Control

Control is a demanding Action Adventure title that stresses both the CPU and GPU heavily, and this pairing of the Intel Core i7-14700F with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT lands in a strong, upper-midrange position. The data shows a system that is clearly capable of delivering smooth gameplay at mainstream resolutions, though it will require some settings adjustments to hit the highest refresh rates.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo ranks 761st out of 1,636 tested combinations in this game, placing it in the upper half of the database. That percentile position—roughly the 53rd percentile—tells a practical story: this is not an extreme enthusiast setup, but it sits comfortably above the median, meaning it will outpace a majority of other systems tested in this title. The ranking reflects a balanced pairing where neither component is a glaring bottleneck; instead, they complement each other to produce a solid, dependable experience.

The CPU is a major contributor to this ranking. The Core i7-14700F sits in the 94th percentile against all CPUs, which is a very high mark. Its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks include the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X, which is just 0.6% faster on average, and the Ryzen 9 9900X3D, which is 1.1% ahead. This places the Intel chip in elite company, showing that it has the processing headroom to avoid holding back the graphics card in most scenarios. The data suggests that in CPU-bound sections of the game, this combo will perform comparably to those much more expensive processors.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is the primary driver of visual output, and its specifications explain the frame rates seen in the measured data. It carries 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. This memory capacity is significant for Control, as the game’s detailed environments and particle effects can consume a substantial amount of VRAM at higher resolutions and settings.

Its clock speeds are the other key factor. The GPU has a base clock of 2150 MHz, a game clock of 2495 MHz, and a boost clock of 2600 MHz. These high frequencies allow the 2,560 shading units to do their work quickly, translating into the pixel and texture rates of 166.4 GPixel/s and 416.0 GTexel/s respectively. The GPU sits in the 79th percentile against all GPUs, and its nearest rivals in average benchmark score include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, which is 1.3% slower, and the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, which is 0.3% faster. This shows the RX 6750 XT is a very capable performer that holds its own against a prior generation’s high-end card.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-14700F provides the computational backbone, with 20 cores and 28 threads running at a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. This high boost clock is crucial for gaming, as it ensures strong single-threaded performance, which many game engines rely on for core game logic and draw call processing. The processor’s large 33 MB of shared L3 cache also helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, reducing latency.

Synthetic benchmarks underscore its strength. In Cinebench R23, it scores 35,443 in multi-core and 5,003 in single-core. The Geekbench results are similarly robust, with a multi-core score of 16,571 and single-core score of 2,711. While Control may not use all 28 threads, the headroom ensures that background tasks and complex physics calculations won’t cause frame drops. The 20-core count is overkill for this game, but it future-proofs the system for other titles and workloads.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how this combo handles Control across different resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system is exceptionally strong. With Low settings, it averages 149.8 FPS, which is well above the 144Hz refresh rate target. Moving to Medium drops the average to 105.6 FPS, and High settings yield 95.7 FPS. Even at Ultra, the average remains a very playable 85 FPS. This resolution is where the combo shines, offering high refresh rate potential even with most settings maxed out.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales predictably. Low settings produce an average of 113.9 FPS, which remains very smooth. Medium settings bring that down to 80.2 FPS, while High settings average 68.6 FPS. Ultra is still playable, with an average of 62 FPS. The data shows that this is the resolution where users will need to start making a choice between visual fidelity and frame rate, but the system remains capable of a solid 60+ FPS experience on High settings.

The 3840x2160 (4K) results reveal the limits of this pairing. Low settings average 78.1 FPS, which is respectable for 4K. However, Medium drops to 55.6 FPS, and High falls to 49.6 FPS. Ultra settings average only 38.8 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay on most displays. At this resolution, the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are being pushed hard, and the data suggests that users should stick to Medium or Low settings for a playable experience.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Control at 144 FPS?

A: Yes, but only at 1920x1080 with Low settings, where it averages 149.8 FPS. At 1080p Medium, the average drops to 105.6 FPS, so hitting 144 FPS will require Low settings.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 4K?

A: The GPU is the clear bottleneck at 3840x2160. The CPU is in the 94th percentile of all processors, while the GPU is in the 79th percentile. The frame rates at 4K Ultra (38.8 FPS) are constrained by the RX 6750 XT’s performance, not the i7-14700F.

Q: How does this combo compare to one with an RTX 3080?

A: The RTX 3080 is a close rival in synthetic benchmarks, with an average score just 1.3% higher than the RX 6750 XT. In practical terms, the performance difference in this game would be minimal, with the RTX 3080 having a slight edge in raw compute.

Q: What is the best setting for a smooth 60 FPS experience at 1440p?

A: The High preset at 2560x1440 delivers an average of 68.6 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS target. The Medium preset offers more headroom at 80.2 FPS, but High should be sufficient for a stable experience.

Q: Does the CPU’s 20-core count matter for this game?

A: Control is not heavily multithreaded, but the i7-14700F’s high boost clock of 5.40 GHz provides strong single-thread performance, which matters more. The extra cores provide headroom for other tasks but are not directly responsible for the game’s frame rates.

Q: Is 12 GB of VRAM enough for Control at high settings?

A: The data suggests yes. At 3840x2160 High, the combo averages 49.6 FPS, which is playable but not ideal. At 1440p High, it averages 68.6 FPS. The 12 GB capacity appears sufficient for these settings, as the frame rates drop due to compute limits rather than memory overflow.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data points to a clear strategy for this combo. For users with a 1080p display, the High preset at 95.7 FPS offers an excellent balance of visual quality and smoothness, and Ultra at 85 FPS is also a strong choice if you prefer maxed-out effects. If you have a high refresh rate monitor, dropping to Medium at 105.6 FPS is the best way to get closer to 144Hz without sacrificing too much visual fidelity.

For 1440p displays, the High preset at 68.6 FPS is the recommended sweet spot, providing a comfortable margin above 60 FPS while maintaining good image quality. The Medium preset at 80.2 FPS is a viable alternative for those who prioritize frame rate over sharpness. Ultra at 62 FPS is playable but leaves little headroom for demanding scenes, so it is not the best choice for consistent performance.

At 4K, the recommendation is to use the Low preset, which averages 78.1 FPS, as it is the only setting that provides a truly smooth experience. The Medium preset at 55.6 FPS is acceptable if you can tolerate occasional dips, but High and Ultra are not recommended due to their sub-50 FPS averages. For the best overall experience across all resolutions, the High preset at 1440p offers the most balanced combination of visual fidelity and performance, making it the default choice for this system.