Pc Building Simulator
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 202 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 74 | 78 | 110 | 155 |
| 1440p QHD | 141 | 148 | 210 | 297 |
| 1080p Full HD | 224 | 235 | 333 | 421 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Pc Building Simulator with AMD Ryzen 7 7700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, In-Depth Analysis
# Pc Building Simulator — AMD Ryzen 7 7700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is an exceptionally strong combination for Pc Building Simulator, ranking in the 94th percentile of all tested combos (227th of 3,723). Benchmark results show this pairing delivers playable frame rates even at 4K Ultra, with the CPU's 8-core/16-thread Zen 4 architecture and the GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6X memory proving more than sufficient for this simulation title's workloads. The data indicates a system that rarely dips below 74 FPS at any tested setting, making it a top-tier choice for this game.
FAQ
Q: What is the combo's overall ranking in Pc Building Simulator?
A: This combination ranks 227th out of 3,723 tested combos, placing it in the top 6% of all configurations measured for this game.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Ryzen 7 7700X has an average benchmark score of 35,909, which is 0.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 and 0.5% higher than both the Intel Core 7 250H and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350. It sits 0.7% above the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H.
Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1440p with this combo?
A: At 2560x1440, the measured results show 141 FPS on Ultra, 148 FPS on High, 210 FPS on Medium, and 297 FPS on Low settings. The Medium preset recorded a minimum of 179 FPS and a maximum of 242 FPS.
Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this hardware?
A: Yes. At 3840x2160, the combo delivers 74 FPS on Ultra, 78 FPS on High, 110 FPS on Medium, and 155 FPS on Low. The Medium preset's minimum was 93 FPS, indicating smooth gameplay even in heavier scenes.
Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to its closest GPU competitors?
A: The RTX 4080's average benchmark score is 54,247, which is 0.1% higher than the RTX 4080 SUPER (54,209). It trails the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X by 1.1% and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB by 2.6%.
Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance like?
A: The Ryzen 7 7700X scores 1,987 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 1,090 in 3DMark single-thread tests. Its PassMark single-thread score is 4,190, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is built on the Zen 4 architecture (codenamed Raphael) using TSMC's 5 nm process node, featuring 8 cores and 16 threads. Its base clock of 4.50 GHz and boost clock of 5.40 GHz provide substantial single-thread headroom, which matters for simulation games that often rely on discrete logical steps. The CPU's 32 MB of shared L3 cache, along with 1 MB L2 per core and 64 KB L1 per core, helps keep frequently accessed simulation data close to the cores.
In Pc Building Simulator, the workload involves managing component compatibility, tracking budgets, and rendering a workshop environment. The CPU's multi-threaded capabilities are reflected in its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19,088 and Geekbench multicore score of 12,451. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 8,859 and max-thread score of 8,852 show consistent scaling across all 16 threads, meaning the processor can handle the game's background simulation logic without becoming a bottleneck.
The 105 W TDP and dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth ensure that data transfer between the CPU and RAM keeps pace with the GPU's demands. The processor's 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates it outperforms the majority of alternatives, and its nearest rivals — the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 (0.3% slower), Core 7 250H (0.5% slower), Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (0.5% slower), and Core Ultra 9 185H (0.7% slower) — are all within a margin that would be imperceptible in real-world gaming. This suggests the 7700X provides ample computational headroom for this title, where even the most demanding CPU-side calculations leave performance on the table.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 employs the AD103 chip on the Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process with 45,900 million transistors. It comes equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 716.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU's base clock is 2205 MHz with a boost clock of 2505 MHz, and memory runs at 1400 MHz (22.4 Gbps effective). With 9,728 shading units, 304 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 76 RT cores, and 304 tensor cores, this card is built for high-throughput rendering.
For Pc Building Simulator, the GPU's role centers on rendering the 3D workshop environment, component models, and the visual feedback of building PCs. The 16 GB VRAM capacity is more than enough for this game's texture and geometry requirements, even at 4K resolution. The memory bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s ensures that texture streaming and scene complexity do not cause stutter. The pixel rate of 280.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 761.5 GTexel/s provide the raw fill rates needed to maintain high frame rates across all tested presets.
The RTX 4080's average benchmark score of 54,247 places it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the RTX 4080 SUPER, scores 54,209 — a 0.1% difference that is effectively negligible. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 1.1% higher, while the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB and Radeon 8060S score 2.6% and 2.7% higher respectively. These small deltas indicate the RTX 4080 sits in a tightly contested performance band, but the data shows it delivers consistently high frame rates in this specific game, with no setting dropping below 74 FPS.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 ranks 227th out of 3,723 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator, placing it in the top 6.1% of all configurations. This is a strong result for a game that is not typically considered a hardware stress test, suggesting that the pairing's high-end components provide substantial overhead. The CPU's 85th percentile ranking and the GPU's 86th percentile ranking combine to create a system that excels across the board.
