Pc Building Simulator

# Pc Building Simulator with AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination delivers a broad range of performance in Pc Building Simulator, scaling from highly playable at 1080p to borderline at 4K Ultra. The measured data shows this pairing ranks in the 54th percentile of all tested combos, placing it slightly above the median in this simulation title. Benchmark results indicate a system that is capable across the board, though the GPU becomes the primary constraint at higher resolutions and quality settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the combo's overall rank in Pc Building Simulator?

A: This pairing ranks 2006 out of 3723 tested combinations, placing it in the 54th percentile of all combos tested in this game.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400F scores 32750 on average. The Intel Core i5-14600T is 0.1% ahead at 32707, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is 0.3% ahead at 32662, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H is 0.2% behind at 32812.

Q: What is the best 1080p performance measured?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system achieves an average of 266 FPS. The Medium preset delivers 189 FPS average, while High and Ultra yield 133 FPS and 127 FPS respectively.

Q: Is the RTX 4060 faster than its closest GPU rivals?

A: The RTX 4060 has an average benchmark score of 17639. The AMD Radeon HD 7790 scores 17666 (0.2% higher), the AMD Radeon 780M scores 17588 (0.3% lower), and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 scores 17551 (0.5% lower).

Q: What frame rate can be expected at 1440p Medium?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the average FPS is 119, with a minimum of 101 and maximum of 137. This represents a 37% drop from the 1080p Medium average of 189 FPS.

Q: How does the system perform at 4K Ultra?

A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 42. This is the lowest measured result, indicating the GPU is heavily taxed at this resolution and quality level.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F brings six cores and twelve threads to this simulation title, built on the Zen 4 architecture with a Raphael codename. The base clock runs at 3.70 GHz with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, and the 65 W TDP reflects a power-efficient design on the 5 nm TSMC process. Cache configuration includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache, which provides ample data locality for simulation workloads.

In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU demonstrates strong multi-threaded capability with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and a single-core score of 3072. The PassMark multi-thread score of 25645 and single-thread score of 3689 reinforce this pattern. Data compression and encryption tests show scores of 289999 and 16712 respectively, indicating solid integer performance that simulation games often leverage. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs places it well above average.

For Pc Building Simulator, the CPU's role is substantial at lower resolutions. The measured data shows 1080p Low achieving 266 FPS average, which suggests the processor can feed frames rapidly when graphical load is minimal. The 12 threads allow background simulation tasks to run without bottlenecking the main game loop. The DDR5 memory support with dual-channel configuration and 83.2 GB/s bandwidth aligns with the CPU's capabilities, though the game itself does not appear to stress memory bandwidth heavily based on the scaling patterns.

The nearest rivals in CPU performance include the Intel Core i5-14600T with a delta of 0.1%, placing these processors within measurement noise of each other. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H trails by 0.2%, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 leads by 0.3%. This tight grouping suggests the 7400F's performance is well understood and consistent with expectations for its tier.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 utilizes the AD107 chip on the Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process with 18,900 million transistors. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1830 MHz and boost clock of 2460 MHz, paired with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus running at 2125 MHz (17 Gbps effective). Memory bandwidth measures 272.0 GB/s, which is adequate for this simulation title's texture and asset streaming requirements.

The GPU's compute resources include 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. Ray tracing hardware includes 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. The 115 W TDP with a suggested 300 W PSU keeps power requirements modest. The 61st percentile ranking among all GPUs places this card in the upper-middle tier of graphics hardware.

In Pc Building Simulator, the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution and settings increase. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 266 FPS average, but at 4K Ultra, this drops to 42 FPS average. The scaling pattern from Low to Ultra at each resolution shows a consistent reduction: at 1080p, the Ultra preset delivers 127 FPS versus 266 FPS on Low, a 52% reduction. At 1440p, Ultra delivers 80 FPS versus 168 FPS on Low, a 52% reduction. At 4K, Ultra delivers 42 FPS versus 88 FPS on Low, a 52% reduction. This consistent percentage suggests the GPU's rendering pipeline scales predictably with quality settings.

The nearest GPU rivals include the AMD Radeon HD 7790, which scores 0.2% higher on average, and the AMD Radeon 780M, which scores 0.3% lower. These differences are minimal, indicating the RTX 4060's performance profile is well established. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for the game's assets at the tested resolutions, as evidenced by the consistent frame rate behavior across settings.

How This Combo Ranks

This combination of the Ryzen 5 7400F and RTX 4060 achieves a rank of 2006 out of 3723 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator. This places the pairing in the 54th percentile, meaning roughly 54% of tested combinations perform at or below this level. The rank reflects a balanced system that sits slightly above the median of all tested hardware pairings.

The ranking implies that this combo outperforms a significant portion of the test pool, which includes both weaker and stronger configurations. Given that the CPU ranks in the 83rd percentile and the GPU in the 61st percentile, the combined rank of 54% indicates the GPU is the more limiting component in this pairing. The CPU has headroom that the GPU cannot fully utilize at higher settings, particularly at 4K where the RTX 4060's 42 FPS average at Ultra is the bottleneck.

