Fivem

Fivem puts the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER through measured frame-rate scenarios at 3840x2160, 2560x1440, and 1920x1080, with Low, Medium, High, and Ultra presets. The combination ranks 1074th out of 1792 tested pairings in Fivem. The Ryzen 9 5950X sits in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, while the RTX 2070 SUPER sits in the 65th percentile among all GPUs. Measured averages span from 31.2 FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra to 177.8 FPS at 1920x1080 Low.

FAQ

Q: What is the combo's overall standing in Fivem?

A: It ranks 1074th out of 1792 tested pairings. The CPU's percentile versus all CPUs is 93, while the GPU's percentile versus all GPUs is 65. The full-system Fivem result is therefore less decorated than the individual hardware percentiles.

Q: Which preset produces the highest average frame rate for this combo?

A: 1920x1080 Low at 177.8 FPS. At 1920x1080, Medium is 139.7, High is 112.9, and Ultra is 85.7.

Q: What are the 3840x2160 averages by preset?

A: Low is 63.0, Medium is 49.9, High is 40.4, and Ultra is 31.2.

Q: How does 2560x1440 High compare with 1920x1080 High?

A: 2560x1440 High averages 73.1 FPS, while 1920x1080 High averages 112.9. At 2560x1440 Ultra, the average drops to 55.9, compared with 85.7 at 1920x1080 Ultra.

Q: What are the key GPU specifications in this pairing?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER has 8 GB GDDR6, a 256-bit bus, 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, a 1605 MHz base clock, a 1770 MHz boost clock, and a 1750 MHz memory clock running at 14 Gbps effective.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank in Fivem is 1074 out of 1792. That places the pairing behind more than half of the database's Fivem combinations, even though the component-level records are stronger. The CPU has an average benchmark score of 49062 and sits at the 93rd percentile. Its nearestRivals list is a tight group: the Intel Core i5-14600K scores 49166 (delta -0.2%), the Intel Core i5-14600KF scores 49367 (delta -0.6%), the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H scores 48698 (delta 0.7%), and the AMD EPYC 4345P scores 49595 (delta -1.1%). The CPU itself is a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 3 part with a 3.40 GHz base clock, a 4.90 GHz boost clock, and 64 MB of L3 cache. None of that prevents Fivem from slotting this CPU+GPU combination at 1074th.

The GPU record gives a similar contrast. The RTX 2070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 22206 and sits at the 65th percentile. Its nearestRivals group includes the NVIDIA RTX A400 at 22307 (delta -0.5%), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z at 22006 (delta 0.9%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile at 22729 (delta -2.3%), and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 at 21670 (delta 2.5%). The Fivem rank therefore reflects the measured behavior of the complete combo, not the synthetic score of either component. The dataIsMeasured flag is true for these FPS rows, so the ranking is based on measured averages rather than estimates.

GPU Role

The RTX 2070 SUPER is a Turing-generation GPU built on a 12 nm process, using the TU104 chip. It contains 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, 40 RT cores, and 320 tensor cores, with 9.062 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput. The memory subsystem is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Clocks are 1605 MHz base and 1770 MHz boost, with memory at 1750 MHz and 14 Gbps effective. These are the hardware constants behind the measured frame rates.

In the measured FPS rows, the GPU's influence appears in the step from Low to Ultra. At 3840x2160, Low averages 63.0, Medium averages 49.9, High averages 40.4, and Ultra averages 31.2. The same pattern holds at 2560x1440: Low 116.9, Medium 90.3, High 73.1, Ultra 55.9. At 1920x1080, Low 177.8, Medium 139.7, High 112.9, Ultra 85.7. The 8 GB frame buffer is fixed across all rows, and no row changes memory clock or VRAM allocation. The GPU's own average benchmark score of 22206 places it between the GTX TITAN Z's 22006 and the RTX A400's 22307, with the RTX 4060 Mobile at 22729 and the RX 5700 at 21670 nearby. API support in the record includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS table lists average frame rates for each resolution and preset. Minimum and maximum FPS fields are null for every row, so the breakdown is based on averages only.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |

|---|---|---|

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 31.2 |

| 3840x2160 | High | 40.4 |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 49.9 |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 63.0 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 55.9 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 73.1 |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 90.3 |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 116.9 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 85.7 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 112.9 |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 139.7 |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 177.8 |

At 3840x2160, Low leads the group with 63.0, followed by Medium's 49.9, High's 40.4, and Ultra's 31.2. The 2560x1440 group shows a wider separation: Low 116.9, Medium 90.3, High 73.1, and Ultra 55.9. At 1920x1080, every preset stays above 85.7, with Low reaching 177.8. The ordering Low > Medium > High > Ultra is consistent at every resolution.

Settings Recommendations

The measured rows give a clear preset ladder. At 3840x2160, Low's 63.0 is the highest measured average; Medium's 49.9, High's 40.4, and Ultra's 31.2 are all lower. Users who prioritize smoothness at this resolution should stick to Low.

At 2560x1440, High's 73.1 provides a strong combination of visual settings and average FPS. Medium at 90.3 and Low at 116.9 are the smoother alternatives. Ultra at 55.9 is the lowest average in this resolution group.

At 1920x1080, Ultra at 85.7 is the highest quality preset and remains above the 2560x1440 High result of 73.1. Medium at 139.7 and Low at 177.8 give progressively higher averages for users who want maximum frame rate. The data therefore supports a simple per-resolution choice: 3840x2160 Low, 2560x1440 High, and 1920x1080 Ultra.