Palworld
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 114 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 42 | 52 | 70 | 83 |
| 1440p QHD | 71 | 95 | 125 | 153 |
| 1080p Full HD | 107 | 146 | 188 | 234 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Palworld with Intel Core i7-14700F + AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT, In-Depth Analysis
Palworld’s measured performance with the Intel Core i7-14700F and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT shows a configuration that is decisively GPU-bound at higher resolutions, yet remarkably capable at 1080p where the CPU’s strength becomes evident. The data reveals a wide performance envelope, from a highly playable 70.3 FPS average at 4K Medium to a blistering 233.9 FPS at 1080p Low, indicating that users have substantial control over their experience based on their display and performance targets.
Resolution Scaling
The transition from 1080p to 4K produces a dramatic shift in frame rates, clearly identifying the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT as the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions. At High settings, the average frame rate drops from 145.9 FPS at 1920x1080 to 94.9 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of 51 FPS. Scaling further to 3840x2160 yields just 52 FPS, representing a 64.4% decrease from the 1080p figure. This pattern strongly indicates that the GPU’s rendering throughput, not the CPU, is the bottleneck when pixel count rises.
The scaling behavior is consistent across all settings presets. At Low settings, the frame rate falls from 233.9 FPS at 1080p to 153.3 FPS at 1440p, then to 83.2 FPS at 4K. The 4K figure is only 35.6% of the 1080p performance, demonstrating that even with reduced graphical load, the RX 6800 XT cannot maintain high frame rates at 4K. Conversely, the relatively small gap between 1080p and 1440p at Medium (188 FPS vs 125.4 FPS) suggests the CPU has ample headroom to feed the GPU at these resolutions, with the performance loss being primarily attributable to the GPU’s pixel processing limits.
The data shows that this combo is best suited for 1440p gaming or high-refresh-rate 1080p. At 4K, the system can deliver playable frame rates, but only with lowered settings, as Ultra at 3840x2160 averages just 41.9 FPS. The scaling pattern confirms that users targeting 4K should expect to make significant compromises, while those on 1080p or 1440p displays will find the system far more capable.
Settings Recommendations
The optimal settings preset depends heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1080p displays, the High preset provides an excellent balance, delivering 145.9 FPS, which is more than sufficient for smooth gameplay on most monitors. Pushing to Ultra at this resolution yields 106.9 FPS, still highly playable, but the 39 FPS gain from dropping to High is significant for those with 144Hz displays. The Low preset at 1080p (233.9 FPS) is only advisable for competitive play where maximum frame rates are prioritized over visual fidelity.
At 1440p, the Medium preset emerges as the sweet spot, producing 125.4 FPS. This is notably higher than the High preset’s 94.9 FPS, while the visual difference between Medium and High is often less impactful than the performance gain. High at 1440p remains a strong choice for those prioritizing image quality, as 94.9 FPS is still smooth. Ultra at 1440p (70.7 FPS) is playable but represents a substantial performance cost for marginal visual improvements.
For 4K, the Medium preset is the clear recommendation, offering 70.3 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold for most users. The High preset at 4K (52 FPS) is borderline, while Ultra (41.9 FPS) is not recommended except for slow-paced exploration. Low at 4K (83.2 FPS) is viable but severely compromises visual quality. The data suggests that Medium settings provide the best overall experience across all resolutions, balancing visual fidelity with smooth frame rates.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU/GPU combo in Palworld?
A: The data shows 2560x1440 as the sweet spot, with 125.4 FPS on Medium and 94.9 FPS on High, offering a strong balance of visual quality and performance. 1080p is excellent for high refresh rates, while 4K requires Medium settings to maintain playable frame rates.
Q: Can this system run Palworld at 4K smoothly?
A: Yes, but with caveats. The Medium preset at 3840x2160 achieves 70.3 FPS, which is smooth. The High preset drops to 52 FPS, and Ultra falls to 41.9 FPS, so users will need to select Medium for the best 4K experience.
Q: How much performance is lost when going from 1080p to 4K on High settings?
A: The average frame rate drops from 145.9 FPS at 1920x1080 to 52 FPS at 3840x2160, a decrease of 93.9 FPS, or roughly 64.4% less performance. This indicates the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions.
Q: What settings preset provides the highest frame rate at 1080p?
A: The Low preset delivers the highest average at 233.9 FPS. For a more balanced experience, Medium provides 188 FPS, and High offers 145.9 FPS, all of which are well above typical monitor refresh rates.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game at 1440p?
A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary constraint at 1440p, as frame rates scale down predictably with increased settings (153.3 FPS Low, 125.4 FPS Medium, 94.9 FPS High, 70.7 FPS Ultra). The CPU’s 20 cores and 28 threads provide sufficient headroom for the GPU to be the limiting factor.
Q: Does the Ultra preset offer a worthwhile performance increase over High?
