Overpower

Overpower

AVERAGE FPS
94
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 94 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 60 71 77 119
1440p QHD 65 83 88 140
1080p Full HD 74 93 99 157

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 119
3840x2160 Medium 77
3840x2160 High 71
3840x2160 Ultra 60
2560x1440 Low 140
2560x1440 Medium 88
2560x1440 High 83
2560x1440 Ultra 65
1920x1080 Low 157
1920x1080 Medium 99
1920x1080 High 93
1920x1080 Ultra 74

Overpower with AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT delivers a playable experience across all tested resolutions in Overpower, though the performance curve reveals a classic balance between CPU headroom and GPU bandwidth limits. The data set shows this combination is capable of high refresh rates at 1080p and remains viable at 4K, with the limiting factor shifting depending on the selected preset.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is substantial but not catastrophic, indicating that the GPU is the primary scaling bottleneck while the CPU maintains sufficient headroom. At Low settings, the average frame rate declines from 156.5 FPS at 1920x1080 to 140 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of 16.5 FPS, and then further to 118.9 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 24% decrease from 1080p to 4K at Low settings, which is relatively modest and suggests that even at lower graphical loads, the RX 6700 XT can keep pace without the CPU becoming a hard ceiling.

The scaling pattern changes dramatically at higher presets. At High settings, the average drops from 93.2 FPS at 1080p to 82.5 FPS at 1440p and then to 70.9 FPS at 4K. The 1080p-to-1440p gap is only 10.7 FPS, but the 1440p-to-4K gap is 11.6 FPS, showing a steeper decline as pixel count rises. This indicates that the GPU's 384.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 192-bit bus width become increasingly strained at 4K, where the rendering load outpaces what the 12 GB GDDR6 frame buffer can efficiently feed.

At Ultra settings, the trend becomes even more pronounced. The average FPS falls from 73.8 at 1080p to 64.5 at 1440p and then to 60.1 at 4K. The 1080p-to-1440p loss is 9.3 FPS, while the 1440p-to-4K loss is only 4.4 FPS. This flattening at the high end suggests that the game engine hits a computational wall at Ultra settings, where the GPU is already near its limit even at 1080p, and additional resolution scaling has diminishing returns because the scene complexity is already maxed out.

The data shows that the 8400F's single-thread performance, measured at 951 in 3dmark_single_thread and 2943 in cinebench_r23_singlecore, is sufficient to avoid bottlenecking even at 1080p Low, where the 156.5 FPS average indicates the GPU is still the limiting component. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz provide enough throughput to feed the GPU across all resolution points, as evidenced by the relatively smooth scaling curve rather than a sudden cliff at lower resolutions.

GPU Role

The Radeon RX 6700 XT's specifications directly explain the observed performance envelope. With 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth, the card has ample capacity for Overpower's textures at 1080p and 1440p, but the 4K Ultra result of 60.1 FPS indicates that memory bandwidth becomes a constraining factor. The GPU's boost clock of 2581 MHz and game clock of 2424 MHz drive its 13.21 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, which is the raw compute that the game's pixel shaders rely on.

The GPU's 77th percentile ranking among all tested GPUs places it in the upper tier, and its nearest rival data shows it performing nearly identically to the RX 6800 (0.7% higher average score for the 6700 XT) while outpacing the NVIDIA RTX A5000 by 1.3%. This competitive positioning is reflected in the measured FPS, where the card delivers 70.9 FPS at 4K High, a result that would be playable on a high-refresh 4K display.

The VRAM allocation is not a limiting factor in any tested configuration. At 4K Ultra, the 12 GB frame buffer is sufficient for the game's asset streaming, as evidenced by the 60.1 FPS average remaining above the 60 FPS threshold. The memory clock of 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) combined with the 192-bit bus produces the 384.0 GB/s bandwidth that appears adequate for this title, though the scaling data suggests that a wider bus would improve 4K performance further.

The GPU's 40 ray tracing cores and 64 ROPs contribute to the high preset performance, but the data does not show RT-specific benchmarks for this game. The pixel rate of 165.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 413.0 GTexel/s provide the fill rate needed for Overpower's action sequences, which often involve high-detail environments and particle effects.

