Pc Building Simulator

# Pc Building Simulator with AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700, an 8-core/16-thread Zen 3 processor with a 3.70 GHz base and 4.60 GHz boost clock, paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, a GA102-based Ampere GPU with 12 GB of GDDR6X memory, delivers a performance profile in Pc Building Simulator that shifts dramatically depending on resolution and settings. Benchmark results show this combination ranks 969th out of 3,723 tested combos for this title, placing it in the top 26% of all tested configurations. The measured frame rates reveal a system that can push extremely high refresh rates at 1080p, but that becomes more balanced as resolution increases, with the data showing how the GPU's 34.10 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 912.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth interact with a simulation game that appears to scale heavily with graphical load.

Resolution Scaling

The transition from 1080p to 1440p to 4K reveals a predictable yet steep performance gradient for this combination. At 1080p with High settings, the system averages 183 FPS; at 1440p High, that number drops to 115 FPS, and at 4K High, it settles at 60 FPS. This represents a 37% reduction from 1080p to 1440p and a further 48% reduction from 1440p to 4K. The scaling pattern suggests that at 1080p, the CPU is likely the limiting factor, as the frame rates are high enough that the GPU has headroom to spare.

Looking at Low settings, the scaling is even more pronounced. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 332 FPS, which drops to 231 FPS at 1440p Low (a 30% reduction) and then to 121 FPS at 4K Low (a 48% reduction from 1440p). The fact that 4K Low still delivers 121 FPS indicates that the RTX 3080 Ti's 12 GB of VRAM and 384-bit memory bus are sufficient to handle the lower graphical load without bottlenecking, but the resolution-driven pixel count still imposes a significant cost.

The Medium settings data provides the only complete min/max FPS information in the measured set. At 1080p Medium, the average is 259 FPS with a minimum of 220 FPS and maximum of 298 FPS; at 1440p Medium, the average drops to 163 FPS with a range of 139-188 FPS; and at 4K Medium, the average is 85 FPS with a range of 73-98 FPS. These numbers show that the frame time consistency relative to the average remains fairly stable across resolutions, with the min-to-max spread being roughly 30% of the average at each resolution.

The scaling from 1080p to 4K at Medium settings shows a 67% reduction in average FPS, which is consistent with the pixel count increase from roughly 2 million to 8.3 million pixels. However, the fact that 4K Medium (85 FPS) is only slightly below 1440p High (115 FPS) in raw performance suggests that the graphical settings have a more substantial impact on frame rate than resolution alone at this level of hardware. The data indicates that this combination is capable of 4K gaming at playable frame rates across all settings, with Ultra being the only preset that dips below 60 FPS average at 4K, hitting exactly 57 FPS.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti serves as the primary driver of frame rates in this title, particularly at higher resolutions. Its 12 GB of GDDR6X memory across a 384-bit bus provides 912.4 GB/s of bandwidth, which is more than sufficient for the textures and scene data in a simulation game like Pc Building Simulator. The GPU's 10,240 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 112 ROPs operate at a base clock of 1365 MHz with a boost clock of 1665 MHz, producing a pixel rate of 186.5 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 532.8 GTexel/s.

The GPU's benchmark scores contextualize its performance within the broader market. Its Passmark G3D score of 26,896 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,077 place it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. The average benchmark score of 41,187 puts it within 2% of the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (0.8% ahead) and within 1.7% of the NVIDIA Tesla M40 (1.7% behind), though the nearestRivals data shows it is also 2% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070.

In the context of Pc Building Simulator specifically, the GPU's role becomes more pronounced as resolution increases. At 1080p Low, the system hits 332 FPS, which is likely near the CPU's limit for this game. But at 4K Ultra, the average drops to 57 FPS, suggesting that the GPU is now fully saturated. The 12 GB VRAM capacity is never likely to be a constraint in this title, given that even at 4K Ultra the game runs without apparent memory-related stuttering, and the measured min FPS values at Medium settings (73 FPS at 4K) suggest stable memory allocation.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti ranks 969th out of 3,723 tested combos for Pc Building Simulator, placing it in the top 26% of all configurations tested. This ranking reflects the strong performance profile of both components, though it also indicates that there are many higher-performing combinations available.

