Red Dead Redemption 2

The data for Red Dead Redemption 2 with the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and Intel Arc B390 presents a clear picture of a system where the graphics processor is the decisive constraint. The measured frame rates across resolutions and settings are consistently low, indicating that the integrated graphics solution is heavily burdened by this title. This analysis walks through the benchmark results, contextualizes the components' specifications, and provides actionable settings guidance based on the measured data.

FAQ

Q: What is the best average FPS this combo achieves in Red Dead Redemption 2?

A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 51 FPS, which occurs at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This is the only configuration in the measured data that approaches playable territory.

Q: How does the GPU's benchmark score compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc B390's average benchmark score of 1482 places it just 1.3% above the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX, which scores 1463. It is also 1.5% ahead of the GeForce 800M, 2.5% ahead of the GT 625 OEM, and 2.7% ahead of the GT 710.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance relative to its closest competitor?

A: In the Cinebench R23 multi-core test, the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 scores 18760 points. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, has an average score of 40048 in the overall benchmark aggregate, which is a 0.1% difference, making them effectively performance peers.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics, and what are its clock speeds?

A: Yes, the CPU includes Radeon Graphics. The CPU's base clock is 3.80 GHz and it can boost up to 5.30 GHz. The separate Intel Arc B390 GPU has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2500 MHz.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the average frame rate drops from 51 FPS on Low settings to 23 FPS on Ultra settings. This represents a 28 FPS reduction, or roughly a 55% decrease in performance when moving to the highest preset.

Q: What does the combo's rank indicate about its performance in this game?

A: The combo ranks 2568 out of 2902 tested combinations for Red Dead Redemption 2. This places it in the lower percentile of all tested combos, confirming that its performance is well below the median.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B390 is the primary bottleneck in this configuration. Its specifications show a chip designed for low-power, integrated use cases, and the benchmark results reflect that. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1482, which places it in the 9th percentile among all GPUs. This is a very low score, and it is consistent with the measured frame rates in Red Dead Redemption 2.

The GPU's memory is designated as "System Shared," meaning it uses a portion of the system's main memory rather than dedicated VRAM. This is a crucial factor, as the shared memory architecture and system-dependent bandwidth limit the data throughput available to the GPU. The performance data shows the impact: at 3840x2160 with High settings, the game only achieves an average of 16 FPS. The GPU's 7.680 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 24 ROPs are insufficient for the rendering demands of this game at higher resolutions.

The clock speeds, with a base of 300 MHz and a boost of 2500 MHz, are typical for a mobile or integrated part. However, the effective performance is dictated by its low benchmark standing. The GPU's nearest rivals are all older, low-end dedicated parts like the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710, which it only barely outperforms in aggregate score. This context is critical: the Arc B390 is not competing with modern discrete GPUs; it is in a league with entry-level hardware from over a decade ago. In Red Dead Redemption 2, this translates to a hard ceiling on frame rates, regardless of the CPU's capabilities.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a steep decline in performance as resolution increases, which is a clear indicator of the GPU being the limiting factor. At Low settings, the average frame rate drops from 51 FPS at 1920x1080 to 38 FPS at 2560x1440, and further down to 25 FPS at 3840x2160. This is a direct scaling of the rendering load on the GPU.

The pattern is consistent across all settings. At High settings, the average FPS goes from 32 at 1080p to 24 at 1440p and then 16 at 4K. At Medium settings, it goes from 39 to 29 to 19. The frame rate drops are roughly proportional to the increase in pixel count. For instance, moving from 1080p to 4K quadruples the pixel count, and the frame rate at Low settings drops by about half. This indicates that the GPU is running out of processing power and memory bandwidth, not that the CPU is struggling to feed it data.

If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see similar frame rates across resolutions, as the CPU's workload would be the same. The data shows the opposite, confirming that the Intel Arc B390's fill rate, texture rate, and memory bandwidth are the primary constraints. The 120.0 GTexel/s texture rate and 60.00 GPixel/s pixel rate are simply not adequate for the demands of 4K rendering in this game.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo of the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and the Intel Arc B390 ranks 2568 out of 2902 tested combinations for Red Dead Redemption 2. This is a poor rank, placing the system in the bottom 12% of all tested configurations. This ranking is heavily dragged down by the GPU's performance.

