Minimum

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is a mobile combination built for balanced 1080p gaming, but its performance profile shifts dramatically when resolution increases. The CPU, a 16-core, 22-thread Meteor Lake part with a 3.80 GHz base and 4.80 GHz boost clock, provides ample processing headroom for a third-person shooter like Minimum. The RTX 5050, based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with 2,560 shading units and 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, handles the graphical load. The data shows that this combo is decidedly resolution-sensitive, with results ranging from highly playable at 1080p to barely interactive at 4K Ultra. This analysis interprets the measured FPS rows to give a practical view of what settings and resolutions make sense for this specific pairing.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a mobile processor with a hybrid architecture design, though the fact pack does not specify the exact core type split. It presents 16 cores and 22 threads, which indicates a mix of performance and efficiency cores, a common high-end mobile layout. Its base clock of 3.80 GHz and boost clock of 4.80 GHz are competitive figures for a 28 W TDP part, allowing it to handle both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads effectively. In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15,028 and a single-core score of 1,743, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs tested. This suggests it is a strong performer for gaming, as most titles benefit from solid single-core speed, while background tasks can leverage the multi-core muscle.

For Minimum, a 2014 third-person shooter, the CPU requirements are far from modern-day heavy hitters. The game's engine is likely more dependent on a few strong cores than on massive parallel processing. The Ultra 7 155H's single-core performance, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,743, is more than adequate to feed the GPU in most scenarios. The multi-core score of 15,028 ensures that any background applications or game logic threads won't create a bottleneck. The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 3,468 reinforces this, showing strong per-core capability. In this pairing, the CPU is not the limiting factor at lower resolutions; it is the GPU that will dictate frame rates. However, the CPU's 24 MB of shared L3 cache helps maintain smooth frame pacing, preventing hitches that could occur with less capable processors.

The nearest rivals to this CPU in terms of average benchmark score are the Intel Core i5-14600T, AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, AMD Ryzen 5 7400F, and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H. The deltaPct values are very small, ranging from -0.4% to 0.1%, indicating that these processors are virtually identical in raw processing power. For gaming, this means the Ultra 7 155H will perform on par with these chips, and any FPS differences in Minimum would be negligible and likely attributable to the GPU or memory. The data shows that the CPU is a capable partner for the RTX 5050, providing enough headroom to avoid holding back the graphics card in most situations, especially at 1080p where the GPU is the primary bottleneck.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how the settings presets impact performance. The goal is to find a balance between visual quality and a smooth, responsive frame rate, typically 60 FPS or higher for a shooter. At 1080p, the "High" preset delivers an average of 95 FPS, which is well above the playable threshold. The "Medium" preset offers 114 FPS, and "Low" pushes to 148 FPS. The "Ultra" preset, while visually more demanding, drops the average to 73 FPS. For a fast-paced game, the "High" preset at 1080p is the sweet spot, offering a significant visual upgrade over "Medium" while maintaining a comfortable 95 FPS average. The "Ultra" preset's 73 FPS is still playable but sacrifices the headroom that prevents drops in intense combat scenarios.

At 1440p, the equation changes. The "High" preset yields 61 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS target but leaves little margin for error. The "Medium" preset provides a healthier 73 FPS, making it the recommended choice for 1440p gaming. The "Low" preset at 96 FPS is also viable for competitive players who prioritize frame rate over visuals. The "Ultra" preset at 47 FPS dips below the smooth threshold and is not recommended for a shooter where reaction time matters. For 4K, the situation is more constrained. The "Low" preset is the only one that achieves a near-playable 52 FPS average. The "Medium" preset drops to 39 FPS, and "High" to 33 FPS, both of which are too choppy for a satisfying experience. Therefore, the data suggests that for the best experience, users should stick to 1080p "High" or 1440p "Medium" as the primary presets, reserving "Low" for 4K or for competitive play at lower resolutions.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The frame rate scaling across resolutions is a classic indicator of a GPU-bound system. At 1080p "High," the combo produces 95 FPS. Moving to 1440p "High," the frame rate drops to 61 FPS, a reduction of roughly 36%. At 4K "High," the average plummets to 33 FPS, a further 46% drop from 1440p. This steep decline is the signature of the RTX 5050 being the limiting component. The GPU's rendering load scales with the pixel count, and the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus become a bottleneck at higher resolutions. The CPU, with its high single-core performance, is likely not the constraint here; if it were, the frame rates would be more consistent across resolutions.

