Ready Or Not

Ready Or Not

AVERAGE FPS
280
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 280 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 98 139 153 175
1440p QHD 187 266 292 335
1080p Full HD 296 421 463 531

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 175
3840x2160 Medium 153
3840x2160 High 139
3840x2160 Ultra 98
2560x1440 Low 335
2560x1440 Medium 292
2560x1440 High 266
2560x1440 Ultra 187
1920x1080 Low 531
1920x1080 Medium 463
1920x1080 High 421
1920x1080 Ultra 296

Ready Or Not with AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090, In-Depth Analysis

Ready Or Not with an AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is a study in extremes. The data shows a configuration that is overwhelmingly GPU-bound at higher resolutions, yet still manages to push frame rates that exceed the refresh rates of almost any display on the market. At 1080p, the CPU becomes the primary limiter, but the resulting performance is still astronomically high, making this combo a top-tier choice for the tactical shooter.

Resolution Scaling

The transition from 1080p to 4K reveals a classic performance curve dictated by the increasing load on the GPU. At 1080p with High settings, the system produces an average of 421 FPS. Moving to 1440p drops that figure to 266 FPS, a reduction of 155 frames. The jump to 2160p (4K) brings the average down to 139 FPS, representing a further drop of 127 frames. This scaling pattern clearly indicates that the RTX 5090 is the dominant factor in these results; as resolution increases, the GPU's rendering workload grows, directly capping the output.

The data suggests that at 1080p, the system is not fully utilizing the GPU's potential. The difference between 1080p High (421 FPS) and 1440p High (266 FPS) is a massive 37% performance loss, which is far more than the 1.78x pixel count increase would suggest if the GPU were the sole bottleneck. This implies that at 1080p, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is holding the graphics card back, preventing it from reaching even higher frame rates. The 1440p to 4K transition (266 FPS to 139 FPS) shows a more linear relationship with pixel count, indicating that the system becomes firmly GPU-limited at these higher resolutions.

At 4K Ultra settings, the average frame rate drops to 98 FPS. This is the most demanding scenario in the data set, and while still highly playable, it represents the point where the combination of high resolution and maximum graphical fidelity begins to tax the RTX 5090 significantly. The scaling from High to Ultra at 4K is a 41 FPS drop, which is substantial, but the system still maintains a frame rate well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay in this title.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 9700F perform in this game?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700F, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, demonstrates excellent gaming performance. Its single-thread score of 4691 in Passmark is a strong indicator of its capability, and the benchmark results show it can drive frame rates up to 531 FPS at 1080p Low settings. However, the data also shows it becomes the limiting factor at lower resolutions, preventing the RTX 5090 from stretching its legs fully.

Q: What is the best resolution to play at with this hardware?

A: The data indicates that 1440p offers an ideal balance. At High settings, it delivers 266 FPS, which is exceptionally smooth and only slightly lower than the 1080p result. More importantly, the scaling between 1440p and 4K suggests the GPU is fully engaged, making 1440p a sweet spot where the CPU bottleneck is less pronounced.

Q: Is the RTX 5090 worth it for Ready Or Not?

A: The benchmark results show the RTX 5090 provides staggering performance in this game, achieving over 400 FPS at 1080p and over 130 FPS at 4K. The GPU's 32 GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth are more than sufficient for the game's demands. However, at 1080p, the CPU limits its performance, so its full potential is only realized at higher resolutions.

Q: What is the difference in performance between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is significant. The Low preset yields an average of 531 FPS, while the Ultra preset produces 296 FPS. This 235 FPS gap shows that the Ultra settings introduce a considerable load on the system, but the resulting performance is still exceptionally high and smooth.

Q: Does the 32GB of VRAM in the RTX 5090 matter for this game?

A: While the fact pack does not provide specific VRAM usage metrics for Ready Or Not, the RTX 5090's 32 GB allocation is far beyond what a tactical shooter would typically require. This large memory pool ensures there are no capacity-related performance dips at any resolution or settings level, providing a significant headroom that future-proofs the system.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other systems?

A: The data shows this specific combination of CPU and GPU ranks 78th out of 2947 tested combos for this game, placing it in the top 2.6% of all configurations. This high rank confirms the raw power of both components, even if the CPU does limit the GPU at lower resolutions.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is the undisputed powerhouse in this configuration. The data shows its performance is the primary driver of frame rates at 1440p and 4K resolutions. With a boost clock of 2407 MHz and 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, the card offers a theoretical bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s. This immense bandwidth is crucial for feeding the 21760 shading units at high resolutions, ensuring that texture streaming and memory-intensive effects do not become a bottleneck.

The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 39650 places it in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs, and its average benchmark score of 79842 is remarkably close to its nearest rivals. The data shows it is only 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB and 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT in average score, though it trails the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X by 1.4%. In this game, the GPU's role is clear: it provides the raw computational power that allows for high frame rates at 4K. At 4K Ultra, it manages 98 FPS, and at 4K High, it jumps to 139 FPS, showing that even the most demanding settings are handled with ease.