Settings Recommendations

The measured rows provide a clear hierarchy for optimal settings based on target frame rates. At 1080p, Low settings deliver 156.5 FPS, which is ideal for competitive play on a 144Hz or 165Hz monitor. High settings at 1080p produce 93.2 FPS, still comfortably above 90 FPS for smooth gameplay, while Ultra drops to 73.8 FPS, which is acceptable but leaves less headroom for demanding scenes.

For 1440p users, the Medium preset at 87.7 FPS offers the best balance between visual fidelity and performance, compared to High at 82.5 FPS and Ultra at 64.5 FPS. The 5.2 FPS difference between Medium and High is modest, suggesting that High is the preferred choice for most players, as the visual upgrade likely outweighs the small frame rate cost. However, the 18 FPS gap between High and Ultra at 1440p indicates that Ultra's additional effects are expensive, and the 64.5 FPS result may dip below 60 FPS in action-heavy moments.

At 4K, the data shows a stark choice. Low settings achieve 118.9 FPS, which is surprisingly high and indicates the game scales well at lower presets even at 4K resolution. High settings at 70.9 FPS are playable, and Medium at 77 FPS is slightly faster. Ultra at 60.1 FPS is right at the edge of playability, meaning any frame time spike could push it below 60 FPS. The recommended 4K preset is High, as it delivers 70.9 FPS with better visuals than Medium's 77 FPS, and the 10.8 FPS advantage over Ultra is significant.

The overall recommendation is to use High settings at any resolution, as it provides consistent performance scaling (93.2, 82.5, 70.9 FPS across 1080p, 1440p, and 4K) without the steep penalties seen at Ultra. Players prioritizing maximum frame rates should use Low, which delivers 156.5 FPS at 1080p and 140 FPS at 1440p, both ideal for high-refresh displays.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo maintain 60 FPS at 4K Ultra settings?

A: The measured average at 3840x2160 Ultra is 60.1 FPS, which is marginally above the 60 FPS threshold. However, this average leaves no headroom for frame time spikes, so players may experience occasional drops below 60 FPS in demanding scenes.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?

A: High settings at 2560x1440 deliver 82.5 FPS, which is the best balance of visual quality and performance. Medium is only 5.2 FPS faster at 87.7 FPS, while Ultra drops to 64.5 FPS, making High the optimal choice.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck at 1080p Low?

A: The 156.5 FPS average at 1080p Low indicates the GPU is the limiting factor, as the CPU's single-thread score of 951 in 3dmark and 2943 in cinebench_r23 singlecore provides sufficient headroom. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are not saturated at this setting.

Q: How does this GPU compare to its closest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RX 6700 XT averages 0.7% higher than the RX 6800 and 1.3% higher than the NVIDIA RTX A5000 in overall GPU benchmarks. It trails the AMD Radeon HD 7950 by 1% and the RX 480 by 1%, indicating tight competition in its performance class.

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1080p Ultra?

A: The measured average at 1920x1080 Ultra is 73.8 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for 144Hz displays. For higher refresh rates, Medium at 98.6 FPS or Low at 156.5 FPS would be better choices.

Q: Does the 12 GB VRAM cause any issues in this game?

A: No, the 12 GB GDDR6 frame buffer is sufficient across all tested settings, including 4K Ultra at 60.1 FPS. The 384.0 GB/s bandwidth is more of a limiting factor than capacity, as seen in the scaling pattern between 1440p and 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Ryzen 5 8400F and RX 6700 XT ranks 926th out of 1744 tested combos in Overpower, placing it in the 53rd percentile of all systems tested. This mid-pack ranking is notable given the individual component percentiles: the CPU sits at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 77th percentile among all GPUs. The combo ranking being lower than either component's individual percentile suggests that the pairing is not perfectly optimized for this specific game, likely due to the CPU's performance relative to the GPU in this title's workload.