The pattern holds for other settings. At "Medium," the FPS goes from 114 at 1080p to 73 at 1440p (a 36% drop) and then to 39 at 4K (a 47% drop from 1440p). This consistent scaling shows that the GPU's compute and memory bandwidth are being saturated. The RTX 5050's 320.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p but struggles to feed the pixel pipeline at 4K. The data indicates that for this game, the RTX 5050 is a 1080p-class GPU, with acceptable 1440p performance on medium settings. Pushing to 4K requires the lowest settings to remain playable, and even then, the 52 FPS average is borderline. This analysis confirms that any attempt to increase resolution will yield diminishing returns, and the user should prioritize resolution over high preset levels when the GPU is the bottleneck.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

In the grand scheme of tested hardware combinations for Minimum, this specific pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 ranks 2,325 out of 2,939 combos. This places it in the lower half of all systems tested, which is a sobering statistic given the relative newness of the components. The combo rank of 2,325 indicates that while this setup is competent for 1080p gaming, it is outperformed by a significant number of other combinations, likely those with higher-end desktop GPUs or more powerful mobile parts. The low rank is primarily attributable to the GPU's performance ceiling rather than the CPU, as the processor is a strong mobile chip.

The combo's position suggests that for a database of all systems, this pairing is not a top-tier performer. However, it is crucial to contextualize this rank. The database includes many desktop systems with far more powerful graphics cards. For a mobile laptop combo, the RTX 5050 is a mid-range part, and its performance in Minimum reflects that. The rank of 2,325 means there are 614 combos that perform worse, which includes older or entry-level hardware. The data shows that this combo is capable of running the game, but it is not a high-performance outlier. Users with this setup should temper their expectations for high-refresh-rate gaming at high resolutions, as the hardware is better suited for 1080p and 1440p medium settings.

FAQ

*Q: Can this combo run Minimum at 4K?*

A: Yes, but only at the "Low" setting, which produces an average of 52 FPS. The "Medium" (39 FPS), "High" (33 FPS), and "Ultra" (25 FPS) presets at 4K are not smooth enough for a playable shooter experience.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1080p gaming?

A: The "High" preset is recommended, as it provides an average of 95 FPS, which is a good balance between visual quality and performance. The "Ultra" preset runs at 73 FPS, which is playable but less fluid.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the main bottleneck for this combo?

A: The benchmark results indicate that the GPU is the primary bottleneck, especially at higher resolutions. The frame rate drops significantly from 1080p to 4K, which is a clear sign of GPU limitation. The CPU's strong single-core performance is sufficient for this game.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H has an average benchmark score of 32,697. Its nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i5-14600T (32,707) and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32,662), have deltaPct values of 0% and 0.1%, respectively, indicating they are statistically equal in performance.

Q: What is the lowest playable setting combination at 1440p?

A: The "Medium" preset at 1440p yields an average of 73 FPS, which is a solidly playable frame rate. The "High" preset at 61 FPS is also viable, but it offers less headroom for demanding scenes.

Q: What is the expected frame rate at 1080p with the "Low" preset?

A: The "Low" preset at 1080p produces an average of 148 FPS, which is excellent for competitive play and high-refresh-rate monitors.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The following table details the exact measured average FPS for each resolution and settings preset combination.

1920x1080

• Low: 148 FPS average
• Medium: 114 FPS average (min 97, max 131)
• High: 95 FPS average
• Ultra: 73 FPS average

2560x1440

• Low: 96 FPS average
• Medium: 73 FPS average (min 62, max 84)
• High: 61 FPS average
• Ultra: 47 FPS average

3840x2160

• Low: 52 FPS average
• Medium: 39 FPS average (min 34, max 45)
• High: 33 FPS average
• Ultra: 25 FPS average

The data shows a clear progression. At 1080p, all settings are playable, with "Low" exceeding 144 FPS for high-refresh displays. At 1440p, the "Medium" and "Low" presets are the most comfortable, with "High" just hitting the 60 FPS mark. At 4K, only the "Low" preset is near-playable, and the "Ultra" preset at 25 FPS is a slideshow. The measured FPS for "Medium" presets includes min and max values, showing a variance that suggests the GPU is working hard. For example, at 1080p "Medium," the frame rate fluctuates between 97 and 131 FPS, while at 4K "Medium," it swings between 34 and 45 FPS. These numbers confirm that the RTX 5050 is the limiting factor, and users should adjust their expectations and settings accordingly based on their resolution of choice.