Compared to other combos in the database, this system's position suggests it is well suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming in this title, with acceptable performance at 4K on lower settings. The rank does not reflect any extreme strengths or weaknesses; rather, it indicates a middle-of-the-pack result that matches the hardware's individual percentiles when combined.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its strongest results. The Low preset achieves an average of 266 FPS, which is the highest measured in the entire dataset. Medium settings yield 189 FPS average with a minimum of 160 and maximum of 217 FPS. High settings produce 133 FPS average, while Ultra drops to 127 FPS average. The gap between High and Ultra is minimal at only 6 FPS, suggesting diminishing returns at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains strong but shows clear scaling. Low settings deliver 168 FPS average, a 37% reduction from 1080p Low. Medium settings produce 119 FPS average with a minimum of 101 and maximum of 137 FPS, representing a 37% drop from 1080p Medium. High settings yield 84 FPS average, while Ultra delivers 80 FPS average. The High to Ultra gap at 1440p is only 4 FPS, again showing marginal differences between these settings.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's limitations become apparent. Low settings achieve 88 FPS average, which is playable. Medium settings produce 62 FPS average with a minimum of 53 and maximum of 72 FPS, providing a playable experience with some dips. High settings yield 44 FPS average, and Ultra delivers 42 FPS average. The difference between High and Ultra at 4K is just 2 FPS, indicating the GPU is saturated at this resolution regardless of minor setting changes.

The Medium settings rows include minimum and maximum FPS values, providing insight into frame time consistency. At 1080p Medium, the range spans from 160 to 217 FPS, a 57 FPS spread. At 1440p Medium, the range is 101 to 137 FPS, a 36 FPS spread. At 4K Medium, the range is 53 to 72 FPS, a 19 FPS spread. This narrowing range at higher resolutions indicates the GPU is working closer to its limits, reducing variance.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured data, the Medium preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance across all resolutions. At 1080p Medium, the system delivers 189 FPS average with a minimum of 160 FPS, providing smooth gameplay with no perceptible frame drops. The 217 FPS maximum indicates headroom for occasional scene complexity spikes. At 1440p Medium, the 119 FPS average with a 101 FPS minimum maintains fluidity for most users, though those with high refresh rate displays may notice the lower bound.

For users prioritizing maximum visual fidelity, the Ultra preset is viable at 1080p and 1440p. At 1080p Ultra, the 127 FPS average remains well above typical refresh rates. At 1440p Ultra, the 80 FPS average is playable but falls below the 100 FPS threshold that some users prefer. The High preset at 1440p delivers 84 FPS average, only marginally better than Ultra, suggesting that the visual quality difference between High and Ultra does not justify the performance cost at this resolution.

At 4K, the Medium preset is the recommended choice. The 62 FPS average with a 53 FPS minimum ensures the experience remains above the 50 FPS comfort threshold, while the 72 FPS maximum shows occasional peaks. The Low preset at 4K achieves 88 FPS average, which is smoother but sacrifices visual quality. The High and Ultra presets at 4K, delivering 44 and 42 FPS respectively, fall below the 45 FPS threshold where most users perceive smoothness, making them less suitable for regular play.

The data suggests that users with 1080p displays should use Ultra settings to maximize visual quality while retaining 127 FPS average. Users with 1440p displays should choose between Medium for higher frame rates or Ultra for visual fidelity, depending on their refresh rate. Users with 4K displays should use Medium settings to maintain playable frame rates without significant quality loss.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS values reveal distinct scaling patterns as resolution increases from 1080p to 4K. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 266 at 1080p to 168 at 1440p, a 37% reduction, then to 88 at 4K, a 48% reduction from 1440p. The total reduction from 1080p to 4K at Low settings is 67%. At Medium settings, the progression is 189 to 119 (37% drop) to 62 (48% drop), totaling a 67% reduction. At High settings, 133 to 84 (37% drop) to 44 (48% drop), again totaling 67%. At Ultra settings, 127 to 80 (37% drop) to 42 (48% drop), matching the 67% total reduction.

The consistency of these percentages across all settings is notable. Each step from 1080p to 1440p reduces performance by approximately 37%, while each step from 1440p to 4K reduces performance by approximately 48%. This pattern indicates that resolution scaling follows a predictable relationship, with the pixel count increase from 1080p to 1440p (1.78x) and from 1440p to 4K (2.25x) driving the frame rate reductions.

The limiting component is clearly the GPU at higher resolutions. The CPU's capabilities, as shown by its 83rd percentile ranking, are sufficient to maintain high frame rates at 1080p, evidenced by the 266 FPS Low result. However, as resolution increases, the GPU's rendering workload grows, and the RTX 4060's 8 GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth become more significant constraints. The 4K Ultra result of 42 FPS indicates the GPU is rendering at its maximum capacity, with the CPU waiting on the GPU to complete frames.

The scaling data suggests that users should target 1080p or 1440p for the best experience with this combo. The 4K results, while playable on Medium settings, show that the system is operating at the edge of its capabilities. The percentage-based scaling pattern indicates that any future resolution increases would yield proportionally similar frame rate reductions, reinforcing the GPU as the primary limiting factor in this configuration.