Pc Building Simulator
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 127 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 60 | 81 | 98 | 125 |
| 1440p QHD | 99 | 133 | 145 | 158 |
| 1080p Full HD | 137 | 152 | 163 | 178 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Pc Building Simulator with AMD Ryzen 7 3700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 delivers a robust performance profile in Pc Building Simulator, demonstrating how a high-end graphics card can offset an older mid-range CPU in a simulation title. The measured data shows this combination ranks in the 44th percentile of tested combos, indicating that while the GPU is powerful, the overall system is held back by the processor in certain scenarios. This analysis breaks down the resolution scaling, GPU influence, comparative ranking, and optimal settings based strictly on the measured FPS data.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K reveals a clear shift in bottleneck behavior. At 1920x1080, the average frame rates across all settings are remarkably high, ranging from 137 FPS at Ultra to 178 FPS at Low. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 41 FPS, which is significant but not enormous, suggesting that even at this resolution the CPU is beginning to limit performance. Moving to 2560x1440, the averages fall to between 99 FPS at Ultra and 158 FPS at Low, showing a more pronounced scaling penalty. The jump from 1440p to 4K is the most dramatic: at 3840x2160, the average FPS drops to between 60 at Ultra and 125 at Low. This represents a 30% reduction from 1440p Low to 4K Low, and a 39% reduction from 1440p Ultra to 4K Ultra.
The data indicates that at 1080p, the RTX 4080 is underutilized, as the Ryzen 7 3700X with its 8 cores and 16 threads cannot feed the GPU fast enough to maintain the highest possible frame rates. The relatively small delta between Low (178 FPS) and High (152 FPS) at 1080p suggests that lowering settings does not yield massive gains because the CPU is the limiting factor. This is typical for a simulation game like Pc Building Simulator, which relies heavily on single-thread performance for game logic. As resolution increases to 1440p, the GPU begins to take on more of the workload, but the CPU still holds back the High and Ultra presets. The most telling sign is at 4K, where the Ultra preset averages exactly 60 FPS, aligning with a standard display refresh rate, while the Low preset reaches 125 FPS. This 65 FPS spread at 4K proves that the GPU is now the primary bottleneck, as it is processing the higher pixel count, while the CPU has enough headroom to handle the game’s logic.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is the dominant component in this pairing, and its specifications directly explain the measured results. The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 716.8 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory capacity is more than sufficient for Pc Building Simulator, which is not a VRAM-intensive title, but the bandwidth ensures that texture streaming and asset loading do not cause stutters, even at 4K Ultra. The boost clock of 2505 MHz and base clock of 2205 MHz, combined with 9728 shading units, provide the raw compute power needed for high-resolution rendering. The GPU’s 48.74 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 76 RT cores are largely irrelevant for this simulation, but the standard rasterization performance is what drives the 4K results.
The RTX 4080’s role becomes clearer when comparing the 4K results. At Low settings, the GPU achieves 125 FPS, which is a 51% improvement over the High preset’s 81 FPS. This scaling is typical for a GPU-bound scenario, where reducing the pixel shading workload directly translates to higher frame rates. However, the Ultra preset at 4K drops to 60 FPS, indicating that the GPU is fully saturated with the maximum visual fidelity. The measured data shows the GPU’s average benchmark score of 54247, placing it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs, which confirms its high-end status. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, scores a deltaPct of 0.1%, meaning the two cards are virtually identical in synthetic tests, but the standard RTX 4080 is end-of-life, so this pairing represents a last-generation flagship. The 320 W TDP and 700 W suggested PSU are not directly reflected in frame rates, but they indicate the power envelope required to sustain these performance levels.
How This Combo Ranks
In Pc Building Simulator, this specific CPU-GPU combination ranks 1638 out of 3723 tested combos, placing it in the 44th percentile of all systems. This rank is surprisingly low for a system with an RTX 4080, which is typically considered a top-tier GPU. The reason for this is the CPU. The Ryzen 7 3700X has a percentileVsAllCpus of 84, meaning it outperforms 84% of all CPUs, but its average benchmark score of 34260 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 scores 34222 with a deltaPct of 0.1%, and the AMD EPYC 4244P scores 34220 with the same deltaPct. The Intel Core i5-13450HX is 0.2% faster with a score of 34333, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H is 0.5% slower. This cluster of CPUs all perform within 0.7% of each other, showing that the 3700X is at the edge of its performance class.
