Fivem
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 127 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 60 | 81 | 98 | 125 |
| 1440p QHD | 99 | 133 | 145 | 158 |
| 1080p Full HD | 137 | 152 | 163 | 178 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Fivem with AMD Ryzen 7 3700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 delivers a top-tier Fivem experience, placing in the 75th percentile of all tested combinations. This combo is ranked 914th out of 3707 tested configurations, indicating that while it is not the absolute fastest, it sits comfortably in the upper echelon, offering far more performance than the majority of systems. The data shows that this pairing is exceptionally well-balanced for Fivem, with the GPU’s immense power being the primary driver of high frame rates, though the CPU’s eight cores ensure it never becomes a bottleneck at standard gaming resolutions.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo’s rank of 914 out of 3707 tested combinations places it in the top 25% of all systems benchmarked. This is a strong result, reflecting a hardware pairing that is capable of handling Fivem’s demanding multiplayer environments with ease. The ranking is not just about raw power; it indicates consistency across the measured resolutions and settings. The data suggests that this system outperforms roughly 75% of all other tested combos, making it a high-tier choice for gamers who prioritize smooth, high-fidelity gameplay.
The CPU’s own benchmark percentile of 84% versus all CPUs reinforces this position. With an average benchmark score of 34260, the Ryzen 7 3700X is a solid performer, but its nearest rivals show just how tight the competition is. It is a mere 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and the AMD EPYC 4244P, and only 0.2% behind the Intel Core i5-13450HX. This indicates that while the CPU is not a class leader, its performance is entirely sufficient to feed the RTX 4080 in Fivem, where the GPU is the dominant factor.
The GPU’s percentile of 86% versus all GPUs is even more impressive. Its average benchmark score of 54247 places it just 0.1% ahead of the RTX 4080 SUPER, which confirms its raw capability. The data shows that this GPU is a top-tier component, and when paired with the 3700X, the combination avoids the common pitfall of CPU limitation, ensuring that the GPU’s potential is fully utilized in Fivem.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is the undisputed powerhouse in this configuration. With 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, it offers a memory bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s. This vast memory pool is crucial for Fivem, a game known for its heavy custom assets and mods, which can quickly consume VRAM. The data shows that even at 4K resolution with High settings, the GPU maintains an average of 81 FPS, indicating that the 16 GB buffer is not being overwhelmed.
Clock speeds are also a key factor. The GPU’s boost clock of 2505 MHz, built on the 5 nm Ada Lovelace architecture, allows it to sustain high frame rates. The measured FPS data shows a clear scaling pattern: at 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is a relatively modest 41 FPS (178 vs 137), but at 4K, this gap widens dramatically to 65 FPS (125 vs 60). This demonstrates that the GPU’s compute power is the primary driver of performance at higher resolutions, where the workload shifts more heavily onto the graphics card.
The RTX 4080’s benchmark scores further validate its role. Its Passmark G3D score of 34457 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6567 show a GPU that excels in modern workloads. The data indicates that this is a card designed for high-refresh-rate gaming and high-resolution rendering. In Fivem, the GPU is the clear performance leader, and the results show that it is capable of delivering playable frame rates at 4K Ultra, though with a significant performance cost compared to lower settings.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS data provides clear guidance on the optimal settings for this combo. For the best balance of visual fidelity and performance, the Medium preset is the standout choice across all resolutions. At 4K, Medium delivers an average of 98 FPS, which is a substantial 38 FPS improvement over Ultra while still looking significantly better than Low. The data for Medium is also the only setting at 4K with a recorded minimum FPS (83) and maximum FPS (112), indicating a stable frame time distribution.
At 1440p, the Medium preset again proves to be the sweet spot, with an average of 145 FPS. This is a 46 FPS jump over Ultra, and the minimum FPS of 123 shows that the system holds up well under load. At 1080p, Medium hits 163 FPS, which is 26 FPS higher than Ultra. The data suggests that Ultra settings, while playable, do not offer a proportional visual benefit for the performance cost incurred. High settings are a viable alternative, but Medium provides a more consistent experience, particularly at higher resolutions where the GPU is taxed more heavily.
