54.1 FPS, and Ultra settings 44 FPS. The transition from Medium to High is a 16.4% drop, and from High to Ultra is an 18.7% drop. This data strongly suggests that for a consistent 60 FPS experience at 4K, users should stick to Medium or lower settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to maintain over 100 FPS?

A: At both 1080p and 1440p, High settings deliver over 100 FPS, with 156.3 FPS and 98.2 FPS respectively. For a guaranteed 100+ FPS, 1080p with High or Medium settings is the safest choice.

Q: How much of a performance gain is there from dropping from Ultra to High at 1440p?

A: The data shows a 23.4% increase in average frame rate, from 79.6 FPS at Ultra to 98.2 FPS at High.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 4K with this game?

A: The benchmark results indicate the GPU is the primary bottleneck at 4K. The frame rate drops significantly as resolution increases, while the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance (25,525 in Cinebench R23) suggests it is not holding the system back.

Q: Can this system achieve 60 FPS at 4K?

A: Yes, but only with adjusted settings. The measured data shows that Medium settings at 4K produce an average of 64.7 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. High settings fall short at 54.1 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 3080's performance compare to its nearest rival in this game?

A: The RTX 3080 has an average benchmark score of 35,787, which is 0.9% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE and 1% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, indicating a very close performance envelope.

Q: What is the difference in frame rate between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: The difference is substantial. Low settings average 266 FPS, while Ultra settings average 125.9 FPS, a gap of 140.1 FPS, showing the significant impact of graphical fidelity on performance.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, plays a supporting role in this game's performance. Its Zen 5 architecture, running at a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, provides the single-thread speed necessary to keep up with the GPU's high frame output at lower resolutions. The CPU's benchmark scores are strong, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,525 and a single-core score of 3,603, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. However, the measured FPS data shows that its influence wanes at higher resolutions. At 4K, the frame rates are largely determined by the GPU, as the CPU has ample headroom to process game logic and draw calls. The CPU's 32 MB of shared L3 cache and DDR5 memory support (89.6 GB/s bandwidth) are more than adequate for the game's demands. The data suggests that the 9600X is not a bottleneck, but it also does not contribute to pushing frame rates higher; its role is to ensure the GPU is never starved of data. This is a classic example of a balanced mid-range CPU pairing with a high-end GPU, where the GPU dictates the final performance in a graphically intensive title like Road 96.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 9600X

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 3900 MHz
Boost Clock 5400 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

VRAM 10 GB GDDR6X
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1710 MHz MHz
TDP 320 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 9600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 in Road 96

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 91.9
3840x2160 Medium 64.7
3840x2160 High 54.1
3840x2160 Ultra 44.0
2560x1440 Low 170.2
2560x1440 Medium 126.0
2560x1440 High 98.2
2560x1440 Ultra 79.6
1920x1080 Low 266.0
1920x1080 Medium 194.9
1920x1080 High 156.3
1920x1080 Ultra 125.9

Road 96 with Ryzen 5 9600X + Other GPUs

See how Road 96 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Road 96 with RTX 3080 + Other CPUs

See how Road 96 performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 9600X + RTX 3080

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.