Overpower

Overpower

AVERAGE FPS
54
playable

This combination offers playable performance with an average of 54 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 36 40 41 70
1440p QHD 37 45 53 81
1080p Full HD 46 53 57 90

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 70
3840x2160 Medium 41
3840x2160 High 40
3840x2160 Ultra 36
2560x1440 Low 81
2560x1440 Medium 53
2560x1440 High 45
2560x1440 Ultra 37
1920x1080 Low 90
1920x1080 Medium 57
1920x1080 High 53
1920x1080 Ultra 46

Overpower with Intel Core i5-14400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB is a combination that sits near the bottom of the database for Overpower, ranking 1588 out of 1744 tested combos. This places the system in the 9th percentile of all configurations measured, indicating that while the hardware is functional, it is not optimized for high-end performance in this title. The data shows a clear pattern: the RTX 3050 4 GB is the limiting factor across all resolutions, and the most effective way to improve playability is to prioritize the Low settings preset, which provides the only consistently high frame rates in the dataset.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data for this combo in Overpower points decisively toward the Low settings preset as the only viable option for a smooth experience. At 1920x1080, Low settings deliver an average of 90.2 FPS, which is the highest score recorded for this system at any resolution or quality level. This is a substantial margin over the next best option: Medium settings at the same resolution average only 56.7 FPS, a drop of approximately 37%. High settings at 1080p fall further to 52.5 FPS, and Ultra settings bottom out at 46.1 FPS.

The gap between Low and Medium settings is not a minor adjustment; it represents the difference between a fluid experience and one that dips into stutter territory. At 2560x1440, Low settings still manage 81.2 FPS, which remains above the 60 FPS threshold for acceptable playability. However, Medium at 1440p plummets to 53.4 FPS, and High drops to 45.1 FPS. At 3840x2160, even Low settings struggle, averaging 70.2 FPS, while Medium and High fall to 41.1 FPS and 40.4 FPS respectively.

Given that the GPU has only 4 GB of VRAM, the benchmark results indicate that the Ultra preset is effectively unusable on this hardware, with scores ranging from 36 FPS at 4K to 46.1 FPS at 1080p. The recommendation is straightforward: run the game at Low settings. If the user prioritizes visual fidelity over frame rate, Medium at 1080p is the highest acceptable preset, but the data shows that this comes with a significant performance penalty. For competitive play or any scenario requiring consistent frame pacing, Low is the only logical choice.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Overpower?*

A: Based on the measured data, 1920x1080 with Low settings is the optimal configuration, yielding an average of 90.2 FPS. This is the only resolution and preset combination that provides a comfortable margin above 60 FPS, making it the most reliable choice for gameplay.

Q: Can this system handle Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: The data shows that Ultra settings at 1920x1080 produce an average of 46.1 FPS. This is below the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay, indicating that the RTX 3050 4 GB does not have sufficient performance headroom for the Ultra preset, even at the lowest resolution tested.

Q: How does the GPU's VRAM capacity affect performance?

A: The RTX 3050 4 GB features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 128-bit bus and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth. The benchmark results show a sharp decline in FPS when moving from Low to Medium settings, suggesting that the limited VRAM is a bottleneck for higher texture and detail levels, particularly at higher resolutions.

Q: Is the CPU a bottleneck in this configuration?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F is a capable processor with 10 cores and 16 threads, scoring in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. However, the FPS data indicates that the GPU is the limiting component, as performance scales significantly with resolution and settings changes while the CPU remains constant.

Q: What is the expected FPS at 1440p with Medium settings?

A: The measured average for 2560x1440 with Medium settings is 53.4 FPS. This is playable but not ideal, as it falls slightly short of the 60 FPS threshold, and users may experience occasional dips during intense action sequences.

Q: Does the combo rank reflect its gaming performance accurately?

A: The combo rank of 1588 out of 1744 places this system in the bottom 9% of tested configurations. This low ranking is consistent with the measured FPS data, confirming that the hardware is not well-suited for high-refresh-rate gaming in Overpower.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB is the definitive bottleneck in this system. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1545 MHz and a boost clock of 1740 MHz, but its 4 GB VRAM capacity is the primary constraint. The measured FPS data shows a clear pattern: across all resolutions, the drop from Low to Medium settings results in a performance loss of over 30%. At 1080p, Low averages 90.2 FPS while Medium drops to 56.7 FPS; at 1440p, the drop is from 81.2 FPS to 53.4 FPS; and at 4K, from 70.2 FPS to 41.1 FPS.

This consistent and dramatic decline suggests that the GPU's memory bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s and its 128-bit bus are insufficient to handle the increased texture and shading loads at Medium settings. The RTX 3050 4 GB is built on the Ampere architecture with 2048 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, but these specifications do not compensate for the VRAM limitation. The card's 7.127 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is respectable, yet the data indicates that the memory subsystem is the limiting factor.

