Overpower
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 192 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 119 | 144 | 154 | 244 |
| 1440p QHD | 140 | 170 | 181 | 283 |
| 1080p Full HD | 158 | 189 | 203 | 314 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Overpower with Intel Core Ultra 5 125H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, In-Depth Analysis
Overpower, a 2023 Action title, presents an interesting hardware scaling profile when paired with the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080. The benchmark data reveals a system that is consistently capable of high refresh rates at 1080p and 1440p, with performance tapering off predictably at 4K. The measured results show a clear hierarchy across the four preset settings, which provides a strong foundation for understanding this specific CPU-GPU combination's behavior in this game.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS data for this combination in Overpower clearly indicates that the High preset offers the most balanced experience across all tested resolutions. At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers an average of 121 FPS, which is a substantial step up from the 100 FPS seen at Ultra, while still maintaining a significant visual upgrade over the Medium preset's 130 FPS. The difference between High and Ultra at 1080p is a 21 FPS drop, suggesting that the Ultra preset's additional graphical demands cost more performance than the visual fidelity gain justifies for most users. Moving to 2560x1440, the High preset maintains a solid 108 FPS average, which is still well within the territory of smooth, responsive gameplay for an action title. The Ultra preset at this resolution drops to 89 FPS, a more noticeable compromise.
The story becomes more nuanced at 4K. At 3840x2160, the High preset produces an average of 92 FPS, which is respectable but requires a high-refresh-rate display to feel fully fluid. The Ultra preset at 4K drops to 76 FPS, which, while playable, begins to show the strain on the system. The Medium preset at 4K yields 99 FPS, which is actually higher than High, but the visual trade-off is likely not worth the 7 FPS gain. Therefore, the data strongly suggests that High is the sweet spot for this hardware configuration. It provides a consistent experience that scales well from 1080p to 4K, avoiding the performance cliff seen at Ultra while offering better visuals than Medium or Low. The Low preset, while achieving high frame rates like 208 FPS at 1080p and 158 FPS at 4K, represents a significant reduction in visual quality that is not necessary given the headroom available at the High settings.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H is a 14-core, 18-thread mobile processor based on the Meteor Lake architecture. Its base clock of 3.60 GHz and boost clock of 4.50 GHz are the key figures that dictate its processing power. In Overpower, the CPU's role appears to be a limiting factor primarily at lower resolutions and higher settings. The data shows that at 1080p, the average FPS for the High preset is 121, while at 1440p it is 108, and at 4K it is 92. This scaling pattern, where FPS decreases as resolution increases, indicates that the GPU is becoming the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. However, the relatively small gap between 1080p and 1440p at High settings (a 13 FPS difference) suggests that the CPU is still very much involved in the rendering pipeline.
The CPU's benchmark scores provide context for its performance. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12804.5 and single-core score of 1647.5 are competitive for a mobile part. The PassMark multithread score of 21100 and single-thread score of 3399 further reinforce its position. In the context of its nearest rivals, the Core Ultra 5 125H is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 5800, showing a deltaPct of -0.1. This performance parity is interesting, as it suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios, the system would perform similarly to a desktop Ryzen 7 5800. The fact that the CPU's percentileVsAllCpus is 79 indicates it is in the top quarter of all CPUs tested, which is a strong position for a mobile chip. The data suggests that at 1080p, where frame rates are highest, the CPU's 14 cores and 18 threads are sufficient to feed the RTX 5080, preventing a massive CPU bottleneck. The gap between the Low preset (208 FPS) and High preset (121 FPS) at 1080p, however, highlights that the CPU is capable of pushing much higher frame rates if the GPU workload is reduced, confirming that the GPU is the primary driver of the FPS ceiling at these settings.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is the clear performance driver in this system, especially as resolution increases. With 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus providing 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth, it has ample resources for Overpower. The GPU's boost clock of 2617 MHz and its 10752 shading units are the primary contributors to its raw rendering power. The measured FPS data shows a clear pattern where the GPU's workload becomes more demanding with each resolution increase, and the FPS drops accordingly. For instance, at the High preset, the average FPS goes from 121 at 1080p to 108 at 1440p and finally to 92 at 4K. This is a classic sign of a GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions.
The GPU's benchmark scores are impressive, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8637 and a PassMark G3D score of 36565. Its percentileVsAllGpus of 87 indicates that it performs better than 87% of all GPUs in the database. When compared to its nearest rivals, the RTX 5080 is 0.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon 8060S and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB. It trails the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by 2.2%. This data suggests that while the RTX 5080 is a top-tier performer, it is not an outlier in its performance class. In Overpower, the GPU's VRAM capacity of 16 GB is unlikely to be a limiting factor. The data shows that the most significant FPS drops occur when moving from Medium to High and from High to Ultra, which are likely tied to more complex shaders and effects rather than memory capacity. The GPU's role is most pronounced at 4K, where the average FPS at Ultra is 76, indicating that even this powerful GPU is challenged by the game's highest settings at that resolution.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 achieves a combo rank of 735 out of 2980 tested combinations in Overpower. This places it in the top 25% of all tested systems, which is a strong result. This ranking is notable because it suggests that the mobile CPU is not significantly holding back the desktop-class GPU in this particular game. The rank of 735 indicates that there are 734 other combinations that perform better, which likely include systems with more powerful desktop CPUs. However, given that the Core Ultra 5 125H is a mobile processor, achieving a top-quartile ranking in a game like Overpower reflects the RTX 5080's dominance.
