Palworld

Palworld

AVERAGE FPS
188
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 188 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 66 87 114 140
1440p QHD 119 157 205 252
1080p Full HD 181 239 311 383

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 140
3840x2160 Medium 114
3840x2160 High 87
3840x2160 Ultra 66
2560x1440 Low 252
2560x1440 Medium 205
2560x1440 High 157
2560x1440 Ultra 119
1920x1080 Low 383
1920x1080 Medium 311
1920x1080 High 239
1920x1080 Ultra 181

Palworld with Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D, In-Depth Analysis

Palworld’s measured performance with the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D places this combination at the top of the database, ranking 1st out of 2,944 tested combos. The data shows a system capable of extreme frame rates, but the optimal settings depend heavily on your target resolution and refresh rate. The benchmark rows indicate that this pairing is so powerful that the CPU becomes the primary limiter at lower resolutions, while the GPU takes over at 4K.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS rows across the four settings presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—reveal a clear hierarchy, but the "best" experience is not always the highest preset. At 1080p, the Low preset delivers a staggering 383 FPS average, which is far beyond the refresh rate of any standard monitor. The Medium preset still achieves 311 FPS, while High drops to 239 FPS and Ultra to 181 FPS. For competitive play or use with a very high refresh rate 1080p panel, the Medium preset provides a massive frame rate cushion with better visual fidelity than Low. The High preset at 1080p is the most balanced for typical 240Hz monitors, as the 239 FPS average nearly saturates that refresh rate while maintaining superior image quality.

Stepping up to 1440p, the frame rates remain incredibly high. The Low preset hits 252 FPS, Medium delivers 205 FPS, and High produces 157 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p is the first to dip below the 120 FPS mark, averaging 119 FPS. For a 1440p 165Hz or 240Hz display, the High preset is the recommended choice; the 157 FPS average is a strong match for 165Hz panels and only slightly below the ceiling for 240Hz. The Medium preset offers a more substantial headroom for 240Hz displays, but the visual jump to High is significant enough to justify the frame rate trade-off for most users.

At 4K, the curve flattens considerably due to GPU load. The Low preset averages 140 FPS, Medium drops to 114 FPS, High falls to 87 FPS, and Ultra brings up the rear at 66 FPS. For a 4K 120Hz display, the Medium preset is the sweet spot, as the 114 FPS average is close to the refresh rate limit while retaining a good level of detail. The High preset at 4K is more suitable for 60Hz to 75Hz displays, where the 87 FPS average provides smooth gameplay. Ultra at 4K is playable but dips to 66 FPS, which is acceptable for slower-paced survival building but not ideal for fast action. Across all resolutions, the Medium preset consistently offers the best balance of frame rate and visual quality, with the High preset being the recommendation for those prioritizing image sharpness at 1080p and 1440p.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is a 20-core, 20-thread processor from the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process. Its base clock is 2.40 GHz and it boosts up to 5.30 GHz. The benchmark results for this CPU show strong synthetic performance, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42,216 and a single-core score of 5,960. These numbers indicate a high level of both multi-threaded and single-threaded capability, which is crucial for Palworld’s simulation and rendering tasks. The CPU sits in the 93rd percentile of all tested processors, with an average benchmark score of 64,640, placing it just 0.3% behind the AMD EPYC 4464P and 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F.

In the measured FPS data, the CPU’s role is most evident at 1080p. At this resolution, the GPU is often not the bottleneck, and the data shows massive frame rates that scale dramatically with lower settings. The jump from High (239 FPS) to Low (383 FPS) at 1080p is a 144 FPS increase, which indicates that the CPU and its 20 threads are capable of feeding the GPU exceptionally well. The single-core boost clock of 5.30 GHz is critical here, as Palworld’s game logic and physics often rely on a few primary threads. The L3 cache of 30 MB shared across the cores helps maintain data locality, reducing latency for frequently accessed game data.

