Palworld
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 81 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 30 | 37 | 47 | 59 |
| 1440p QHD | 51 | 72 | 86 | 110 |
| 1080p Full HD | 77 | 106 | 135 | 166 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Palworld with AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER, In-Depth Analysis
Palworld’s performance on the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER combination reveals a system that is heavily constrained by the graphics card at higher resolutions, yet shows surprising headroom at 1080p. The measured frame rates across four settings presets and three resolutions provide a clear picture of where this pairing excels and where it struggles.
Resolution Scaling
The transition from 1080p to 4K produces a dramatic and consistent drop in frame rates across all quality presets, indicating that the rendering load scales aggressively with pixel count. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 106.1 FPS at 1920x1080 to 72.0 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of roughly 32%, and then plummets to 36.7 FPS at 3840x2160 — a 65% drop from the 1080p baseline. This pattern strongly suggests that the GPU is the primary bottleneck once resolution increases, as the computational demand on the rasterizer and memory subsystem grows faster than the CPU can feed frames.
The scaling curve is not linear, which is telling. Moving from 1440p to 4K at High settings costs 35.3 FPS, while the move from 1080p to 1440p costs 34.1 FPS. The near-identical absolute losses imply that the system is hitting a performance ceiling where additional pixels directly translate into fewer frames, with no other component stepping in to mitigate the load. At Low settings, the same trend holds: 165.5 FPS at 1080p drops to 110.0 FPS at 1440p and then to 58.7 FPS at 4K. The 4K Low result is particularly notable — it is barely above the 1440p High result of 72.0 FPS, suggesting that even at minimal quality, the GPU cannot sustain high frame rates at Ultra HD.
At 1080p, the data reveals a different dynamic. The spread between Low (165.5 FPS) and Ultra (76.7 FPS) is substantial, but the fact that the system can exceed 100 FPS at High settings indicates that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU adequately at this resolution. The 5950X’s 16 cores and 32 threads, coupled with its boost clock of 4.90 GHz, provide enough single-thread and multi-thread throughput to avoid becoming the limiting factor at lower pixel counts. However, the 76.7 FPS Ultra result at 1080p shows that even a modest quality increase can quickly saturate the RTX 2070 SUPER’s capabilities, pushing the bottleneck back onto the GPU.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is the dominant performance limiter in this pairing, particularly at 1440p and above. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 4K results suggest that both capacity and bandwidth become strained. The memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) is a fixed characteristic that cannot compensate for the increased data demands of 4K textures and geometry. The GPU’s boost clock of 1770 MHz and base clock of 1605 MHz are typical for the Turing architecture, but the 215 W TDP and 12 nm process node mean it lacks the raw throughput of newer generations.
Benchmark scores place this GPU at the 65th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 22206. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA RTX A400 (22307, deltaPct -0.5) and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 (21670, deltaPct 2.5), indicating that the RTX 2070 SUPER sits in a mid-range tier. In Palworld, this translates to playable but not exceptional performance. At 1440p High, the 72.0 FPS average is smooth, but at 4K High, the 36.7 FPS result falls below the 60 FPS threshold that most players consider the minimum for a fluid experience. The 4K Ultra result of 29.8 FPS is borderline unplayable, reinforcing that this GPU is not designed for 4K gaming in demanding titles.
The 40 ray tracing cores and 320 tensor cores are present but do not appear to provide a meaningful advantage in this title, as Palworld’s rendering workload seems to rely more on traditional rasterization. The passmark G3D score of 18169 and the DirectX 12 score of 67 confirm that the GPU’s raw compute is adequate for mid-range performance but not for high-end 4K workloads. The FP32 throughput of 9.062 TFLOPS is the theoretical ceiling, and the measured results show that the card operates near this limit at 4K, where every additional setting increase (from Low at 58.7 FPS to Ultra at 29.8 FPS) costs roughly 10 FPS per preset step.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is a high-end desktop processor that provides ample computational headroom for Palworld, even at 1080p where frame rates are highest. With 16 cores and 32 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture (Vermeer), the CPU offers substantial multi-threaded performance, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38607 and Passmark multi-thread score of 45424. Its single-thread performance is equally strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5450 and a 3DMark single-thread score of 944, ensuring that the game’s primary simulation thread is not a bottleneck.
The CPU’s boost clock of 4.90 GHz and base clock of 3.40 GHz are competitive for the 5000 series, and its 64 MB of L3 cache helps reduce memory latency for game data. The 105 W TDP and 7 nm process node (TSMC) make it an efficient choice, though its launch MSRP of $799 places it in the premium tier. In Palworld’s measured results, the CPU’s role is most evident at 1080p Low, where the 165.5 FPS average indicates that the processor can sustain high frame delivery. However, the data also shows that the CPU is not the limiting factor at any resolution — the GPU consistently becomes the constraint as resolution increases.
