Minimum

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER produces a wide spread of frame rates in Minimum, depending on resolution and graphics preset. The data shows a system that is clearly capable of high-refresh-rate play at 1080p but transitions to a more demanding, GPU-bound experience as resolution climbs. This analysis walks through the measured FPS rows to explain exactly how this combo behaves.

Resolution Scaling

The measured data shows a steep performance drop when moving from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160, which indicates the GPU is the primary limiting component at higher resolutions. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo averages 186.9 FPS, but at 4K with Low settings, that figure falls to 62.4 FPS — a reduction of roughly two-thirds. This pattern holds across all settings presets, confirming that the RTX 2070 SUPER's rendering load scales heavily with pixel count.

The scaling from 1440p to 4K is particularly telling. At 1440p High, the system produces 78.5 FPS, while at 4K High it drops to 40 FPS. That is a 49% reduction in frame rate for a 2.25x increase in pixel count, suggesting the GPU is nearing its bandwidth or compute ceiling. The RTX 2070 SUPER has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, and the data implies this resource pool is stretched thin at 4K.

Conversely, the jump from 1080p to 1440p is less punishing. At Ultra settings, 1080p yields 92.5 FPS while 1440p yields 57.1 FPS, a 38% drop. At Low settings, 1080p produces 186.9 FPS versus 124.2 FPS at 1440p, a 34% drop. The smaller relative decline between these two resolutions suggests the CPU, the Ryzen 9 5950X with 16 cores and 32 threads, still has headroom to feed the GPU at 1440p. The 5950X's strong multi-threaded performance — evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38607 — means it is not the bottleneck until the GPU becomes fully saturated.

At 4K, the frame rate compression across settings is notable. Low yields 62.4 FPS, Medium 50.5 FPS, High 40 FPS, and Ultra 33.4 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 29 FPS, which is significant but not as dramatic as the 94.4 FPS gap seen at 1080p between Low (186.9 FPS) and Ultra (92.5 FPS). This compression indicates that at 4K, the GPU is so heavily loaded that even reducing settings to Low cannot fully bypass the rendering bottleneck. The data strongly suggests that for 4K play, the RTX 2070 SUPER is the limiting factor, while at 1080p, the combination is more balanced.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured rows, the best experience depends heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers 122.9 FPS, which is above the 100 FPS threshold for smooth competitive play. The Ultra preset at 1080p drops to 92.5 FPS, still playable but with a 30 FPS penalty compared to High. The data shows that High at 1080p offers the best balance between visual quality and performance, as the step from High to Ultra only gains marginal visual fidelity while costing 24.7% of the frame rate.

For 2560x1440, the Medium preset at 96 FPS is the sweet spot. High at 1440p produces 78.5 FPS, which is acceptable for most players, but Medium provides a 22% improvement. The Ultra preset at 1440p falls to 57.1 FPS, which may feel sluggish for a third-person shooter. Low at 1440p hits 124.2 FPS, but the visual compromise is substantial. The data suggests that Medium at 1440p is the recommended preset for players who prioritize frame rate without sacrificing too much detail.

At 3840x2160, the situation is more constrained. The Low preset yields 62.4 FPS, which is the only preset that clears the 60 FPS mark. Medium at 50.5 FPS and High at 40 FPS are both below that threshold, and Ultra at 33.4 FPS is likely too choppy for a shooter. For 4K, the data indicates that Low is the only viable preset for smooth gameplay, and even then, players should expect occasional dips below 60 FPS in demanding scenes. The measured results clearly favor 1080p High or 1440p Medium as the best overall experiences for this combo.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER combination ranks 1054 out of 1733 tested combos in Minimum. This places it in the lower-middle tier of the database, which is consistent with the GPU's age — the RTX 2070 SUPER was released in 2019 and is now end-of-life. The CPU, however, is a top-tier part, ranking in the 93rd percentile against all CPUs, but the combo's overall standing is dragged down by the GPU's mid-range position (65th percentile against all GPUs).

The data shows a clear mismatch in component tiers. The Ryzen 9 5950X sits near the top of the CPU charts, with an average benchmark score of 49062, just 0.2% below the Intel Core i5-14600K (49166) and 0.6% below the Core i5-14600KF (49367). Meanwhile, the RTX 2070 SUPER's average score of 22206 is 2.3% below the RTX 4060 Mobile (22729) and 2.5% above the Radeon RX 5700 (21670). This pairing of a high-end CPU with a mid-range GPU means the combo's rank is largely determined by GPU performance in this game.

