Ready Or Not

Ready Or Not

AVERAGE FPS
280
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 280 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 98 139 153 175
1440p QHD 187 266 292 335
1080p Full HD 296 421 463 531

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 175
3840x2160 Medium 153
3840x2160 High 139
3840x2160 Ultra 98
2560x1440 Low 335
2560x1440 Medium 292
2560x1440 High 266
2560x1440 Ultra 187
1920x1080 Low 531
1920x1080 Medium 463
1920x1080 High 421
1920x1080 Ultra 296

Ready Or Not with Intel Core i5-14600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is a configuration built for extreme frame rates, and in Ready Or Not the data confirms this is a top-tier combo. With a combo rank of 82 out of 3714 tested pairings, this system sits in the top 2.2% of all configurations, delivering frame rates that range from a floor of 98 FPS at 4K Ultra to a ceiling of 531 FPS at 1080p Low. The following analysis breaks down how the CPU and GPU each contribute to these results, how the system scales across resolutions, and what the measured numbers mean for actual gameplay.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core i5-14600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, running on a 10nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, which gives it substantial single-thread headroom for a tactical shooter like Ready Or Not, where frame pacing in tight corridors and during breaching sequences heavily depends on per-core performance. The processor's 24 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache help keep frequently accessed game data close to the cores, reducing latency in scenarios where enemy AI and physics calculations are processed in bursts.

In synthetic benchmarks, the i5-14600KF posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32544 and a single-core score of 4594. This places it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 49394. Compared to its nearest rivals, the data shows a tight cluster: it is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (49228), 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49196), and 0.8% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 (48995). It trails the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 by 0.8% (49796). This indicates that the i5-14600KF is not a performance outlier but rather a very strong mainstream contender whose capabilities align closely with higher-core-count alternatives.

For Ready Or Not, the relevance of the CPU becomes clear when looking at the FPS deltas across settings. At 1080p Low, the combo delivers 531 FPS, which is 110 FPS higher than at 1080p High (421 FPS). This 20.7% performance jump when lowering settings suggests that at Low settings, the game is more CPU-bound, as the GPU has plenty of headroom to render frames quickly, and the bottleneck shifts to how fast the CPU can feed draw calls and physics updates. The i5-14600KF's 5.30 GHz boost clock is a key factor here, as it allows the game's main thread to execute quickly, ensuring that the RTX 5090 is not starved of work. The processor's 125W TDP indicates a power-hungry but manageable chip, and the fact that it is multiplier-unlocked means enthusiasts could push beyond stock clocks, though the data presented here reflects stock behavior.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

*Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo achieves in Ready Or Not?*

A: The highest recorded average is 531 FPS at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This drops to 296 FPS at the same resolution with Ultra settings, showing a significant cost for graphical fidelity.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600KF has an average benchmark score of 49394, which is 0.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900's 49228. This makes the i5-14600KF marginally faster in overall synthetic testing, though the difference is negligible in real-world gaming.

Q: Is the RTX 5090 the limiting factor at 4K resolution?

A: Yes, the data indicates the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at 3840x2160. The average FPS at 4K High is 139, while at 4K Low it is 175. The gap between Low and High settings (36 FPS) is smaller than at 1080p, where the gap between Low and High is 110 FPS, indicating the GPU is saturated at 4K regardless of settings.

Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested CPU-GPU pairings?

A: The combo ranks 82nd out of 3714 tested combinations. This places it in the top 2.2% of all configurations, indicating that it is a very high-performance pairing suitable for demanding games.

Q: Does the RTX 5090's 32 GB VRAM make a difference for this game?

A: The 32 GB VRAM on the RTX 5090 is far more than Ready Or Not requires at any setting. The data shows that the game runs smoothly even at 4K Ultra with 98 FPS, so VRAM capacity is not a limiting factor here. The GPU's memory bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s is more relevant for pushing high pixel counts.

Q: How much FPS do you lose by switching from Medium to Ultra at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Medium setting averages 292 FPS (with a min of 248 and max of 336), while Ultra averages 187 FPS. This represents a 105 FPS drop, or roughly a 36% reduction, when moving to the highest quality preset.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of GPU-bound scaling as resolution increases. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the combo averages 421 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 High drops this to 266 FPS, a reduction of 155 FPS (36.8%). At 3840x2160 High, the average falls further to 139 FPS, which is 67 FPS below the 1440p result (48.2% drop). This steep decline as resolution rises indicates that the RTX 5090's rendering workload is the dominant factor at higher pixel counts.

The same trend holds across all settings. At Low settings, the FPS progression is 531 (1080p) → 335 (1440p) → 175 (4K). At Medium, it is 463 → 292 → 153. At Ultra, it is 296 → 187 → 98. In every case, the step from 1440p to 4K incurs a larger percentage drop than the step from 1080p to 1440p. For example, at High settings, the 1080p-to-1440p drop is 36.8%, while the 1440p-to-4K drop is 47.7%. This suggests that the GPU's pixel and memory bandwidth limits are being hit hard at 4K, where the 32 GB GDDR7 memory and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth are still insufficient to maintain the frame rates seen at lower resolutions.

