Ready Or Not

The Intel Core i5-12400F paired with the Intel Arc B390 produces a combination that ranks near the bottom of the database for Ready Or Not, landing at 3300 out of 3714 tested combos. This is a pairing where the integrated graphics solution is the overwhelming bottleneck, and the CPU’s substantial processing headroom goes largely unused at every resolution and settings preset tested. The data shows a system capable of smooth 1080p play at lower presets, but one that struggles to maintain playable frame rates at 4K, revealing a stark performance ceiling defined by the GPU.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core i5-12400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache, providing ample fast-access memory for game logic and AI calculations.

In synthetic benchmarks, this CPU demonstrates strong multi-threaded capability. It scores 12,380 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1,680 points in single-core, while its Geekbench scores reach 9,472 multi-core and 1,964 single-core. The 3DMark results show a clear scaling pattern: 1,699 for 2 threads, 3,067 for 4 threads, 4,779 for 8 threads, and 5,895 for 16 threads, with a max-thread score of 5,912. This indicates that the processor efficiently utilizes additional threads, a trait that benefits modern tactical shooters which often manage numerous AI agents and environmental interactions.

However, the benchmark results for Ready Or Not indicate that the CPU is never the limiting factor in this pairing. The average FPS across all tested settings is determined far more by resolution and GPU load than by processor capability. For instance, at 1920x1080 Low settings, the combo achieves 125 FPS average, while at 3840x2160 Ultra it drops to 23 FPS. This dramatic variance is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario, where the CPU has ample headroom to feed frames but the graphics processor cannot keep up.

The CPU’s percentile ranking of 73 against all CPUs places it above the median, and its average benchmark score of 19,039 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals. The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS scores 19,047 (0% delta), the Intel Core 3 201E scores 19,056 (-0.1% delta), the Intel Core i5-1335U scores 18,982 (0.3% delta), and the AMD EPYC 7773X scores 18,979 (0.3% delta). This shows that the i5-12400F is a solidly mid-range processor, but its performance in this game is masked by the GPU constraint.

Given the measured FPS data, the CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads are more than sufficient for Ready Or Not’s demands. The single-thread score of 909 in 3DMark and 1,680 in Cinebench R23 suggest strong per-core performance, which is crucial for the game’s core simulation loop. The data implies that even at the lowest GPU-bound frame rates, the CPU is not causing stutter or bottlenecking, as the frame pacing at Medium settings shows a reasonable range between min and max FPS (e.g., 92 to 125 at 1080p).

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Arc B390 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) based on the Xe3-LPG architecture, part of the Panther Lake generation, built on Intel's 3 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2500 MHz, with a TDP of 80 W. Critically, the memory configuration is "System Shared," meaning it relies on the host system’s RAM for both capacity and bandwidth, which is described as "System Dependent."

This shared memory architecture is the primary reason for the performance characteristics observed. With a memory bus and bandwidth that are system-dependent, the GPU’s access to data is constrained by the CPU’s memory controller and the speed of the installed RAM. The GPU has 1,536 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 ROPs, along with 12 ray tracing cores. Its pixel rate is 60.00 GPixel/s and texture rate is 120.0 GTexel/s, with a FP32 performance of 7.680 TFLOPS.

The GPU’s benchmark presence is minimal, with only one recorded score: 1,482 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. This score places the Arc B390 in the 9th percentile of all GPUs, indicating very low relative performance. Its nearest rivals in the database are all legacy NVIDIA parts: the GeForce GT 520MX (1,463, +1.3% delta), the GeForce 800M (1,460, +1.5% delta), the GeForce GT 625 OEM (1,446, +2.5% delta), and the GeForce GT 710 (1,443, +2.7% delta). This rivalry grouping reveals that the Arc B390’s raw compute performance is comparable to decade-old entry-level discrete GPUs, which aligns with the frame rates observed in Ready Or Not.

The measured FPS data shows the GPU’s limitations clearly. At 1920x1080, the integrated graphics can manage 125 FPS on Low settings, but this drops to 99 FPS on High and 69 FPS on Ultra. This scaling suggests that while the GPU can handle the base geometry and lighting at lower settings, the increased shading and texture work at higher presets overwhelms its 24 ROPs and shared memory bandwidth. At 2560x1440, the average FPS ranges from 79 (Low) to 44 (Ultra), and at 3840x2160, it falls to a range of 41 (Low) to 23 (Ultra). The 4K results are consistently below the 30 FPS playability threshold except for Low settings, making the experience borderline at best.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-12400F compare to its closest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The i5-12400F has an average benchmark score of 19,039, which is statistically tied with its nearest rivals. The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS scores 19,047 (0% delta), the Intel Core 3 201E scores 19,056 (-0.1% delta), the Intel Core i5-1335U scores 18,982 (0.3% delta), and the AMD EPYC 7773X scores 18,979 (0.3% delta).