The combo rank of 1638 suggests that many other systems, likely those with newer CPUs like the Ryzen 7000 series or Intel 13th/14th gen, achieve better frame rates in this game, even with slower GPUs. The data indicates that the RTX 4080 is wasted in this pairing at lower resolutions, as the CPU cannot push frame rates high enough to distinguish it from a mid-range GPU. However, at 4K Ultra, the GPU is the bottleneck, and the combo rank improves relative to systems with weaker GPUs. The 44th percentile ranking is a clear signal that this is not an optimal balance for Pc Building Simulator, but it is still a capable system for 4K gaming, as evidenced by the 60 FPS average at Ultra settings. For a simulation game that is not graphically demanding, the CPU limitation is more pronounced than it would be in a AAA shooter.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of which preset offers the best experience at each resolution. For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset achieves 137 FPS, which is more than sufficient for a smooth experience on a high refresh rate monitor. The High preset at 152 FPS offers a negligible visual difference for a 15 FPS gain, so Ultra is the recommended choice for 1080p. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset drops to 99 FPS, which is still playable, but the High preset at 133 FPS provides a better balance. The Medium preset at 145 FPS with a minimum of 123 FPS is also a strong option, but the High preset offers better visual quality with only a 12 FPS penalty compared to Medium. For 1440p, High is the sweet spot.
At 3840x2160, the settings choice is critical. The Ultra preset averages exactly 60 FPS, which is the minimum for a standard 60 Hz display, but it leaves no headroom for dips. The High preset at 81 FPS is the recommended choice for 4K, as it provides a 35% performance increase over Ultra while still delivering high visual fidelity. The Medium preset at 98 FPS is also viable, but the High preset is the best compromise between visual quality and frame rate. The Low preset at 125 FPS is unnecessarily fast and will sacrifice too much visual detail. The data shows that for this game, the High preset at 4K is the optimal setting, as it avoids the 60 FPS cap of Ultra while maintaining a smooth experience. It is worth remembering the Medium preset at 4K has a minimum FPS of 83, which is a 22 FPS lower than the average, indicating some frame pacing issues, while the High preset does not have a listed minimum in the data.
Measured FPS Breakdown
1920x1080: The Low preset averages 178 FPS, the highest of any configuration. The Medium preset averages 163 FPS with a minimum of 138 FPS and a maximum of 187 FPS, showing a 49 FPS range. The High preset averages 152 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 137 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 41 FPS, indicating that the CPU limits the top end.
2560x1440: The Low preset averages 158 FPS, a 20 FPS drop from 1080p Low. The Medium preset averages 145 FPS with a minimum of 123 FPS and a maximum of 166 FPS, a 43 FPS range. The High preset averages 133 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 99 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 59 FPS, showing that GPU load is increasing.
3840x2160: The Low preset averages 125 FPS, a 33 FPS drop from 1440p Low. The Medium preset averages 98 FPS with a minimum of 83 FPS and a maximum of 112 FPS, a 29 FPS range. The High preset averages 81 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 60 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 65 FPS, confirming that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at 4K.
The data shows a consistent pattern: the performance gap between Low and Ultra widens as resolution increases, from 41 FPS at 1080p to 65 FPS at 4K. This is a classic sign of a system that is CPU-bound at low resolutions and GPU-bound at high resolutions. The Medium preset consistently provides a middle ground, with the 4K Medium result of 98 FPS being particularly notable, as it outperforms the High preset by 17 FPS.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Pc Building Simulator?
A: The data shows that 2560x1440 with the High preset yields 133 FPS, which is a strong balance. At 4K, the High preset averages 81 FPS, which is playable, but 1440p provides a higher refresh rate experience without sacrificing too much visual quality.
Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X a bottleneck for the RTX 4080 in this game?
A: Yes, particularly at 1080p. The FPS spread between Low and Ultra at 1080p is only 41 FPS, which is smaller than the 65 FPS spread at 4K. This indicates that the CPU limits frame rates at lower resolutions, preventing the GPU from reaching its full potential.
Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to its nearest rival in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The RTX 4080 has an average benchmark score of 54247, while the RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54209, a deltaPct of 0.1%. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 1.1% faster, and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 2.6% faster in these specific tests.
Q: What is the combo's overall ranking among tested systems?
A: The combo ranks 1638 out of 3723 total combinations, placing it in the 44th percentile. This means that 56% of tested systems perform better in Pc Building Simulator, likely due to newer CPU architectures.
Q: Should I use the Ultra preset at 4K with this system?
A: No. The Ultra preset at 4K averages exactly 60 FPS, which is the minimum for a standard display. The High preset at 81 FPS provides a 35% performance improvement with minimal visual difference, making it the better choice.
Q: Does the 16 GB of VRAM on the RTX 4080 matter for this game?
A: The 16 GB of GDDR6X memory is more than sufficient for Pc Building Simulator. The game is not VRAM-intensive, but the 716.8 GB/s bandwidth ensures smooth asset streaming, particularly at 4K where the GPU is the limiting factor.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 3700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 in Pc Building Simulator
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 125.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 98.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 81.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 60.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 158.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 145.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 133.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 99.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 178.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 163.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 152.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 137.0 |
Pc Building Simulator with Ryzen 7 3700X + Other GPUs
See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Pc Building Simulator with RTX 4080 + Other CPUs
See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 3700X + RTX 4080
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.