Overpower

Overpower

AVERAGE FPS
43
playable

This combination offers playable performance with an average of 43 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 26 32 34 54
1440p QHD 31 37 40 64
1080p Full HD 35 42 45 72

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 54
3840x2160 Medium 34
3840x2160 High 32
3840x2160 Ultra 26
2560x1440 Low 64
2560x1440 Medium 40
2560x1440 High 37
2560x1440 Ultra 31
1920x1080 Low 72
1920x1080 Medium 45
1920x1080 High 42
1920x1080 Ultra 35

Overpower with AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + Intel Arc B390, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F paired with the Intel Arc B390 delivers a highly constrained gaming experience in Overpower, ranking 2,638th out of 2,980 tested combinations. This places the combo in the bottom 12% of all systems, a position driven almost entirely by the integrated GPU’s limited compute capabilities rather than the processor’s substantial headroom. The data reveals a system that can run the game, but only at modest settings and resolutions, with the CPU frequently idle while the GPU operates at its ceiling.

FAQ

*Q: What is the overall performance ranking of this combo in Overpower?*

A: The combination ranks 2,638th out of 2,980 tested combinations in the game, placing it in the bottom percentile of systems. This indicates that while the setup is functional, it delivers frame rates that are significantly below what most modern gaming systems achieve.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B390 compare to its closest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,482 is only 1.3% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX’s 1,463 score, and 1.5% higher than the GeForce 800M’s 1,460. It is also 2.5% ahead of the GT 625 OEM and 2.7% ahead of the GT 710, showing it is competitive with a very low-performance tier of graphics hardware.

Q: What is the best average frame rate achieved at 1080p?

A: The highest average frame rate at 1920x1080 is 72 FPS, which is achieved with the Low settings preset. This is the only configuration in the entire dataset that crosses the 60 FPS threshold, highlighting the GPU’s limitations at higher graphical demands.

Q: Does the CPU show any signs of being a bottleneck in this pairing?

A: No. The Ryzen 7 9700F has a Passmark single-thread score of 4,691 and a multithread score of 36,470, both ranking in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. The frame rate differences between 1080p and 4K at the same settings show a direct GPU limitation, with the CPU providing more than enough processing power for the Arc B390.

Q: What is the FPS drop when moving from 1080p to 4K at High settings?

A: At High settings, the average frame rate drops from 42 FPS at 1920x1080 to 32 FPS at 3840x2160, a reduction of 10 FPS. This scaling pattern is consistent with a GPU-bound scenario where the rendering resolution is the primary factor limiting performance.

Q: Which settings preset provides the most balanced experience at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Medium preset yields an average of 40 FPS with a minimum of 34 FPS and a maximum of 46 FPS. While Low offers a higher average of 64 FPS, the Medium preset provides a more visually detailed experience while still maintaining a playable frame rate for this hardware tier.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 2,638 out of 2,980 tested combinations is a decisive indicator of its standing. With only 342 configurations performing worse, this pairing sits in the lower echelon of gaming systems for Overpower. The data suggests that this is not a system designed for high-refresh-rate monitors or maxed-out settings; rather, it operates at a level where compromises are necessary for acceptable playability.

The ranking is shaped by the GPU’s percentile standing, which is a mere 9th percentile against all GPUs. This is a stark contrast to the CPU’s 94th percentile ranking. The imbalance is so severe that the GPU’s performance ceiling defines the entire experience. The synthetic benchmarks reinforce this: the Arc B390’s average benchmark score is 1,482, which is nearly identical to its closest rivals, all of which are entry-level NVIDIA parts from over a decade ago. The CPU, by contrast, sits within 1% of high-end desktop processors like the Intel Core i7-14700KF and AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, confirming that the processor is a top-tier component in a system with a bottom-tier graphics solution.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B390 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) based on the Xe3-LPG architecture and Panther Lake chip. Its role in this combo is the definitive limiting factor. With a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2500 MHz, the GPU attempts to compensate for its architecture with higher frequencies, but its physical resources are scarce. The 1,536 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 ROPs are a fraction of what a dedicated gaming GPU offers, resulting in a pixel rate of 60.00 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 120.0 GTexel/s.

