Pc Building Simulator

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data for Pc Building Simulator shows a clear and dramatic scaling curve as resolution increases. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, this combo delivers 394.6 FPS, which drops to 252.5 FPS at 2560x1440, and further to 132.7 FPS at 3840x2160. That is a 66% reduction from 1080p to 4K at Low settings. The pattern is consistent across all settings presets: moving from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 35-40% of performance, while moving from 1440p to 4K costs another 45-50%.

This scaling behavior is revealing. At 1080p Low, the system achieves nearly 400 FPS, which is far beyond what any display can typically refresh. The fact that performance drops so steeply with resolution indicates that the GPU is the dominant limiting factor in this title. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see a plateau at higher resolutions—where the frame rate stays roughly constant regardless of pixel count. Instead, the data shows a monotonic decline, which is classic GPU-bound behavior.

At 4K Ultra, the combo manages 59.4 FPS, which is just below the 60 FPS threshold often considered ideal for smooth gameplay. The gap between High (62.6 FPS) and Ultra (59.4 FPS) at 4K is small, suggesting that the Ultra preset pushes the GPU to its limits. The Low preset at 4K still produces 132.7 FPS, which is more than double the Ultra result, indicating that the game's visual settings have a significant impact on GPU load.

The resolution scaling also reveals that this is not a memory-bandwidth-limited scenario. The GPU's 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth is sufficient to handle the data demands even at 4K, as evidenced by the smooth scaling curve. If bandwidth were a constraint, we would see a more abrupt cliff between 1440p and 4K rather than the gradual decline observed.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with a 5 nm process from TSMC. Its boost clock of 2512 MHz and base clock of 2325 MHz provide the raw compute throughput that Pc Building Simulator leverages. The GPU's 30.87 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 482.3 GTexel/s texture rate are directly relevant to a simulation game that must render complex scenes with many objects and texturing needs.

The 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus is a notable aspect. Pc Building Simulator is not typically considered a VRAM-heavy title, but the data suggests that 12 GB is adequate for all tested configurations. At 4K Ultra, the game still achieves nearly 60 FPS, which would not be possible if the GPU were spilling into system memory. The memory clock of 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) contributes to the 672.0 GB/s bandwidth, which appears sufficient for this game's demands.

The GPU's benchmark scores place it in the 83rd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 41687. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 (deltaPct 0.6) and the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (deltaPct 0.2). This positioning tells us that the RTX 5070 is a high-end part, but not the absolute top. In Pc Building Simulator specifically, the measured FPS at 1080p Low (394.6) suggests the GPU is capable of handling even the most demanding scenarios without breaking a sweat.

The GPU's pixel rate of 201.0 GPixel/s and 80 ROPs are relevant for a game that likely relies on fill-rate-intensive rendering. The data shows that at 4K Ultra, the system produces 59.4 FPS, which translates to roughly 548 million pixels per second (3840x2160 = 8.3 million pixels, times 59.4). This is well within the GPU's pixel throughput capabilities, indicating that other factors like shader complexity or geometry are the limiting factors at Ultra settings.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core i7-12700KF brings a hybrid architecture with 12 cores and 20 threads, based on the Alder Lake design. Its boost clock of 5.00 GHz and base clock of 3.60 GHz provide strong single-threaded performance, which is critical for simulation games that often have a primary game logic thread. The CPU's 25 MB of shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB per-core L2 cache help keep frequently accessed data close to the cores.

The CPU's benchmark results show a clear strength in both single and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28979 and single-core score of 4091 demonstrate that this processor excels in both domains. The Geekbench scores of 13596 (multicore) and 2526 (single-core) reinforce this assessment. The PassMark multithread score of 34092 and single-thread score of 3984 further confirm the CPU's capability.

In the context of Pc Building Simulator, the CPU's role is to manage the simulation logic, including the physics of component installation, thermal calculations, and system stability modeling. The PassMark physics score of 1780 and floating point math score of 87449 suggest that the CPU can handle these computational tasks without becoming a bottleneck. The data supports this: at 1080p Low, the system achieves 394.6 FPS, which is far beyond what the GPU alone could produce if the CPU were limiting the frame rate.

The CPU's 89th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35355, puts it in a strong position. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-14400 (deltaPct 0.1) and Intel Core i9-12900HX (deltaPct 0.2), showing that it performs essentially on par with these parts. The 12th-gen processor's architecture, with its combination of performance and efficiency cores, appears well-suited to the mixed workloads of a simulation game.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Pc Building Simulator?

A: The data shows that 2560x1440 at High settings produces 122.9 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold while still offering a significant visual upgrade over 1080p. At 4K High, the system still achieves 62.6 FPS, so 4K is viable if you prefer higher pixel density.

Q: How much performance is lost when going from 1080p to 4K at Ultra settings?

A: At 1080p Ultra, the system produces 188.3 FPS. At 4K Ultra, it produces 59.4 FPS. This represents a 68% reduction in frame rate, which is a substantial drop but still leaves the game playable.

Q: Is the RTX 5070 GPU or the i7-12700KF CPU the bottleneck in this game?

A: The resolution scaling data indicates the GPU is the primary limiting factor. As resolution increases from 1080p to 4K, frame rates drop consistently across all settings, which is characteristic of GPU-bound scenarios. The CPU's strong benchmark scores support this conclusion.

