Pc Building Simulator

# Pc Building Simulator — AMD Ryzen 5 5600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER

The measured FPS data for Pc Building Simulator reveals a system that scales predictably with resolution and settings, but with some notable efficiency cliffs that point to where the bottleneck shifts between CPU and GPU. The combo ranks 1075th out of 1769 tested configurations, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database, which is surprising given the hardware's individual benchmark percentiles — the CPU sits at the 78th percentile and the GPU at the 65th percentile. This suggests that Pc Building Simulator's engine may not fully utilize the available compute resources, or that the game's simulation logic creates a unique performance profile that differs from synthetic benchmarks.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is dramatic and tells a clear story about the limiting component at each resolution. At High settings, the average FPS falls from 123.3 at 1920x1080 to 81.1 at 2560x1440, a reduction of 42.2 FPS (34.2%), then further to 42.7 at 3840x2160, which is a 65.4% drop from the 1080p baseline. This steep decline indicates that the GPU becomes progressively more stressed as pixel count increases, which is expected behavior for a 8 GB GDDR6 card with 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth.

The scaling pattern at Low settings is even more revealing: 247.6 FPS at 1080p drops to 154.6 at 1440p (a 37.6% reduction) and then to 80.2 at 4K (a 67.6% reduction from 1080p). The fact that Low settings still show such a severe 4K penalty suggests that even at minimal graphical load, the 3840x2160 resolution requires substantial GPU throughput that the RTX 2070 SUPER cannot maintain. In contrast, the CPU's role appears to diminish at higher resolutions — the 65W TDP chip with 6 cores and 12 threads is capable of feeding frames at 1080p, but the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor at 4K.

GPU Role

The RTX 2070 SUPER's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is a critical factor in Pc Building Simulator's performance. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective), and the GPU's base clock of 1605 MHz boosts to 1770 MHz. The benchmark results show a pattern where the gap between Low and Ultra settings widens as resolution increases — at 1080p, the difference is 127.9 FPS (247.6 vs 119.7), while at 4K it narrows to 40.1 FPS (80.2 vs 40.1). This compression of the settings delta at 4K indicates that the GPU's raw shading power, rated at 9.062 TFLOPS FP32, is more dominant than memory bandwidth at lower resolutions, but at 4K both become saturated.

The GPU's transistor count of 13,600 million on a 545 mm² die (12 nm process) gives it 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The pixel rate of 113.3 GPixel/s and texture rate of 283.2 GTexel/s suggest that the card can handle the visual complexity of a simulation game like Pc Building Simulator, which likely involves rendering many 3D components in a workshop environment. The 40 RT cores and 320 tensor cores are present but unlikely to be heavily utilized in this genre, which may explain why the GPU's 65th percentile rank doesn't translate to a higher in-game combo rank.

FAQ

Q: Does the RTX 2070 SUPER bottleneck the Ryzen 5 5600G at any resolution?

A: Yes, particularly at 4K. At 3840x2160, the average FPS drops below 60 even at Medium settings (58.4 FPS), and the gap between Low (80.2) and Ultra (40.1) suggests the GPU's 8 GB memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient to maintain high frame rates at that resolution.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to maintain 60+ FPS?

A: At 2560x1440, all tested settings except Ultra (72.2 FPS) remain above 60 FPS, with High hitting 81.1 FPS. At 1920x1080, even Ultra maintains 119.7 FPS, so 1080p offers the most headroom.

Q: How does the CPU's 16 MB L3 cache affect Pc Building Simulator performance?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600G's 16 MB L3 cache, combined with 512 KB L2 per core and 64 KB L1 per core, provides fast access to frequently used simulation data. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16758 suggests strong single-threaded and multi-threaded performance for the game's logic, though the 4K bottleneck shows the GPU limits overall FPS.

Q: Is the integrated Radeon Vega 7 graphics relevant when using the RTX 2070 SUPER?

A: No, the discrete GPU fully replaces the integrated graphics. The Vega 7 iGPU is present on the CPU but has no role in the measured FPS data, which is exclusively driven by the RTX 2070 SUPER.

Q: Why does the combo rank 1075th out of 1769 when both components have above-average benchmark scores?

A: The CPU's 78th percentile and GPU's 65th percentile rankings are based on synthetic benchmarks like Cinebench and PassMark. Pc Building Simulator's measured FPS suggests the game may be more dependent on specific engine optimizations or memory bandwidth rather than raw compute, resulting in a lower relative standing among tested combos.

Q: What settings change has the most impact on FPS at 1080p?