A: No. At all resolutions, Ultra delivers significantly lower frame rates than High. For example, at 1440p, Ultra averages 70.7 FPS versus 94.9 FPS for High, a 24.2 FPS difference. The visual gains from Ultra are typically minimal compared to this performance cost.
How This Combo Ranks
Within the benchmark database, this specific combination of Intel Core i7-14700F and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT ranks 580 out of 1718 tested combos for Palworld. This places it in the upper third of all configurations, indicating a strong performer for this title. The top 33.8% ranking suggests that while there are many faster setups, this combo is well above the median for playable performance.
The ranking reflects a balanced pairing where neither component is drastically mismatched for the game’s demands. The CPU’s high multi-threaded capability, evidenced by its 35443 score in Cinebench R23 multi-core, prevents it from bottlenecking the GPU in most scenarios. Conversely, the GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM and 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are sufficient for Palworld’s asset streaming, though the 4K Ultra results show the GPU’s limits.
Compared to other tested combos, the 580th rank out of 1718 means the system outperforms 66.2% of all recorded configurations. This is a solid result, especially considering the RX 6800 XT is an end-of-life product. The data confirms that users with this setup can expect a smooth experience at 1080p and 1440p, with playable 4K performance at Medium settings, making it a versatile choice for Palworld.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT is the dominant factor in Palworld’s performance scaling. Its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is ample for the game’s textures and world streaming at 1080p and 1440p. The GPU’s 4608 shading units and 128 ROPs deliver the raw pixel throughput needed for high frame rates, as seen in the 233.9 FPS result at 1080p Low.
The GPU’s clock speeds—1825 MHz base, 2015 MHz game, and 2250 MHz boost—contribute to its performance headroom. The boost clock of 2250 MHz is particularly relevant for the High and Medium presets, where the GPU can operate at higher frequencies under load. The 20.74 TFLOPS FP32 performance is a key metric, translating directly into the frame rates observed across resolutions.
The data shows the RX 6800 XT’s limitations at 4K, particularly on Ultra settings where the 41.9 FPS average indicates it is overwhelmed. However, its performance at 1440p Medium (125.4 FPS) and High (94.9 FPS) demonstrates that it is well-suited for this resolution. The GPU’s 87th percentile ranking among all GPUs and its proximity to rivals like the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER (2.6% higher average score) contextualize its capabilities, showing it remains a competitive option despite being end-of-life.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system delivers consistently high frame rates across all presets. The Low preset averages 233.9 FPS, Medium 188 FPS, High 145.9 FPS, and Ultra 106.9 FPS. These figures indicate that at 1080p, the CPU and GPU combination has significant headroom, with even the most demanding Ultra preset maintaining over 100 FPS.
Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains strong but shows the GPU’s increasing workload. Low averages 153.3 FPS, Medium 125.4 FPS, High 94.9 FPS, and Ultra 70.7 FPS. The drop from High to Ultra at this resolution is 24.2 FPS, highlighting the cost of the highest preset.
At 3840x2160, the frame rates fall to more modest levels. Low averages 83.2 FPS, Medium 70.3 FPS, High 52 FPS, and Ultra 41.9 FPS. This breakdown shows a clear pattern: the gap between Low and Medium is 12.9 FPS, while the gap between Medium and High is 18.3 FPS, and the final step to Ultra costs another 10.1 FPS. The 4K results demonstrate that users must prioritize either frame rate or visual quality, as the system cannot deliver both at this resolution.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i7-14700F provides a robust foundation for Palworld, with 20 cores and 28 threads that ensure the GPU is rarely starved of data. Its boost clock of 5.40 GHz delivers strong single-thread performance, as evidenced by the 5003 score in Cinebench R23 single-core, which is crucial for game logic and physics calculations. The 33 MB of shared L3 cache further aids in reducing latency for frequently accessed data.
The CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities, shown by the 35443 score in Cinebench R23 multi-core, are more than sufficient for Palworld’s survival game mechanics, which often involve numerous simulated entities. The 94th percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms its high standing, though it trails the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X by 0.6% in average benchmark score, a negligible difference.
In Palworld specifically, the CPU’s role is to maintain frame pacing and avoid bottlenecks. The data shows this is achieved at 1080p, where the 233.9 FPS Low result indicates the CPU can feed the GPU at very high rates. However, at 4K, the CPU is not the limiting factor, as the GPU’s rendering load dominates. The CPU’s 65W TDP is modest, and its support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory allows flexibility in system configuration, though these factors do not directly impact the measured frame rates.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i7-14700F
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i7-14700F + AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT in Palworld
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 83.2 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 70.3 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 52.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 41.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 153.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 125.4 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 94.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 70.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 233.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 188.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 145.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 106.9 |
Palworld with ii7-14700F + Other GPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Palworld with RX 6800 XT + Other CPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii7-14700F + RX 6800 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.