Q: Does this combo support 4K gaming in Pc Building Simulator?

A: Yes, but with caveats. At 4K High, the system achieves 62.6 FPS, which is smooth. At 4K Ultra, it drops to 59.4 FPS, which is still playable but close to the edge. For the most consistent experience, High settings at 4K are recommended.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 compare to its nearest rivals in terms of benchmark scores?

A: The RTX 5070 has an average benchmark score of 41687. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro 5300, scores 41610 (deltaPct 0.2), while the NVIDIA Tesla M40 scores 41897 (deltaPct -0.5). The RTX 5070 sits between these two in performance.

Q: What is the CPU's single-threaded performance, and why does it matter?

A: The i7-12700KF scores 4091 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 3984 in PassMark single-thread. Single-threaded performance is critical for simulation games that often have a primary game logic thread that cannot be parallelized effectively.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i7-12700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 ranks 325th out of 1769 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator. This places it in the top 18% of all configurations tested, which is a strong showing for a mid-to-high-end setup. The rank suggests that while this combo is not at the absolute top tier, it outperforms the vast majority of systems in this game.

The ranking is particularly notable given the game's simulation nature. Pc Building Simulator is not a typical AAA shooter with demanding graphics; it is a simulation title that requires a balance of CPU and GPU performance. The fact that this combo ranks as well as it does indicates that both components are pulling their weight. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking and the GPU's 83rd percentile ranking both contribute to the overall position.

The gap between this combo and the top-ranked systems is likely due to more powerful GPUs at higher resolutions. At 4K Ultra, this combo produces 59.4 FPS, while top-tier systems with flagship GPUs would likely exceed 100 FPS. However, for the vast majority of gaming scenarios—especially at 1080p and 1440p—this combo delivers excellent performance that exceeds what most users would need.

The rank of 325 out of 1769 also indicates that there is a significant population of systems that perform worse than this combo. This is reassuring for users who want a capable system without chasing the absolute highest-end components. The data shows that this combo is well-balanced for Pc Building Simulator's demands.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides clear guidance on which settings preset offers the best experience. At 1080p, all presets are playable, with even Ultra delivering 188.3 FPS. However, the jump from Medium (281.7 FPS) to Ultra (188.3 FPS) represents a 33% performance cost. Given that 188.3 FPS is already far beyond any display's refresh rate, the Ultra preset is the best choice at 1080p if you want the best visuals without sacrificing smoothness.

At 1440p, the situation is similar but with a tighter margin. High settings produce 122.9 FPS, while Ultra produces 119.2 FPS—a difference of only 3%. This suggests that the Ultra preset at 1440p is nearly as efficient as High, making it the recommended choice. Medium (178.3 FPS) offers a higher frame rate but at a noticeable visual quality cost. The data indicates that High or Ultra at 1440p is the sweet spot.

At 4K, the choice becomes more critical. Ultra produces 59.4 FPS, which is just below 60 FPS and may be noticeable to some users. High produces 62.6 FPS, which is above 60 and provides a smoother experience with only a minimal visual difference from Ultra. Medium produces 93.1 FPS, which is a significant improvement. For the best balance of visual quality and frame rate at 4K, High settings are recommended. The 3.2 FPS difference between High and Ultra is not worth the potential stutter, while the 30.5 FPS difference between Medium and High is worth the visual upgrade.

Overall, the data suggests that this combo is best utilized at 1440p with High or Ultra settings, or at 4K with High settings. The system has enough headroom at 1080p that even Ultra settings are overkill for most displays.

Measured FPS Breakdown

1920x1080:

• Low: 394.6 FPS
• Medium: 281.7 FPS
• High: 200.1 FPS
• Ultra: 188.3 FPS

At 1080p, the system is clearly GPU-bound at all settings. The difference between Low and Ultra is 206.3 FPS, showing that visual settings have a substantial impact. Even at Ultra, the frame rate is more than triple the 60 FPS threshold, making this resolution the most comfortable for this combo.

2560x1440:

• Low: 252.5 FPS
• Medium: 178.3 FPS
• High: 122.9 FPS
• Ultra: 119.2 FPS

At 1440p, the scaling becomes more pronounced. The drop from Low to Ultra is 133.3 FPS. The relative closeness of High (122.9) and Ultra (119.2)—a difference of only 3.7 FPS—suggests that the Ultra preset at this resolution is not significantly more demanding than High, making it a viable choice.

3840x2160:

• Low: 132.7 FPS
• Medium: 93.1 FPS
• High: 62.6 FPS
• Ultra: 59.4 FPS

At 4K, the system's limits become apparent. Ultra barely crosses the 60 FPS threshold, while High sits just above it. The difference between High and Ultra is only 3.2 FPS, suggesting that the Ultra preset's additional visual features have diminishing returns at this resolution. Medium (93.1 FPS) offers a much smoother experience if you're willing to compromise on visual fidelity.

The data shows a consistent pattern: as resolution increases, the performance gap between settings presets narrows. At 1080p, the gap between Low and Ultra is 206.3 FPS. At 4K, it is 73.3 FPS. This narrowing is characteristic of GPU-bound scenarios where the GPU's compute capacity becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions, regardless of the settings preset.