Overpower

This page analyzes the combination of the Intel Core i5-10400F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 in the action title Overpower, drawing on measured frame rates across four quality presets and three resolutions, synthetic benchmark results, and comparative rankings against the nearest rival components. The data set is limited to the facts provided, and all figures cited below come directly from that pack.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS of this combo at 1080p with High settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with High settings, the measured average frame rate is 137 FPS (min/max not given). The same resolution at Low yields 168 FPS, at Medium 140 FPS (min 119, max 161), and at Ultra 128 FPS.

Q: How does the GPU rank relative to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 4080 holds an average benchmark score of 54,247, which is only about 0.1% higher than the RTX 4080 SUPER (54,209) and roughly 1.1% lower than the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54,828). Its percentile among all GPUs is 86.

*Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the system in Overpower?*

A: The Intel Core i5-10400F has a 3DMark multi-thread score of 4,748 and a single-thread score of 688, placing it in the 68th percentile among CPUs. The measured frame rate drop from 137 FPS (1080p High) to 119 FPS (4K High) suggests the GPU remains the primary limiter, not the CPU, though the i5-10400F’s 6 cores and 12 threads could still be a minor constraint at lower resolutions.

Q: What memory configuration does the GPU use that could affect high-resolution performance?

A: The RTX 4080 features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus with a bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s. Its memory clock is listed as 1400 MHz (22.4 Gbps effective). This bandwidth directly supports the frame rates observed at 4K Ultra, which average 99 FPS.

Q: Which preset offers the best balance between high FPS and quality based on the measured data?

A: Across all resolutions, the Medium preset provides the highest average FPS among the three non-Low presets: 168 FPS at 1080p, 135 FPS at 1440p, and 128 FPS at 4K. High is close, but Medium’s minimum FPS key (e.g., 109 at 4K) is higher than no min data for High; the data suggests Medium yields the most consistent experience.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the GPU?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 had a launch MSRP of 1,199 USD.

Q: How many page threads does the CPU have?

A: The Intel Core i5-10400F has 6 physical cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture (5 nm process from TSMC) and sits in the 86th percentile of all GPUs by average benchmark score. Its synthetic performance is strong; the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 6,567 and the Geekbench Vulkan result reaches 263,779. With a boost clock at 2505 MHz and a base of 2205 MHz, the card operates at a nominal 461.3 TFLOP? Actually the FP32 figure is 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 (and the same for FP16 at 1:1). The memory system comprises 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, delivering 716.8 GB/s bandwidth—a figure that proves critical for high resolutions.

In the measured results, the GPU shows strong scaling from 1080p to 4K. At High settings, average FPS drops from 137 (1080p) to 118 (1440p) to 119 (4K) (the 4K has a 1 FPS bump, which is a data artifact). At Low settings, the progression is 168→162→119? Actually we have: 168 (1080p), 162 (1440p), and 153 (4K). The Ultra setting shows 128→116→99. These figures suggest that even the massive RTX 4080 becomes less CPU-bound as resolution increases, but the overall headroom is such that the card is rarely the limiting factor at any resolution tested.

The GPU’s 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores are present for ray tracing and AI features, though the measured FPS does not include any ray-tracing-specific data. The card’s transistor count is 45,900 million and die size 379 mm², with a pixel rate of 280.6 GPixel/s.

When compared to its nearest rivals in the benchmark pack, the RTX 4080 trails the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB by 2.6% and the AMD Radeon 8060S by 2.7% in average score, but outperforms the RTX 4080 SUPER by a hair (0.1%) and the Radeon Pro W5700X by 1.1%. The meaningful takeaway is that while the 4080 is not the absolute top card, it sits within a tight performance band at its price tier, and it delivers the high FPS observed in Overpower.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-10400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Comet Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 14 nm process. Its base clock is 2.90 GHz and it can boost to 4.30 GHz. The TDP is 65 W, and it uses an LGA 1200 socket. The cache layout is 64 KB L1 per core, 256 KB L2 per core, and a shared 12 MB L3. It supports DDR4 memory, dual-channel, with a memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s, though that is not directly relevant to the game benchmarks. The CPU reaches the 68th percentile among all CPUs, which is a modest standing for a mainstream part.

Synthetic benchmarks show the i5-10400F’s multi-threaded capabilities: Cinebench R23 multi-core scored 10,283, and Geekbench multi-core hit 6,257. Single-thread performance is modest (Geekbench 1,420, Cinebench R23 single-core 1,451). The 3dMark results scale with thread count: 8-thread score 3,929, 4-thread 2,560, and 2-thread 1,350; the max-thread score is 4,735, close to the 16-thread 4,748, which indicates that the CPU stops scaling beyond a core count.

In Overpower, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU. At 1080p, where GPU load is lower, the CPU could become a limiting factor. For instance, at 1080p Low the FPS is 168, which is within a typical CPU-bound ceiling. At 4K Ultra, the FPS drops to 99, indicating the GPU is the primary load. However, the 1080p Medium result (140 FPS) is lower than 1440p Medium (135 FPS) only by a small margin, and the scaling is close. The CPU’s boost clock of 4.30 GHz is relatively high for a Comet Lake part, but the 6 cores may be enough to feed a card of this tier at lower resolutions, as the data shows no severe CPU bottleneck: the 1080p Low FPS of 168 is already the highest value observed.

The nearest CPU rivals are the Intel Xeon 6756E (0.2% slower), the Intel Core 7 160UL (0.3% faster), the AMD EPYC 7552 (0.5% slower), and the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C (0.6% slower). All are close to the i5-10400F in average benchmark score, which suggests that the CPU is not a differentiator in this tier.

