Overpower
This combination offers playable performance with an average of 37 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 23 | 27 | 29 | 47 |
| 1440p QHD | 27 | 32 | 35 | 55 |
| 1080p Full HD | 30 | 36 | 39 | 62 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Overpower with Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + AMD Radeon RX 570, In-Depth Analysis
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 570 lands at rank 2866 out of 2980 tested combos in Overpower. That places this pairing in the bottom 5% of all configurations tested for this game, a surprisingly weak showing given the individual components' benchmark standings. The CPU itself sits in the 90th percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 74th percentile among all graphics cards, so the combination underperforms relative to what each part's standalone scores would suggest.
The bottleneck is clearly the GPU. The RX 570, despite its respectable percentile rank, is an end-of-life Polaris 20 part from 2017, and Overpower's demands expose its age. The CPU has ample headroom — its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32924 and single-core score of 4648 indicate strong processing capability — but the GPU's 4 GB of GDDR5 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth simply cannot feed frames fast enough at higher settings. The data shows a consistent pattern: every resolution and settings combination produces average FPS well below what the CPU alone could likely sustain.
Compared to its nearest rivals in the database, the CPU performs almost identically to the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (0.4% slower), the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (0.5% slower), and the Intel Core i5-14600K (0.8% slower). The GPU similarly sits within 1.2% of the AMD Radeon RX 6800M, the AMD Radeon R9 M295X, and the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000. Yet none of that matters in Overpower — the measured FPS data tells a story of a system that struggles to maintain playable frame rates at any resolution above 1080p Low.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution to play Overpower with this combo?
A: According to the measured FPS data, 1920x1080 at Low settings delivers 62 FPS average, which is the only configuration that exceeds 60 FPS. All other resolutions and settings combinations fall below this threshold.
Q: How much performance difference exists between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the average FPS drops from 62 at Low to 30 at Ultra, representing a 32 FPS decrease. The Medium preset averages 39 FPS, and High averages 36 FPS.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this game?
A: The GPU is the limiting factor. The RX 570 has 4 GB of VRAM, a 256-bit memory bus, and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the Core Ultra 5 245 has 14 cores, 14 threads, and a 5.10 GHz boost clock. The GPU's age (2017 release) and memory constraints prevent the CPU from reaching its potential.
Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Overpower?
A: Barely. At 3840x2160, the average FPS ranges from 23 at Ultra to 47 at Low. Only the Low preset approaches playability, while Medium (29 FPS), High (27 FPS), and Ultra (23 FPS) all fall below 30 FPS.
Q: How does the RX 570 compare to its closest GPU rivals?
A: The RX 570's average benchmark score of 28766 is 0.4% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 6800M, 0.7% higher than the AMD Radeon R9 M295X, 0.8% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 470, and 1.2% higher than the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000.
Q: What is the CPU's standing among all processors?
A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 ranks in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 48995. It is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, AMD Ryzen 9 7900, Intel Xeon Gold 5318H, and Intel Core i5-14600K.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 570 is the decisive component in this combo's Overpower performance, and the data shows it is overmatched by the game's demands. The GPU features 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation pipelines, with base and boost clocks of 1168 MHz and 1244 MHz respectively. Its memory configuration consists of 4 GB of GDDR5 running at 1750 MHz (7 Gbps effective) across a 256-bit bus, yielding 224.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
These specifications translate into 5.095 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and pixel and texture rates of 39.81 GPixel/s and 159.2 GTexel/s respectively. The GPU's 150 W TDP and dual-slot design are modest by modern standards, but the Polaris 20 chip on a 14 nm GlobalFoundries process is fundamentally a 2017 design. Its DirectX 12 (12_0) support and Vulkan 1.3 API compatibility are sufficient for Overpower, but the 4 GB VRAM capacity becomes a liability at higher resolutions and settings.
The measured FPS data illustrates this clearly. At 1080p Low, the RX 570 manages 62 FPS, but cranking to Ultra drops it to 30 FPS — a 52% reduction. At 4K, the GPU falls to 47 FPS at Low and 23 FPS at Ultra. The GPU's benchmark percentile (74th among all GPUs) and its average score of 28766 place it in the upper-mid range, yet Overpower appears to be particularly demanding on memory bandwidth and capacity. The nearest GPU rivals — RX 6800M, R9 M295X, RX 470, and Quadro RTX 8000 — all score within 1.2% of the RX 570, but none would likely fare substantially better given similar VRAM constraints.
The Core Ultra 5 245's integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU is not a factor in these results, as the discrete RX 570 handles all rendering. The CPU's 24 MB of shared L3 cache and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth are more than sufficient for gaming; the bottleneck is unequivocally the GPU's rendering throughput and memory subsystem.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured data covers three resolutions (1920x1080, 2560x1440, 3840x2160) and four quality presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra), yielding 12 distinct data points. The full breakdown follows.
1920x1080: Low averages 62 FPS. Medium averages 39 FPS with a minimum of 33 and maximum of 45. High averages 36 FPS. Ultra averages 30 FPS.
