Minimum

The Intel Core i7-14700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER combination delivers a highly playable experience in Minimum, a 2014 third-person shooter, with performance scaling predictably from a 1080p dominance to a 4K compromise. The data shows this pairing ranks 2142nd out of 3712 tested combinations for this game, placing it in the upper-middle tier of systems. At 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-core performance drives frame rates well above 120 FPS on High settings, while at 4K, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth become the primary constraint, dropping High settings to 42 FPS. The benchmark results indicate that the best balance of visual fidelity and smoothness is found at 1440p with High settings, which maintains a 78 FPS average.

FAQ

*Q: What is the average frame rate at 1080p with High settings in Minimum?*

A: The measured data shows an average of 121 FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings. This is a strong result, indicating that the combination of the Intel Core i7-14700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is well-suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at this resolution.

Q: How does the RTX 2070 SUPER perform compared to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RTX 2070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 20282, which places it 1% behind the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and 1.2% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile. It also trails the Intel Arc B570 by 1.3% and the Intel Arc A750 by 1.5%.

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-14700F a high-performing CPU relative to other processors?

A: Yes, the data indicates the i7-14700F sits in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 53620 is slightly higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, which scores 53288, and it is 0.6% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7313P.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: The difference is substantial. At 2560x1440, the Low preset achieves an average of 121 FPS, while the Ultra preset drops to 59 FPS. This 62 FPS difference highlights the significant GPU load increase from the Ultra preset’s effects.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded at 4K with Medium settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with Medium settings, the minimum FPS recorded is 42, with an average of 50 FPS and a maximum of 57 FPS. This indicates that while the average is playable, there are moments of noticeable frame pacing dips.

Q: Does the data show this combo is better for CPU-bound or GPU-bound scenarios?

A: The data shows a clear shift. At 1080p, the high frame rates across all settings suggest the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU efficiently. However, the large frame rate drops at 4K, from 188 FPS on Low to 32 FPS on Ultra, demonstrate that the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-14700F is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. For a game like Minimum, which launched in 2014, the high boost clock is more critical than the sheer core count. The benchmark results support this: the CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4958 and Geekbench single-core score of 2429 indicate strong per-thread performance that drives high frame rates in less demanding titles.

In this game’s measured results, the CPU’s role is most evident at 1080p. The data shows that at 1920x1080, even the Ultra preset achieves an average of 92 FPS, and the Low preset reaches 188 FPS. These figures suggest that the i7-14700F’s single-core performance is sufficient to avoid bottlenecking the RTX 2070 SUPER at lower resolutions. The processor’s 33 MB of shared L3 cache also helps with game logic and draw calls, contributing to the high 1% lows seen at 1080p Medium (122 FPS).

However, the CPU’s influence wanes as resolution increases. The 20 cores and 28 threads are largely underutilized by a 2014 title, which typically scales with a few threads. The data confirms this by showing that the frame rate gap between 1080p and 1440p is primarily a GPU limitation, not a CPU one. The i7-14700F’s 91st percentile ranking and its benchmark score being 0.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X further solidify its position as a high-end part that will not be the primary constraint in most gaming scenarios.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is built on the Turing architecture and features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. Its boost clock of 1770 MHz and 2560 shading units give it a peak FP32 performance of 9.062 TFLOPS. These specifications are the defining factor for Minimum’s performance at higher resolutions.

The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for this game, but the data shows that memory bandwidth and compute throughput become the bottlenecks at 4K. At 3840x2160, the average frame rate drops from 65 FPS on Low to 42 FPS on High, and further to 32 FPS on Ultra. This steep decline indicates that the RTX 2070 SUPER’s compute resources are saturated by the increased pixel count and visual effects.