Comparing to its nearest rivals, the Core Ultra 7 265’s performance is nearly identical to the Core Ultra 7 265F, which is expected as they are the same silicon with minor feature differences. The small delta of 0.3% against the AMD EPYC 4464P suggests that the Core Ultra 7 265 has ample headroom for gaming workloads. However, the data does not show a scenario where the CPU completely bottlenecks the system at 1080p; even at Ultra settings with 181 FPS, the frame rate is still very high. The 20-core configuration ensures that background tasks and streaming do not interfere with game performance, as the parallel workload is well distributed. The CPU’s memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s over a dual-channel DDR5 interface is sufficient to keep the GPU fed with data, as evidenced by the high minimum FPS figures at Medium settings across all resolutions.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is a powerhouse based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, featuring the GB202 chip with 21,760 shading units. Its boost clock is 2407 MHz, and it comes with a massive 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, providing 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. The GPU’s raw compute power is rated at 104.8 TFLOPS for FP32 operations. In the database, this GPU holds a 92nd percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 77,712. Its nearest rivals show a mixed bag: the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT is 1.6% ahead, while the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT is 1.1% behind, indicating that the RTX 5090 D is at the top tier of consumer graphics.

The GPU’s role in Palworld becomes increasingly dominant as resolution rises. At 4K, the frame rate gap between Low (140 FPS) and Ultra (66 FPS) is a 74 FPS difference, which is a direct result of the GPU’s rendering load. The 32 GB VRAM is unlikely to be a limiting factor in Palworld, even at 4K with Ultra textures, as the game’s asset sizes are dwarfed by this capacity. The boost clock of 2407 MHz, combined with the 1.79 TB/s memory bandwidth, allows the RTX 5090 D to handle the high pixel counts of 4K without stuttering. The data shows that at Medium settings, the 4K average is 114 FPS with a minimum of 96 FPS, showing that the GPU maintains consistent frame pacing even under load.

The RTX 5090 D’s nearest rival scores are interesting; the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT is a laptop part that edges it out by 1.6% in synthetic benchmarks, but the measured game FPS here shows the RTX 5090 D performing exceptionally well. The GPU’s 176 ROPs and 680 TMUs are fully utilized at 4K, where the pixel fill rate and texture filtering are the primary bottlenecks. At 1440p and 1080p, the GPU is less stressed, allowing the CPU to take the lead, but the RTX 5090 D still ensures that frame rates never dip below playable levels. For Palworld, the RTX 5090 D is overkill for 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K it provides the headroom needed to run High settings at 87 FPS or Medium at 114 FPS, making it the definitive choice for high-resolution survival gaming.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D achieves the top spot in the database for Palworld, ranking 1st out of 2,944 tested combos. This is a definitive result, indicating that no other pairing in the database produces higher average frame rates in this game. The rank is a composite of the measured FPS across all resolutions and settings, and the data shows that this combo excels in every category. The CPU’s 93rd percentile and GPU’s 92nd percentile scores are both near the top of their respective fields, and their synergy in Palworld is unmatched.

The nearest rival CPU comparisons show the Core Ultra 7 265 is nearly tied with the AMD EPYC 4464P, but the GPU is what pushes this combo over the edge. The RTX 5090 D’s performance, while slightly behind the RX 6850M XT in synthetic tests, translates to superior real-world gaming results in this title. The rank of 1 suggests that even configurations with higher-end CPUs or GPUs individually do not match this specific pairing’s total output. For context, the deltaPct values for the CPU rivals are all within 1%, meaning the CPU choice has minimal impact on the final rank; the GPU’s raw power at 4K is the primary driver of this combo’s dominance.

The data implies that users with this combo will not need to compromise on settings to achieve high frame rates. Even the most demanding preset (Ultra) at 4K yields 66 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The combo’s rank of 1 is not just about peak FPS but also about consistency; the Medium settings at 1080p show a minimum FPS of 264, which is higher than many systems’ average FPS. This ranking solidifies the Core Ultra 7 265 and RTX 5090 D as the ultimate reference point for Palworld performance, and it is unlikely to be dethroned until next-generation hardware arrives.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data across 1080p, 1440p, and 4K reveals a predictable scaling pattern that highlights the shift in bottleneck between CPU and GPU. At the High settings preset, the frame rates drop from 239 FPS at 1080p to 157 FPS at 1440p, a 34% decrease, and then to 87 FPS at 4K, a further 45% decrease. This steep drop-off from 1440p to 4K is a clear indicator that the GPU is becoming the limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU is doing most of the heavy lifting, as the GPU has spare capacity to render more frames than the CPU can feed.

