Ready Or Not
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 114 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 43 | 56 | 61 | 74 |
| 1440p QHD | 74 | 107 | 118 | 138 |
| 1080p Full HD | 121 | 169 | 186 | 217 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Ready Or Not with AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT + Intel Arc B580, In-Depth Analysis
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data for Ready Or Not with the AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT and Intel Arc B580 shows a predictable but steep drop as resolution climbs. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo produces 216.7 FPS average. Moving to 2560x1440 Low drops that to 137.5 FPS, a reduction of roughly 37%. At 3840x2160 Low, the average falls to 73.8 FPS, which is only about 34% of the 1080p figure. This scaling pattern indicates the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor as pixel count rises.
The gap between Low and Ultra settings widens dramatically at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the difference between Low (216.7 FPS) and Ultra (121.2 FPS) is 95.5 FPS. At 1440p, that spread shrinks to 63.8 FPS (137.5 vs 73.7). At 4K, the Ultra preset yields 43 FPS while Low delivers 73.8 FPS, a 30.8 FPS gap. The shrinking delta suggests that at 4K, the GPU is so heavily loaded that even lowering settings cannot fully compensate for the pixel throughput demands.
The 1080p results reveal a CPU-bound scenario at lower settings. With Low preset hitting 216.7 FPS and Medium at 186.2 FPS, the Ryzen 5 5600GT's six cores and 12 threads are clearly capable of feeding the Arc B580 at high frame rates. The fact that Ultra at 1080p still achieves 121.2 FPS shows headroom remains even with maximum visual fidelity. At 4K, however, the GPU's 13.67 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 456.0 GB/s memory bandwidth become the bottleneck, as evidenced by the 43 FPS Ultra result.
How This Combo Ranks
Among the 1748 tested combinations for Ready Or Not, this pairing of Ryzen 5 5600GT and Arc B580 ranks 1376th. That places it in the lower third of all tested combos, which is notable given the individual component performance. The CPU sits at the 78th percentile among all tested processors, while the GPU is at the 66th percentile. The combination's poor in-game rank relative to component percentiles suggests the pairing has specific limitations in this title.
The CPU's nearest rivals provide context. The Intel Core i7-10700 scores 20746 in average benchmarks, essentially identical to the 5600GT's 20740 (0% delta). The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X scores 20680, a 0.3% deficit, while the Intel Core i5-12490F leads by 0.3% at 20794. These are all within statistical noise, meaning the 5600GT's compute performance is competitive with its direct peers. The GPU's nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, scores 23181 versus the Arc B580's 23021, a 0.7% deficit. The AMD Radeon 760M is 0.1% behind, and the NVIDIA P106-100 trails by 0.3%.
Despite these competitive component-level scores, the in-game rank of 1376 out of 1748 indicates that Ready Or Not's specific workload does not favor this combination. The game's tactical shooter genre often stresses both CPU and GPU in ways that synthetic benchmarks do not fully capture. The data suggests that while each component performs adequately in isolation, their interaction in this title produces results below what their percentile rankings would imply.
Settings Recommendations
For 1080p gaming, the High preset at 168.5 FPS offers the best balance of visual quality and performance. Ultra at 121.2 FPS is still playable, but the 47.3 FPS drop from High represents a significant cost for marginal visual gains. Medium at 186.2 FPS is the choice for high-refresh displays, though it sacrifices visual fidelity. Low at 216.7 FPS is only useful for competitive play where frame rate trumps everything.
At 1440p, High at 106.9 FPS is the sweet spot. It maintains triple-digit performance while delivering solid visuals. Medium at 117.7 FPS provides a 10.8 FPS boost with some visual compromise. Ultra at 73.7 FPS is borderline for smooth gameplay, and the 33.2 FPS drop from High makes it hard to recommend. Low at 137.5 FPS is viable for esports-style play, but the visual downgrade is noticeable at this resolution.
At 4K, the picture changes entirely. High at 56.1 FPS is playable but not smooth by modern standards. Medium at 60.8 FPS is the best option for a playable experience, as it stays above 60 FPS. Low at 73.8 FPS is the only preset that provides comfortable headroom, but it strips away much of the game's visual atmosphere. Ultra at 43 FPS is not recommended for any serious play session. The data indicates that 4K Ultra is beyond this combo's capability, and 4K gaming should stick to Medium or Low.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the measured results span from 121.2 FPS at Ultra to 216.7 FPS at Low. Medium lands at 186.2 FPS, and High at 168.5 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a consistent decline, with the largest single-step drop occurring between Medium (186.2) and High (168.5), a 17.7 FPS reduction. The step from High to Ultra costs 47.3 FPS, the steepest penalty in the 1080p set.