The rank of 227 indicates that 226 other combinations outperform this setup, but given the game's modest demands, those higher-ranked combos likely consist of even more powerful — and presumably more expensive — hardware. The measured frame rates show that this combo already achieves 421 FPS at 1080p Low and 297 FPS at 1440p Low, which far exceed typical display refresh rates. The gap between this combo and the top performers is unlikely to translate into perceptible differences at standard refresh rates, as the game's engine appears to cap practical benefits well below what this hardware can deliver.
The data suggests this combo is positioned near the upper echelon of what is sensible for Pc Building Simulator. Higher-ranked combos may offer marginal FPS gains, but the measured results indicate diminishing returns: the jump from 224 FPS (1080p Ultra) to 421 FPS (1080p Low) is already achieved within this single configuration by adjusting settings, meaning users have extensive headroom to prioritize visual quality without sacrificing smoothness.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo produces exceptional frame rates across all settings. Low settings yield an average of 421 FPS, Medium delivers 333 FPS with a minimum of 283 FPS and maximum of 383 FPS, High achieves 235 FPS, and Ultra provides 224 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the system is overwhelmingly GPU-bound at lower presets but maintains playability even at Ultra with over 200 FPS.
Moving to 2560x1440, the results remain impressive. Low settings produce 297 FPS, Medium averages 210 FPS (minimum 179, maximum 242), High reaches 148 FPS, and Ultra maintains 141 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a predictable performance cost — approximately 30% lower frame rates across most presets — but the absolute values remain well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.
At 3840x2160, the combo still delivers strong performance. Low settings achieve 155 FPS, Medium averages 110 FPS with a minimum of 93 FPS and maximum of 126 FPS, High provides 78 FPS, and Ultra drops to 74 FPS. The 4K Ultra result, while the lowest of all tested configurations, remains comfortably above 60 FPS, making this combo suitable for high-refresh-rate 4K monitors in this game. The Medium preset's minimum of 93 FPS suggests that even during complex scenes — such as assembling a system with many components visible — the frame rate stays smooth.
Comparing resolutions, the data shows a consistent pattern: each step from 1080p to 1440p to 4K costs roughly 30-35% of performance at the same settings. The gap between Ultra and Low at each resolution is substantial — at 1080p, Ultra is 47% slower than Low; at 1440p, the difference is 53%; at 4K, it is 52%. This indicates that settings have a significant impact on performance, and users can roughly double their frame rate by dropping from Ultra to Low.
Settings Recommendations
For users with a 1920x1080 display, the Ultra preset at 224 FPS is the clear recommendation. The frame rate is more than triple the 60 FPS standard, and the visual quality benefits of Ultra settings — better shadows, textures, and effects — come at no practical cost. Even if the display supports 240 Hz, the 224 FPS average is close enough that most users will not notice a difference, and the minimum frame rates at this resolution are not recorded but the average suggests stability.
At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset at 141 FPS is similarly recommended. This provides excellent visual fidelity while remaining well above 120 FPS, which is ideal for 144 Hz monitors. The Medium preset at 210 FPS would only be preferable for competitive play on a 240 Hz display, but the visual trade-off is steep. The High preset at 148 FPS offers a middle ground that is nearly indistinguishable from Ultra in this game while providing a small performance buffer.
For 3840x2160 users, the choice depends on the display's refresh rate. The Ultra preset at 74 FPS is suitable for 60 Hz or 75 Hz monitors and provides the best visual experience. The High preset at 78 FPS offers a marginal improvement in frame rate with a slight visual downgrade. The Medium preset at 110 FPS is the recommended choice for 120 Hz displays, as it maintains a minimum of 93 FPS — ensuring no drops below the 90 FPS threshold that some variable refresh rate displays target. The Low preset at 155 FPS is unnecessary for any current 4K display, as even 144 Hz panels would not benefit from frame rates above that level in a simulation game.
Overall, the data supports maxing out settings at 1080p and 1440p, while at 4K, users should choose between Ultra for visual purity or Medium for a higher frame rate buffer. The combo's performance headroom means that Pc Building Simulator can be played with all visual features enabled without concern for playability.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 7700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 in Pc Building Simulator
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 155.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 110.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 78.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 74.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 297.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 210.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 148.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 141.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 421.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 333.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 235.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 224.0 |
Pc Building Simulator with Ryzen 7 7700X + Other GPUs
See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Pc Building Simulator with RTX 4080 + Other CPUs
See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 7700X + RTX 4080
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.