Palworld

Palworld

AVERAGE FPS
115
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 115 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 40 53 69 86
1440p QHD 73 96 125 154
1080p Full HD 111 146 190 234

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 86
3840x2160 Medium 69
3840x2160 High 53
3840x2160 Ultra 40
2560x1440 Low 154
2560x1440 Medium 125
2560x1440 High 96
2560x1440 Ultra 73
1920x1080 Low 234
1920x1080 Medium 190
1920x1080 High 146
1920x1080 Ultra 111

Palworld with Intel Core i5-14600KF + AMD Radeon RX 9070, In-Depth Analysis

# Palworld — Intel Core i5-14600KF + AMD Radeon RX 9070

This combination delivers a playable experience across most resolutions and settings in Palworld, with the data revealing a system that is clearly GPU-bound at higher resolutions while the CPU provides ample headroom at 1080p. The measured frame rates show a consistent scaling pattern from 1080p to 4K, with the Ultra preset becoming increasingly demanding as resolution rises. The combo ranks 1125 out of 3711 tested combinations, placing it in the upper third of all systems tested for this title.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate progression from 1080p to 4K follows a predictable pattern that highlights the GPU as the primary limiter at higher resolutions. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 234 at 1920x1080 to 154 at 2560x1440 (a 34% reduction), and further to 86 at 3840x2160 (a 63% reduction from 1080p). This steep decline at 4K indicates that the Radeon RX 9070's rendering throughput, with its 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 644.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, becomes the bottleneck when pixel count quadruples.

At Medium settings, the scaling shows a similar trend: 190 FPS at 1080p, 125 FPS at 1440p, and 69 FPS at 4K. The 1440p to 4K drop of 45% is slightly less severe than the Low preset's 44% decline, suggesting that the game's medium-quality shader workload interacts differently with the GPU's 128 ROPs and 224 TMUs. Interestingly, the High preset shows the most linear scaling: 146 FPS at 1080p, 96 FPS at 1440p, and 53 FPS at 4K, with each resolution step reducing performance by roughly 34-45%.

The Ultra preset reveals the most dramatic scaling penalty. Starting at 111 FPS at 1080p, it falls to 73 FPS at 1440p (34% drop) and then to 40 FPS at 4K (64% drop from 1080p). This 4K Ultra result of 40 FPS is below the 60 FPS threshold many players target, indicating that the RX 9070's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 2520 MHz boost clock are insufficient for maxed-out 4K in this title. The data suggests that at 1080p and 1440p, the CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads can feed the GPU adequately, but at 4K the GPU's pixel rate of 322.6 GPixel/s becomes the deciding factor.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-14600KF brings substantial processing power to this pairing, with 14 cores (likely a mix of performance and efficiency cores given Raptor Lake architecture) and 20 threads operating between a 3.50 GHz base clock and 5.30 GHz boost clock. The CPU's benchmark scores demonstrate its capability: a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32544 and single-core score of 4594, with a Geekbench multi-core result of 17085. These numbers place the processor at the 90th percentile among all CPUs tested, with an average benchmark score of 49394.

The CPU's nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks include the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 with an average score of 49228 (0.3% lower), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G at 49196 (0.4% lower), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 at 48995 (0.8% lower). The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 scores 49796, which is 0.8% higher than the i5-14600KF. These close margins indicate the CPU is well within the expected performance band for its class, and in Palworld's measured results, it appears to provide sufficient headroom even at 1080p Low where 234 FPS is achieved.

The fact that frame rates at 1080p Low reach 234 FPS suggests the CPU is not the limiting factor at lower resolutions, as this is an extremely high frame rate that would require strong per-core performance. The single-core Cinebench R20 score of 1929 and PassMark single-thread score of 4273 support this interpretation, as Palworld's gameplay loop likely benefits from strong single-thread performance for game logic and physics. However, the absence of min FPS data for most settings means the data cannot reveal potential frame-time spikes or stutter issues that might be CPU-related.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is the dominant component in this system for Palworld, as evidenced by the resolution scaling analysis. Built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture with a 4 nm process from TSMC, this GPU features 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 128 render output units. The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth, which is critical for handling the game's open-world textures at 4K resolution.