The GPU's 90 W TDP and dual-slot design suggest a low-power card, but the performance ceiling is clearly defined by its memory configuration. For Overpower, the RTX 3050 4 GB can only deliver acceptable frame rates when the game is set to Low, which likely reduces texture quality to fit within the VRAM budget. At higher presets, the card appears to struggle with memory paging, resulting in the observed FPS drops.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-14400F and RTX 3050 4 GB combination ranks 1588 out of 1744 tested combos in Overpower, placing it in the bottom 9% of all systems. This ranking is a direct reflection of the measured FPS data, which shows the system struggling to maintain playable frame rates at higher settings. The CPU is not the weak link; the i5-14400F scores in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32508.

The CPU's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-12800H (32513, 0% delta), AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 (32446, 0.2% delta), AMD Ryzen 7 250 (32584, -0.2% delta), and Intel Core i7-13705H (32586, -0.2% delta). These scores indicate that the i5-14400F is competitive with high-end mobile and desktop processors, delivering strong single-threaded and multi-threaded performance. However, this processing power is wasted in Overpower because the GPU cannot translate it into higher frame rates.

The low combo rank is almost entirely attributable to the RTX 3050 4 GB, which sits in the 50th percentile of all GPUs. This mid-pack GPU is simply outmatched by the demands of Overpower at higher settings. The data shows that even at 1080p, the system cannot exceed 90.2 FPS, and this only occurs at Low settings. For users considering this combo, the ranking serves as a warning that the system is not designed for high-fidelity gaming.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS data reveals how the system scales across resolutions, and the pattern is unusual. Typically, a CPU-bound system would show minimal FPS drops when moving from 1080p to 1440p to 4K. However, this combo exhibits a different behavior. At Low settings, the FPS drops from 90.2 at 1080p to 81.2 at 1440p (a 10% reduction) and then to 70.2 at 4K (a further 13.5% reduction). This relatively modest scaling suggests that the GPU is not the sole bottleneck at Low settings, and the CPU is contributing to the frame rate.

However, at Medium settings, the scaling is more dramatic. The FPS drops from 56.7 at 1080p to 53.4 at 1440p (a 5.8% reduction) and then to 41.1 at 4K (a 23% reduction). This indicates that as settings increase, the GPU becomes the dominant limiting factor, and the 4 GB VRAM is overwhelmed at higher resolutions. At High settings, the pattern continues: 52.5 FPS at 1080p, 45.1 FPS at 1440p (a 14.1% drop), and 40.4 FPS at 4K (a 10.4% drop).

The resolution scaling analysis shows that the system is balanced at Low settings, with both CPU and GPU contributing to performance. However, as settings increase, the GPU's limitations become apparent, particularly at 4K. The 4 GB VRAM is insufficient for high-resolution textures, and the data suggests that users should stick to 1080p or 1440p with Low settings to maintain playable frame rates.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its best performance. Low settings average 90.2 FPS, which is the highest score in the entire dataset. Medium settings drop to 56.7 FPS, High settings to 52.5 FPS, and Ultra settings to 46.1 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 33.5 FPS, indicating a significant performance cliff.

At 2560x1440, the results follow a similar pattern but with lower absolute values. Low settings average 81.2 FPS, remaining above the 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings drop to 53.4 FPS, High settings to 45.1 FPS, and Ultra settings to 36.9 FPS. The drop from Low to Medium is 27.8 FPS, again highlighting the GPU's struggle with increased settings.

At 3840x2160, the system is clearly out of its depth. Low settings average 70.2 FPS, which is surprisingly playable, but Medium settings plummet to 41.1 FPS, High settings to 40.4 FPS, and Ultra settings to 36 FPS. The difference between Low and Medium at 4K is 29.1 FPS, and the system cannot maintain 60 FPS at any preset other than Low.

The complete dataset shows a consistent trend: Low settings are the only viable option for this combo, with all other presets resulting in average frame rates below 57 FPS. The RTX 3050 4 GB simply does not have the memory capacity or bandwidth to handle higher settings in Overpower, and users should adjust their expectations accordingly.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i5-14400F

Cores / Threads 10 / 16
Base Clock 2500 MHz
Boost Clock 4700 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

VRAM 4 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1740 MHz MHz
TDP 90 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i5-14400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB in Overpower

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 70.2
3840x2160 Medium 41.1
3840x2160 High 40.4
3840x2160 Ultra 36.0
2560x1440 Low 81.2
2560x1440 Medium 53.4
2560x1440 High 45.1
2560x1440 Ultra 36.9
1920x1080 Low 90.2
1920x1080 Medium 56.7
1920x1080 High 52.5
1920x1080 Ultra 46.1

Overpower with RTX 3050 4 GB + Other CPUs

See how Overpower performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii5-14400F + RTX 3050 4 GB

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.