Ready Or Not

Ready Or Not is a tactical shooter that leans heavily on both CPU and GPU, but the data for the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 combination reveals a system that is clearly balanced around delivering high refresh rates at 1080p while making compromises at higher resolutions. The measured frames per second across three resolutions and four quality presets paint a picture of a mobile platform that is capable, but whose performance ceiling is dictated by the graphics card rather than the processor.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a 16-core, 22-thread mobile processor based on the Meteor Lake architecture. Its base clock of 3.80 GHz and boost clock of 4.80 GHz are the specifications that define its potential for handling game logic, AI, and physics calculations. The processor has a 24 MB shared L3 cache, which is critical for keeping frequently accessed data close to the cores, and its 7 nm process node from Intel indicates a modern, power-efficient design. The CPU’s market segment is Mobile, and its 28 W TDP classifies it as a low-power part, which is a key factor in understanding why the overall combo performs the way it does.

In the context of Ready Or Not, the CPU’s role is to manage the complex AI routines of suspects and civilians, the destructible environments, and the simulation of ballistic effects. Benchmark results for the CPU show a strong showing in multi-threaded tests, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15028 and a Passmark multi-thread score of 24873. Single-thread performance is respectable, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1743 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3468. The CPU’s percentile vs all CPUs is 83, indicating it outperforms the majority of processors in the database. However, the nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score, such as the Intel Core i5-14600T with a deltaPct of 0 and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 with a deltaPct of 0.1, show that the 155H is not a top-tier performer; it sits firmly in the upper-midrange of desktop and mobile parts.

This CPU performance is sufficient to feed the RTX 5050 at 1080p, where the measured average FPS at High settings reaches 155. The data suggests that at lower resolutions, the CPU is not the primary bottleneck, as the frame rates scale significantly when moving from 4K to 1080p. However, the 22 threads and 16 cores are not underutilized; Ready Or Not is known for its demanding AI, and the CPU’s strong multi-threaded scores indicate it is well-equipped to handle the game’s simulation load. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth and dual-channel memory bus further support the CPU’s ability to move data efficiently, which is essential for a game with many simultaneous dynamic elements.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is the clear performance driver in this combo. It is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and uses the GB207 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s. Its base clock is 2317 MHz, with a boost clock of 2572 MHz. The memory clock is listed as 2500 MHz, which translates to 20 Gbps effective. With 2560 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, the RTX 5050 is positioned as an entry-level to mid-range part in the GeForce 50-series. It also includes 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores, which are relevant for games that use ray tracing or DLSS, although the measured data for this game does not specify whether those features were enabled.

The GPU’s FP32 performance is 13.17 TFLOPS, and its texture rate is 205.8 GTexel/s. In the database, the RTX 5050 has a percentile vs all GPUs of 66, placing it above the median but not in the upper echelon. Its nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (deltaPct -0.6) and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (deltaPct 1.6), which are older or lower-tier parts. This context is crucial: the RTX 5050 is a competent 1080p card, but its 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus are limiting factors at higher resolutions. The measured FPS data confirms this, as the GPU’s performance drops dramatically from 196 FPS at 1080p Low to 65 FPS at 4K Low, a reduction of 66.8% that is typical of a VRAM or bandwidth-bound scenario.

The 8 GB VRAM is the most likely culprit for the steep decline at 4K. Ready Or Not, with its detailed textures and many on-screen objects, can exceed 8 GB of VRAM usage at 4K with high-quality textures. The data shows that at 4K Ultra, the average FPS falls to 36, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay. This is not a CPU limitation; the CPU is capable of maintaining higher frame rates, as evidenced by the 1080p results. The GPU is simply running out of memory bandwidth and capacity, causing the frame rate to collapse. The GPU’s TDP of 130 W and suggested 300 W PSU indicate it is a power-hungry part for a mobile device, but the performance is what it is.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data across resolutions is the most revealing aspect of this analysis. At 1080p High settings, the combo achieves an average of 155 FPS. Moving to 1440p High, the average drops to 98 FPS, a reduction of 36.8%. At 4K High, the average falls to 51 FPS, which is a 67.1% drop from the 1080p result. This scaling pattern is classic GPU-bound behavior. The CPU is not the limiting factor at 1080p, as the frame rate is high, but as resolution increases, the GPU’s fill rate and memory bandwidth become the bottleneck.

Looking at the Low preset, the scaling is even more dramatic. At 1080p Low, the average is 196 FPS. At 1440p Low, it is 123 FPS, a 37.2% drop. At 4K Low, it is 65 FPS, a 66.8% drop from 1080p. The consistency of these percentage drops across different settings indicates that the resolution is the dominant variable. The CPU is capable of pushing more frames, but the GPU cannot keep up as the pixel count increases. The Medium preset shows a similar trend: 170 FPS at 1080p, 108 FPS at 1440p (a 36.5% drop), and 56 FPS at 4K (a 67.1% drop).

The Ultra preset is where the GPU’s limitations become most apparent. At 1080p Ultra, the average is 109 FPS, which is still playable. At 1440p Ultra, it drops to 69 FPS, a 36.7% reduction. At 4K Ultra, it plummets to 36 FPS, which is a 67.0% drop from 1080p and is not a smooth experience for a tactical shooter. The data strongly suggests that the RTX 5050 is the limiting component at 1440p and 4K, while the CPU has headroom. The 16-core, 22-thread processor is not being maxed out at these resolutions; the GPU is the wall.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

In the database of tested hardware combinations for Ready Or Not, this specific pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 ranks 2350 out of 2947 combos. This places it in the 79.7th percentile of all tested combos, meaning it performs better than roughly 80% of the systems in the database. This is a solid ranking, but it is not exceptional. The rank reflects the overall performance across all tested resolutions and settings, and the 4K results are dragging the combo down.