The Low settings preset shows an even more pronounced CPU limitation at 1080p. The 383 FPS at 1080p drops to 252 FPS at 1440p (a 34% decrease), and then to 140 FPS at 4K (a 44% decrease). The fact that 1080p Low does not scale linearly to 1440p Low suggests that the CPU’s frame generation limit is being reached at 1080p, and the GPU is still not the primary constraint until 4K. At 4K, all presets show a significant drop, with the Ultra preset falling to 66 FPS, which is a 63% reduction from the 1080p Ultra score of 181 FPS.

This scaling behavior indicates that for this combo, the CPU is the bottleneck at 1080p and 1440p, while the GPU becomes the bottleneck at 4K. The RTX 5090 D is so fast that it can render 1080p frames almost as fast as the CPU can submit them, leading to diminishing returns when lowering settings at that resolution. The data suggests that to get the most out of this combo, users should either target 4K with Medium or High settings to balance the load, or stick to 1080p/1440p with High settings for maximum frame rates. The 4K numbers are still exceptionally high, but the scaling curve shows that 4K Ultra is the only scenario where the system struggles to maintain triple-digit FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the core Ultra 7 265 and RTX 5090 D produce exceptional frame rates across all presets. The Low preset yields an average of 383 FPS, which is the highest measured in the entire dataset. The Medium preset delivers 311 FPS, with a minimum of 264 FPS and a maximum of 357 FPS, showing excellent consistency. The High preset averages 239 FPS, while the Ultra preset drops to 181 FPS. These numbers suggest that at 1080p, the system is rarely GPU-bound, and the CPU’s 20 cores and 5.30 GHz boost clock are fully utilized to push frame rates past 300 FPS on lower settings.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but show the expected decline. The Low preset averages 252 FPS, which is still an incredible number for a 1440p resolution. The Medium preset achieves 205 FPS, with a minimum of 174 FPS and a maximum of 235 FPS, indicating smooth performance even in demanding scenes. The High preset produces 157 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to 119 FPS. The 1440p results demonstrate that the combo is well-suited for high-refresh-rate 1440p gaming, with the High preset being the most balanced for a 165Hz monitor, while the Low preset is reserved for competitive play.

At 3840x2160, the GPU’s influence is most apparent. The Low preset averages 140 FPS, which is a 44% drop from the 1080p Low score, confirming the GPU is now the primary bottleneck. The Medium preset delivers 114 FPS, with a minimum of 96 FPS and a maximum of 131 FPS, providing a solid 4K experience. The High preset averages 87 FPS, which is suitable for 60Hz displays but not for high-refresh-rate panels. The Ultra preset drops to 66 FPS, which is the lowest measured in the dataset but still playable. The 4K data shows that the RTX 5090 D’s 32 GB of VRAM and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth are sufficient to handle 4K textures without stuttering, but the settings need to be moderated to achieve high frame rates.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

Cores / Threads 20 / 20
Base Clock 2400 MHz
Boost Clock 5300 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1851
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

VRAM 32 GB GDDR7
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2407 MHz MHz
TDP 575 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D in Palworld

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 140.0
3840x2160 Medium 114.0
3840x2160 High 87.0
3840x2160 Ultra 66.0
2560x1440 Low 252.0
2560x1440 Medium 205.0
2560x1440 High 157.0
2560x1440 Ultra 119.0
1920x1080 Low 383.0
1920x1080 Medium 311.0
1920x1080 High 239.0
1920x1080 Ultra 181.0

Palworld with iUltra 7 265 + Other GPUs

See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Palworld with RTX 5090 D + Other CPUs

See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with iUltra 7 265 + RTX 5090 D

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.