For gamers with high-refresh-rate monitors, the Low preset is the only way to maximize frame rates, with 178 FPS at 1080p and 158 FPS at 1440p. However, the visual trade-off is significant. The recommendation is to start with Medium and adjust based on personal preference; the data shows that this combo has ample headroom to run Medium at all resolutions without dropping below 83 FPS, ensuring a smooth multiplayer experience.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo shows its highest frame rates. The Low preset leads with an average of 178 FPS, followed by Medium at 163 FPS (min 138, max 187), High at 152 FPS, and Ultra at 137 FPS. The data shows a clear linear progression, with each step up in settings costing roughly 10-15 FPS. This resolution is clearly CPU-bound at Low settings, but the GPU still has enough power to maintain high frame rates even at Ultra.
At 2560x1440, the performance remains excellent but the scaling changes. Low hits 158 FPS, Medium averages 145 FPS (min 123, max 166), High averages 133 FPS, and Ultra drops to 99 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra is a substantial 34 FPS, indicating that Ultra settings at 1440p place a significant load on the GPU. The Medium preset’s minimum FPS of 123 shows that this is the most stable choice for competitive play at this resolution.
At 3840x2160, the GPU’s limits begin to show. Low averages 125 FPS, Medium averages 98 FPS (min 83, max 112), High averages 81 FPS, and Ultra falls to exactly 60 FPS. The data reveals a steep drop-off from High to Ultra, a 21 FPS decrease, which is the largest single-step penalty in the entire dataset. This indicates that 4K Ultra is the only configuration where the combo struggles to maintain high refresh rates, though 60 FPS is still a playable baseline for most users.
FAQ
Q: Can this combo run Fivem at 4K with high settings?
A: Yes. The measured data shows an average of 81 FPS at 3840x2160 with High settings, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.
Q: What is the best resolution for maximum frame rates?
A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 178 FPS. This is the highest measured frame rate in the dataset, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors.
Q: Does the Medium preset offer a good balance of performance and visuals?
A: Yes. At all three resolutions, Medium provides a significant FPS boost over Ultra while maintaining stable minimum frame rates. For example, at 1440p, Medium averages 145 FPS compared to 99 FPS on Ultra.
Q: Is the RTX 4080's 16 GB VRAM sufficient for Fivem?
A: The data indicates yes. Even at 4K Ultra, the combo maintains a 60 FPS average, suggesting that the VRAM capacity is not a limiting factor in the game’s default asset sets.
Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?
A: It ranks 914th out of 3707 tested combos, placing it in the top 25% of all configurations. This is a strong result for a mid-generation CPU paired with a high-end GPU.
Q: Is the CPU a bottleneck for this GPU in Fivem?
A: The data suggests no. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 178 FPS, which is a very high frame rate. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads are sufficient to keep up with the GPU’s output at standard gaming resolutions.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, provides a solid foundation for this GPU. Its base clock of 3.60 GHz and boost clock of 4.40 GHz, built on the Zen 2 architecture, ensure that it can handle the game’s simulation and AI workloads. The CPU’s benchmark data shows a Passmark multithread score of 22458 and a single-thread score of 2656, which are respectable figures for a processor from the 3000 series.
In Fivem, the CPU’s role is to manage the complex multiplayer interactions and world streaming. The data shows that at 1080p, the CPU is the primary limiter. The difference between Low (178 FPS) and Medium (163 FPS) is only 15 FPS, while the difference between Medium and Ultra (137 FPS) is 26 FPS. This indicates that as settings increase, the GPU begins to take on more of the workload, and the CPU has enough headroom to avoid becoming a bottleneck.
The CPU’s 32 MB of L3 cache is beneficial for game performance, as it helps reduce memory latency. Its memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, while not class-leading, is sufficient for a game like Fivem. The fact that this CPU is ranked in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, and is virtually tied with newer processors like the Ryzen AI 7 350, shows that it remains a capable gaming CPU. The data confirms that the 3700X does not compromise the RTX 4080’s performance in Fivem, allowing the GPU to deliver the high frame rates seen in the measured results.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 3700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 in Fivem
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 125.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 98.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 81.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 60.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 158.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 145.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 133.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 99.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 178.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 163.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 152.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 137.0 |
Fivem with Ryzen 7 3700X + Other GPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Fivem with RTX 4080 + Other CPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 3700X + RTX 4080
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.