The CPU alone, with an average benchmark score of 25,517, sits in the 78th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon D-2752TER (average score 25,530, just 0.1% higher), the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U (average score 25,485, 0.1% lower), and the AMD Ryzen 5 6600H (average score 25,550, 0.1% lower). These tight margins indicate that the Ryzen 7 5700 is right at the boundary of a performance tier, with the Ryzen 7 5825U (average score 25,446) being just 0.3% lower.

The GPU, with an average benchmark score of 41,187, sits in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show a similar clustering: the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 is 0.8% higher, the NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB is 1.2% lower, and the NVIDIA Tesla M40 is 1.7% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 trails by 2.0%. This suggests that the RTX 3080 Ti, despite being from a previous generation, remains competitive in raw compute terms.

The combined ranking of 969/3,723 should be interpreted with the understanding that Pc Building Simulator is not a graphically demanding title by modern standards. The measured frame rates at 4K Ultra (57 FPS) show that this combination is right at the edge of 60 FPS at the highest settings, which explains why it doesn't rank higher — many combos with newer, more powerful GPUs would push well beyond 60 FPS at 4K Ultra.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its highest frame rates across all settings. Low settings produce an average of 332 FPS, Medium produces 259 FPS (with a minimum of 220 and maximum of 298), High produces 183 FPS, and Ultra produces 174 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium (73 FPS) is larger than the gap between High and Ultra (9 FPS), suggesting that the most significant visual quality improvements come at the cost of a substantial frame rate hit, while the Ultra preset adds relatively little overhead over High.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but show the expected reduction. Low settings average 231 FPS, Medium averages 163 FPS (minimum 139, maximum 188), High averages 115 FPS, and Ultra averages 110 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is consistent across settings, with reductions of roughly 30%, 37%, 37%, and 37% for Low, Medium, High, and Ultra respectively. The Low setting's smaller relative drop (30% vs. 37%) suggests that at lower graphical loads, the CPU begins to have a more significant impact on the frame rate.

At 3840x2160, the system still delivers playable frame rates across all settings. Low settings average 121 FPS, Medium averages 85 FPS (minimum 73, maximum 98), High averages 60 FPS, and Ultra averages 57 FPS. The Ultra setting at 4K is the only configuration in the entire measured set that drops below 60 FPS average, hitting exactly 57 FPS. The min FPS data at Medium settings (73 FPS at 4K) indicates that even in demanding scenes, the system maintains a frame rate well above the 60 FPS threshold.

FAQ

Q: Can this combination run Pc Building Simulator at 4K with high settings?

A: Yes, the data shows an average of 60 FPS at 3840x2160 with High settings. This is exactly at the 60 FPS threshold, so it is playable but leaves no headroom for frame rate drops. The Medium preset at 4K provides a more comfortable margin with an average of 85 FPS and a minimum of 73 FPS.

Q: What is the highest average frame rate this combo achieves?

A: The highest measured average is 332 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This is the only configuration in the measured set that exceeds 300 FPS, and it indicates that the system is capable of extremely high refresh rate gaming at 1080p when graphical settings are lowered.

Q: How does the frame rate scale from 1080p to 4K at Ultra settings?

A: At 1080p Ultra, the average is 174 FPS; at 1440p Ultra, it drops to 110 FPS; and at 4K Ultra, it falls to 57 FPS. This represents a 37% reduction from 1080p to 1440p and a 48% reduction from 1440p to 4K, for a total reduction of 67% from 1080p to 4K.

Q: Is the RTX 3080 Ti a bottleneck at any resolution in this game?

