Palworld

Palworld

AVERAGE FPS
39
playable

This combination offers playable performance with an average of 39 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 12 15 25 28
1440p QHD 26 34 40 54
1080p Full HD 36 48 66 82

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 28
3840x2160 Medium 25
3840x2160 High 15
3840x2160 Ultra 12
2560x1440 Low 54
2560x1440 Medium 40
2560x1440 High 34
2560x1440 Ultra 26
1920x1080 Low 82
1920x1080 Medium 66
1920x1080 High 48
1920x1080 Ultra 36

Palworld with AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + AMD Radeon RX 580, In-Depth Analysis

Palworld with the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and AMD Radeon RX 580 produces a deeply GPU-bound experience, where the CPU's substantial headroom is wasted at most settings. The data shows a combo ranking in the 1610th position out of 1718 tested combinations, placing it in the bottom 6% of all pairings. The RX 580 is the definitive bottleneck, and the results demonstrate that this configuration is only viable for low-resolution or low-detail play, with performance collapsing entirely at 4K Ultra.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a textbook case of GPU saturation. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 81.6 FPS, but this drops to 53.5 FPS at 1440p and further to 27.5 FPS at 4K. This represents a 34% loss from 1080p to 1440p and a 66% loss from 1080p to 4K, indicating that the render resolution is the dominant factor limiting performance. The scaling pattern is consistent across all settings presets, confirming that the GPU's pixel throughput is the primary constraint.

The High preset shows the same trend: 48.4 FPS at 1080p falls to 34.3 FPS at 1440p and 15.4 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1440p to 4K is particularly severe, with a 55% reduction, while the 1080p to 1440p transition only costs 29%. This nonlinear scaling suggests that the RX 580's 256-bit memory bus and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth become increasingly strained as pixel count rises, though the exact bottleneck shifts with each resolution step.

At 4K Ultra, the system produces a nearly unplayable 11.5 FPS, which is 86% lower than the 1080p Low result. Even at 1440p Medium, the 40.4 FPS average is below the threshold for smooth gameplay. The data indicates that the CPU is never the limiting factor here; the Ryzen 9 7900X's 12 cores and 24 threads are far beyond what this workload requires, as evidenced by the fact that even the weakest GPU settings produce frame rates that are still constrained by the graphics card.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Palworld?

A: The data shows 1080p is the only viable resolution for acceptable frame rates. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 81.6 FPS, and at 1080p Medium it reaches 66.1 FPS, both of which are playable. At 1440p, the best result is 53.5 FPS on Low, while 4K never exceeds 27.5 FPS.

Q: How does the RX 580's performance compare to its closest rivals?

A: The RX 580 has an average benchmark score of 13559, which is essentially identical to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 at 13564 (0% difference) and the GTX 950 at 13549 (0.1% ahead). It sits 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 455 and 1.1% behind the NVIDIA P106-090.

Q: Is the Ryzen 9 7900X the bottleneck in this setup?

A: No. The Ryzen 9 7900X ranks in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 50556, while the RX 580 ranks in the 53rd percentile with a score of 13559. The massive gap in relative performance indicates the GPU is the limiting component.

Q: What settings preset should be avoided at 1440p?

A: The Ultra preset at 1440p yields only 25.8 FPS, and High produces 34.3 FPS. Both are below the 40 FPS threshold that Medium achieves (40.4 FPS), so Ultra and High should be avoided at this resolution.

Q: How much performance is lost going from 1080p to 4K at the same settings?

A: At Low settings, the drop is from 81.6 FPS to 27.5 FPS, a 66% reduction. At High settings, it falls from 48.4 FPS to 15.4 FPS, a 68% loss. The scaling is consistent regardless of preset.

Q: Does the CPU's single-thread performance matter here?

A: The Ryzen 9 7900X posts a 3DMark single-thread score of 1093 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6168, placing it well above average. However, since the GPU is the bottleneck, these strengths do not translate to higher frame rates in Palworld.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on Zen 4 architecture, running at a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. Its benchmark scores are exceptional: a Cinebench R23 multicore result of 43695 and a Geekbench multicore score of 17830 place it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 (0.1% higher average score) and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT (0.4% lower).

Despite this compute power, the CPU's role in Palworld is minimal. The frame rates scale almost entirely with GPU settings and resolution, showing no evidence of CPU limitation. At 1080p Low, the 81.6 FPS result is likely near the RX 580's maximum output, not the CPU's. The processor's 64 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support (83.2 GB/s bandwidth) provide ample headroom for game logic, but this does not manifest in higher FPS.

The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 10972 and 8-thread score of 7798 indicate strong multi-threaded capability, which is irrelevant for a game that appears to be GPU-bound at every measured setting. The data suggests that pairing this high-end CPU with an entry-level GPU from 2017 is a severe mismatch; the CPU is effectively idle while the GPU works at 100% capacity.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1080p, the combo delivers its best results: 81.6 FPS on Low, 66.1 FPS on Medium, 48.4 FPS on High, and 36.4 FPS on Ultra. The step from Low to Medium costs 19% performance, while Medium to High costs 27%, and High to Ultra costs 25%. These are the only settings where the combo approaches playable frame rates, with Low and Medium both exceeding 60 FPS.