The CPU's nearest rivals provide context for this ranking. The Ryzen 5 8400F scores nearly identically to the Ryzen 7 2700X (0% delta), the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 (-0.1%), and the Ryzen 5 7500F (0.3% delta, with the 8400F scoring higher). This places the CPU in a crowded performance band where small differences in synthetic scores translate to negligible in-game differences. The EPYC 9474F at -0.2% delta is a server chip that performs similarly in these benchmarks, further emphasizing that the 8400F's 6-core/12-thread configuration hits a performance plateau.

The GPU's rival comparisons show a similar pattern, with the RX 6700 XT at 0.7% above the RX 6800 and 1.3% above the RTX A5000. The 1% deficits to the HD 7950 and RX 480 are within measurement noise and indicate that the GPU's performance is tightly clustered with several older and newer architectures. This clustering explains why the combo's in-game rank is not higher, as the GPU cannot decisively separate itself from competitors despite its modern RDNA 2.0 architecture.

The rank of 926 out of 1744 means that 818 combos perform better, which is a significant number. This is attributable to the GPU's mid-tier positioning rather than the CPU, as the 8400F's 82nd percentile ranking is strong. The data suggests that pairing this CPU with a higher-tier GPU would likely improve the combo rank substantially, while the current GPU holds the system back in this specific title.

CPU Role

The Ryzen 5 8400F's specifications are well-suited for Overpower's demands. With 6 cores and 12 threads based on the Zen 4 architecture (Phoenix codename) on a 4 nm TSMC process, the CPU provides a solid foundation for the game's multi-threaded workloads. The base clock of 4.20 GHz and boost clock of 4.70 GHz are competitive, and the 16 MB shared L3 cache helps maintain data locality for game logic.

The CPU's benchmark scores show a strong single-threaded performance, which is critical for Overpower's action gameplay. The 3dmark_single_thread score of 951 and cinebench_r23_singlecore score of 2943 indicate that the Zen 4 architecture delivers excellent per-core throughput. This is evidenced by the measured FPS at 1080p Low (156.5 FPS), where the CPU must process game logic and issue draw calls quickly enough to keep the GPU fed.

Multi-threaded performance is also robust, with cinebench_r23_multicore scoring 20851 and passmark_multithread scoring 24530. The 3dmark_16_threads score of 6091 and max_threads score of 6165 show that the CPU scales well up to 12 threads, which is sufficient for Overpower's engine that typically utilizes 6-8 threads. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms that it outperforms the vast majority of processors in general compute tasks.

The CPU's memory support for DDR5 with dual-channel configuration and 83.2 GB/s bandwidth provides ample bandwidth for the GPU to receive data. The PCIe Gen 4 interface with 20 lanes ensures the RX 6700 XT can communicate at full bandwidth, and the CPU's 65 W TDP means it runs cool enough to sustain boost clocks under load. The 3dmark_4_threads score of 3563 and 2_threads score of 1874 indicate that even lightly-threaded scenarios are handled efficiently, which is important for maintaining consistent frame times in Overpower's action sequences.

The data shows that the CPU is not the limiting factor in any tested configuration. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K is consistently driven by GPU load, as evidenced by the relatively smooth decreases across all presets. At 1080p Low where the GPU is least stressed, the CPU still delivers 156.5 FPS without becoming a bottleneck, demonstrating that the 8400F has headroom beyond this game's requirements. The CPU's performance relative to its nearest rival, the Ryzen 5 7500F (0.3% higher score), suggests that this pairing is near the optimal point for the RX 6700 XT in Overpower, as additional CPU performance would yield diminishing returns.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 4200 MHz
Boost Clock 4700 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2581 MHz MHz
TDP 230 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT in Overpower

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 118.9
3840x2160 Medium 77.0
3840x2160 High 70.9
3840x2160 Ultra 60.1
2560x1440 Low 140.0
2560x1440 Medium 87.7
2560x1440 High 82.5
2560x1440 Ultra 64.5
1920x1080 Low 156.5
1920x1080 Medium 98.6
1920x1080 High 93.2
1920x1080 Ultra 73.8

Overpower with Ryzen 5 8400F + Other GPUs

See how Overpower performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Overpower with RX 6700 XT + Other CPUs

See how Overpower performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 8400F + RX 6700 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.