A: Dropping from High (123.3 FPS) to Low (247.6 FPS) nearly doubles performance, a 100.8% increase. The jump from Low to Medium (172.6 FPS) is also substantial, but the difference between High and Ultra (119.7 FPS) is minimal at just 3.6 FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the data shows a wide spread across presets: Low averages 247.6 FPS, Medium 172.6 FPS, High 123.3 FPS, and Ultra 119.7 FPS. The near-identical results between High and Ultra suggest that the Ultra preset adds minimal visual overhead at this resolution, or that the game's engine caps some effects that don't scale with pixel count.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates are 154.6 FPS (Low), 111.9 FPS (Medium), 81.1 FPS (High), and 72.2 FPS (Ultra). The delta between Low and Ultra is 82.4 FPS, which is smaller in absolute terms than at 1080p (127.9 FPS) but proportionally similar. The 1440p results indicate that the RTX 2070 SUPER can comfortably handle this resolution for Pc Building Simulator, with even Ultra maintaining above 60 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the performance drops significantly: Low averages 80.2 FPS, Medium 58.4 FPS, High 42.7 FPS, and Ultra 40.1 FPS. Only Low settings achieve a consistently playable frame rate above 60 FPS at 4K. The gradual decline from Low to Medium (21.8 FPS drop) and then a smaller gap between High and Ultra (2.6 FPS difference) implies that the Medium-to-High transition involves a heavy graphical feature that the GPU cannot sustain at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

With a combo rank of 1075 out of 1769 tested configurations, this pairing sits in the 39th percentile of all combos tested for Pc Building Simulator. This is notably lower than the individual component percentiles — the CPU at 78th and GPU at 65th — which suggests that the game's performance profile does not align perfectly with what synthetic benchmarks predict. The CPU's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-11600H (avg score 19949, 0.2% lower) and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX (19928, 0.3% higher), while the GPU's nearest rivals are the NVIDIA RTX A400 (22307, 0.5% higher) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z (22006, 0.9% lower). These close margins in benchmark scores contrast with the wider variance seen in real-world game FPS, indicating that Pc Building Simulator may be sensitive to specific hardware configurations beyond just raw compute scores.

The rank suggests that many other combos deliver higher FPS in this game, potentially due to better CPU-GPU balance or memory subsystem configurations. The RTX 2070 SUPER's 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and 1440p but shows strain at 4K, and the CPU's 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth (dual-channel DDR4) may be a limiting factor for simulation workloads that require frequent data transfers.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G's 6 cores and 12 threads with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and boost up to 4.40 GHz provide solid computational power for Pc Building Simulator's simulation logic. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16758 and single-core score of 2365 indicate strong performance for both multi-threaded background tasks and single-threaded game logic. The PassMark multi-thread score of 19717 and single-thread score of 3177 further confirm this.

The 7 nm Cezanne architecture with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die is efficient, with a 65W TDP that keeps thermals manageable. The 16 MB L3 cache is shared across all cores, which helps with data locality in simulation scenarios where multiple components interact. The CPU's 3DMark scores — 5451 for 16 threads, 4694 for 8 threads, 3258 for 4 threads, and 872 for single thread — show that scaling from 2 to 8 threads is efficient (1705 to 4694), but diminishing returns appear beyond 8 threads (5451 at 16 threads).

In Pc Building Simulator, the CPU's role is likely most critical at lower resolutions where the GPU can render frames quickly. At 1080p Low, the 247.6 FPS average indicates the CPU can feed frames well above typical display refresh rates, but the drop to 80.2 FPS at 4K Low suggests the GPU becomes the primary constraint. The CPU's 78th percentile ranking among all CPUs reflects its competent but not top-tier performance, which is adequate for this simulation genre.

Settings Recommendations

For the best experience at 1920x1080, the High preset at 123.3 FPS offers a strong balance — it's well above 60 FPS and only 3.6 FPS lower than Ultra, meaning the visual fidelity gain from Ultra is negligible. The Low preset at 247.6 FPS is excessive for most displays and likely sacrifices visual quality for no practical benefit. Medium at 172.6 FPS is also a solid choice if you prefer smoother motion over slight visual improvements.

At 2560x1440, High at 81.1 FPS is the recommended preset, as it maintains a comfortable margin above 60 FPS while delivering better visuals than Medium (111.9 FPS). Ultra at 72.2 FPS is playable but leaves less headroom for demanding scenes, and the 8.9 FPS difference between High and Ultra may not justify the extra graphical load. Low at 154.6 FPS is overkill for most monitors.

At 3840x2160, only Low at 80.2 FPS provides a consistently smooth experience above 60 FPS. Medium at 58.4 FPS dips below the 60 FPS threshold, and High (42.7 FPS) and Ultra (40.1 FPS) are not recommended for competitive or fast-paced play. For 4K users, reducing to Low is the only viable option, or consider dropping to 1440p with High settings for a better visual-to-performance tradeoff.

The data indicates that this combo is best utilized at 1080p or 1440p with High settings, where the GPU's 8 GB memory and the CPU's 12 threads are sufficient to maintain high frame rates. At 4K, the system's limitations become apparent, and users should expect to sacrifice visual quality significantly.