Ready Or Not

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data for Ready Or Not with the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 shows a clear and predictable progression as resolution increases, but the shape of that curve reveals which component is doing the heavy lifting. At 1080p High, the combo delivers 210.8 FPS, which is already well beyond what a 60 Hz or even 144 Hz display can use. Moving to 1440p High drops that to 134 FPS, a 36.4% reduction, and then 4K High lands at 71.4 FPS, another 46.7% cut from the 1440p figure. This steep falloff is the signature of a GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions.

The data indicates that at 1080p, the CPU is the limiting factor, not the GPU. This is evident from the spread between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p: Low produces 269 FPS while Ultra produces 148.3 FPS, a difference of 120.7 FPS. That gap is entirely attributable to GPU workload, yet even at Ultra the frame rate stays above 148 FPS, which suggests the CPU can feed the GPU fast enough to avoid a bottleneck at lower resolutions. The Ryzen 7 5700's 8 cores and 16 threads, boosting to 4.60 GHz, provide ample headroom for a tactical shooter that does not rely heavily on multi-threaded physics.

At 4K, the situation inverts. The RTX 4060, with its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth, becomes the clear constraint. The 4K Low result of 87.8 FPS versus 4K Ultra at 50 FPS shows a 75.6% performance swing purely from settings, which is a GPU-bound response. The 4K High result of 71.4 FPS is respectable for a game of this genre, but the data suggests that the GPU's 128-bit memory bus and 15.11 TFLOPS of FP32 compute are what set the ceiling. The CPU is not the issue here; even the weakest measured 4K result, Ultra at 50 FPS, is far above what a CPU-limited scenario would produce.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo achieves in Ready Or Not?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 269, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. At 1080p High, the combo still manages 210.8 FPS, indicating strong performance at standard resolution.

Q: How does the RTX 4060's memory configuration affect 4K performance?

A: The RTX 4060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 272.0 GB/s bandwidth. At 4K, the Ultra preset drops to 50 FPS, while Low reaches 87.8 FPS, showing that the GPU's memory subsystem and compute capacity, not the CPU, limit high-resolution performance.

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 5700 strong enough for this game?

A: Yes. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, deliver a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20655 and a single-core score of 2916. These scores place it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, and the measured FPS at 1080p (210.8 High) confirms it does not bottleneck the RTX 4060.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?

A: At 2560x1440, the Medium preset delivers 144.5 FPS, while High delivers 134 FPS and Ultra drops to 93.1 FPS. For a smooth high-refresh experience, Medium or High are the better choices, as Ultra's 93.1 FPS is still playable but sacrifices 38.4% of the frame rate compared to Medium.

Q: How does this combo rank against all tested combinations?

A: The combo ranks 1001 out of 1748 tested combinations in Ready Or Not. This places it in the lower-middle tier of all tested systems, which is consistent with the RTX 4060's 66th percentile ranking among all GPUs.

Q: Does the RTX 4060 outperform its nearest rivals in synthetic tests?

A: The RTX 4060's average benchmark score is 23181. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6600M, scores 23321, which is 0.6% higher. The Intel Arc B580 scores 23021, 0.7% lower, and the AMD Radeon 760M scores 22999, 0.8% lower. The differences are minimal, within 1.5%.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is the dominant factor in this game's performance at higher resolutions. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory is adequate for Ready Or Not's environments, but the 128-bit memory bus and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest by modern standards. This becomes apparent at 4K, where the Ultra preset's 50 FPS result is the lowest measured in the entire dataset. The GPU's boost clock of 2460 MHz, combined with 3072 shading units and 96 TMUs, provides enough raw throughput for 1080p and 1440p, but the 4K results show a clear ceiling.

The GPU's synthetic benchmark results contextualize its in-game behavior. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2302 and PassMark G3D score of 19545 are respectable, but the GPU's percentile ranking of 66 among all GPUs indicates it is a mid-range part. The nearest rivals are telling: the RX 6600M scores 23321 (0.6% higher), while the GTX 780 Ti scores 23338 (0.7% higher), and the Arc B580 scores 23021 (0.7% lower). These are all within a 1.5% band, meaning the RTX 4060 is squarely in a competitive cluster, and Ready Or Not's results reflect that positioning.

The RTX 4060's 15.11 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is the key metric for this game's rendering. At 1080p, the GPU is never the bottleneck, as evidenced by the 269 FPS Low result. But at 4K, the pixel rate of 118.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 236.2 GTexel/s are insufficient to maintain high frame rates on Ultra. The 4K High result of 71.4 FPS is the best 4K preset measured, and it comes at a 28.8% cost versus the 4K Low result of 87.8 FPS, which shows the GPU's memory bandwidth is a limiting factor when texture detail increases.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination ranks 1001 out of 1748 tested combos in Ready Or Not. This places it in the 57th percentile of all tested systems, which is slightly below the midpoint. The ranking is consistent with the individual component percentiles: the CPU ranks in the 84th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 66th percentile among all GPUs. The combo's lower overall ranking suggests that Ready Or Not is more GPU-intensive than CPU-intensive, and the RTX 4060's mid-range standing drags the combined result down.

