Overpower

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS for this combo at 1080p Ultra settings in Overpower?

A: The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti delivers an average of 120.4 FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings.

Q: How does this CPU compare to its closest rival in overall benchmark scores?

A: The Core i5-13400F has an average benchmark score of 25236, which is essentially tied with the Intel Core i7-13620H (0.1% ahead) and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (0.5% behind). It sits just 0.5% above the AMD EPYC 9474F.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and how does it affect 4K performance?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti features 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth. At 3840x2160 Ultra, the combo manages 88.2 FPS, showing the memory subsystem is sufficient for this game's demands.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming based on the measured data?

A: At 2560x1440, Medium settings provide a strong balance at 141.2 FPS, while High settings yield 129.1 FPS. Ultra drops to 105.4 FPS, still playable but with diminishing returns over High.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested CPU-GPU combinations in Overpower?

A: This configuration ranks 199th out of 1744 tested combos, placing it in the top 11.4% of all systems tested in this game.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread and multi-thread performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Core i5-13400F scores 3004 in single-core and 21279 in multi-core tests on Cinebench R23, demonstrating strong per-core performance for game logic while maintaining solid multi-threaded capability.

How This Combo Ranks

The data places this Intel Core i5-13400F + RTX 4070 Ti combination at rank 199 out of 1744 tested configurations in Overpower. This 88.6th-percentile placement signals a high-end pairing that outperforms the vast majority of systems, yet it is not at the absolute top tier. The ranking suggests headroom exists, likely from CPUs with higher boost clocks or GPUs with more VRAM, but for practical purposes this combo sits comfortably in the upper echelon.

The CPU's percentile ranking of 82 across all processors aligns with its nearest rival comparisons. The average benchmark score of 25236 places it within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D and just 0.1% above the Intel Core i7-13620H. This clustering indicates that in CPU-bound scenarios, the i5-13400F delivers performance nearly indistinguishable from those alternatives. The 10-core, 16-thread configuration with a 4.60 GHz boost clock provides ample processing power for Overpower's action-oriented gameplay, where frame pacing and consistent physics calculations matter.

The GPU's percentile ranking of 85 further reinforces the combo's positioning. With an average benchmark score of 44900, the RTX 4070 Ti sits just 0.6% below the RTX 5090 Mobile and 1.5% below the Intel Arc A730M, while leading the AMD Radeon Pro 580 by 1.6%. These margins are narrow, suggesting the card delivers consistent, predictable performance that scales predictably across resolutions.

GPU Role

The RTX 4070 Ti contributes significantly to Overpower's measured results through its Ada Lovelace architecture and 5 nm process node. The GPU operates with a base clock of 2310 MHz and boosts to 2610 MHz, enabling high sustained throughput. Its 12 GB of GDDR6X memory at 21 Gbps effective speed produces 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth across a 192-bit bus, which proves adequate for the texture and geometry loads at all tested resolutions.

The memory configuration directly influences the scaling pattern observed in the FPS data. At 1080p, the GPU can push frame rates well beyond 200 FPS at Low settings (243.1 FPS), indicating the memory bandwidth is not a limiting factor at lower resolutions. However, at 4K Ultra, the combination drops to 88.2 FPS, showing that the 12 GB capacity and bandwidth begin to constrain performance as pixel count quadruples and texture detail increases. The 60 RT cores and 240 tensor cores provide additional headroom for any ray-traced or DLSS-enhanced workloads, though the measured data reflects standard rasterization.

The GPU's 285 W TDP and dual-slot design suggest robust thermal management, allowing the boost clock to sustain near-maximum frequencies during extended gaming sessions. The 40.09 TFLOPS FP32 compute capability ensures the card can handle Overpower's particle effects and dynamic lighting without bottlenecking the CPU.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data reveals a clear hierarchy across presets at each resolution. For 1080p, Medium settings deliver 152.6 FPS, which is only 7.5% higher than High at 145 FPS, while Ultra drops to 120.4 FPS. Given the diminishing returns between Medium and High, High settings provide the best visual fidelity per frame at this resolution, offering 145 FPS with only a modest performance penalty over Medium.

At 1440p, the recommendation shifts toward Medium. The gap between Medium (141.2 FPS) and High (129.1 FPS) is 9.4%, while Ultra falls to 105.4 FPS. Medium maintains a comfortable margin above 140 FPS, which is ideal for high-refresh-rate displays, while High still offers smooth gameplay. For users prioritizing visual quality, High remains viable, but Medium is the optimal balance.

At 4K, the choice becomes more critical. Ultra produces 88.2 FPS, High yields 107.1 FPS, and Medium reaches 117.2 FPS. The jump from Ultra to High represents a 21.4% improvement, making High the recommended preset for 4K play. Medium offers a further 9.4% gain but with noticeable visual compromises. Low settings at 4K reach 187.1 FPS, but this sacrifices too much detail for a game like Overpower where visual clarity aids gameplay.

Measured FPS Breakdown

Across all resolutions, the pattern shows consistent scaling from Low to Ultra, with the most significant drop occurring between Low and Medium. At 1920x1080, the progression is: Low at 243.1 FPS, Medium at 152.6 FPS, High at 145 FPS, and Ultra at 120.4 FPS. The 90.5 FPS difference between Low and Medium indicates a substantial increase in GPU workload when enabling standard visual features.

The 2560x1440 results follow a similar trajectory: Low delivers 218.5 FPS, Medium drops to 141.2 FPS, High maintains 129.1 FPS, and Ultra settles at 105.4 FPS. The relative performance between Medium and High at this resolution is tighter than at 1080p, suggesting the GPU becomes more balanced across presets as resolution increases.

At 3840x2160, the scaling becomes more pronounced. Low produces 187.1 FPS, Medium drops to 117.2 FPS, High reaches 107.1 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 88.2 FPS. The transition from Low to Medium represents a 59.7% reduction in frame rate, highlighting the significant pixel fill rate demands at 4K. The gap between Medium and High is 8.6%, while High to Ultra costs 17.6%, making Ultra the least efficient preset at this resolution.

The 4K Ultra result of 88.2 FPS remains above the 60 FPS threshold, but the 4K High preset at 107.1 FPS provides a safer margin for frame time consistency. At 1440p, all presets except Ultra exceed 120 FPS, and even Ultra stays above 100 FPS. The 1080p results show that Low settings approach the 240 Hz refresh ceiling, while Ultra remains well above 100 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay across all configurations.