Pc Building Simulator

# Pc Building Simulator with AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + Intel Arc B370

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with the Intel Arc B370 produces a playable but constrained experience in Pc Building Simulator, a simulation title from January 2019. The combination ranks 2761st out of 3002 tested combos in this game, placing it in the lower percentile of tested hardware configurations. The Arc B370, operating as an integrated graphics solution with system-shared memory, delivers frame rates that range from 113 FPS at 1080p Low down to 18 FPS at 4K Ultra, making resolution and settings selection critical for a smooth experience.

FAQ

Q: What is the best average frame rate this combo achieves in Pc Building Simulator?

A: The highest measured average is 113 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. At the same resolution, Medium settings yield 80 FPS, High yields 56 FPS, and Ultra yields 54 FPS.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its nearest GPU rivals in raw benchmark score?

A: The Arc B370 scores 1184 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, which is 0.2% behind the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (1186), 0.5% behind the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (1190), and 1.4% ahead of the AMD FirePro M2000 (1168).

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, Low settings produce an average of 71 FPS, while Ultra settings drop to 34 FPS. That is a 37 FPS reduction, or roughly a 52% decrease in average frame rate when moving from the lowest to the highest preset.

Q: Does the Arc B370 have dedicated VRAM?

A: No. The Intel Arc B370 uses system-shared memory for both its memory size, type, and bus width. Its memory bandwidth is listed as system dependent, meaning performance relies on the host system's RAM configuration.

Q: What are the CPU's multi-threaded and single-threaded benchmark scores?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F scores 22799 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3218 in single-core. In Geekbench, it scores 12362 multi-core and 2374 single-core. Its average benchmark score across all tests is 24964.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7500F compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F's average score of 24964 is 0.1% above the Intel Core i7-11850H (24935), 0.2% above the Intel Core i7-13620H (24911), and 0.4% above the Intel Core 5 210H (24872). It trails the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (25005) by 0.2%.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B370 is the decisive bottleneck in this configuration for Pc Building Simulator. This GPU operates as an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a 25 W TDP, using system-shared memory rather than dedicated VRAM. Its memory bandwidth is explicitly listed as system dependent, meaning the frame rate results are tied to the shared memory subsystem of the host platform. The GPU's base clock is 300 MHz with a boost clock of 2400 MHz, and it features 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 render output units.

The Arc B370's raw compute capabilities are modest: 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 and 12.29 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which covers the API requirements of a 2019 simulation title. The GPU's benchmark presence is minimal — a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184 — placing it at the 5th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in benchmark score are the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (1186, 0.2% faster), ATI Radeon HD 5770 (1190, 0.5% faster), AMD Radeon HD 7650M (1192, 0.7% faster), and AMD FirePro M2000 (1168, 1.4% slower).

In Pc Building Simulator specifically, the GPU's shared-memory design manifests as severe frame rate scaling with resolution. At 1080p Low the combo hits 113 FPS, but at 4K Low it drops to 37 FPS — a 76 FPS loss. The pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s are low by modern standards, which explains why higher resolutions and settings overwhelm the render output units. The GPU has 10 ray tracing cores, but their presence does little to help in a simulation game that relies more on traditional rasterization and CPU logic.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of GPU-limited scaling as resolution increases. At Low settings, the average frame rate drops from 113 FPS at 1080p to 71 FPS at 1440p (a 42 FPS reduction) and then to 37 FPS at 4K (a further 34 FPS reduction). This steep decline — from 113 to 37 FPS across the three resolutions — indicates that the Arc B370's fill rate and memory bandwidth are overwhelmed at higher pixel counts.

At Medium settings, the same scaling trend holds: 80 FPS at 1080p, 50 FPS at 1440p, and 26 FPS at 4K. The gap between 1080p and 1440p is 30 FPS, while the gap between 1440p and 4K is 24 FPS. At High settings, the averages are 56 FPS (1080p), 36 FPS (1440p), and 19 FPS (4K). At Ultra, the numbers are 54 FPS, 34 FPS, and 18 FPS respectively.

The resolution scaling suggests that the CPU is not the limiting factor at lower resolutions — the Ryzen 5 7500F has ample headroom to push well beyond 113 FPS, but the GPU cannot keep pace. At 1080p Low, the 113 FPS result is likely near the GPU's architectural ceiling for this workload. As resolution climbs, the GPU spends more time on pixel shading and memory access, which directly reduces output. The 4K results (18-37 FPS across all settings) are uniformly poor, indicating that 4K is simply beyond the Arc B370's capabilities for this title regardless of quality preset.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured rows, the recommended preset for this combo is Medium at 1080p. This setting delivers 80 FPS average with a minimum of 68 FPS and a maximum of 92 FPS, providing a smooth experience with a comfortable margin above typical 60 FPS targets. The jump from Low to Medium costs 33 FPS (from 113 to 80), but the visual quality improvement in a simulation game — where reading UI elements and component details matters — justifies the trade-off.

