Pc Building Simulator

# Pc Building Simulator with Intel Core i7-14700F + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

This combination of an Intel Core i7-14700F and an AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT places in the 886th position out of 1,769 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator, landing it just past the halfway point of the database. The CPU itself sits in the 94th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks in the 79th percentile among all graphics cards, suggesting a pairing where the processor's relative strength is notably higher than the graphics card's standing. The benchmark results across all resolutions and settings reveal a system that can comfortably handle this simulation title, though the performance ceiling varies dramatically depending on how aggressively the settings are pushed.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 886 out of 1,769 tested combinations places it squarely in the middle of the field, which is a somewhat surprising outcome given the individual component percentiles. The Intel Core i7-14700F is a 20-core, 28-thread Raptor Lake Refresh part with a 5.40 GHz boost clock, and its average benchmark score of 54,097 puts it within striking distance of much more expensive processors. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X, scores 54,450 — a mere 0.6% difference — while the Ryzen 9 9900X3D sits 1.1% ahead. On the other side, the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 trails by 1.2% and the AMD EPYC 7313P by 1.7%. This places the i7-14700F in a tight cluster where a few percentage points separate it from several formidable competitors.

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT presents a different picture. Its average benchmark score of 35,327 is nearly matched by the AMD Radeon RX 5600M, which comes within 0.2%, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is 0.3% ahead and the AMD Radeon 880M leads by 0.9%. Notably, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 — a card many would consider a tier above — is only 1.3% ahead in average score. The GPU's 79th percentile ranking among all graphics cards is respectable but not exceptional, which helps explain why the overall combo lands in the middle of the pack. In a simulation game that likely depends on a mix of CPU and GPU work, this pairing produces a balanced but not dominant result.

Settings Recommendations

The measured frame rate data makes a compelling case for Medium settings as the sweet spot for this combo, particularly at 1440p and 4K. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers 282.9 FPS on average, which is far beyond what any standard display can show, while Medium drops to 198.1 FPS and High settles at 138.9 FPS. Ultra at 1080p still manages a very playable 133.9 FPS. The story changes at higher resolutions, where the gap between presets widens considerably. At 2560x1440, Medium produces 123.7 FPS, which is a strong result, while High drops to 89.6 FPS and Ultra falls to 85.5 FPS. At 3840x2160, Medium maintains a solid 66.6 FPS, but High sinks to 45.9 FPS and Ultra to 45.5 FPS — both approaching the edge of comfortable playability.

Given these numbers, Medium settings offer the best balance of visual quality and performance across all three resolutions. The jump from Low to Medium at 1080p costs roughly 84.8 FPS (from 282.9 to 198.1), but the visual improvement in a building simulation is substantial. At 1440p, Medium's 123.7 FPS leaves ample headroom for demanding scenes, and at 4K, the 66.6 FPS average remains fluid enough for a simulation title where precise timing is less critical than in competitive shooters. For users with high-refresh-rate 1080p displays, High at 138.9 FPS is also a viable choice, but Ultra's gains over High are minimal in frame rate terms while demanding notably more from the GPU.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate progression from 1080p to 4K reveals where this combo's bottleneck lies. At Low settings, the drop from 282.9 FPS at 1080p to 177.1 FPS at 1440p represents a 37.4% decrease, and then to 91.3 FPS at 4K — a further 48.4% reduction from the 1440p figure. This steep decline suggests the GPU is being pushed harder as pixel count rises, but the CPU still has plenty of headroom at 1080p Low, where the frame rate is so high that the processor is likely the limiting factor. At Medium settings, the scaling is similar: 198.1 FPS at 1080p, 123.7 FPS at 1440p, and 66.6 FPS at 4K, with the 4K figure representing just 33.6% of the 1080p performance.

The High preset tells a more revealing story. From 138.9 FPS at 1080p to 89.6 FPS at 1440p is a 35.5% drop, and then to 45.9 FPS at 4K is another 48.8% reduction. The near-identical percentage drops across all three presets indicate that the GPU is the dominant constraint at every resolution when settings are elevated. The RX 6750 XT's 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth is sufficient for this game, but the 2,560 shading units and 64 ROPs are simply not enough to maintain high frame rates at 4K with High or Ultra details. The CPU, by contrast, shows its strength at lower resolutions where the frame rates are high enough to expose any processor weakness — and the i7-14700F's 20 cores handle the simulation workload without breaking a sweat.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers exceptional performance across the board. Low settings produce an average of 282.9 FPS, which is more than enough for any display. Medium achieves 198.1 FPS, representing a 30% reduction from Low but still exceptionally smooth. High comes in at 138.9 FPS, and Ultra at 133.9 FPS — the gap between High and Ultra is just 5 FPS, suggesting diminishing returns from the highest preset. The 1080p results show that even at Ultra, this pairing has more than double the frame rate needed for a standard 60 Hz monitor.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but the scaling is evident. Low delivers 177.1 FPS — still very high — while Medium drops to 123.7 FPS, a 30.2% reduction that mirrors the 1080p pattern. High falls to 89.6 FPS, and Ultra to 85.5 FPS. The High-to-Ultra delta at 1440p is only 4.1 FPS, again indicating that Ultra offers little practical benefit. At 1440p, Medium is the clear choice for high-refresh-rate monitors, while High remains viable for 60-75 Hz displays.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's limitations become apparent. Low settings produce 91.3 FPS, which is still playable, but Medium drops to 66.6 FPS — a 27.1% reduction from Low. High falls to 45.9 FPS, and Ultra to 45.5 FPS. The difference between High and Ultra at 4K is a negligible 0.4 FPS, meaning users should never choose Ultra over High at this resolution. The 4K results show that this combo is best suited for 1080p or 1440p gaming, with 4K requiring Low or Medium settings to maintain smooth performance.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with a Navi 22 chip fabricated on a 7 nm TSMC process, containing 17,200 million transistors across a 335 mm² die. Its base clock of 2150 MHz boosts to 2600 MHz, with a game clock of 2495 MHz, and the memory runs at 2250 MHz effective 18 Gbps. The 12 GB GDDR6 frame buffer is generous for a card in this class, and the 192-bit bus provides 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The card's 13.31 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 40 ray tracing cores place it as a solid mid-range option, though its 250 W TDP and requirement for a 600 W PSU mean it needs adequate power delivery.

In Pc Building Simulator, the GPU's role is clearly defined by the measured frame rates. The card's 79th percentile ranking among all GPUs aligns with its mid-pack performance in this title. Its closest rivals — the RX 5600M, RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, Radeon 880M, and RTX 3080 — all sit within 1.3% of its average score, indicating that the RX 6750 XT is neither a standout nor a laggard. The benchmark results show that the card handles 1080p and 1440p with ease at Medium settings, but its 64 ROPs and 160 TMUs struggle to maintain high frame rates at 4K with elevated detail levels. The 12 GB VRAM is not a limiting factor here, as even at 4K Ultra the game does not appear to exceed this capacity. Instead, the raw compute throughput and memory bandwidth dictate the performance ceiling, and the data shows that ceiling is around 66 FPS at 4K Medium or 45 FPS at 4K High. The GPU is the clear bottleneck at 4K, while at 1080p the CPU's 20 cores keep the frame rates high enough that the graphics card becomes the primary constraint even at Low settings.