Ready Or Not
This combination offers playable performance with an average of 59 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 21 | 29 | 32 | 37 |
| 1440p QHD | 40 | 56 | 62 | 71 |
| 1080p Full HD | 63 | 89 | 98 | 113 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Ready Or Not with AMD Ryzen 5 5500 + Intel Arc B370, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 paired with the Intel Arc B370 produces a highly constrained gaming experience in Ready Or Not, with performance that places this combination in the bottom 8% of all tested systems. The data indicates a substantial bottleneck, where the GPU's capabilities significantly limit frame rates across all settings and resolutions. While the CPU provides ample headroom, the graphics subsystem struggles to maintain playable performance, particularly at higher settings.
FAQ
Q: What is the best average FPS this combo achieves at 1080p?
A: The highest average frame rate recorded at 1920x1080 is 113 FPS, which is achieved with the Low preset. This drops to 98 FPS on Medium, 89 FPS on High, and 63 FPS on Ultra.
Q: How does the combo perform at 4K resolution?
A: At 3840x2160, the performance is largely unplayable. The highest average FPS at this resolution is 37 FPS on Low, which falls to 32 FPS on Medium, 29 FPS on High, and 21 FPS on Ultra.
Q: What is the performance difference between the lowest and highest settings at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset yields an average of 40 FPS, while the Low preset produces 71 FPS. This represents a 31 FPS difference, or a performance increase of roughly 77.5% when switching from Ultra to Low.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this configuration?
A: The data strongly suggests the Intel Arc B370 is the primary limiting factor. The GPU has a percentile rank of 5, meaning it performs better than only 5% of all GPUs, while the CPU has a percentile rank of 73. The GPU's low performance ceiling restricts frame rates, regardless of the CPU's capabilities.
Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its nearest rivals in raw GPU benchmarks?
A: In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the Intel Arc B370 scores 1184. Its nearest rival, the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, scores a nearly identical 1186, indicating a 0.2% difference. Other close rivals include the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (1190) and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M (1192), all within a 1% performance band.
Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for this combo across all tested settings?
A: The lowest minimum FPS recorded in the data is 28 FPS, which occurs at 3840x2160 on Medium settings. The minimum FPS for 1440p Medium is 53 FPS, and for 1080p Medium it is 83 FPS.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B370 is the decisive factor in this system's Ready Or Not performance. Its specifications reveal a hardware profile that is fundamentally unsuited for high-end gaming. The GPU features a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, but its memory configuration is "System Shared," which means it relies on system RAM rather than dedicated VRAM. This shared memory setup, with bandwidth listed as "System Dependent," inherently limits data throughput in graphically intensive scenes.
The GPU's raw compute power is reflected in its 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 performance and a pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s. With 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs, the architecture is designed for efficiency rather than brute force. The benchmark results confirm this assessment. The GPU's average benchmark score is a mere 1184, placing it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are legacy parts like the ATI Radeon HD 5770 and AMD Radeon HD 7650M, which are separated by less than one percent in score. This places the Arc B370 in a performance tier that is simply not competitive for a demanding tactical shooter at higher settings.
In Ready Or Not, this GPU bottleneck is apparent from the data. At 1080p, the GPU manages to push frame rates above 60 FPS only on the Low (113 FPS) and Medium (98 FPS) presets. The High preset drops to 89 FPS, and Ultra falls to 63 FPS. The situation worsens dramatically at higher resolutions. The data indicates that the GPU's limited memory bandwidth and processing power are overwhelmed when the rendering resolution increases, leading to a steep decline in performance.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 presents a stark contrast to the GPU, offering robust processing capabilities that are underutilized in this pairing. This 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 5000 series is based on the Zen 3 architecture and can boost up to 4.20 GHz from a base clock of 3.60 GHz. Its benchmark scores are respectable, with an average benchmark score of 19593, placing it in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs.
The CPU's multi-threaded performance is demonstrated by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16429 and a single-core score of 2319. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 (-0.1% delta) and the Intel Core i5-12500 (-0.4% delta), indicating it is competitive with modern mid-range processors. This level of performance is more than sufficient to feed frames to a more powerful GPU.