At 1440p, Low settings are the only reasonable choice, yielding 71 FPS average. Medium at 1440p drops to 50 FPS with a minimum of 43 FPS, which is playable but close to the edge for demanding scenes. High and Ultra at 1440p (36 FPS and 34 FPS) are not recommended for consistent gameplay.

At 4K, no preset achieves a playable frame rate. The best result is 37 FPS at Low, with Medium at 26 FPS and High/Ultra at 19/18 FPS. Users targeting 4K should consider this combo inadequate for Pc Building Simulator, as even the lowest settings fail to reach 40 FPS.

For users prioritizing frame rate over visual fidelity, 1080p Low at 113 FPS is the smoothest option. However, the Medium preset at 1080p offers the best balance: 80 FPS average with a recorded minimum of 68 FPS, which keeps frame times consistent enough for a simulation title where menu navigation and object manipulation are frequent.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo produces its strongest results. Low settings average 113 FPS. Medium settings average 80 FPS with a minimum of 68 FPS and a maximum of 92 FPS. High settings average 56 FPS. Ultra settings average 54 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 59 FPS, showing that the GPU has limited headroom for quality enhancements at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, performance drops significantly. Low settings average 71 FPS. Medium settings average 50 FPS with a minimum of 43 FPS and a maximum of 58 FPS. High settings average 36 FPS. Ultra settings average 34 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p at the same preset is substantial: 42 FPS for Low, 30 FPS for Medium, 20 FPS for High, and 20 FPS for Ultra.

At 3840x2160, the results are marginal. Low settings average 37 FPS. Medium settings average 26 FPS with a minimum of 22 FPS and a maximum of 30 FPS. High settings average 19 FPS. Ultra settings average 18 FPS. The 4K results are consistently below 40 FPS, making this resolution impractical for real gameplay.

The only settings row with full min/max data is Medium across all three resolutions. At 1080p Medium, the min/max range is 68-92 FPS, a 24 FPS spread. At 1440p Medium, the range is 43-58 FPS, a 15 FPS spread. At 4K Medium, the range is 22-30 FPS, an 8 FPS spread. The narrowing range at higher resolutions suggests that the GPU becomes consistently saturated, reducing frame time variance but also reducing average output.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on Zen 4 architecture with the Raphael codename. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, and it features 32 MB of shared L3 cache along with 1 MB L2 per core and 64 KB L1 per core.

In Pc Building Simulator, the CPU's role appears secondary to the GPU, based on the frame rate scaling pattern. The CPU scores 22799 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3218 in single-core, both strong results that indicate ample processing power for a simulation game. Its 3DMark scores show scaling from 974 (single-thread) to 6379 (max-threads), confirming that multi-threaded workloads benefit from the 12 threads.

The CPU's percentile ranking of 77 means it outperforms 77% of all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score of 24964 places it in close competition with the Intel Core i7-11850H (24935, 0.1% slower), AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (25005, 0.2% faster), Intel Core i7-13620H (24911, 0.2% slower), and Intel Core 5 210H (24872, 0.4% slower). This tight clustering shows the 7500F is a solid mid-range performer.

However, the measured FPS data shows that CPU performance is not the limiting factor in Pc Building Simulator. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 113 FPS, which is respectable but far below what the CPU could theoretically support. The fact that frame rates drop by roughly 50% when moving from 1080p to 1440p at the same settings (e.g., 113 to 71 FPS at Low) points to GPU-bound rendering. The CPU's cache hierarchy (32 MB L3 shared) and high boost clock are sufficient for the simulation's logic and object management, but the integrated GPU's shared memory architecture creates a bottleneck that no amount of CPU headroom can overcome.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + Intel Arc B370 combination ranks 2761st out of 3002 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator, placing it in the bottom 8% of configurations. This low ranking is directly attributable to the GPU's performance class — the Arc B370 sits at the 5th percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU sits at the 77th percentile of all CPUs. The mismatch between a strong processor and a weak integrated GPU creates a system where the GPU severely limits overall gaming performance.

In the context of the combo ranking, this configuration is near the bottom of the distribution. The 3002 total combos span a wide range of hardware, and a 2761st place finish indicates that most other combinations deliver higher frame rates in this title. The GPU's nearest rivals — all legacy ATI/AMD parts from a previous era — underscore its limited gaming capability. The fact that the Arc B370's benchmark score (1184) is within 1.4% of parts like the ATI Radeon HD 5770 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 confirms that it competes with decade-old hardware in raw GPU compute.

For users considering this combo, the ranking data suggests that it is suitable only for low-resolution, low-settings gaming in Pc Building Simulator. The CPU has room to drive much higher frame rates, but the GPU cannot deliver them. The combo's best case scenario — 1080p Low at 113 FPS — is playable, but the experience degrades rapidly with any quality increase or resolution bump. The ranking of 2761/3002 serves as a warning that this is a bottom-tier configuration for this specific game, despite the modern CPU at its core.