Ready Or Not

Ready Or Not is a tactical shooter that leans heavily on CPU performance for its AI-driven squad mechanics and level simulation, and the measured frame rates for the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 with the Intel Arc B370 show a system that is consistently bound by the integrated graphics solution. The data indicates that this combination is only capable of playable frame rates at 1080p with reduced settings, and it falls well behind the majority of tested configurations in the database. This analysis breaks down the specific roles of the processor and graphics, provides settings guidance based on the measured rows, and answers common questions about this pairing’s performance in the game.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is a 14-core, 14-thread desktop processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. This is a modern CPU with a 24 MB shared L3 cache and support for DDR5 memory, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its multi-threaded performance is strong, as evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,924 and a single-core score of 4,648, which indicates it has ample headroom for the game’s simulation and AI logic.

However, in the measured results for Ready Or Not, the CPU’s potential is not the primary limiter. The data shows that the frame rate scales predictably with resolution and settings, but the absolute numbers are low. For instance, at 1080p Low, the average FPS is 113, which is the highest recorded for this combo, while at 1080p Ultra it drops to 63. This pattern suggests that the CPU is capable of driving high frame rates, but the integrated GPU becomes the bottleneck. The processor’s performance relative to its nearest rivals is marginal; it scores 0.8% higher than the Intel Core i5-14600K and 0.5% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 in average benchmark scores. This means that in a system with a discrete graphics card, the Core Ultra 5 245 would likely deliver excellent results in this game, but the current pairing does not allow it to stretch its legs.

In tactical shooters like Ready Or Not, where enemy AI and environmental interactions are frequent, a strong single-threaded performance is crucial. The Core Ultra 5 245’s Cinebench R20 single-core score of 1,952 and R15 single-core score of 468 are solid figures, and the processor’s boost clock of 5.10 GHz should easily handle the game’s logic. The measured FPS at 1440p High (56 average) versus 1080p High (89 average) shows a 37% drop in performance when increasing resolution, which is far more attributable to the GPU’s rendering load than the CPU’s processing capabilities. The processor is not the limiting factor in this configuration; it is the graphics solution that is holding the system back.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Given the measured data, the only preset that offers a consistently playable experience is Low settings at 1920x1080. At this setting, the average FPS is 113, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay in a tactical shooter. The Medium preset at 1080p yields an average of 98 FPS, with a minimum of 83 and a maximum of 113, which is also acceptable for most players, but the drop to 89 FPS on High suggests that the integrated GPU is starting to struggle with the increased visual fidelity. For the best balance of visual quality and performance, Medium at 1080p is the highest setting that maintains an average above 90 FPS.

Moving to 1440p, the situation becomes more challenging. The Low preset at 1440p produces an average of 71 FPS, which is playable, but the Medium preset drops to 62 FPS with a minimum of 53, which may cause noticeable stutter in intense firefights. The High preset at 1440p averages 56 FPS, and Ultra drops to 40, which is not recommended for a game that requires precise aiming and quick reactions. For 1440p users, Low settings are the only option that consistently stays above 60 FPS, and even then, the minimum frame rates are not recorded, so there is potential for dips. At 4K, the data shows that no preset is playable, with the highest average being 37 FPS on Low, which is far below the standard for action gameplay.

The data suggests that users should prioritize frame rate over visual fidelity with this hardware. The difference between Low and Medium at 1080p is 15 FPS on average, which is significant for a game where smoothness is key. The Ultra preset at any resolution is not viable, as it yields an average of 21 FPS at 4K and 63 FPS at 1080p, the latter being only marginally playable but likely with significant frame time inconsistency. For a stable experience, stick to Low or Medium at 1080p, and accept that higher resolutions will require a substantial reduction in settings to remain fluid.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 strong enough for Ready Or Not?

A: Yes, the CPU is more than adequate for this game. It has 14 cores and 14 threads with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, and its benchmark scores place it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. The measured FPS drops when increasing resolution or settings are due to the integrated GPU, not the processor. In a system with a discrete graphics card, this CPU would likely produce much higher frame rates than what is shown here.

Q: Can this combo run Ready Or Not at 60 FPS in 1440p?

A: Only at Low settings. The data shows an average of 71 FPS at 1440p Low, which is above 60, but Medium settings drop to 62 average with a minimum of 53. High settings average 56 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target. For a consistent 60 FPS experience at 1440p, you must use Low settings.

Q: What is the best settings preset for this hardware?

A: For a playable experience, the Low preset at 1080p is the best choice, as it delivers an average of 113 FPS. If you want slightly better visuals, the Medium preset at 1080p averages 98 FPS with a minimum of 83, which is still smooth. Avoid Ultra settings at any resolution, as they drop the average to 63 FPS at 1080p and 21 FPS at 4K.

Q: How does this combo compare to other tested configurations?

A: This combination ranks 2710 out of 2947 tested combos in Ready Or Not, placing it in the bottom 8% of all systems. This is primarily due to the Intel Arc B370 being an integrated graphics solution with a 5th percentile ranking among all GPUs. The CPU is capable, but the GPU severely limits the overall performance.