The GPU's boost clock of 2520 MHz and game clock of 2070 MHz contribute to its 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. In synthetic benchmarks, the RX 9070 achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6290 and a PassMark G3D score of 25381, placing it at the 69th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals in the GPU benchmark database are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z (23736, 0.6% lower), AMD Radeon RX 6800S (24063, 0.8% higher), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile (23628, 1.1% lower), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER (24170, 1.2% higher). These comparisons show the RX 9070 sits in a competitive mid-to-high range, though its 69th percentile ranking indicates it is not a top-tier card.

In Palworld specifically, the GPU's performance at 4K Ultra (40 FPS) versus 4K Low (86 FPS) demonstrates a 115% performance swing based solely on settings, which is a clear indication of GPU-bound behavior. The 16 GB VRAM capacity is likely sufficient for Palworld's world streaming, but the 4K Ultra result suggests the rendering complexity at that preset overwhelms the GPU's compute capabilities. The 56 ray tracing cores are present, but the measured data does not include ray tracing-specific benchmarks, so their impact on Palworld cannot be assessed from this pack.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides clear guidance for optimal settings at each resolution. At 1920x1080, all presets deliver playable frame rates, with Medium achieving 190 FPS and High reaching 146 FPS. The Ultra preset at 111 FPS is also smooth, so players with 144Hz or 165Hz displays can consider High or Ultra for visual quality without sacrificing responsiveness. The Medium preset's min FPS of 161 and max FPS of 218 indicate consistent frame delivery.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset delivers 125 FPS with a min of 106 and max of 144, making it the best balance for high-refresh monitors. High at 96 FPS is also viable for 100Hz displays, while Ultra at 73 FPS remains playable for 60-75Hz screens. The Low preset at 154 FPS is only recommended for competitive play where maximum frame rate trumps visuals, as the visual degradation may not justify the 23% improvement over Medium.

At 3840x2160, the situation changes dramatically. Medium at 69 FPS with a min of 59 and max of 80 is the only preset that consistently stays above 60 FPS, making it the recommended choice for 4K gaming. High at 53 FPS is acceptable for 60Hz displays but may feel less responsive. Low at 86 FPS is technically smoother, but the visual quality loss is substantial. Ultra at 40 FPS is not recommended for general play, as the frame rate dips below the threshold where most players perceive smooth motion. For 4K users, the data strongly suggests Medium as the sweet spot, offering a 73% improvement over Ultra while maintaining acceptable visual fidelity.

FAQ

Q: What is the best preset for 4K gaming in Palworld with this combo?

A: The Medium preset at 3840x2160 delivers an average of 69 FPS with a minimum of 59 and maximum of 80. This is the only 4K preset that consistently stays near or above 60 FPS, making it the recommended choice. The High preset averages 53 FPS, while Ultra drops to 40 FPS.

Q: How does the RX 9070 compare to its nearest GPU rivals in this system?

A: The RX 9070's average benchmark score is 23877, which is 0.6% higher than the GTX TITAN Z (23736), 0.8% lower than the RX 6800S (24063), 1.1% higher than the RTX 3080 Mobile (23628), and 1.2% lower than the RTX 2080 SUPER (24170). These margins are small, indicating similar synthetic performance levels.

Q: Is the i5-14600KF a bottleneck at 1080p in Palworld?

A: The data does not indicate a CPU bottleneck at 1080p. The Low preset achieves 234 FPS, and the Medium preset reaches 190 FPS, both of which are very high frame rates that would only be possible if the CPU can keep up with the GPU's output. The CPU's 5.30 GHz boost clock and strong single-core performance support this conclusion.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 154 FPS while the Ultra preset averages 73 FPS. This represents a 111% increase in frame rate when dropping from Ultra to Low, with Medium (125 FPS) and High (96 FPS) falling between these extremes.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems for Palworld?

