Ready Or Not

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data for Ready Or Not with the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 reveals a clear pattern of performance scaling as resolution increases. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the combo produces 128 FPS average. Moving to 2560x1440 drops that to 89 FPS, a reduction of 39 FPS. At 3840x2160, the average falls further to 53 FPS. This represents a 75 FPS swing from 1080p to 4K at High settings, demonstrating that the rendering load scales substantially with pixel count.

The Low preset tells a similar story in relative terms. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 180 FPS. At 1440p Low, it still manages 125 FPS, and at 4K Low, it produces 74 FPS. The delta between 1080p and 4K at Low is 106 FPS, which is a larger absolute drop than at High settings because the starting frame rate is much higher. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K at Low is roughly 59%, while at High the drop is about 59% as well, indicating that resolution scaling behaves consistently across presets in this game.

The Medium preset provides the only complete FPS range data in the pack, with min and max values recorded. At 1080p Medium, the average is 141 FPS with a min of 120 and max of 163. At 1440p Medium, the average drops to 98 FPS with min 83 and max 113. At 4K Medium, the average is 58 FPS with min 50 and max 67. The gap between 1080p and 1440p Medium is 43 FPS, while the gap between 1440p and 4K Medium is 40 FPS. This near-linear scaling suggests that the GPU is the primary limiting factor across all three resolutions, as the CPU headroom is sufficient to feed the graphics card at every step.

Ultra settings produce the lowest frame rates at every resolution. At 1080p Ultra, the average is 82 FPS. At 1440p Ultra, it falls to 57 FPS, and at 4K Ultra, it bottoms out at 34 FPS. The 1080p to 4K drop at Ultra is 48 FPS, which is a 59% reduction, matching the pattern seen at other presets. The data indicates that Ready Or Not scales almost uniformly with resolution for this hardware combo, with no sudden cliff or plateau that would suggest a CPU bottleneck emerging at lower resolutions.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 brings specific hardware characteristics to Ready Or Not that directly influence the measured results. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The clock speeds are 1830 MHz base and 2460 MHz boost, with memory running at 2125 MHz (17 Gbps effective). The card is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process from TSMC, containing 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die.

The RTX 4060's 8 GB VRAM capacity is relevant when considering the 4K Ultra result of 34 FPS. At that resolution with the highest preset, the game's memory footprint likely approaches the card's limit, which contributes to the low frame rate. The 128-bit memory bus, combined with 272.0 GB/s bandwidth, provides moderate throughput that becomes strained at 4K resolutions. The measured data shows that at 4K Medium, the system still delivers 58 FPS, indicating the GPU can handle moderate settings at 4K but struggles with Ultra.

The GPU's benchmark profile places it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17639. Its nearest rivals in the synthetic benchmarks are the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17666, 0.2% higher), the AMD Radeon 780M (17588, 0.3% lower), the AMD Radeon Pro 560 (17551, 0.5% lower), and the AMD Radeon Pro 460 (17509, 0.7% lower). These deltas are all within 1%, suggesting the RTX 4060 sits in a tightly packed performance cluster in general compute tasks, though its gaming performance in Ready Or Not is what matters here.

The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support, along with Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6, means Ready Or Not can take advantage of modern rendering paths. The 3072 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs provide the raw throughput for the measured frame rates. The 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores are present but their specific impact on this game's FPS is not directly quantified in the data. The pixel rate of 118.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 236.2 GTexel/s help explain why the card performs better at lower resolutions where pixel fill requirements are reduced.

FAQ

Q: What is the maximum average FPS this combo achieves in Ready Or Not?

A: The highest recorded average FPS is 180 at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The next highest is 141 FPS at 1080p Medium, followed by 128 FPS at 1080p High.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Ready Or Not?

A: Yes, but with compromises. At 4K Low, the average FPS is 74, and at 4K Medium it is 58. At 4K High it drops to 53 FPS, while 4K Ultra produces only 34 FPS. Medium settings at 4K appear to be the practical ceiling for smooth gameplay.

Q: What is the lowest FPS recorded in the measured data?

A: The lowest average FPS is 34 at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings. The lowest minimum FPS recorded is 50, which occurs at 4K Medium. At 1440p Medium, the minimum is 83 FPS, and at 1080p Medium, the minimum is 120 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 compare to its nearest GPU rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RTX 4060's average benchmark score is 17639. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon HD 7790, scores 17666, which is 0.2% higher. The AMD Radeon 780M scores 17588 (0.3% lower), the AMD Radeon Pro 560 scores 17551 (0.5% lower), and the AMD Radeon Pro 460 scores 17509 (0.7% lower).

Q: What is the FPS difference between High and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, High settings produce 89 FPS average, while Ultra produces 57 FPS average. This is a 32 FPS difference, representing a 36% performance reduction for the highest preset.

Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU at any resolution?

A: The data suggests no clear CPU bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 180 FPS, and frame rates scale downward consistently with each resolution increase. The pattern indicates the GPU is the limiting component across all tested configurations.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 ranks 3114 out of 3714 tested combos in Ready Or Not. This places the system in the lower portion of the overall distribution, specifically around the 16th percentile of all tested combinations. The rank reflects the mid-range positioning of both components, where the CPU performs well in synthetic benchmarks but the GPU limits gaming performance in demanding titles.