The data also shows how settings affect the scaling. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 235 FPS (531 vs 296), but at 4K the gap narrows to 77 FPS (175 vs 98). This compression at 4K is a classic sign of a GPU bottleneck: when the GPU is already working near its maximum capacity, reducing settings yields diminishing returns because the underlying pixel throughput limit remains. Conversely, at 1080p, the large gap indicates the CPU is keeping up easily, and the GPU has headroom to render many more frames when settings are lowered.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The Intel Core i5-14600KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 combination achieves a rank of 82 out of 3714 tested combos in Ready Or Not. This places it in the 97.8th percentile of all configurations, meaning only 81 other pairings perform better in this specific game. Given that the RTX 5090 is one of the most powerful GPUs available, with a 92nd percentile rank among all GPUs and an average benchmark score of 79842, the fact that the combo does not rank higher suggests that the i5-14600KF is holding the system back slightly in this game.

Looking at the GPU's nearest rivals, the RTX 5090 is 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (79605) and 0.6% ahead of the Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB (79396). It is 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (78940) and 1.4% behind the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X (80959). These are all data-center or professional cards, which underscores the RTX 5090's positioning as a compute-heavy consumer part. The CPU's 90th percentile rank and its proximity to rivals like the Ryzen 9 7900 (0.3% ahead) and the Ryzen AI Max+ 388 (0.8% behind) indicate that it is not a weak link, but its 14-core/20-thread configuration may not be fully optimized for Ready Or Not's threading model, which likely favors fewer, faster cores.

The rank of 82 is impressive but not the top spot, which would likely require a more powerful CPU such as a higher-core-count Raptor Lake or Zen 5 part. Still, with an average FPS of 421 at 1080p High, the combo is far beyond what is needed for smooth gameplay, and the rank reflects that this is a high-end pairing that will not be the cause of any performance complaints.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using a 5nm process at TSMC, with a massive 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die. It features 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2017 MHz and a boost clock of 2407 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). These specifications position it as an extreme enthusiast card, and its 92nd percentile rank among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 79842, confirms this.

In Ready Or Not, the RTX 5090's role is to push massive pixel counts at high resolutions. The data shows it is capable of 139 FPS at 4K High, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for comfortable play. The 32 GB VRAM is more than sufficient for this game, as even at 4K Ultra, the GPU does not appear to be VRAM-limited; the 98 FPS average at Ultra is a rendering load, not a memory capacity issue. The GPU's FP32 performance of 104.8 TFLOPS and its 21760 shading units are the key drivers of raw rasterization speed, and they allow the card to maintain high frame rates even with the game's detailed environments and dynamic lighting.

The measured FPS at 1080p Low (531 FPS) highlights the GPU's ability to output frames at an extremely high rate when not bound by resolution. The fact that the max FPS at 1080p Medium is 533 indicates that the GPU can push beyond 500 FPS, which is overkill for any display but demonstrates the headroom available. The GPU's 575W TDP and suggested 950W PSU indicate it is a power-hungry part, but the performance payoff is clear in the benchmark scores: the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 18355 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 376728 are among the highest recorded.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

1920x1080: At this resolution, the combo delivers exceptional frame rates across all settings. Low settings produce an average of 531 FPS, Medium averages 463 FPS (with a min of 394 and max of 533), High averages 421 FPS, and Ultra averages 296 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 235 FPS, indicating that the GPU is not the bottleneck at this resolution; rather, the CPU's ability to feed frames is the limiting factor at Low settings, while Ultra settings add enough graphical load to bring the GPU into play.

2560x1440: At 1440p, the average FPS drops but remains very high. Low settings average 335 FPS, Medium averages 292 FPS (with a min of 248 and max of 336), High averages 266 FPS, and Ultra averages 187 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 148 FPS, which is narrower than at 1080p, showing the start of GPU-bound behavior. The min FPS at Medium (248) is still well above 144Hz refresh rates, ensuring smooth gameplay.

3840x2160: At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor. Low settings average 175 FPS, Medium averages 153 FPS (with a min of 130 and max of 176), High averages 139 FPS, and Ultra averages 98 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 77 FPS, the smallest of any resolution, as the GPU is now working near its maximum capacity. Even at Ultra, the 98 FPS average is playable on high-refresh 4K displays, though the min FPS at Medium (130) suggests some dips during intense scenes.

The data shows a consistent pattern: the RTX 5090 has enough raw power to drive Ready Or Not at any resolution and setting combination, but the i5-14600KF begins to show its limits at 1080p where the CPU cannot keep pace with the GPU's frame generation. At 4K, the GPU takes over as the bottleneck, and the system delivers a smooth experience regardless of settings, with the only caveat being that Ultra settings at 4K drop below the 100 FPS mark.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i5-14600KF

Cores / Threads 14 / 20
Base Clock 3500 MHz
Boost Clock 5300 MHz
TDP 125W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

VRAM 32 GB GDDR7
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2407 MHz MHz
TDP 575 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i5-14600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 in Ready Or Not

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 175.0
3840x2160 Medium 153.0
3840x2160 High 139.0
3840x2160 Ultra 98.0
2560x1440 Low 335.0
2560x1440 Medium 292.0
2560x1440 High 266.0
2560x1440 Ultra 187.0
1920x1080 Low 531.0
1920x1080 Medium 463.0
1920x1080 High 421.0
1920x1080 Ultra 296.0

Ready Or Not with ii5-14600KF + Other GPUs

See how Ready Or Not performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Ready Or Not with RTX 5090 + Other CPUs

See how Ready Or Not performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii5-14600KF + RTX 5090

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.