The data implies that the performance ceiling for this combo is primarily set by the GPU. The CPU's benchmark scores, while competitive, are not at the very top of the charts. The fact that this combo ranks at 735, rather than higher, could be attributed to the CPU's inability to keep up with the GPU in certain CPU-intensive scenarios, such as at 1080p with Low settings where the frame rate is extremely high. In those instances, the CPU's processing power becomes the limiting factor. The deltaPct values for the CPU's rivals, which are all within 0.5% of its average benchmark score, suggest that swapping the CPU for a slightly faster model would yield minimal gains. Conversely, the GPU's rivals show a wider performance spread, with the RX 9070 GRE being 2.2% faster. This suggests that the GPU choice has a more significant impact on the overall combo ranking than the CPU choice, which is a common trend for GPU-bound games like Overpower at higher resolutions.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data across the three resolutions reveals a clear and predictable scaling pattern. At the High preset, the average FPS drops from 121 at 1080p to 108 at 1440p, a decrease of 13 FPS. Moving from 1440p to 4K, the average FPS drops further to 92, a decrease of 16 FPS. This pattern, where the FPS drop becomes more pronounced as resolution increases, is characteristic of a system that is becoming increasingly GPU-bound. The GPU's rendering workload scales with the number of pixels, and at 4K, the RTX 5080 is working significantly harder than at 1080p.
This scaling behavior provides insight into the limiting component at each resolution. At 1080p, the system is likely to be more balanced, with the CPU and GPU sharing the workload. This is supported by the fact that the FPS at Low settings (208) is much higher than at High (121), indicating that reducing the GPU load allows the CPU to push more frames. At 4K, the system is clearly GPU-limited. The FPS difference between Low (158) and High (92) is 66 FPS, which shows that the GPU is the primary bottleneck. The data suggests that if a user wants to achieve higher frame rates at 4K, they would need to reduce the settings, as the CPU has sufficient headroom to support higher FPS if the GPU's workload is lightened. The scaling from 1080p to 4K is not linear, which is typical for modern games. The jump from 1440p to 4K represents a 2.25x increase in pixel count, but the FPS drop is only about 15%, indicating that the RTX 5080 handles the resolution increase relatively efficiently.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system delivers its highest frame rates. The Low preset achieves an average of 208 FPS, while the Medium preset averages 130 FPS with a minimum of 111 FPS and a maximum of 150 FPS. The High preset averages 121 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 100 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a steady decline, with the most significant drop being the 78 FPS difference between Low and Medium. This indicates that the Medium preset introduces a substantial graphical load that the GPU must process.
At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but drops accordingly. The Low preset averages 186 FPS. The Medium preset averages 116 FPS, with a minimum of 99 FPS and a maximum of 133 FPS. The High preset averages 108 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 89 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 70 FPS, which is similar to the 1080p pattern. The difference between Medium and High is 8 FPS, and between High and Ultra is 19 FPS, showing that the Ultra preset is particularly demanding at this resolution.
At 3840x2160, the system's performance is more constrained. The Low preset averages 158 FPS, which is still very high. The Medium preset averages 99 FPS, with a minimum of 84 FPS and a maximum of 113 FPS. The High preset averages 92 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 76 FPS. The scaling here is more even, with a 59 FPS drop from Low to Medium, a 7 FPS drop from Medium to High, and a 16 FPS drop from High to Ultra. This data confirms that the RTX 5080 is the limiting factor at 4K, as the CPU's performance becomes less relevant when the GPU is under maximum load.
FAQ
Q: What is the best setting preset for Overpower with this hardware?
A: The High preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance, delivering 121 FPS at 1080p, 108 FPS at 1440p, and 92 FPS at 4K. The Ultra preset is more demanding, resulting in a 21 FPS drop at 1080p and a 16 FPS drop at 4K compared to High.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the main bottleneck in Overpower?
A: The GPU is the primary bottleneck, especially at higher resolutions. The FPS drops significantly as resolution increases (e.g., from 121 FPS at 1080p to 92 FPS at 4K on High settings), which indicates the GPU's rendering load is the limiting factor. The CPU becomes more relevant at lower resolutions and settings, where the high frame rates (208 FPS at 1080p Low) require faster processing.
Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?
A: This combination ranks 735th out of 2980 tested combos in Overpower, placing it in the top 25% of systems. This strong ranking is largely due to the high-performing RTX 5080, which outperforms 87% of all GPUs.
Q: What is the performance difference between the RTX 5080 and its closest rivals?
A: The RTX 5080 is 0.6% faster than the AMD Radeon 8060S and 0.7% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB. It is 2.2% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE.
Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 5800, showing a deltaPct of -0.1%. It is also 0.3% slower than the Intel Core i5-12600K and AMD Ryzen 7 5700X, and 0.5% faster than the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G.
Q: Is 16 GB of VRAM sufficient for Overpower at 4K?
A: The data indicates that 16 GB of VRAM is sufficient, as the performance scaling from 1440p to 4K follows a predictable pattern tied to GPU processing power rather than memory capacity. The RTX 5080's 960.0 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB capacity are not shown to be a limiting factor in the measured results.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 5 125H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 in Overpower
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 119.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 144.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 154.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Low | 244.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 140.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 170.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 181.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 283.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 158.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 189.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 203.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 314.0 |
Overpower with iUltra 5 125H + Other GPUs
See how Overpower performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Overpower with RTX 5080 + Other CPUs
See how Overpower performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 5 125H + RTX 5080
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.