A: At 4K Ultra, the average of 57 FPS suggests the GPU is the primary limiting factor, as this is the only configuration that drops below 60 FPS. At 1080p Low (332 FPS), the CPU is more likely the constraint, given that the GPU has demonstrated much higher raw performance potential in benchmark scores.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested configurations?

A: This combination ranks 969th out of 3,723 tested combos for Pc Building Simulator, placing it in the top 26% of all tested configurations. The GPU sits in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU sits in the 78th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The only min FPS values recorded are for Medium settings: 220 FPS at 1080p, 139 FPS at 1440p, and 73 FPS at 4K. The 4K Medium minimum of 73 FPS indicates that even in the most demanding recorded scenes, the system stays comfortably above 60 FPS.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured frame rates, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and refresh rate. For 1080p displays, the Ultra preset at 174 FPS is the best choice for those with 144Hz or 165Hz monitors, as it delivers well above the refresh rate threshold while providing the highest visual quality. For 240Hz displays, the High preset at 183 FPS is only marginally faster, so the Medium preset at 259 FPS would be required to take full advantage of such a high refresh rate.

At 1440p, the Ultra preset at 110 FPS is suitable for 100Hz or 120Hz displays, while the High preset at 115 FPS offers essentially the same performance. For 144Hz displays, the Medium preset at 163 FPS is the only way to reach the refresh rate ceiling, and it does so with a comfortable margin, as the minimum FPS is 139. The Low preset at 231 FPS is unnecessary at this resolution unless the display supports refresh rates above 200Hz.

At 4K, the choice is more constrained. The Ultra preset at 57 FPS is below the 60 FPS threshold and should be avoided for a consistently smooth experience. The High preset at 60 FPS is exactly at the threshold but offers no headroom. The Medium preset at 85 FPS is the recommended choice for 4K, as it provides a comfortable margin above 60 FPS with a minimum of 73 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay even in demanding scenes. The Low preset at 121 FPS is available for those seeking very high frame rates at 4K, though the visual quality trade-off is substantial.

For the best overall balance of visual quality and performance, the Medium preset at 1440p (163 FPS average, 139 FPS minimum) or the Medium preset at 4K (85 FPS average, 73 FPS minimum) represent the sweet spots in the measured data.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 provides the computational foundation for this combination. With 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture (Cezanne codename), it offers a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The 16 MB of L3 cache, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 64 KB of L1 cache per core help feed the GPU with game data. The CPU's 65W TDP is notably lower than the GPU's 350W TDP, indicating that the CPU is not the primary power consumer in this system.

In terms of synthetic benchmarks, the Ryzen 7 5700 scores 20,655 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 2,916 in single-core, and 6,628 in 3DMark 16-thread testing. Its Passmark multi-thread score is 24,303, with a single-thread score of 3,296. These scores place it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25,517.

The CPU's role in Pc Building Simulator becomes evident when examining the frame rate data. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 332 FPS, which is likely near the maximum frame rate that the CPU can feed to the GPU in this game. The CPU's 16 threads are well-suited to a simulation game, which typically involves significant single-threaded logic mixed with parallelizable tasks. The gap between 1080p Low (332 FPS) and 1440p Low (231 FPS) is 30%, which is smaller than the pixel count difference, suggesting that at 1080p Low, the CPU is limiting the frame rate rather than the GPU.

The CPU's nearest rivals in benchmark performance include the Intel Xeon D-2752TER (0.1% higher average score), AMD Ryzen 5 7640U (0.1% lower), and AMD Ryzen 5 6600H (0.1% lower). The tight clustering of these scores indicates that the Ryzen 7 5700 is near the boundary between performance tiers, and in a game like Pc Building Simulator, the CPU's performance is sufficient to avoid bottlenecking the RTX 3080 Ti at most settings, with the exception of the lowest graphical presets at 1080p where the GPU's potential is not fully utilized.