A: This combination ranks 1125 out of 3711 tested combos, placing it in the upper 30% of all systems tested. This ranking reflects the balance between the i5-14600KF's strong CPU performance and the RX 9070's mid-to-high tier GPU performance.

Q: Does the 16 GB VRAM on the RX 9070 provide enough memory for Palworld at 4K?

A: The measured results show playable frame rates at 4K Medium (69 FPS) and 4K High (53 FPS), suggesting the 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for the game's memory requirements at these settings. The bottleneck at 4K Ultra appears to be compute-related rather than memory-related, as the GPU's 36.13 TFLOPS throughput is insufficient for that preset's workload.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the full range of presets was measured. Low averages 234 FPS, Medium averages 190 FPS with a minimum of 161 and maximum of 218, High averages 146 FPS, and Ultra averages 111 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 123 FPS, demonstrating the significant performance cost of the Ultra preset's enhanced effects.

At 2560x1440, the measured values show Low at 154 FPS, Medium at 125 FPS (min 106, max 144), High at 96 FPS, and Ultra at 73 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 106 FPS is notable because it remains above the 100 FPS threshold, making it suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors. The High preset at 96 FPS is just below this threshold but still smooth for most users.

At 3840x2160, the data reveals the most constrained results. Low averages 86 FPS, Medium averages 69 FPS with a minimum of 59 and maximum of 80, High averages 53 FPS, and Ultra averages 40 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 59 FPS is critically close to the 60 FPS target, and users sensitive to frame drops may notice occasional stutter. The 4K results show a 115% difference between Low and Ultra, emphasizing the need to choose settings carefully at this resolution.

The min and max FPS data is only available for the Medium preset at each resolution, which limits the ability to assess frame consistency across other settings. The available data shows that the Medium preset maintains a reasonably tight frame range: 57 FPS spread at 1080p (161-218), 38 FPS spread at 1440p (106-144), and 21 FPS spread at 4K (59-80). The narrowing spread at higher resolutions indicates that the GPU becomes more consistently loaded, reducing frame-time variance.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 1125 out of 3711 tested combinations places this system in the 30th percentile of all tested combos for Palworld, which means approximately 70% of tested systems perform better. This ranking is consistent with the RX 9070's 69th percentile GPU ranking and the i5-14600KF's 90th percentile CPU ranking — the GPU is the limiting factor in this pairing.

The CPU's 90th percentile ranking among all CPUs suggests that the processor is not holding back the system in most scenarios. However, the GPU's 69th percentile ranking means that many other GPU options would deliver higher frame rates in Palworld. The nearest GPU rivals with similar benchmark scores — the GTX TITAN Z, RX 6800S, RTX 3080 Mobile, and RTX 2080 SUPER — all have average scores within 1.2% of the RX 9070, so systems with those GPUs would likely produce very similar Palworld results.

The 3711 total combos in the database include a wide range of CPU and GPU pairings, from budget to enthusiast tiers. This combo's position at 1125 suggests it is a solid mid-range performer, capable of excellent 1080p and 1440p gameplay with good 4K performance at Medium settings. The data does not include comparison scores for other specific combos, so the exact delta in Palworld FPS against higher-ranked systems cannot be quantified. However, the synthetic benchmark deltas suggest that upgrading the GPU would yield the most significant improvement in Palworld performance, while the CPU has ample headroom for future GPU upgrades.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i5-14600KF

Cores / Threads 14 / 20
Base Clock 3500 MHz
Boost Clock 5300 MHz
TDP 125W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 9070

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2520 MHz MHz
TDP 220 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i5-14600KF + AMD Radeon RX 9070 in Palworld

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 86.0
3840x2160 Medium 69.0
3840x2160 High 53.0
3840x2160 Ultra 40.0
2560x1440 Low 154.0
2560x1440 Medium 125.0
2560x1440 High 96.0
2560x1440 Ultra 73.0
1920x1080 Low 234.0
1920x1080 Medium 190.0
1920x1080 High 146.0
1920x1080 Ultra 111.0

Palworld with ii5-14600KF + Other GPUs

See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Palworld with RX 9070 + Other CPUs

See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii5-14600KF + RX 9070

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.