Moving to 1440p, performance drops significantly. Low yields 53.5 FPS, Medium 40.4 FPS, High 34.3 FPS, and Ultra 25.8 FPS. The relative gaps between presets shrink, with only a 24% difference between Low and Medium, suggesting the GPU is becoming the absolute limit. At this resolution, no preset reaches 60 FPS, and only Low is consistently above 50 FPS.

At 4K, the results are largely unplayable. Low produces 27.5 FPS, Medium 25.4 FPS, High 15.4 FPS, and Ultra 11.5 FPS. The difference between Low and Medium at 4K is just 8%, indicating that settings have diminishing impact as resolution increases. The Ultra preset at 4K is 86% slower than the 1080p Low result, highlighting the extreme GPU pressure.

The data shows that the RX 580's 8 GB of GDDR5 memory is sufficient in capacity, but its 1257 MHz base and 1340 MHz boost clocks, combined with a 256-bit bus, cannot sustain high frame rates at modern resolutions. The 6.175 TFLOPS FP32 performance is the fundamental limit here.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 580 is built on the Polaris 20 chip using GCN 4.0 architecture and a 14 nm process. It has 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with a base clock of 1257 MHz and a boost clock of 1340 MHz. The 8 GB of GDDR5 memory runs at 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) across a 256-bit bus, yielding 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its average benchmark score of 13559 places it in the 53rd percentile of all GPUs, with nearest rivals being the GTX 570 (0% difference) and GTX 950 (0.1% difference).

In Palworld, the GPU is the sole performance limiter. The measured FPS data shows that even at 1080p Low, the card produces only 81.6 FPS, which is far below what the CPU could theoretically support. The 4K results (15.4 FPS High, 11.5 FPS Ultra) are consistent with the card's compute capabilities. The 42.88 GPixel/s pixel rate and 193.0 GTexel/s texture rate are simply inadequate for 4K gaming.

The RX 580's 14 nm process and 185 W TDP are dated compared to the CPU's 5 nm process, but the real issue is architectural. The GCN 4.0 design lacks modern features and efficiency, resulting in the steep performance cliff as resolution increases. The 8 GB VRAM is never exceeded, but the card's raw throughput is insufficient for demanding titles like Palworld.

Settings Recommendations

The data clearly indicates that 1080p Low is the only setting that provides a consistently smooth experience, with 81.6 FPS. For players seeking better visual quality, 1080p Medium at 66.1 FPS is the best compromise, offering a 19% visual upgrade for a 19% frame rate cost. High at 1080p drops to 48.4 FPS, which is borderline for action games, while Ultra at 36.4 FPS is not recommended.

At 1440p, the Low preset at 53.5 FPS is the only acceptable option, and even this falls short of 60 FPS. Medium at 1440p (40.4 FPS) is playable but not smooth, and High/Ultra should be avoided. At 4K, no preset is recommended, as even Low only achieves 27.5 FPS, which is below the minimum threshold for comfortable gameplay.

The optimal strategy is to run at 1080p with Medium settings, which balances visual fidelity and performance. If frame rate is the priority, 1080p Low provides the best headroom. The Ultra preset at any resolution is a poor choice, as it yields less than 40 FPS even at 1080p and drops to 11.5 FPS at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

The Ryzen 9 7900X + RX 580 combo ranks 1610th out of 1718 tested combinations in Palworld, placing it in the bottom 6% of all systems. This rank is almost entirely due to the GPU's limitations, as the CPU is in the top 7% of processors. The data suggests that this pairing is severely unbalanced, with the CPU's capabilities far exceeding what the GPU can deliver in this game.

Compared to other tested combos, this setup sits above only 108 other configurations, likely those with even older or weaker GPUs. The RX 580's 53rd percentile GPU ranking contrasts sharply with the CPU's 93rd percentile, creating a system where the graphics card is the clear weak link. For Palworld specifically, the combo's performance is consistent with the GPU's overall standing, but the CPU's high-end status does nothing to boost the frame rates.

The results indicate that users with this CPU should pair it with a far more powerful GPU to take advantage of its capabilities. Conversely, those with an RX 580 should expect this level of performance regardless of CPU choice, as the game is wholly GPU-bound. This combo represents a classic case of CPU overkill, where the processor's premium features are wasted on a graphics card that cannot keep up.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

Cores / Threads 12 / 24
Base Clock 4700 MHz
Boost Clock 5600 MHz
TDP 170W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 580

VRAM 8 GB GDDR5
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1340 MHz MHz
TDP 185 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + AMD Radeon RX 580 in Palworld

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 27.5
3840x2160 Medium 25.4
3840x2160 High 15.4
3840x2160 Ultra 11.5
2560x1440 Low 53.5
2560x1440 Medium 40.4
2560x1440 High 34.3
2560x1440 Ultra 25.8
1920x1080 Low 81.6
1920x1080 Medium 66.1
1920x1080 High 48.4
1920x1080 Ultra 36.4

Palworld with Ryzen 9 7900X + Other GPUs

See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Palworld with RX 580 + Other CPUs

See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 9 7900X + RX 580

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.