2560x1440: Low averages 55 FPS. Medium averages 35 FPS with a minimum of 29 and maximum of 40. High averages 32 FPS. Ultra averages 27 FPS.
3840x2160: Low averages 47 FPS. Medium averages 29 FPS with a minimum of 25 and maximum of 34. High averages 27 FPS. Ultra averages 23 FPS.
The pattern is consistent: each step up in quality costs roughly 7-10 FPS at a given resolution, while each step up in resolution costs roughly 5-8 FPS at a given quality setting. The only configuration that achieves a smooth 60 FPS experience is 1080p Low. The Medium preset at 1080p (39 FPS) is the highest quality setting that remains above 30 FPS, while 1440p Low (55 FPS) is the only 1440p option that approaches playability.
At 4K, no settings preset reaches 50 FPS. Even the lowest quality at 3840x2160 produces only 47 FPS, and the minimum FPS values for Medium at 4K (25 FPS) indicate noticeable stuttering during demanding scenes. The frame time consistency, where measured, shows a tight range: 1080p Medium spans 33-45 FPS, 1440p Medium spans 29-40 FPS, and 4K Medium spans 25-34 FPS.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K reveals a GPU-bound system. At Low settings, the average FPS falls from 62 at 1080p to 55 at 1440p (an 11.3% reduction) and then to 47 at 4K (a 24.2% reduction from 1080p). At High settings, the progression is 36 → 32 → 27 FPS, representing a 25% total drop from 1080p to 4K. At Ultra, the numbers go from 30 → 27 → 23 FPS, a 23.3% drop.
These scaling patterns are relatively flat, which is typical of a GPU that is already heavily loaded at 1080p. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the FPS would remain nearly constant across resolutions, as the processor would be limiting frame generation regardless of pixel count. Instead, the steady decline with increasing resolution indicates the RX 570's shading units and memory bandwidth are being saturated progressively.
The 4 GB VRAM capacity likely exacerbates the situation at 1440p and 4K. Overpower's textures at High and Ultra presets may exceed 4 GB, forcing the GPU to spill into system memory or reduce texture quality dynamically. This would explain why the gap between Low and Ultra settings widens at higher resolutions: at 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 32 FPS; at 1440p, it is 28 FPS; at 4K, it is 24 FPS. The narrowing gap suggests that at 4K, even Low settings are constrained by memory bandwidth or capacity, not just shading throughput.
The Core Ultra 5 245's role in this scaling is minimal. Its 14 cores and 5.10 GHz boost clock provide ample single-thread performance for game logic, and its 24 MB L3 cache helps with data locality. The CPU's benchmark scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core: 32924; PassMark multi-thread: 38706) are far above what Overpower requires, so the resolution scaling curves purely reflect GPU limitations.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal experience depends on the user's display resolution and tolerance for frame rate drops.
For 1080p displays: The Low preset at 62 FPS is the only configuration that fully saturates a 60 Hz display. If the user prioritizes visual quality over frame rate, the Medium preset at 39 FPS (minimum 33, maximum 45) is the highest setting that remains comfortably above 30 FPS. High (36 FPS) and Ultra (30 FPS) are playable but risk dipping into the high-20s during intense action, which the data does not capture as minimum FPS but the averages suggest is possible.
For 1440p displays: Low at 55 FPS is the only viable choice for smooth gameplay. Medium (35 FPS), High (32 FPS), and Ultra (27 FPS) all fall below the 40 FPS threshold that most action games need for responsive feel. The 55 FPS average at Low is close enough to 60 that most users would find it acceptable, though frame pacing may vary.
For 4K displays: The data shows no good options. Low at 47 FPS is the best result, but the 23-29 FPS range for Medium through Ultra makes those presets nearly unplayable. Users with 4K displays should either drop to 1440p or accept a Low preset with the understanding that the experience will be marginal.
The overall recommendation is to run Overpower at 1920x1080 with the Medium preset (39 FPS) as the best balance of visual fidelity and performance, or drop to Low (62 FPS) for the most responsive experience. At 1440p, Low is the only sensible choice. At 4K, the combo is not recommended for this game unless visual quality at Low is acceptable.
The data suggests that the RX 570's 4 GB VRAM is the critical constraint. Users who want higher settings should consider that the GPU's nearest rivals, such as the RX 6800M or RX 470, score within 1% in synthetic benchmarks but may have different memory configurations that could affect Overpower specifically, though the measured data here only covers the RX 570. For this specific combo, the CPU's capabilities are largely wasted in Overpower, as the GPU cannot translate the Core Ultra 5 245's processing power into frame rate.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 5 245
AMD Radeon RX 570
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + AMD Radeon RX 570 in Overpower
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 47.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 29.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 27.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 23.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 55.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 35.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 32.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 27.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 62.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 39.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 36.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 30.0 |
Overpower with iUltra 5 245 + Other GPUs
See how Overpower performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Overpower with RX 570 + Other CPUs
See how Overpower performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 5 245 + RX 570
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.