The data suggests the CPU is not the primary bottleneck in this configuration. For example, at 1080p, the difference between the Low and Ultra presets is a 50 FPS drop (113 to 63 FPS). This significant performance penalty is a result of the GPU being unable to handle the increased graphical load, not the CPU. The CPU's high percentile rank and strong benchmark scores imply it has significant headroom left on the table. The system's overall performance is dictated by the GPU's inability to keep up, making the Ryzen 5 5500 a capable but wasted resource in this specific combination.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a detailed view of how this combo scales across different resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system performs best, with the Low preset averaging 113 FPS. The Medium preset averages 98 FPS, with minimum and maximum values of 83 and 113 FPS respectively. High settings yield 89 FPS average, and the Ultra preset brings the average down to 63 FPS. This demonstrates that the system can achieve high refresh rates at 1080p, but only with reduced graphical fidelity.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance hit becomes more pronounced. The Low preset averages 71 FPS, which drops to 62 FPS on Medium (min 53, max 71). The High preset produces an average of 56 FPS, and Ultra falls to 40 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p results in a substantial 42 FPS loss on Low settings (113 to 71 FPS), highlighting the GPU's sensitivity to resolution scaling.
At 3840x2160, the combo is unable to deliver playable performance. The Low preset averages just 37 FPS. Medium settings average 32 FPS, with a minimum of 28 FPS and maximum of 37 FPS. High settings average 29 FPS, and Ultra plummets to 21 FPS. The data shows that even the lowest settings at 4K fail to reach the 60 FPS threshold, confirming that this resolution is beyond the capabilities of the Intel Arc B370 in Ready Or Not.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 5500 and Intel Arc B370 ranks 2710 out of 2947 tested combos in Ready Or Not. This places it in the bottom 8% of all systems, a position that reflects the severe bottleneck imposed by the GPU. This ranking is a critical indicator; it shows that while the CPU is a mid-range performer, the overall gaming experience is dragged down by the graphics card.
This low ranking is consistent with the GPU's 5th percentile performance. The Intel Arc B370's benchmark scores are comparable to integrated graphics from over a decade ago, such as the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570. The data implies that this combo would be better suited for older or less demanding games, or for productivity tasks where the CPU's strengths can be leveraged. In the context of Ready Or Not, this combo is at the very bottom of the performance ladder, making it a poor choice for this title.
Settings Recommendations
Given the measured performance, the only viable presets for a playable experience are found at 1080p. At this resolution, the Low preset provides the highest average FPS at 113, ensuring smooth gameplay. The Medium preset, with an average of 98 FPS and a minimum of 83 FPS, is also a strong option, offering a balance between visual quality and performance that remains above 60 FPS.
At 1440p, the data suggests that even the Low preset (71 FPS) can be playable, but the experience is less stable. The Medium preset at 1440p has a minimum FPS of 53, which could lead to noticeable stutters. The Ultra and High presets at 1440p, with averages of 40 and 56 FPS respectively, are not recommended for competitive play.
For the best experience per the measured rows, the 1080p Medium preset is the optimal choice. It provides a substantial improvement in visual quality over Low while maintaining an average frame rate of 98 FPS and a minimum of 83 FPS, ensuring a consistent and responsive experience. The 1080p High preset (89 FPS) is a secondary option if visual fidelity is paramount, but the Medium preset offers a safer margin.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and revealing. At Low settings, the average FPS falls from 113 at 1080p to 71 at 1440p, and finally to 37 at 4K. This represents a 67% decrease in performance from 1080p to 4K. Similarly, on High settings, the average FPS goes from 89 at 1080p to 56 at 1440p and 29 at 4K, a 67% reduction.
This scaling pattern is a clear indicator of a GPU-limited system. When the rendering resolution increases, the workload on the GPU's shading units, ROPs, and memory subsystem increases exponentially. The Intel Arc B370, with its limited 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 power and shared system memory, cannot sustain performance as the pixel count grows. The CPU, in contrast, would handle the additional overhead of higher resolutions with relative ease.
The data paints a clear picture: this combo is a 1080p gaming solution. The 4K results are uniformly below 40 FPS, which is unplayable for a tactical shooter requiring precision. The resolution scaling confirms that the GPU is the limiting component, and any attempt to play Ready Or Not above 1080p will result in a significantly compromised experience.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 5500
Intel Arc B370
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 5500 + Intel Arc B370 in Ready Or Not
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 37.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 32.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 29.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 21.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 71.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 62.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 56.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 40.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 113.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 98.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 89.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 63.0 |
Ready Or Not with Ryzen 5 5500 + Other GPUs
See how Ready Or Not performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Ready Or Not with Arc B370 + Other CPUs
See how Ready Or Not performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 5500 + Arc B370
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.