The GPU’s benchmark performance, with an average score of 20282, places it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, scores 20480, which is 1% higher. This marginal difference in synthetic benchmarks translates to the real-world results seen in Minimum, where the GPU is the limiting component at 1440p and 4K. The data for 2560x1440 shows a 62 FPS drop when moving from Low (121 FPS) to Ultra (59 FPS), confirming that the GPU’s fill rate and shading power are the primary drivers of performance at this resolution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the system is highly capable, with the Low preset averaging 188 FPS, Medium at 144 FPS (with a 122 FPS minimum and 165 FPS maximum), High at 121 FPS, and Ultra at 92 FPS. These numbers show that the combo can easily drive high-refresh-rate 1080p monitors on any preset.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain respectable but show the GPU’s increasing load. The Low preset averages 121 FPS, Medium averages 93 FPS (with a 79 FPS minimum and 106 FPS maximum), High averages 78 FPS, and Ultra averages 59 FPS. The 1440p results demonstrate that the RTX 2070 SUPER can maintain smooth gameplay on High settings, but Ultra settings push the average below 60 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the performance drops significantly. The Low preset averages 65 FPS, Medium averages 50 FPS (with a 42 FPS minimum and 57 FPS maximum), High averages 42 FPS, and Ultra averages 32 FPS. These 4K numbers indicate that the GPU is the clear bottleneck, as the frame rates fall below the 60 FPS threshold for most presets. The data shows a consistent pattern: 1080p is CPU-friendly and GPU-light, 1440p is a balanced middle ground, and 4K is only viable with the Low preset for a playable experience.

Resolution Scaling

The performance scaling from 1080p to 4K is stark and reveals the system’s limiting component. For the High preset, the average FPS drops from 121 at 1080p to 78 at 1440p, a 35.5% decrease, and then to 42 at 4K, a further 46.2% decrease from 1440p. This steep drop-off is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario, where the increased pixel count directly taxes the RTX 2070 SUPER’s 9.062 TFLOPS of compute power.

The Low preset shows a similar trend: 188 FPS at 1080p, 121 FPS at 1440p, and 65 FPS at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K is 65.4%, which is significant but less severe than the Ultra preset’s drop. The Ultra preset goes from 92 FPS at 1080p to 59 FPS at 1440p and 32 FPS at 4K, a total decrease of 65.2% from 1080p to 4K. This consistent scaling pattern across all presets confirms that the GPU’s memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s and its 2560 shading units are the primary factors limiting performance at higher resolutions.

The data also indicates that the CPU is not the bottleneck at any resolution. If the CPU were the limiting factor, the frame rates would plateau at higher resolutions, but they continue to fall. The i7-14700F’s high single-core boost clock of 5.40 GHz ensures that it can keep up with the GPU’s demands at 1080p, but as the resolution increases, the GPU’s workload grows, and the frame rates drop accordingly. This analysis points to the RTX 2070 SUPER as the definitive limiting component in this configuration.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1080p, all presets are playable, but the High preset at 121 FPS offers the best balance of visual quality and performance, easily exceeding the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The Ultra preset at 92 FPS is also viable for those prioritizing visual fidelity, but the High preset provides a more comfortable margin above 100 FPS.

At 1440p, the High preset is the recommended choice, as it delivers a 78 FPS average, which is above the 60 FPS standard for most monitors. The Medium preset at 93 FPS offers an even higher frame rate with a modest reduction in visual effects, making it a strong alternative for competitive play. The Ultra preset at 59 FPS is borderline, as it dips just below the 60 FPS threshold, and the data shows that the Medium preset’s minimum FPS of 79 is better than the Ultra’s average.

For 4K, the Low preset is the only viable option for a consistently playable experience, averaging 65 FPS. The Medium preset at 50 FPS (with a 42 FPS minimum) may be acceptable for slower-paced gameplay, but it risks noticeable stutters. The High and Ultra presets at 42 FPS and 32 FPS, respectively, are not recommended for a smooth experience. In summary, the data suggests prioritizing High settings at 1080p and 1440p for the best experience, while accepting Low settings at 4K to maintain frame rates above 60 FPS.