Settings Recommendations

When all four presets—Low, Medium, High, Ultra—have measured average FPS data, the best choice for a smooth, experience depends on resolution and the need for quality. The data provides FPS averages for each preset at 1240p, 1440p, and 4K. The measured frame times indicate that Medium offers the best combination of quality and FPS across resolutions.

• At 1080p: Low (168 FPS), Medium (140 FPS, min 119, max 161), High (137), Ultra (128). If the display refresh rate is 144 Hz, then neither Ultra nor High is needed, but Medium easily exceeds 140. For the best frame time consistency, Medium shows a minimum of 119 and a maximum of 161—a small variance—while High has no min/max data. Medium is the safest pick.
• At 1440p: Low (162 FPS), Medium (135 FPS, min 115, max 155), High (131), Ultra (116). Here Medium still keeps above 115 FPS minimum, which is ideal for many high-refresh monitors. High is only 4 FPS slower on average, but the Medium’s variance is more transparent.
• At 4K: Low (153 FPS), Medium (128 FPS, min 109, max 147), High (119 FPS), Ultra (99 FPS). Medium is the only preset above 120 FPS on average, while Ultra falls below 100 FPS average. High sits at 119, which is just below a typical 120 FPS target.

Given these numbers, Medium is the recommended preset for most scenarios. It ensures no preset-specific frame drops that go below 109 FPS at 4K, whereas High and Ultra might have unobserved stutters. The fact that Medium offers a minimum of 109 FPS at 4K, compared to no min FPS data for High/Ultra, gives Medium a trustability advantage.

Still, if the user prefers a more quality-heavy experience, High is only 9 FPS slower than Medium at 1080p (137 vs 140) and similar in other resolutions. But for a “benchmark database” recommendation, Medium is the highest FPS at all resolutions while still providing a meaningful quality step over Low.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination (Intel i5-10400F + RTX 4080) has a combo rank of 724 out of 3,713 total combos tested in Overpower. That places it in the top 19.5% of all tested configurations. This ranking is relative to other combos with various CPUs and GPUs, though only one combo result is given.

Given that the GPU is a high-tier product (86th percentile) and the CPU is mid-range (68th percentile), the rank reflects that the pairing is strong but not top-tier, likely because other combinations of the RTX 4080 with better CPUs. The GPU’s synthetic scores are within 0.1% of the RTX 4080 SUPER, and the CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 4,748 is not far off competitors. The ordering inside the top 1/5 shows that a more balanced CPU might shift the rank upward.

The key insight is that this combo delivers high FPS in Overpower at every resolution, with average FPS above about 99 (4K Ultra) and up to 168 (1080p Low). The rank does not reflect that the GPU does the heavy lifting, while the CPU is not a bottleneck also because the game likely supports multi-threaded processing.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The provided table lists average FPS for each combination (some with min/max only when they were reported). We list all 12 rows:

3840x2160:

• High: avg 119 FPS
• Low: avg 153 FPS
• Medium: avg 128 FPS (min: 109, max: 147)
• Ultra: avg 99 FPS

2560x1440:

• High: avg 131 FPS
• Low: avg 162 FPS
• Medium: avg 135 FPS (min: 115, max: 155)
• Ultra: avg 116 FPS

1920x1080:

• High: avg 137 FPS
• Low: avg 168 FPS
• Medium: avg 140 FPS (min: 119, max: 161)
• Ultra: avg 128 FPS

Observations: At 1080p, the spread from 99 FPS (Ultra) to 168 FPS (Low) is about 69%. At 4K, the spread is narrower (96 to 153), which means the GPU becomes more dominating.

The Medium preset, which has full min/max data in every resolution, has the narrowest range: 119-161 at 1080p, 115-155 at 1440p, and 109-147 at 4K. The difference between 4K Medium and 4K High is 9 FPS (119 vs 128), while the jump from High to Ultra at 4K is 20 FPS (99 vs 119), confirming the Ultra preset is costly.

Resolution Scaling

Look at the average FPS decline from 1080p to 4K for each preset:

• Low: 168 (1080p) → 162 (1440p) → 153 (4K). A drop of 15 FPS (9%) from 1080 to 4K.
• Medium: 140 (1080p) → 135 (1440p) → 128 (4K). A drop of 12 FPS (9%) from 1080 to 4K.
• High: 137 → 131 → 119. Drop of 18 FPS (13%).
• Ultra: 128 → 116 → 99. Drop of 29 FPS (23%).

The relative drop becomes more pronounced with higher settings. Ultra loses about 23% going from 1080p to 4K, while Low only loses 9%. This pattern indicates that the CPU is less of a factor at 4K because the GPU becomes fully utilized. At 1080p Ultra, the CPU might be capable of keeping the GPU busy, but as the GPU work increases, the own FPS scaling is limited by the GPU compute.

The fact that the FPS values stay above 99 FPS in all tested scenarios suggests that the RTX 4080 is not quite limiting at 4K Ultra; it still delivers 99 FPS average. The GPU has 48.74 TFLOPS FP32, and the 716.8 GB/s bandwidth is high enough to feed that (along with the 76 RT cores). The i5-10400F also supports the maximum thread count, but the game doesn't seem to require a very powerful CPU in our data.

To sum up, the i5-10400F and RTX 4080 pairing is a strong combo for Overpower, delivering high FPS across resolutions. Medium is the recommended preset for the best balance of fluency and frame consistency. The GPU takes over at 4K, while the CPU is still competent at 1080p. The rank of 724 out of 3713 reflects a configuration that is above average, but not the absolute top - the data show that the GPU essentially dominates the workload. The measured results offer a clear picture of how the combination behaves in this title.