The memory configuration is also a critical constraint. The Arc B390 uses "System Shared" memory, meaning it relies on the CPU’s DDR5 memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. This shared memory setup is system-dependent, and while it eliminates the cost of dedicated VRAM, it introduces latency and bandwidth contention that can hurt performance in memory-intensive scenes. The GPU’s FP32 compute power is rated at 7.680 TFLOPS, which is low for modern gaming, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,482 places it in the company of the GT 520MX and GT 710. These factors combine to create a hard cap on frame rates, regardless of the CPU’s capabilities. In Overpower, this manifests as an inability to consistently maintain 60 FPS even at 1080p Low, with the GPU being the clear source of the bottleneck.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at how the combo handles the game across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 72 FPS, which is the only playable high-refresh-rate option. The Medium preset averages 45 FPS, with a minimum of 38 FPS and a maximum of 52 FPS, while High drops to 42 FPS and Ultra to 35 FPS. This shows a steep performance cliff as settings increase, with a 37 FPS difference between Low and Ultra at the same resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the Low preset yields an average of 64 FPS, still above the 60 FPS mark but with less headroom. Medium averages 40 FPS (min 34, max 46), High averages 37 FPS, and Ultra averages 31 FPS. The pattern is consistent: each step up in settings costs roughly 3-5 FPS, and the gap between Low and Ultra widens to 33 FPS. At 3840x2160, the system struggles significantly. Low averages 54 FPS, Medium averages 34 FPS (min 29, max 39), High averages 32 FPS, and Ultra averages 26 FPS. The 4K Ultra configuration is the worst-performing row in the dataset, falling below 30 FPS.

The data shows a clear hierarchy: the combo is only truly comfortable at 1080p Low, where it achieves its peak performance. At 1440p, it can manage 60+ FPS only on Low, and at 4K, every settings preset except Low dips below 60 FPS, with Medium and above falling into the 20-30 FPS range.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals the GPU-bound nature of this system. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 72 at 1080p to 64 at 1440p, and then to 54 at 4K. This is a 25% reduction in FPS from 1080p to 4K. At High settings, the drop is from 42 to 37 to 32, a 24% reduction. The scaling is nearly linear with the increase in pixel count, which is the hallmark of a system where the GPU is fully saturated.

If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see smaller FPS differences between resolutions, as the processor would be the limiting factor regardless of pixel count. Instead, the data shows that increasing the resolution from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 8 FPS on Low and 5 FPS on High, and the move from 1440p to 4K costs another 10 FPS on Low and 5 FPS on High. This consistent decline indicates that the Arc B390 is the sole constraint, and the Ryzen 7 9700F has ample unused capacity even at 1080p. The processor’s high single-thread score of 4,691 and its 94th percentile ranking suggest it could handle far more complex scenes without breaking a sweat, but the GPU’s fill rate and shading power cannot keep up with the demand.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is a Zen 5 (Granite Ridge) architecture processor on the AM5 socket. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. Its 65W TDP and 4nm process node make it an efficient part, but its performance is anything but modest. The Passmark multithread score of 36,470 and single-thread score of 4,691 both place it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, and its average benchmark score of 69,996 puts it within 1% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX and Intel Core i7-14700KF.

In this combo, the CPU’s role is largely to feed the GPU with data, but the GPU’s low demand means the processor is rarely stressed. The game’s frame rates are dictated by the GPU’s rendering pipeline, not the CPU’s command processing. The L3 cache of 32 MB shared and dual-channel DDR5-89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth provide a fast conduit for game assets, but the system shared GPU memory introduces a bottleneck that the CPU cannot overcome. The 8,315 million transistors and 70.6 mm² die size indicate a powerful compute engine, yet in Overpower, its performance is capped by the IGP. The CPU is not a limiting factor; it is a high-performance part waiting for a graphics card that can match its capabilities.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the user’s priority for frame rate versus visual fidelity. For a smooth, responsive experience, the Low preset is the only viable option at 1920x1080, delivering an average of 72 FPS. This is the only settings/resolution combination in the entire dataset that exceeds 60 FPS, making it the clear choice for any competitive or fast-paced gameplay.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset still manages an average of 64 FPS, which is playable, but the user must accept a lower pixel density. The Medium preset at 1440p yields an average of 40 FPS with a minimum of 34 FPS, which is a more visually rich experience but with a higher risk of noticeable stutter. Given that the drop from Low to Medium is 24 FPS at 1440p, the visual gain may not justify the performance loss for many users.

For 4K, the data is discouraging. The Low preset averages 54 FPS, which is borderline playable, but the Medium preset drops to 34 FPS and High to 32 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K averages 26 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth motion. Therefore, the recommendation is to play at 1080p Low for the best balance of frame rate and stability, or accept a 1440p Low configuration for a sharper image at a slightly lower frame rate. Higher settings at any resolution are not recommended, as the GPU’s architecture and shared memory configuration cannot sustain them without significant frame rate drops.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 9700F

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 3800 MHz
Boost Clock 5500 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

Intel Arc B390

VRAM System Shared System Shared
Base Clock
Boost Clock 2500 MHz MHz
TDP 80 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + Intel Arc B390 in Overpower

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 54.0
3840x2160 Medium 34.0
3840x2160 High 32.0
3840x2160 Ultra 26.0
2560x1440 Low 64.0
2560x1440 Medium 40.0
2560x1440 High 37.0
2560x1440 Ultra 31.0
1920x1080 Low 72.0
1920x1080 Medium 45.0
1920x1080 High 42.0
1920x1080 Ultra 35.0

Overpower with Ryzen 7 9700F + Other GPUs

See how Overpower performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Overpower with Arc B390 + Other CPUs

See how Overpower performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 9700F + Arc B390

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.