The CPU’s percentile ranking of 93 vs all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 49062, places it just below the Intel Core i5-14600K (49166, deltaPct -0.2) and the Intel Core i5-14600KF (49367, deltaPct -0.6), but above the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (48698, deltaPct 0.7). This suggests that the 5950X is a top-tier processor that will not hold back the RTX 2070 SUPER in most scenarios. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 10810 and max-thread score of 11597 further confirm that the CPU can handle heavy multi-threaded workloads, which is relevant for Palworld’s base-building and creature AI systems that may spawn multiple threads.
How This Combo Ranks
In the benchmark database’s comprehensive testing of Palworld, this specific combination of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ranks 1058 out of 1718 tested combos. This places it in the lower-middle tier of all possible pairings, which is a surprising result given the CPU’s high-end status. The rank suggests that the GPU’s mid-range positioning (65th percentile) drags down the overall system performance, despite the CPU’s strong standing (93rd percentile). The combo’s ranking implies that users who pair this CPU with a more powerful GPU would see significantly better results, whereas the current configuration is unbalanced toward the processor.
The measured FPS data supports this interpretation. At 1080p High, the system achieves 106.1 FPS, which is respectable but not exceptional for a high-end CPU. At 1440p High, the 72.0 FPS result is playable but indicates that the GPU is already working hard. The 4K results, particularly the 36.7 FPS at High and 29.8 FPS at Ultra, are below the 60 FPS target that most gamers prefer, confirming that this combo is not suited for 4K gaming. The fact that the CPU can deliver 165.5 FPS at 1080p Low but the GPU can only manage 58.7 FPS at 4K Low illustrates the fundamental imbalance: the 5950X has far more capacity than the RTX 2070 SUPER can utilize at higher resolutions.
Compared to other combos in the database, this pairing’s rank of 1058 out of 1718 means that roughly 38% of tested configurations outperform it. This is not a poor result, but it is underwhelming for a CPU that costs $799 at launch. The GPU’s nearest rivals, such as the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile (22729, deltaPct -2.3), show that the RTX 2070 SUPER is competitive with newer mid-range parts, but the 4K performance gap remains a significant weakness. For users targeting 1080p or 1440p gaming, this combo is adequate, but for 4K, it falls short.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this system in Palworld?
A: The data shows that 2560x1440 at High settings (72.0 FPS) is the sweet spot, providing smooth frame rates without sacrificing too much quality. At 1920x1080, the system can exceed 100 FPS at High (106.1 FPS) and even reach 165.5 FPS at Low, but 4K performance drops below 60 FPS even at Low settings (58.7 FPS).
Q: How does the RTX 2070 SUPER perform relative to its rivals in this game?
A: The GPU’s average benchmark score of 22206 places it near the NVIDIA RTX A400 (22307, deltaPct -0.5) and above the AMD Radeon RX 5700 (21670, deltaPct 2.5). In Palworld, this translates to playable 1080p and 1440p performance, but the 4K results are below 40 FPS at High settings.
Q: Is the Ryzen 9 5950X a bottleneck for the RTX 2070 SUPER?
A: No, the CPU is not the limiting factor. The 5950X’s high single-thread and multi-thread scores (Cinebench R23 single-core 5450, multi-core 38607) ensure it can feed the GPU effectively. The bottleneck shifts to the GPU at higher resolutions, as evidenced by the steep FPS drops from 1080p to 4K.
Q: What FPS can I expect at 1080p Ultra settings?
A: At 1920x1080 Ultra, the system delivers an average of 76.7 FPS. This is above the 60 FPS threshold but noticeably lower than the 106.1 FPS at High settings, indicating that Ultra quality places a significant load on the GPU.
Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested configurations?
A: This pairing ranks 1058 out of 1718 tested combos in Palworld, placing it in the lower-middle tier. The CPU is high-end (93rd percentile), but the GPU’s mid-range positioning (65th percentile) results in an imbalanced system that underperforms at 4K.
Q: Is this system suitable for 4K gaming in Palworld?
A: No, the data shows that 4K performance is below 60 FPS at all settings, with the best result being 58.7 FPS at Low. At High settings, the average FPS drops to 36.7, and at Ultra it falls to 29.8, making 4K gaming impractical with this GPU.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in Palworld
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 58.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 47.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 36.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 29.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 110.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 86.3 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 72.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 51.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 165.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 135.1 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 106.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 76.7 |
Palworld with Ryzen 9 5950X + Other GPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Palworld with RTX 2070 SUPER + Other CPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 9 5950X + RTX 2070 SUPER
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.