The gap between the CPU and GPU percentiles is significant. The Ryzen 7 5700's average benchmark score of 27220 places it 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core i9-9900K (27043) and 0.8% ahead of the Intel Core i7-12700H (27006). But the RTX 4060's average score of 23181 is 0.6% behind the RX 6600M (23321). This means the CPU is a high-performing part paired with a mid-range GPU, and in a game like Ready Or Not, the GPU becomes the limiting factor at 1440p and 4K, which is where the combo's rank suffers.

The 4K Ultra result of 50 FPS is the weakest data point in the entire measured set, and it drags the overall ranking down. However, the 1080p results are all above 148 FPS, which is excellent. This split personality explains the rank: the combo is capable of high frame rates at lower resolutions but falls to console-level performance at 4K Ultra. The 1440p results are the sweet spot, with High at 134 FPS and Medium at 144.5 FPS, both of which are strong for a tactical shooter.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 is a Zen 3 architecture processor built on TSMC's 7 nm process, with 8 cores and 16 threads. Its base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost clock of 4.60 GHz provide strong single-thread performance, as indicated by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2916 and the 3DMark single-thread score of 901. The CPU's 16 MB of L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for Ready Or Not's CPU demands.

In this game, the CPU's role is to feed the GPU with draw calls and process AI and physics. The 1080p Low result of 269 FPS is the clearest indication that the CPU is not a bottleneck, as this frame rate is far above what the GPU can sustain at higher settings. The 1080p High result of 210.8 FPS and the 1080p Ultra result of 148.3 FPS show that even with increased GPU load, the CPU keeps up. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 8675 and R15 multi-core score of 2082 demonstrate the CPU's multi-threaded capability, which is relevant for a game that simulates multiple AI enemies and environmental interactions.

The CPU's percentile ranking of 84 among all CPUs is noteworthy. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core i9-9900K (0.7% higher average score), the Intel Core i7-12700H (0.8% higher), and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (1.2% higher). This places the Ryzen 7 5700 in elite company for CPU-bound tasks. However, in Ready Or Not, the measured FPS data shows that the CPU's headroom is only fully utilized at 1080p. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and the CPU's superior performance relative to its GPU partner is not reflected in the final frame rates.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data covers three resolutions and four settings presets, providing a complete picture of performance. At 1920x1080, the results are: Low at 269 FPS, Medium at 230.2 FPS, High at 210.8 FPS, and Ultra at 148.3 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 120.7 FPS, a 44.9% reduction, which indicates the GPU is increasingly taxed as settings rise, but even Ultra remains well above 144 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the results drop noticeably: Low at 170.1 FPS, Medium at 144.5 FPS, High at 134 FPS, and Ultra at 93.1 FPS. The Low to Ultra spread is 77 FPS, a 45.3% reduction. The Medium and High presets both exceed 130 FPS, making them viable for high-refresh monitors, while Ultra falls below 100 FPS, which is a significant step down.

At 3840x2160, the results show the GPU's limits: Low at 87.8 FPS, Medium at 74.7 FPS, High at 71.4 FPS, and Ultra at 50 FPS. The Low to Ultra spread is 37.8 FPS, a 43.1% reduction. The 4K Low result is the only 4K preset above 80 FPS, and the 4K Ultra result of 50 FPS is exactly half the 1080p Ultra result of 148.3 FPS. This halving at 4K Ultra is a clear indication of the GPU's pixel throughput limits.

The settings scaling is consistent across resolutions: Low to Medium typically costs about 10-15% of frame rate, Medium to High costs another 5-10%, and High to Ultra costs 20-30%. The largest single drop is from High to Ultra at 1080p, which costs 62.5 FPS (from 210.8 to 148.3), a 29.7% reduction. This suggests the Ultra preset introduces effects that are disproportionately expensive on the RTX 4060.

Settings Recommendations

For the best experience with this combo, the data points clearly toward 1440p with Medium or High settings. At 2560x1440 Medium, the system delivers 144.5 FPS, which is ideal for a 144 Hz monitor. High settings at 1440p produce 134 FPS, a 7.3% reduction but with better visual quality. Both presets are well above the 93.1 FPS of Ultra, which sacrifices too much performance for marginal visual gains.

At 1080p, any preset works well, but the recommendation is High at 210.8 FPS, which balances visual fidelity with a frame rate that exceeds most display refresh rates. Ultra at 1080p produces 148.3 FPS, which is still excellent, but the 29.7% drop from High makes it less appealing unless maximum visual quality is the priority. Low settings at 1080p are unnecessary, as the 269 FPS result provides no practical benefit over High on typical monitors.

At 4K, the data suggests High is the best choice, delivering 71.4 FPS. Medium at 74.7 FPS is only 4.6% faster, while Low at 87.8 FPS sacrifices visual quality for a 22.9% gain. Ultra at 50 FPS is not recommended, as it falls below the 60 FPS threshold and the 30% reduction from High is not justified by the modest visual improvements in a tactical shooter where clarity matters more than particle effects.

The overall recommendation is to use 1440p High as the default configuration. This preset delivers 134 FPS, which is smooth for the fast-paced gunfights in Ready Or Not, while maintaining enough visual detail to spot enemies at range. If a higher frame rate is desired, 1440p Medium at 144.5 FPS is a suitable fallback, and if 4K is mandatory, 4K High at 71.4 FPS is the only preset that stays above the 60 FPS playability threshold.