Q: Does the Intel Arc B370 have enough VRAM for Ready Or Not?

A: The Intel Arc B370 uses System Shared memory, meaning it has no dedicated VRAM. This is a significant limitation for a modern game like Ready Or Not, which requires substantial video memory for textures at higher settings. The measured FPS drops sharply when moving from Low to High settings, indicating that the shared memory bandwidth and capacity are insufficient for the game’s demands.

Q: Is the Intel Arc B370 a discrete graphics card?

A: No, it is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a 25 W TDP and a base clock of 300 MHz, boosting to 2400 MHz. It has 1280 shading units and 10 ray tracing cores, but its performance is far below any discrete GPU. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184 is comparable to very old discrete cards like the ATI Radeon HD 5770, which is not suitable for modern gaming at high settings.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

In the database of tested combinations for Ready Or Not, this specific pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and the Intel Arc B370 ranks 2710 out of 2947 total combos. This places it in the bottom 8% of all systems tested, which is a poor result for a modern CPU. The ranking is almost entirely dragged down by the GPU’s performance, as the Intel Arc B370 sits in the 5th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The CPU itself is in the 90th percentile, but the integrated graphics solution is not capable of delivering playable frame rates at higher settings or resolutions.

The data shows that the CPU is not the bottleneck in this system. If the same processor were paired with a discrete graphics card, the combo’s rank would likely be significantly higher. The current rank indicates that this configuration is only suitable for low-demand scenarios, such as 1080p gaming on Low settings. The measured FPS at 1080p Low is 113, which is acceptable, but the drop to 89 at High settings shows how quickly the GPU becomes overwhelmed. In comparison to other combos, this system is at the lower end of the spectrum, and users would need to significantly compromise on visual quality to achieve smooth gameplay.

The GPU’s nearest rivals in the database include the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M, which are both integrated or low-end mobile solutions from over a decade ago. This highlights the disconnect between the modern CPU and the outdated graphics performance. The combo’s rank of 2710 suggests that for Ready Or Not, this is not a viable gaming system beyond the most basic settings, and users would be better served by investing in a discrete GPU.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) based on the Xe3-LPG architecture, with a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. It has 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 raster output units, along with 10 ray tracing cores. Critically, it has no dedicated VRAM and instead uses System Shared memory, with its bandwidth being system-dependent. This is a major limitation for a game like Ready Or Not, which features detailed environments and multiple AI characters that require significant memory bandwidth.

The GPU’s performance in the database is very poor, ranking in the 5th percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 1184 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. This score is comparable to the ATI Radeon HD 5770, a discrete card from 2009, and the AMD FirePro M2000, which is a workstation mobile GPU. The measured FPS in Ready Or Not reflects this: at 1080p Ultra, the average is 63 FPS, which is barely playable, but at 4K Ultra, it drops to 21 FPS. The lack of dedicated VRAM means that the GPU must share system memory, which can cause stuttering and frame drops when the game loads textures.

The GPU’s clock speeds and memory limitations directly impact the measured results. At 1080p Low, the average FPS is 113, but this drops to 89 at High and 63 at Ultra, showing a steep performance curve as the rendering load increases. The integrated nature of the GPU means it is also competing with the CPU for memory bandwidth, which can further reduce performance in CPU-intensive scenes. For a tactical shooter that relies on quick target acquisition, the low frame rates at higher settings are a significant handicap. The GPU is simply not designed for modern gaming at high fidelity, and the data confirms that only the lowest settings provide a smooth experience.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data for this combo in Ready Or Not is as follows, broken down by resolution and settings:

At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 113 FPS, which is the highest measured for this system. The Medium preset averages 98 FPS, with a minimum of 83 and a maximum of 113, showing a slight dip in frame times. The High preset averages 89 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 63 FPS. This resolution is the only one where the system can achieve playable frame rates across multiple presets, though Ultra is marginal.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 71 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. The Medium preset averages 62 FPS, with a minimum of 53 and a maximum of 71, indicating that there are noticeable dips below 60 FPS. The High preset averages 56 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 40 FPS. For 1440p, only Low settings provide a consistently smooth experience, and even then, the minimum frame rates are not recorded, so there is a risk of stutter.

At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 37 FPS, the Medium preset averages 32 FPS with a minimum of 28 and a maximum of 37, the High preset averages 29 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 21 FPS. None of these are playable for a tactical shooter, as even the highest average is well below the 60 FPS target. The data clearly shows that this combo is not suitable for 4K gaming in Ready Or Not, and users should avoid this resolution entirely.

The progression of frame rates across resolutions and settings confirms that the GPU is the limiting factor. At 1080p Low, the system can push over 100 FPS, but at 4K Ultra, it drops to just 21 FPS, a reduction of over 80%. The lack of a minimum FPS for most presets also suggests that the game may have unstable frame times, which can be more noticeable than a lower average FPS in a game requiring precise aiming. For the best experience, stick to 1080p with Low or Medium settings, as the data shows these are the only configurations that maintain an average above 90 FPS.