At 2560x1440, Low produces 137.5 FPS, Medium 117.7 FPS, High 106.9 FPS, and Ultra 73.7 FPS. The drop from Medium to High is 10.8 FPS, while High to Ultra costs 33.2 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p delivers exactly the same frame rate as the High preset at 4K (73.7 vs 56.1 is actually different, but the pattern shows diminishing returns). The 1440p results show a tighter grouping between Low and High, with only a 30.6 FPS spread across those three settings.
At 3840x2160, Low yields 73.8 FPS, Medium 60.8 FPS, High 56.1 FPS, and Ultra 43 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 13 FPS, Medium to High is 4.7 FPS, and High to Ultra is 13.1 FPS. The 4K results compress into a narrow band, with only 30.8 FPS separating the best and worst presets. This compression is a hallmark of GPU-bound scenarios, where rendering resolution dominates over settings changes.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B580 brings 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, yielding 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 80 ROPs are paired with 20 ray tracing cores. The GPU runs at a fixed 2670 MHz base and boost clock, which is unusual for modern cards that typically boost higher under load. The pixel rate of 213.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 427.2 GTexel/s define its raw output capabilities.
In Ready Or Not, the 12 GB frame buffer is not the limiting factor at any tested resolution. The game's asset requirements at 4K Ultra fit within this capacity, as evidenced by the playable 43 FPS result. The memory bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s, however, appears to constrain performance at 4K. The steep drop from 1440p High (106.9 FPS) to 4K High (56.1 FPS) suggests the GPU's compute throughput, not its memory capacity, is the primary bottleneck.
The GPU's nearest rival, the RTX 4060, scores 0.7% higher in average benchmarks. This margin is small enough that game-specific optimizations determine actual performance. In Ready Or Not, the Arc B580's 13.67 TFLOPS of FP32 compute must handle the game's lighting and shadow calculations, and the 4K Ultra result of 43 FPS reflects that workload. The GPU's 190 W TDP and 450 W suggested PSU requirement indicate a mid-range power draw, but the performance data shows it struggles with this game's 4K demands.
FAQ
Q: Can this combo run Ready Or Not at 4K?
A: Yes, but with caveats. At 4K Low, the average FPS is 73.8, and Medium achieves 60.8 FPS. High drops to 56.1 FPS, and Ultra falls to 43 FPS. For smooth 4K play, Low or Medium settings are required.
Q: What is the best resolution for this pairing?
A: The 2560x1440 High preset at 106.9 FPS offers the best combination of visual quality and smoothness. It provides triple-digit frame rates without the visual compromises of Low settings.
Q: How much performance does Ultra cost over High?
A: At 1080p, Ultra is 47.3 FPS slower than High (121.2 vs 168.5). At 1440p, the cost is 33.2 FPS (73.7 vs 106.9). At 4K, Ultra costs 13.1 FPS over High (43 vs 56.1).
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this game?
A: At 1080p, the CPU appears capable of driving high frame rates, with Low hitting 216.7 FPS. At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, as frame rates compress to a narrow 43-73.8 FPS band regardless of settings.
Q: How does the Arc B580 compare to its closest competitor in this game?
A: The GPU's average benchmark score of 23021 is 0.7% below the RTX 4060's 23181. In Ready Or Not specifically, the measured results indicate the Arc B580 handles 1080p and 1440p well but struggles at 4K Ultra.
Q: What settings should I use for a 144Hz monitor?
A: At 1080p, Medium (186.2 FPS) or High (168.5 FPS) both exceed 144 FPS. At 1440p, only Low (137.5 FPS) comes close, and it falls short of 144 FPS. For 144Hz at 1440p, you would need to accept frame rates below the refresh rate.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT
Intel Arc B580
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT + Intel Arc B580 in Ready Or Not
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 73.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 60.8 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 56.1 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 43.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 137.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 117.7 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 106.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 73.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 216.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 186.2 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 168.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 121.2 |
Ready Or Not with Ryzen 5 5600GT + Other GPUs
See how Ready Or Not performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Ready Or Not with Arc B580 + Other CPUs
See how Ready Or Not performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 5600GT + Arc B580
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.