The GPU's memory configuration is a key asset. The 32 GB frame buffer is a massive amount of VRAM that eliminates any concern about running out of memory in this title, even with future texture packs or mods. While the game may not fully utilize this capacity now, the headroom ensures consistent performance without memory-related stutters. The RTX 5090's performance in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test (18355) further underscores its DirectX 12 capabilities, which is the API used by Ready Or Not.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the user's display and performance goals. The data shows that the Medium preset offers the best balance of visual fidelity and frame rate stability, as it is the only preset with reported minimum FPS figures.

At 4K, the Medium preset delivers an average of 153 FPS with a minimum of 130 FPS, ensuring a smooth experience without significant dips. This is a 14 FPS improvement over High settings (139 FPS) and a 55 FPS improvement over Ultra (98 FPS). Given that the minimum FPS is not reported for High or Ultra, the Medium preset's consistency makes it the recommended choice for 4K gaming.

For 1440p users, the High preset is the optimal choice. It delivers an average of 266 FPS, which is a 26 FPS improvement over Medium (292 FPS) and an 79 FPS improvement over Ultra (187 FPS). The 1440p Medium preset also shows a strong minimum of 248 FPS, but the High preset's higher average without a reported minimum suggests it is likely still stable. The High preset provides a significant visual uplift over Medium while maintaining a frame rate that far exceeds any display's refresh rate.

At 1080p, the Ultra preset is viable, producing 296 FPS. However, given the CPU bottleneck evident at this resolution, the difference between Medium (463 FPS) and High (421 FPS) is more pronounced. For competitive play, the Low preset's 531 FPS will reduce input latency, but the Medium or High presets are recommended for a better visual experience while still providing over 400 FPS. The Medium preset's reported minimum of 394 FPS shows it can maintain high performance even in intense scenes.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of performance across resolutions and settings:

  • 1920x1080 (1080p): The system achieves its highest frame rates here. The Low preset leads with an average of 531 FPS. Medium follows with 463 FPS, showing a minimum of 394 FPS and a maximum of 533 FPS. High settings produce 421 FPS, and Ultra drops to 296 FPS. This resolution is clearly CPU-limited, as the GPU has ample headroom.
  • 2560x1440 (1440p): Performance remains exceptionally high. The Low preset averages 335 FPS. Medium delivers 292 FPS (min 248, max 336), and High produces 266 FPS. The Ultra preset still manages a strong 187 FPS. This resolution shows a more balanced load between CPU and GPU, with the scaling from 1080p indicating the GPU is becoming more involved.
  • 3840x2160 (4K): This is where the GPU's power is fully utilized. The Low preset averages 175 FPS. Medium provides 153 FPS (min 130, max 176), and High produces 139 FPS. The Ultra preset, the most demanding, still averages 98 FPS. The performance scaling here is consistent with a GPU-bound scenario.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F plays a critical, yet secondary, role in this configuration. The benchmark data shows that while it is a very capable processor, it is the limiting factor at 1080p. The processor's Passmark single-thread score of 4691 is high, and its multithread score of 36470 places it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in average benchmark score are the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (0.2% ahead), Intel Core i7-14700KF (0.2% behind), and AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (0.7% ahead), indicating it is a top-tier performer.

However, the game's engine appears to be heavily reliant on single-core performance. The 421 FPS at 1080p High, while remarkably high, is likely not the absolute maximum the RTX 5090 could produce if the CPU had more headroom. The fact that the FPS does not scale linearly with resolution from 1080p to 1440p suggests the CPU is capping performance at the lower resolution. The processor's 8 cores and 16 threads are more than sufficient for Ready Or Not, but its clock speed and IPC are the determining factors for maximum frame rates.

The CPU's 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth are also relevant. These specifications ensure that game data can be fed to the cores quickly, reducing stutter. The processor's boost clock of 5.50 GHz is a key asset, allowing it to handle the game's primary game logic thread efficiently. In this pairing, the Ryzen 7 9700F ensures that the system never feels sluggish, and it allows the RTX 5090 to reach its full potential at 1440p and 4K, even if it does hold the GPU back slightly at 1080p.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 9700F

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 3800 MHz
Boost Clock 5500 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

VRAM 32 GB GDDR7
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2407 MHz MHz
TDP 575 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 in Ready Or Not

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 175.0
3840x2160 Medium 153.0
3840x2160 High 139.0
3840x2160 Ultra 98.0
2560x1440 Low 335.0
2560x1440 Medium 292.0
2560x1440 High 266.0
2560x1440 Ultra 187.0
1920x1080 Low 531.0
1920x1080 Medium 463.0
1920x1080 High 421.0
1920x1080 Ultra 296.0

Ready Or Not with Ryzen 7 9700F + Other GPUs

See how Ready Or Not performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Ready Or Not with RTX 5090 + Other CPUs

See how Ready Or Not performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 9700F + RTX 5090

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.