The combo’s rank is understandable given the GPU’s mid-range standing. The RTX 5050 has a percentile vs all GPUs of 66, and its average benchmark score of 21035 is close to that of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT, which has a deltaPct of 1.6. This suggests that the RTX 5050 is comparable to a previous-generation desktop mid-range card. The CPU, with a percentile of 83, is a stronger component relative to the GPU. The combo’s rank of 2350 out of 2947 indicates that while it is not a top-tier system, it is competitive with many other mobile and desktop configurations. For a laptop CPU paired with a mobile GPU, this ranking is respectable, but it is clear that the GPU is the limiting factor for achieving higher frame rates at 1440p and 4K.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data is complete for three resolutions and four settings presets, with some entries including minimum and maximum FPS values. At 1080p, the Low preset delivers an average of 196 FPS, which is the highest measured on this page. The Medium preset averages 170 FPS, with a minimum of 145 FPS and a maximum of 196 FPS. High settings average 155 FPS, and Ultra settings average 109 FPS. The span from Low to Ultra at 1080p is 87 FPS, indicating that the Ultra preset exacts a significant performance cost.

At 1440p, the Low preset averages 123 FPS. The Medium preset averages 108 FPS, with a minimum of 91 FPS and a maximum of 124 FPS. High settings average 98 FPS, and Ultra settings average 69 FPS. The drop from Low to Ultra at 1440p is 54 FPS, which is less severe than at 1080p, suggesting that the GPU is becoming more of a bottleneck at this resolution. The minimum FPS values for Medium settings at 1440p (91 FPS) are still above 60, indicating playable performance.

At 4K, the Low preset averages 65 FPS. The Medium preset averages 56 FPS, with a minimum of 48 FPS and a maximum of 65 FPS. High settings average 51 FPS, and Ultra settings average 36 FPS. The drop from Low to Ultra at 4K is 29 FPS, and the minimum FPS at Medium (48 FPS) dips below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The 4K Ultra result of 36 FPS is the lowest on the page and is not ideal for a tactical shooter where reaction time matters. The data is consistent: each resolution step down from 1080p to 4K costs roughly 36-37% performance at the same settings, and the Ultra preset is always the most demanding.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Ready Or Not?

A: Based on the measured FPS, 1080p is the best resolution. At 1080p High, the average FPS is 155, and even at Ultra, it is 109 FPS, both of which are smooth. At 1440p, High settings drop to 98 FPS, and at 4K, High settings drop to 51 FPS, which is below the ideal threshold for fast-paced gameplay.

Q: How does the RTX 5050 compare to its nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score?

A: The RTX 5050 has an average benchmark score of 21035. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT with a score of 20713 and a deltaPct of 1.6, meaning the RTX 5050 is 1.6% faster. The AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL has a score of 21153 (deltaPct -0.6), and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile has a score of 21379 (deltaPct -1.6).

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 4K?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K. The frame rate drops from 196 FPS at 1080p Low to 65 FPS at 4K Low, a 66.8% reduction. The CPU’s single-thread and multi-thread benchmark scores are strong, and the combo’s 4K performance is constrained by the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus.

Q: What is the average FPS at 1440p Medium settings?

A: The average FPS at 2560x1440 with Medium settings is 108, with a minimum of 91 FPS and a maximum of 124 FPS. This is a playable experience, though not as high as the 1080p results.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to all tested combos?

A: This combo ranks 2350 out of 2947 tested combos for Ready Or Not. This places it in the upper-midrange of all tested systems, performing better than approximately 80% of them.

Q: Does the Ultra preset provide a good experience at 1440p?

A: At 1440p Ultra, the average FPS is 69, with no minimum or maximum values provided. This is playable but close to the edge of smoothness for a tactical shooter. The 1080p Ultra preset, at 109 FPS, would be a better choice for a higher frame rate.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the best experience for this combo is achieved at 1080p with High settings. The average FPS of 155 is well above the 60 FPS threshold, and the visual quality is high. The Ultra preset at 1080p, with an average of 109 FPS, is also a good option for players who prioritize visual fidelity over raw frame rate, as it remains smooth. The Medium preset at 1080p, at 170 FPS, is the best choice for competitive play where a high refresh rate is critical, but the visual difference between Medium and High is typically less noticeable in a tactical shooter.

At 1440p, the High preset at 98 FPS is the recommended starting point. The Ultra preset at 69 FPS is acceptable but may suffer from frame pacing issues in intense firefights. The Medium preset at 108 FPS is a better alternative if you want to maintain a higher frame rate at 1440p. At 4K, the Low preset at 65 FPS is the only acceptable option for most players, and even then, the frame rate is not ideal. The Medium preset at 4K, with a minimum of 48 FPS, risks noticeable stuttering. The Ultra preset at 4K, at 36 FPS, is not recommended.

The data suggests that the sweet spot for this combo is 1080p with High or Ultra settings, or 1440p with High settings. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is the primary constraint at higher resolutions, and players should adjust texture quality accordingly. The CPU has ample headroom, as evidenced by the high frame rates at 1080p, so the settings recommendations are focused on optimizing the GPU workload. For a balanced experience that maximizes visual quality while maintaining a smooth frame rate, 1080p High is the best choice. For a higher refresh rate, 1080p Medium or Low will deliver the highest FPS numbers.