The rank of 1054 out of 1733 (about 61st percentile) is consistent with a system that can handle 1080p and 1440p well but struggles at 4K. The measured FPS data supports this: at 1080p, the combo delivers playable frame rates across all presets, but at 4K, only Low settings approach 60 FPS. The ranking reflects this duality — the combo is not a top performer, but it is far from the bottom, and its CPU headroom suggests that a GPU upgrade would significantly improve its standing.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The complete measured FPS table for this combo is as follows:

At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 186.9 FPS. This is the highest frame rate recorded for this combo. The Medium preset produces 145.1 FPS, High produces 122.9 FPS, and Ultra produces 92.5 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra represents a 50.5% reduction in frame rate, which is the largest relative drop across all resolutions, indicating that at 1080p the CPU and GPU have enough headroom to respond to settings changes.

At 2560x1440, Low averages 124.2 FPS, Medium averages 96 FPS, High averages 78.5 FPS, and Ultra averages 57.1 FPS. The step from Low to Medium is a 22.7% drop, Medium to High is an 18.2% drop, and High to Ultra is a 27.3% drop. The Ultra preset at 1440p is the first point where the frame rate falls below 60 FPS, which is a critical threshold for a shooter.

At 3840x2160, Low averages 62.4 FPS, Medium averages 50.5 FPS, High averages 40 FPS, and Ultra averages 33.4 FPS. The scaling here is nearly linear, with each preset step costing roughly 10 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 29 FPS, which is smaller in absolute terms than the 94.4 FPS difference at 1080p, but the relative impact is more severe because the starting point is lower.

The data shows that the combo can maintain 60+ FPS at 1080p on any preset, at 1440p only on Low and Medium, and at 4K only on Low. The frame rate ranges from a high of 186.9 FPS to a low of 33.4 FPS, giving players a wide operating window depending on their preferences.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER plays the decisive role in this combo's Minimum performance. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory running at 14 Gbps effective, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth over a 256-bit bus. The base clock is 1605 MHz with a boost clock of 1770 MHz, and the card has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. These specifications place it in the 65th percentile against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 22206.

The measured FPS data shows that the GPU's memory bandwidth is likely a limiting factor at 4K. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is substantial for 1080p and 1440p, but at 3840x2160, the pixel throughput demand exceeds what this card can comfortably provide. The fact that lowering settings from Ultra to Low at 4K only improves frame rate from 33.4 FPS to 62.4 FPS suggests that the GPU's compute units, not just memory, are under heavy load.

The RTX 2070 SUPER's Turing architecture, fabricated on a 12 nm process at TSMC, includes 40 RT cores and 320 tensor cores, but these are not directly relevant to Minimum, which does not appear to use ray tracing or DLSS based on the measured data. The card's FP32 performance of 9.062 TFLOPS is the raw compute metric that likely drives the rasterization performance seen in the benchmark rows. The GPU's 215 W TDP and dual-slot design are consistent with a mid-range card that was competitive at launch in 2019 but is now outclassed by newer parts, as reflected in its nearest rivals — the RTX A400 (0.5% higher average score) and the GTX TITAN Z (0.9% lower).

The data clearly indicates that the RTX 2070 SUPER is the component that determines the combo's performance ceiling. The Ryzen 9 5950X, with its 64 MB of L3 cache and 16 cores, is never the bottleneck in this game, as evidenced by the fact that frame rates scale predictably with resolution and settings — a hallmark of GPU-limited scenarios.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Minimum?*

A: The data shows 1920x1080 is the best resolution, as it delivers 92.5 FPS even on Ultra settings and 186.9 FPS on Low. At 2560x1440, only Low and Medium presets clear 60 FPS, and at 3840x2160, only Low reaches 62.4 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 2070 SUPER compare to its nearest rivals in this game?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score of 22206 is 0.5% lower than the RTX A400 (22307) and 2.3% lower than the RTX 4060 Mobile (22729). It outperforms the GTX TITAN Z (22006) by 0.9% and the Radeon RX 5700 (21670) by 2.5%.

Q: Is the Ryzen 9 5950X a bottleneck for the RTX 2070 SUPER at 4K?

A: No. The measured data shows that frame rates drop significantly from 1440p to 4K (e.g., 78.5 to 40 FPS on High), which indicates the GPU is the limiting component. The CPU's high multi-threaded score (38607 in Cinebench R23) suggests it has ample headroom.

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1440p with Medium settings?

A: The measured average is 96 FPS at 2560x1440 with Medium settings. This is the second-highest frame rate at 1440p, behind Low at 124.2 FPS.

*Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems in Minimum?*

A: It ranks 1054 out of 1733 tested combos, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database. This rank reflects the GPU's mid-range position relative to all GPUs.

Q: Is the Ultra preset at 1080p worth the performance cost?

A: Ultra at 1080p averages 92.5 FPS, which is 30.4 FPS lower than High at 122.9 FPS. The data suggests High is the better choice if frame rate matters, as the visual gain from Ultra is not quantified but the performance loss is significant.