The CPU alone sits in the 78th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26324. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (26274, 0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS (26402, 0.3% lower), the Intel Core i9-11900KF (26212, 0.4% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U (26187, 0.5% higher). These deltas are all below 1%, showing the 7600 is competitively positioned among similar processors.

The GPU sits in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17639. The combination of a high-percentile CPU with a mid-range GPU means the system's overall rank in this game is dragged down by the graphics card's performance ceiling. The 3714 total combos include many systems with more powerful GPUs, which explains why this combo lands at 3114 despite the CPU's strong showing. For Ready Or Not specifically, the GPU is the dominant factor in determining frame rates, as evidenced by the resolution scaling data showing consistent GPU-bound behavior.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It operates on the AMD Socket AM5 platform with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The CPU has a 65 W TDP and supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The 5 nm process from TSMC houses 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache.

In synthetic benchmarks, the 7600 demonstrates strong single-thread and multi-thread performance. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 12735, while single-core is 1852. Geekbench scores are 13413 multi-core and 2521 single-core. The 3DMark tests show scaling from 999 single-thread to 6503 max-threads, with 6499 at 16 threads. PassMark scores include 27058 multi-thread, 3910 single-thread, 48107 floating point math, and 80581 integer math.

For Ready Or Not, the CPU's role is to feed the GPU with draw calls and game logic. The 6-core, 12-thread configuration provides adequate parallelism for modern game engines. The measured FPS data shows that at 1080p Low, the system reaches 180 FPS, which is high enough to suggest the CPU can keep up with the GPU even at that demanding frame rate. The consistent scaling from 1080p to 4K across all presets indicates the CPU is not introducing a bottleneck at any resolution tested.

The 7600's nearest CPU rivals in terms of average benchmark score are all within 0.5% performance delta. The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX is 0.2% higher, the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS is 0.3% lower, the Intel Core i9-11900KF is 0.4% higher, and the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U is 0.5% higher. This tight clustering means the 7600 performs essentially identically to these alternatives in general computing tasks, and the differences in Ready Or Not frame rates would come primarily from the GPU rather than the CPU.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest frame rates. Low settings produce 180 FPS average. Medium settings yield 141 FPS average with a minimum of 120 and maximum of 163. High settings produce 128 FPS average. Ultra settings drop to 82 FPS average. The progression from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a 98 FPS spread, with each preset tier costing roughly 30-50 FPS.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong but reduced. Low settings produce 125 FPS average. Medium settings yield 98 FPS average with a minimum of 83 and maximum of 113. High settings produce 89 FPS average. Ultra settings drop to 57 FPS average. The 1440p results show a 68 FPS spread from Low to Ultra, with the most significant drop occurring between High and Ultra at 32 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes heavily taxed. Low settings produce 74 FPS average. Medium settings yield 58 FPS average with a minimum of 50 and maximum of 67. High settings produce 53 FPS average. Ultra settings drop to 34 FPS average. The 4K results show a 40 FPS spread from Low to Ultra, with all presets except Low falling below 60 FPS.

The Medium preset is the only one with complete min/max data across all resolutions, allowing for frame time consistency analysis. At 1080p, the min-to-max range is 43 FPS (120 to 163). At 1440p, the range is 30 FPS (83 to 113). At 4K, the range is 17 FPS (50 to 67). This tightening range at higher resolutions suggests that as the GPU becomes the bottleneck, frame delivery becomes more consistent, with less variance between frames.

Settings Recommendations

For players targeting 60 FPS as a playable threshold, the data shows which presets are viable at each resolution. At 1920x1080, all presets exceed 60 FPS, with Ultra at 82 FPS providing a comfortable margin. At 2560x1440, Low, Medium, and High all exceed 60 FPS, but Ultra at 57 FPS falls just short. At 3840x2160, only Low at 74 FPS exceeds 60 FPS, while Medium at 58 FPS is close but doesn't quite reach the threshold.

For the best experience at each resolution, the High preset offers a strong balance. At 1080p, High delivers 128 FPS, which is more than sufficient for smooth gameplay while maintaining higher visual quality than Medium or Low. At 1440p, High produces 89 FPS, keeping well above 60 FPS while preserving visual fidelity. At 4K, High drops to 53 FPS, which might be acceptable for some players but falls below the 60 FPS target.

The Medium preset represents the most consistent choice across all resolutions. At 1080p, it delivers 141 FPS with tight frame pacing (120-163 range). At 1440p, it produces 98 FPS with a 83-113 range. At 4K, it achieves 58 FPS with a 50-67 range. The min FPS values at Medium are all within 17 FPS of the average, indicating stable performance without major frame drops.

For 4K gaming specifically, Low settings at 74 FPS provide the only configuration that comfortably exceeds 60 FPS. Medium at 58 FPS is the second-best option, offering better visuals at a slight performance cost. Ultra at 4K is not recommended given the 34 FPS average, which would likely feel sluggish in a tactical shooter where quick reactions matter. The data indicates that 1440p High is the sweet spot for this hardware combo, offering 89 FPS with good visual quality, while 1080p Ultra at 82 FPS is the best option for players who prioritize maximum visual fidelity at lower resolutions.