Pc Building Simulator

The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT delivers a dominant performance in PC Building Simulator, ranking in the 67th percentile of all tested combinations. This pairing excels at high refresh rates at 1080p and 1440p, with the GPU becoming the primary limiting factor only at 4K Ultra settings. The data indicates a well-balanced system for this simulation title, where the CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance and the GPU’s substantial memory bandwidth combine to produce smooth gameplay across most configurations.

FAQ

*Q: What is the overall performance ranking of this CPU and GPU combo in PC Building Simulator?*

A: The combination ranks 591st out of 1769 tested combos, placing it in the top third of all systems benchmarked for this game.

Q: How does the CPU benchmark against its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-13400F has an average benchmark score of 25236, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i7-13620H and 0.5% higher than the AMD EPYC 9474F. It is 0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance relative to its closest competitors?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT has an average benchmark score of 49982. This puts it 0.5% ahead of the Intel Arc A550M and 1.9% ahead of the NVIDIA CMP 50HX, but 1.7% behind the NVIDIA RTX A1000 and 2.6% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER.

Q: What frame rate can be expected at 1440p with High settings?

A: At 2560x1440 resolution with High settings, the system achieves an average of 108.4 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to be the bottleneck at 4K?

A: At 3840x2160, the performance gap between Low and Ultra settings is significant, dropping from 110.3 FPS to 52.4 FPS. This large swing indicates the GPU is the primary limiting factor at this resolution, especially under higher graphical loads.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the Intel Core i5-13400F has a locked multiplier, meaning it is not unlocked for overclocking.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT is the central component for rendering in PC Building Simulator, and its specifications directly correlate with the observed frame rates. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1825 MHz and a boost clock of 2250 MHz, providing the raw computational speed needed for this simulation’s visual output. More critically, the card’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s, which is ample for handling the textures and assets typical of a building and management simulator.

The benchmark results show a clear scaling pattern tied to the GPU’s workload. At 1080p Low settings, the average FPS is 339, a figure that drops to 161.7 FPS at Ultra settings. This 177.3 FPS difference demonstrates how increasing graphical fidelity directly taxes the GPU’s shading units and texture rate. The RX 6800 XT’s 4608 shading units and 288 TMUs provide the architecture necessary for high polygon counts and detailed textures. The card’s performance percentile of 87 versus all GPUs indicates it is a high-tier part, and the data confirms it has enough headroom to push high refresh rates at lower resolutions, but it begins to show limits when ray tracing or extreme settings are enabled at 4K.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals how the performance burden shifts across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system is clearly CPU-bound at lower settings, as evidenced by the 339 FPS at Low. This figure is so high that the GPU is not the limiting factor. Moving to 2560x1440, the average FPS at Low settings drops to 217.4, showing a 35.9% decrease. At 4K (3840x2160), the Low setting average falls further to 110.3 FPS, a 67.5% drop from the 1080p Low result.

The scaling pattern changes dramatically with settings. At High settings, the frame rate goes from 171.5 FPS at 1080p to 108.4 FPS at 1440p, and then to 58 FPS at 4K. This indicates that as resolution increases, the GPU becomes the bottleneck. The difference between 1080p and 4K at High settings is a 113.5 FPS loss, which is a 66% reduction. This is a classic sign of a GPU-limited scenario, where the rendering resolution demands more pixel throughput than the Radeon RX 6800 XT can sustain, despite its 288.0 GPixel/s pixel rate. The data suggests that for 4K gaming, users should consider Medium settings, which yield 79.8 FPS, to avoid dropping below the 60 FPS threshold.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT achieves a rank of 591 out of 1769 tested configurations in PC Building Simulator. This places the system in the 67th percentile of all possible pairings, a strong result that underscores the synergy between these two components. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 25236 places it in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU’s 49982 average score is in the 87th percentile among all GPUs. The combination of two high-percentile parts results in a system that is well above average for this title.

When compared to the nearest rival GPUs, the RX 6800 XT’s performance is competitive. It is 2.6% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, which is a notable margin. The CPU’s nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-13620H, is nearly identical in average score, with a delta of only 0.1%. This suggests that the specific CPU model has less impact on the overall ranking than the GPU selection. The data confirms that this combo is a high-performance pairing that will not cause significant bottlenecks in most scenarios, ranking it ahead of the majority of systems tested.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-13400F provides the computational foundation for PC Building Simulator, a game that involves complex logic, inventory management, and real-time simulation of PC components. The CPU features 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. This configuration is well-suited for the game’s multi-threaded workloads, as indicated by its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21279 and Geekbench multicore score of 10971. The 20 MB of shared L3 cache also helps reduce latency when accessing frequently used game data.

The CPU’s performance is particularly evident at lower resolutions. At 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves 339 FPS, a figure that far exceeds what the GPU can render at higher settings. This suggests that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with enough data to maintain such high frame rates. The single-thread performance, measured at 3004 in Cinebench R23, is also strong, ensuring that the game’s primary simulation logic runs efficiently. The CPU’s 82nd percentile ranking versus all CPUs supports its role as a capable partner for the RX 6800 XT, preventing it from becoming a limiting factor in most gaming scenarios.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of performance across twelve different configurations. At 1920x1080, the average FPS ranges from 339 at Low settings to 161.7 at Ultra, with Medium at 240.3 and High at 171.5. This shows a 177.3 FPS spread between the lowest and highest settings. At 2560x1440, the figures are 217.4 FPS (Low), 151.5 FPS (Medium), 108.4 FPS (High), and 101.1 FPS (Ultra). The drop from 1080p to 1440p at Low settings is 121.6 FPS, or 35.9%.

At 3840x2160, the performance becomes more demanding. The average FPS is 110.3 at Low, 79.8 at Medium, 58 at High, and 52.4 at Ultra. The transition from 1440p to 4K at High settings results in a loss of 50.4 FPS, a 46.5% decrease. The 4K Ultra setting is the only configuration that dips below 60 FPS, with 52.4 FPS. The data shows that the system is capable of 60+ FPS at 4K with Medium settings or lower, but it will struggle to maintain high frame rates at the highest preset. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 4K is a 57.9 FPS drop, emphasizing the GPU’s workload.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings balance is dependent on the target resolution. For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset provides an excellent experience with 161.7 FPS, which is well above the threshold for high refresh rate monitors. Users with 144Hz displays can comfortably use Ultra settings without any performance concerns. At 2560x1440, the High preset delivers 108.4 FPS, which is ideal for 100Hz+ monitors. The Ultra preset also remains viable at 101.1 FPS, making it a good choice for those prioritizing visual quality over a marginal FPS increase.

For 3840x2160, the recommendation is to use the Medium preset, which achieves 79.8 FPS. This provides a smooth experience above 60 FPS while retaining a reasonable level of visual fidelity. The High preset at 4K drops to 58 FPS, which is just below the 60 FPS standard and may cause noticeable stuttering on some displays. The Ultra preset at 52.4 FPS is not recommended for 4K gaming, as the frame rate is too low for a consistent experience. The data suggests that the Medium preset is the sweet spot for 4K, offering a 27.4 FPS improvement over High settings with a modest reduction in graphical detail.