The CPU's own benchmarks are respectable. The Ryzen 7 7700 has an average benchmark score of 40081, which places it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in the aggregate benchmark are the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Intel Core 5 221E, AMD Ryzen 9 270, and Intel Core i9-13905H, with performance deltas of only 0.1% to -0.6%. This shows the CPU is a strong performer in general processing tasks. However, its high standing does not translate to gaming performance when paired with such a weak GPU.

The rank of 2568 is a stark illustration of the system's overall gaming capability. While the CPU is capable of handling the game's logic and physics calculations, the GPU is unable to render the frames at a playable rate. The combination is severely unbalanced for this title, and the rank reflects the worst-case scenario of a powerful processor being held back by an integrated graphics solution. The data suggests that this combo is not suitable for a game like Red Dead Redemption 2, which demands a dedicated graphics card.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 is a high-performance desktop processor, and its specifications suggest it should be more than capable of handling the CPU-side demands of Red Dead Redemption 2. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 4 architecture. Its base clock is 3.80 GHz, and it can boost up to 5.30 GHz. These clocks are high, and the 32 MB of shared L3 cache helps with game data access.

Its benchmark results support this assessment. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 18760, and the single-core score is 1930. The Geekbench multi-core score is 15371, and the single-core score is 2525. These numbers show a robust processor that can handle both multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads effectively. The Passmark multi-thread score of 34470 and single-thread score of 4063 further confirm its strength.

However, in this specific game, the CPU's role is secondary. The measured frame rates are so low that it is unlikely the CPU is ever the bottleneck. The GPU's rendering time is so long that the CPU has plenty of time to prepare frames. The data shows no signs of CPU limitation, such as frame rate plateaus across different resolutions. The CPU's performance is effectively masked by the GPU's inability to keep up. The 65W TDP and 5 nm process node are details of its design, but the practical impact is that it provides a solid foundation that is completely wasted in this pairing for this game.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of the system's performance across all tested configurations. The following breakdown details the exact numbers.

At 1920x1080 resolution, the settings show a clear progression:

• Low: 51 FPS average
• Medium: 39 FPS average, with a minimum of 33 FPS and a maximum of 44 FPS
• High: 32 FPS average
• Ultra: 23 FPS average

At 2560x1440 resolution, the performance drops significantly:

• Low: 38 FPS average
• Medium: 29 FPS average, with a minimum of 24 FPS and a maximum of 33 FPS
• High: 24 FPS average
• Ultra: 17 FPS average

At 3840x2160 resolution, the game becomes largely unplayable:

• Low: 25 FPS average
• Medium: 19 FPS average, with a minimum of 16 FPS and a maximum of 22 FPS
• High: 16 FPS average
• Ultra: 11 FPS average

The data indicates that only the 1080p Low setting achieves an average frame rate above 50 FPS. All other configurations are below 40 FPS. The Medium setting at 1080p offers a 39 FPS average, which is the only other configuration that might be considered borderline playable for some users, but it falls short of smooth performance. The 1440p and 4K results are all below 39 FPS, with 4K Ultra being a slideshow at 11 FPS. The minimum and maximum FPS data for the Medium settings shows some variance, but the overall trend is consistent.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal configuration for this system is 1920x1080 with Low settings, which yields an average of 51 FPS. This is the only setting that provides a frame rate that can be considered playable for an action-adventure title. It is the only preset in the data that breaks the 50 FPS barrier.

If a user prefers Medium settings, they would need to accept a significant performance hit. At 1080p Medium, the average FPS drops to 39, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay but might be acceptable for a more cinematic experience. However, the data shows that this comes with a 12 FPS penalty compared to Low.

The data strongly advises against using High or Ultra settings. At 1080p High, the average FPS is 32, and at Ultra it is 23. These are not playable for a game that requires quick reactions. At higher resolutions, the situation is worse, with all settings at 1440p and 4K failing to reach 39 FPS. The Low setting at 1440p achieves 38 FPS, but this is still below the 1080p Low result.

Therefore, the recommended path is to play at 1080p with Low settings. This is the only configuration that maximizes the playable frame rate. Users who prioritize visual fidelity over smoothness might attempt 1080p Medium, but the data indicates that the experience will be compromised. For any other resolution or setting preset, the frame rates fall below acceptable levels, and the game will feel sluggish and unresponsive. The measured results make it clear that this game requires a dedicated GPU for a satisfactory experience.