Ready Or Not

This analysis covers Ready Or Not, a tactical shooter released on 2021-12-16, using the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090. All results are marked as measured data. The pairing ranks 13th out of 1748 tested combos. The CPU is a 6-core/12-thread Zen 4 part in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs; the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 card in the 94th percentile of all GPUs. Those component positions explain why this combo sits near the top of the Ready Or Not result pool.

How This Combo Ranks

The comboRankInGame value is 13 out of 1748 system combinations. A 13th-place finish in a pool that large puts this pairing in the leading group for Ready Or Not. The component data supports that placement. The CPU's average benchmark score is 24993, which is the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. The GPU's average benchmark score is 84306, which is the 94th percentile of all GPUs. The GPU is higher in its own distribution, which is consistent with the 1080p and 4K frame-rate pattern in the measured FPS rows.

The CPU's nearest rivals by average score are the Intel Core i7-11850H at 24974 with a deltaPct of 0.1, the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X at 25057 with a deltaPct of -0.3, the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F at 25064 with a deltaPct of -0.3, and the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX at 24897 with a deltaPct of 0.4. The GPU's nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D at 84241 with a deltaPct of 0.1, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile at 84171 with a deltaPct of 0.2, the AMD Radeon PRO W6600 at 83209 with a deltaPct of 1.3, and the NVIDIA CMP 40HX at 85637 with a deltaPct of -1.6. These nearest-rival values show that both components are surrounded by parts with very similar aggregate scores. The 13th-place combo result is not the product of one outlier component.

GPU Role

The RTX 5090 is built around the GB202 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture and is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die. The card is dual-slot, uses one 16-pin power connector, has a 575 W TDP, and recommends a 950 W PSU. Its bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16. The memory subsystem is 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus, with 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, listed as 28 Gbps effective. The GPU runs at a base clock of 2017 MHz and a boost clock of 2407 MHz.

The compute configuration includes 21,760 shading units, 680 texture mapping units, 176 ROPs, 170 RT cores, and 680 tensor cores. Peak FP32 performance is 104.8 TFLOPS, with 423.6 GPixel/s pixel rate and 1,636.8 GTexel/s texture rate. API support covers DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The GPU's average benchmark score is 84306, in the 94th percentile of all GPUs.

In Ready Or Not, the GPU's influence appears directly in the measured rows: 4K Low averages 176.9 FPS, 4K Medium 153.8, 4K High 141.9, and 4K Ultra 99.6. A 32 GB frame buffer on a 512-bit bus gives this card enough memory throughput and capacity for the title's higher-resolution settings, and the data shows no sign that VRAM is the limiting factor at any measured resolution.

CPU Role

The Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor in the AMD 7000 series, based on Zen 4 with the Raphael codename. It uses the AMD Socket AM5 and a 5 nm TSMC process. The CPU has a base clock of 3.70 GHz, a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, a 65 W TDP, and an unlocked multiplier. The cache layout is 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3. Memory support is DDR5 over a dual-channel interface with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU has PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, and its die contains 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die.

The average benchmark score is 24993, in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. PassMark results include 26825 for multithread, 3841 for single thread, 79108 for integer math, 47176 for floating point math, 17510 for data encryption, 305925 for data compression, 22776 for extended instructions, 1788 for physics, 36191 for random string sorting, and 199 for find prime numbers. Cinebench R23 scores are 22799 multi-core and 3218 single-core; Cinebench R20 scores are 9575 multi-core and 1351 single-core; Geekbench scores are 12686 multi-core and 2759 single-core. 3DMark results include 6376 for 16 threads, 3621 for 4 threads, 5372 for 8 threads, 6379 for max threads, and 974 for single thread.

In Ready Or Not, the CPU's role is most visible at low resolution: the 1080p Low row reaches 535.7 FPS, the highest measured average in the entire data set. A 6-core/12-thread part with single-core scores like these is not preventing the RTX 5090 from reaching very high frame rates at 1080p.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The dataset includes Low, Medium, High, and Ultra at three resolutions. At 1920x1080, Low averages 535.7 FPS, Medium 472.2, High 428.3, and Ultra 302.2. At 2560x1440, Low averages 339.2, Medium 294.3, High 268.5, and Ultra 187.2. At 3840x2160, Low averages 176.9, Medium 153.8, High 141.9, and Ultra 99.6.

Every resolution follows the same ordering: Low is fastest, then Medium, then High, then Ultra. At 1080p, even Ultra delivers 302.2, which is higher than the 1440p Ultra row and every 4K row. The slowest 1440p row is Ultra at 187.2, and the slowest overall row is 4K Ultra at 99.6. The measured rows do not report minFPS or maxFPS values, so the averages are the only frame-rate metrics available.

Resolution Scaling

Raising the resolution has a clear cost in the measured rows. For Low, the average FPS moves from 535.7 at 1080p, to 339.2 at 1440p, to 176.9 at 4K. For Medium, it moves from 472.2, to 294.3, to 153.8. For High, it moves from 428.3, to 268.5, to 141.9. For Ultra, it moves from 302.2, to 187.2, to 99.6.

These values show the FPS drop becoming larger when the resolution changes from 1440p to 4K. That is the expected shape of a GPU-heavy workload: the CPU can feed frames at lower resolutions, but the RTX 5090 has to do much more work at 4K. The limiting component shifts as resolution rises. At 1080p Low, the 535.7 FPS result is close to the practical delivery ceiling of the CPU and game engine. At 4K Ultra, the 99.6 FPS result is the slowest row, and it reflects the GPU's rendering load. The GPU's 1.79 TB/s bandwidth and 32 GB VRAM keep memory from becoming the bottleneck, but the pixel workload still reduces average FPS substantially at 4K.

Settings Recommendations

The measured preset rows provide four options. For maximum frame rate, Low is the top choice at every resolution: 535.7 at 1080p, 339.2 at 1440p, and 176.9 at 4K. Medium offers the next highest averages: 472.2, 294.3, and 153.8. High is the middle ground at 428.3, 268.5, and 141.9. Ultra is the most demanding preset, with 302.2 at 1080p, 187.2 at 1440p, and 99.6 at 4K.

The data set does not include image-quality measurements, so the recommendation is based purely on the measured FPS rows. At 1080p and 1440p, High looks like a sensible balance because it remains far above the slowest rows in the data set while leaving Ultra available for users who want the highest visual quality setting. At 4K, Medium is the fastest middle preset at 153.8, and it beats High at 141.9; users who want more visual quality than Low can run Medium and still get a higher average FPS than High. Users who accept the slowest measured frame rate can run Ultra at 99.6. For Ready Or Not, this combo is fast enough that the choice between presets is more about visual load than about playability.