Q: What is the best average FPS this combo achieves in Ready Or Not at 1080p?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 125 frames per second, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This is the only preset that exceeds 120 FPS, indicating that the GPU is the limiting factor at higher quality levels.

Q: Is the Intel Arc B390's performance comparable to any discrete GPUs in the database?

A: Yes, the Arc B390’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,482 places it near the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX (1,463, +1.3% delta), GeForce 800M (1,460, +1.5% delta), GeForce GT 625 OEM (1,446, +2.5% delta), and GeForce GT 710 (1,443, +2.7% delta). This indicates it performs similarly to those older entry-level parts.

Q: Does the combo maintain 60 FPS at 2560x1440 resolution?

A: Yes, at 2560x1440, the combo achieves an average of 62 FPS on High settings and 69 FPS on Medium settings, with Low settings reaching 79 FPS. However, Ultra settings dip to 44 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What are the minimum FPS values recorded for this combo?

A: The only settings with reported minimum FPS are at Medium quality. At 1920x1080, the minimum is 92 FPS; at 2560x1440, the minimum is 58 FPS; and at 3840x2160, the minimum is 30 FPS.

Q: How does this combo rank overall in the database for Ready Or Not?

A: The combination ranks 3300 out of 3714 tested combos, placing it in the bottom 11% of all configurations tested for this game. This low rank is primarily due to the integrated GPU’s performance ceiling.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear performance profile across three resolutions and four settings presets. The results show a consistent pattern: frame rates decrease as resolution increases, and decrease as settings quality increases. The gap between Low and Ultra settings becomes more pronounced at higher resolutions.

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its best performance. Low settings produce an average of 125 FPS, which is the highest figure recorded for this pairing. Medium settings yield 109 FPS, with a minimum of 92 and maximum of 125. High settings average 99 FPS, while Ultra settings drop to 69 FPS. This resolution is the only one where all presets exceed the 60 FPS threshold, making it the recommended choice for playable frame rates.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance degrades noticeably. Low settings average 79 FPS, Medium settings average 69 FPS with a range of 58 to 79, and High settings average 62 FPS. Ultra settings fall to 44 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS standard for smooth gameplay. The data shows that Medium and High presets are still viable at this resolution, but Ultra is not.

At 3840x2160, the integrated GPU struggles to maintain playable frame rates. Low settings average 41 FPS, Medium settings average 36 FPS with a minimum of 30 and maximum of 41, and High settings average 33 FPS. Ultra settings drop to 23 FPS, which is well below acceptable playability. None of the 4K presets reach 60 FPS, and even Low settings barely exceed the 30 FPS minimum threshold for playability.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 3300 out of 3714 tested combinations places it in the bottom 11% of all configurations for Ready Or Not. This low ranking is a direct consequence of the Intel Arc B390’s performance, which is in the 9th percentile of all GPUs. The CPU, by contrast, is in the 73rd percentile, suggesting that the processor is not the limiting factor.

The data indicates that this pairing is severely GPU-bound. The CPU’s synthetic scores, such as a PassMark multi-thread score of 19,433 and a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,380, are respectable for a mid-range desktop processor. However, the GPU’s single benchmark score of 1,482 in 3DMark Steel Nomad highlights its weakness. The rank of 3300 reflects that most other tested combos, even those with older CPUs, likely pair them with more capable discrete GPUs.

The nearest GPU rivals, such as the GeForce GT 710 and GT 520MX, are ancient parts that would not be found in modern gaming rigs. This context reinforces that the Arc B390 is not designed for gaming workloads, and its inclusion in a desktop combo with a strong CPU like the i5-12400F creates a significant imbalance. The rank is a quantitative measure of this imbalance, showing that the system’s overall gaming performance is dragged down by the GPU.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal experience for this combo is achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Medium settings. This preset provides an average of 109 FPS, with a minimum of 92 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay without the performance cost of High or Ultra. The 92 FPS minimum indicates that even in demanding scenes, the frame rate remains well above the 60 FPS threshold.

For players prioritizing frame rate over visual fidelity, 1920x1080 Low settings are the best choice, delivering 125 FPS average. This is the only configuration that approaches high-refresh-rate territory, though the visual quality is reduced. High settings at 1080p still offer 99 FPS, which is acceptable, but the jump from Medium to High yields a 10 FPS drop in average, making Medium the better balance.

At 2560x1440, Medium settings are the only preset that maintains an average above 60 FPS, at 69 FPS, but the minimum of 58 FPS suggests occasional dips below the threshold. Low settings at 1440p provide 79 FPS, offering a smoother experience, while High settings at 62 FPS are borderline acceptable. Ultra at 1440p is not recommended due to the 44 FPS average.

The data shows that 3840x2160 resolution is not viable for this combo. Even Low settings only reach 41 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS standard, and Medium settings have a minimum of 30 FPS, indicating potential stutter in intense firefights. The recommendation is to avoid 4K entirely and instead utilize 1080p Medium for the best combination of visual quality and performance, or 1080p Low for maximum smoothness.